Saturday, 18 April 2026

Naval Operations Behind Enemy Lines

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-893279

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-893282

Israel breaks new ground at sea

The Navy has been carrying out more risky operations.

     Israeli Subs

One of the untold stories of Israel’s wars since 2023 has been the new cutting-edge activities and cooperation among Shayetet 13 (Israel’s equivalent of the US Navy Seals), the Mossad, and the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency).

On Tuesday, Shayetet 13 invaded Naqoura, Lebanon, from the sea – the first time such an operation has occurred in Lebanon since 2000, the Israel Navy reported Thursday.

According to the military, this move was made as part of a new attitude by the IDF and the navy after the October 7 massacre of forward-leaning defense.

For the ground forces, this has manifested itself in creating buffer zones in Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria. For the navy, it has meant special forces carrying out more risky and aggressive operations behind enemy lines.

In one mission, five Shayetet 13 naval commandos were sent thousands of kilometers away from Israel with no support and no immediate rescue plan in the event of complications, the navy disclosed, without revealing dates and locations.

Shayetet 13 invades Naqura in first 

In yet another vaguely described mission, the navy said it had sent Shayetet 13 on a mission to a part of the world where it had never operated before.

The navy said its joint operations with the Mossad have reached new levels in recent years.

The navy declined to connect the dots regarding exact operations in which it had worked with the Mossad. But it did say the Naval Intelligence Division was directly involved in the killing of Iranian Navy commander Alireza Tangsiri and had facilitated IAF attacks against Iranian naval cruise missiles and sites related to submarines and other underwater threats.

Likewise, the navy said it had been involved in both intelligence and operations in eliminating five senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Quds Force liaison officials with Hezbollah in an attack on the Ramada Hotel in Beirut on March 8.

Until now, the navy’s involvement had been kept classified.

In that attack, the navy fired 14 missiles to kill the five officials, who were top commanders in Quds Force-Hezbollah intelligence and terrorist financing and had links to Palestinian terrorist groups in Lebanon.

The terrorist financing official was the key actor in transferring $770 million from Iran to Hezbollah over the past year, the IDF reported.

It is well known that the Mossad has for years been the main actor for locating and assassinating top Iranian officials, whether in Iran itself, or Quds Force officials overseas, including in Lebanon. The navy has also become involved in these efforts.

The IDF Intelligence Corps is also usually in the picture, and the navy said their work together in recent years has been unparalleled.

In Gaza, the Shin Bet took the lead for planning top-level Hamas assassinations.

While most of these were carried out by the IAF, on Thursday, the navy said it had also been involved in a number of these assassinations, working directly with the Shin Bet in new ways.

Last November 19, the navy worked with the IDF Intelligence Corps to assassinate Hamas naval commander Abdullah Abu Samael after Hamas significantly violated the ceasefire.

On March 16, the Shin Bet, the navy, and the IDF Intelligence Corps jointly assassinated Yunas Mahmoud Hasin Elian, a top Hamas naval commander.

Elian had been substantially responsible for attempts by Hamas to reconstitute itself as posing a naval threat to Israel, the IDF said.

On March 31, the navy, working with other Israeli intelligence agencies, assassinated Hezbollah’s commander for the southern front, Hajj Yusuf Ismail Hashem, it said.

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-893279

Israeli Navy hits Iran, Hezbollah, Syria, Yemen, and Gaza targets with precision strikes

     Chief of Staff visits the Navy

The Israel Navy has torn apart enemy forces in Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Gaza, and Yemen since 2023, raising Israel’s power in the Middle East to new heights, since most of its rivals have been wiped out militarily.

With over 1,000 naval combat soldiers at sea, logging over 26,000 operational hours in only 47 days of the current war with Iran and Hezbollah, the Navy said on Thursday that it has already undertaken or provided critical intelligence for 154 attacks.

95 of these attacks have been in Iran.

Of those 95 attacks, 68 of them were undertaken by US forces, but were entirely based on Israeli naval intelligence.

27 of those attacks were solely by the Israeli naval intelligence and carried out by the air force.

    Off Ashdod

This was a major jump from the Navy's involvement in the June 2025 war with Iran, in which it had a much smaller, though still lethal, role.

During the current war, the Navy has also struck 53 targets in Lebanon.

These attacks included 35 general attacks, 18 senior targeted assassination targets, and six special forces operations.

In addition, the Navy has attacked six targets in Gaza, mostly senior terror operatives, during the current war.

Previously, IDF Navy Lt. "G" told the Jerusalem Post that during Operation Rising Lion against Iran, "I was in a bunch of operations. To be part of these operations felt like a substantial contribution."

G added, "For two-and-a-half years, sometimes it was hard to see why the training mattered. But when you are on the frontlines at sea, it helps you connect everything you studied to something real and practical. The climax was against Iran, we had the chance to perform all of the skills which we learned during the course."

IDF destroys Syrian submarines, other naval capabilities

In December 2024, when the Assad regime fell, the Israeli military went after the Syrian military's capabilities to ensure that they would not be passed on to the next regime, with fears of new Syrian leader Ahmad al-Sharaa's jihadist past.

Although the Navy's involvement in these attacks has been discussed before, on Thursday, the Navy revealed far more nuance and detail about them.

According to the Navy, it destroyed 15 out of 21 Syrian naval ships.

These ships all included long-range missiles capable of reaching targets 80-200 kilometers away.

The Navy said that it struck these ships mainly at two bases: Latakia and Tel Baida, and that they were all destroyed within only a few hours.

Next, the Navy said there were complex reasons that could not be disclosed why the other six ships could not be struck.

It is well known that parts of the Syrian and Russian militaries were combined in terms of personnel and equipment at the time.

In addition, the Navy said it helped the air force destroy five advanced Syrian anti-aircraft batteries in 40 minutes, eliminating hundreds of powerful long-range missiles, including Styx missiles.

Overall, this eliminated 70-75% of a certain category of missiles.

IDF destroyed nearly all of Hezbollah's ship-to-ship missiles

The Israeli Navy disclosed on Thursday that it destroyed nearly all of the 100 advanced ship-to-ship missiles that Hezbollah possessed in 2023, destroying them between the fall of 2023 and 2024, before the major escalation with the terror group took place.

The idea was to disarm Hezbollah of many of its strategic weapons gradually over time, so that it would not sense how much weaker it was in the big and sudden moment when the IDF would hit it with all of its might, until it would be too late.

According to the Navy, 50% of these missiles were destroyed in Dahiyeh, Beirut, and another 50% in Darlat.

Further, the Navy revealed that it has mostly destroyed Hezbollah's Unit 1200, which had a substantial number of underwater drones before 2023.

The Navy said it destroyed nearly all of them within a few hours at a specific location where Hezbollah concealed them, thinking they would be safe.

Yemen's naval capability: 'You need to be independent'

In Yemen, the Navy disclosed that at least one of its targets was 150 kilometers inland, whereas most air force targets have been closer to the coast.

Lt. Y told the Post about his involvement in operations against the Houthis of Yemen at a distance of around 1,700 kilometers from Israel.

"No one can help you when you are that far away. You need to be independent. If there is a problem, no one can send a helicopter to perform a rescue. And I got to see up close the impact of the operation. Then there was nothing close to the great feeling when we finally returned home from so far away," said Y.

While Y declined to discuss the specifics of the operation against Yemen, the Post and other Hebrew media previously reported on June 10, 2025, that two of Israel's navy missile boats, one of them a Sa'ar 6, fired two long-range precision missiles from hundreds of kilometers away at the Houthi port in Hodeidah.

That attack marked the first time during the Israel-Hamas War that the Navy attacked Yemen.

Regarding that attack, some of the Houthi targets that were struck were platforms for ships to anchor on within the port.

Further, the IDF said that the explosive power of sea-to-land missiles would leave a lasting mark and increase deterrence in a different way than air-to-ground bombs.

Getting the Navy involved was part of Israel's broader strategy to deter foreign ships from using the port since naval vessels can remain in the area and strike repeatedly. They can also accomplish this much more easily than aircraft, which attack and then must immediately fly back to their home airbase before running out of fuel.

Moreover, because the Navy can remain at sea for an extended period, it can be more precise about the ideal moment to strike.

Nearly all of Hamas's naval commandos have been killed or wounded

The Navy disclosed on Thursday that Hamas had over 300 naval commandos in 2023, and that nearly all of them have been killed or wounded.

Despite that broad success, the Navy admitted that Hamas still has naval commandos and has continued to work to reconstitute that force.

Showing that it will not go along with this Hamas plan quietly, the Navy revealed that in the last two weeks, it has killed four Hamas naval commandos.

The Israeli Navy currently has around 10,000 soldiers in total to address all those fronts.

In addition, the IDF revealed on Thursday that for the first time, three submarines performed three separate operations simultaneously in completely different areas.

Late Thursday, Navy Chief Maj. Gen. David Saar Salame will conclude an unusually long four-and-a-half-year term and 39 years in the Navy.

Outgoing IDF Planning Directorate chief V.-Adm. Eyal Harel is replacing Saar Salame after IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir won a battle royale with Defense Minister Israel Katz to secure his appointment to the position.

The truth is that Harel was probably only collateral damage in a larger battle in which Katz was trying to force Zamir to pick IDF officers he deemed likely to be more loyal to him, such as for the US defense attaché position in Washington, DC.

That position has been vacant for several months, prompting Zamir to appoint IDF Brig. Gen. Arik Ben Dov, as the military's acting defense attache to the US, returned on December 11.

Given that there have been no developments since, it is possible that Ben Dov will continue to serve in an "acting" capacity, essentially on a permanent basis, at least through Israeli elections into late 2026 or even 2027.

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-893282





Friday, 17 April 2026

Warcrimes Lawsuit Filed Against Spanish PM at ICC


https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2026/04/15/israeli-ngo-files-war-crimes-complaint-spains-pm/

Israeli NGO Files War-Crimes Complaint Against Spain’s PM : Iran Aid Enabled the Regime’s ‘Terror Machine’

Spain’s prime minister is facing a complaint at the International Criminal Court alleging his government enabled Iran’s “terror machine” through dual-use exports, with the legal group behind the filing arguing that responsibility for war crimes extends to those who provide the means.

The complaint, filed Tuesday by Israeli legal advocacy group Shurat HaDin under Article 15 of the Rome Statute, calls on prosecutors in The Hague to open a criminal investigation — and consider issuing an arrest warrant — against Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez and other senior officials.

The complaint alleges that Spain’s socialist government approved the transfer of approximately €1.3 million in dual-use components to Iran in 2024 and 2025, including materials linked to detonators and explosive systems.

According to the filing, the items were not benign industrial goods but “critical components that enable explosive devices to function,” transferred under circumstances in which their use in attacks against civilians was foreseeable.

At the core of the case is the allegation that materials classified as civilian “dual-use” goods function as essential components in weapons systems.

Shurat HaDin argues that under international law, supplying essential components that render weapons operational can constitute aiding and abetting war crimes and crimes against humanity — even when classified as dual-use.

The complaint further states that Iran — widely described as the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism — has long armed proxy terrorist groups, including Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis, which rely on such systems and rockets directed at civilian populations. The complaint also points to Iranian messaging as evidence that Tehran viewed Spanish policy as supportive.

Iranian state-linked outlets circulated footage and images showing ballistic missiles bearing stickers featuring Sánchez alongside the message, “Thank you, Prime Minister,” after the Spanish leader condemned U.S.-Israeli military operations as “illegal.”

Israeli officials seized on the imagery, with the Foreign Ministry warning that Iran’s regime was placing the Spanish leader’s words “on the missiles it fires at civilians in Israel and the Arab world.”

While Sánchez has repeatedly criticized U.S. and Israeli military actions — including in late March when he described the conflict as an “absurd, cruel and illegal” campaign — his government is accused of facilitating transfers of components ultimately used by the Iranian regime and its proxies.

In line with that stance, Sánchez’s socialist government denied American forces access to key bases and ultimately barred U.S. aircraft involved in the campaign from using Spanish airspace, with the prime minister telling lawmakers that “all flight plans involving operations in Iran have been rejected.”

Earlier reports in Spanish media during the initial phase of the operation, however, suggested logistical activity linked to U.S. missions continued to pass through Spanish facilities, highlighting a gap between political messaging and operational reality before the restrictions were fully enforced.

The policy drew a sharp response from Washington, with a White House official stating that the U.S. military “does not need help from Spain or anyone else” to meet its operational goals.

Relations between Israel and Spain have deteriorated sharply since Madrid recognized a Palestinian state in 2024 and escalated its criticism of Israel’s war against Hamas, with both countries withdrawing ambassadors.

Tensions escalated further last Friday when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Spain of hostility toward Israel and removed Madrid from a U.S.-led mechanism coordinating postwar Gaza stabilization efforts.

The deterioration in ties has also included repeated public rebukes, with Israeli officials summoning Spanish diplomats and condemning Madrid’s rhetoric toward the Jewish state in recent months.

In a move that drew additional criticism, Spain last Thursday announced it would reopen its embassy in Tehran during the ongoing ceasefire window, positioning itself as a potential mediator in talks with Iran.

Israeli officials condemned the decision that same day, warning it signaled dangerous proximity to a regime they accuse of sponsoring terrorism across the region.

Shurat HaDin President Nitsana Darshan-Leitner said the case centers on whether providing the components that enable attacks can make officials legally responsible for the consequences.

“When a prime minister enables, directly or indirectly, the transfer of components that strengthen the Iranian regime’s terror machine, he cannot continue to present himself as someone acting in the name of human rights,” she said.

“It is impossible to condemn Israel in the international arena, while at the same time assisting a regime that arms terrorist organizations and attacks innocent civilians,” Darshan-Leitner added, stressing that responsibility for war crimes “does not stop only with those who pull the trigger, but also extends to those who provide the means that enable the shooting.”

There was no immediate response from Spanish officials to the complaint.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2026/04/15/israeli-ngo-files-war-crimes-complaint-spains-pm/





Thursday, 16 April 2026

Justice fires Biden prosecutors who targeted pro-life activists

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/04/14/doj-fires-prosecutors-who-weaponized-face-act-against-pro-life-activists-under-biden/

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/04/14/doj-face-act-weaponization-report-biden-admin-targeted-pro-lifers-demand-abortion-groups/

DOJ Fires Prosecutors Who Weaponized FACE Act Against Pro-Life Activists Under Biden


The Department of Justice (DOJ) has fired several prosecutors who weaponized the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act to go after pro-life activists during the Biden administration.

CBS News reported Monday evening — before the agency released a bombshell report about the Biden-era DOJ’s abuse of power — that at least four prosecutors had been fired for their role in targeting pro-life Americans with the FACE Act. The DOJ confirmed the firings in a post to X.

“DOJ has terminated the employment of personnel responsible for weaponizing the FACE Act who still remained at the department,” the agency said on social media.

Among those fired on Monday is Sanjay Patel, a federal prosecutor in the Civil Rights Division, who was placed on administrative leave last month, the outlet reported.

Patel — who was the architect behind the Biden DOJ’s pairing of a KKK-era charge called “conspiracy against rights” with the FACE Act to bolster potential sentencing time for pro-life activists — was prominently featured in the lengthy DOJ report and accused of working to target pro-lifers at the behest of abortion groups. 

Many other federal prosecutors who handled FACE Act cases have already left the DOJ, according to the report. 

The FACE Act is a 1994 law that “prohibits the use or threat of force and physical obstruction that injures, intimidates, or interferes with a person seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health services or to exercise the First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship.” The act was written to equally protect abortion clinics, pro-life pregnancy resource centers, and churches; however, data indicate that 97 percent of FACE Act cases since the law’s inception have been against pro-life advocates.

The DOJ’s nearly 900-page “Weaponization Working Group” report constitutes a review of approximately 700,000 internal DOJ records showing the Biden administration weaponizing FACE Act against pro-life Americans by engaging in biased enforcement, demanding harsher sentencing, authorizing aggressive arrest tactics, collaborating with pro-abortion groups for surveillance, and making inappropriate comments about religion.

“This Department will not tolerate a two-tiered system of justice,” Acting Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement following the release of the report. “No Department should conduct selective prosecution based on beliefs. The weaponization that happened under the Biden Administration will not happen again, as we restore integrity to our prosecutorial system.”

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/04/14/doj-fires-prosecutors-who-weaponized-face-act-against-pro-life-activists-under-biden/

DOJ FACE Act Weaponization Report: Biden Admin Targeted Pro-Lifers at Demand of Abortion Groups, Mocked Christian Views as ‘Culty’


President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice (DOJ) released a report early Tuesday morning revealing how the Biden administration systematically targeted pro-life activists for FACE Act prosecutions, often at the behest of pro-abortion organizations.

The nearly 900-page report constitutes a review of approximately 700,000 internal DOJ records showing the Biden administration weaponizing the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act against pro-life Americans by engaging in biased enforcement, demanding harsher sentencing, authorizing aggressive arrest tactics, collaborating with pro-abortion groups for surveillance, and making inappropriate comments about religion.

“This Department will not tolerate a two-tiered system of justice,” Acting Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement. “No Department should conduct selective prosecution based on beliefs. The weaponization that happened under the Biden Administration will not happen again, as we restore integrity to our prosecutorial system.”

The FACE Act is a 1994 law that “prohibits the use or threat of force and physical obstruction that injures, intimidates, or interferes with a person seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health services or to exercise the First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship.” The act was written to equally protect abortion clinics, pro-life pregnancy resource centers, and churches; however, data indicate that 97 percent of FACE Act cases since the law’s inception have been against pro-life advocates.

The DOJ’s “Weaponization Working Group” report confirms that the Biden administration was laser-focused on jailing pro-life activists and “largely ignored attacks on pro-life pregnancy resource centers, only charging five people for vandalism and attacks…” despite the flood of violence against churches and pregnancy centers following the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs decision overruling Roe v. Wade. 

“During the four years under President Biden, DOJ charged more than 45 pro-life defendants in over 20 cases with violating the FACE Act in connection with pro-life demonstrations. This was a significant increase in FACE Act prosecutions compared to prior administrations,” the report notes, adding that Biden’s DOJ targeted some Christian pro-life activists more than once.

Collaboration with Abortion Groups 

The DOJ report confirms that the department, under former Attorney General Merrick Garland, revived the “National Task Force on Violence Against Reproductive Health Care Providers” and collaborated with abortion groups like the National Abortion Federation (NAF), Planned Parenthood, and Feminist Majority Foundation (FMF) to track the First Amendment activity of pro-life activists.

The report alleges that the abortion groups “capitalized on their relationship with the Task Force to gain internal information and push targets for FACE Act enforcement.”

“NAF, Planned Parenthood, and FMF not only flagged concerns about possible violations of the FACE Act, but also monitored the activities and locations of pro-life activists and shared updates about their First Amendment activities with the Biden DOJ and FBI in case chargeable conduct occurred. The Biden DOJ later charged many of the individuals surveilled by abortion NGOs,” the report states.

The report zeroes in on the dubious actions of the Task Force director, Civil Rights Division (CRT) Trial Attorney Sanjay Patel, who is notably the architect behind the Biden DOJ’s pairing of a KKK-era charge called “conspiracy against rights” with the FACE Act to bolster potential sentencing time for pro-life activists. “Coordination primarily took place between Patel, as Task Force Director, and NAF Security Director, Michelle Davidson, remained in routine communication,” the report reads. “Patel described Davidson as an ‘MVP’ at bringing incidents to his ‘attention, often in real-time, which usually result in an investigation/ prosecution.”‘The report includes several examples of pro-abortion groups compiling information on pro-lifers for the Task Force. In one example, the NAF “compiled a law enforcement resource guide” before a national event by Operation Save America. The guide “broke down the schedule of events — including protests and meetings at local churches — before providing detailed dossiers of ‘anti-choice individuals’ expected to attend, including pro-life pastors and speakers. These dossiers included significant amounts of personal identifying information, such as birthdates, addresses, contact information, physical descriptions and photographs, names of family and close associates (including photographs of minor children), affiliated groups, history of pro-life and faith-based activities, and drivers’ license numbers. The guide included information about prior protests that ultimately were the basis for the Biden DOJ’s FACE Act charges,” the report reads. The report also discusses how Patel “provided significant amounts of information to NAF, seemingly unbeknownst to CRT supervisors who thought that the ‘information flow ha[d] always been a one-way street.'” The report accuses Patel of giving NAF a list of all active FACE Act charges, as well as information about the terms of release for several pro-life activists. The NAF also invited Patel to attend and speak at its national conference about the FACE Act, which he accepted. The report further alleges that in 2020, Patel had agreed to serve as a reference for NAF’s application for a third-party grant, which the DOJ says raises major ethical questions. CBS News reported Monday evening, before the release of the DOJ report, that the department fired at least four prosecutors who were involved in Biden-era FACE Act prosecutions, including Patel.  Trump’s DOJ found that Biden DOJ prosecutors “engaged in inappropriate conduct and comments direct toward pro-life defendants.”“Prosecutors disparaged defendants’ religious beliefs, Catholic judges, and defense counsel,” the report reads. “Prosecutors sought to exclude religious jurors. They declined to allow some defendants to self-surrender, instead authorizing aggressive arrest tactics. And, when defense counsel requested data on historic FACE Act prosecutions, Patel asserted that he did not maintain those records, referring counsel to the FOIA process, although he had the data on hand and had provided similar information to abortion NGOs a year prior.” The report points to an example of a FACE Act case out of Michigan called United States v. Zastrow. At one point in that case, Frances Carlson, an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Michigan, complained that they “ended up with a very Catholic magistrate on duty.” Other records show the Biden DOJ trial team brainstorming how to keep Christians off the jury. “The judge adopted questions into the jury questionnaire that the Biden DOJ proposed. While the final phrasing was unremarkable, internal drafts indicate what types of information the trial team hoped to glean from the answers, such as how frequently the jurors attend services or whether their children attend religious schools,” the report reads. “Throughout the process, they searched for ‘an indirect way to get some more info about religion without directly asking it.'”“The trial notes are consistent with this approach. The Biden DOJ prosecutors flagged several Christian jurors for peremptory and for-cause strikes from the jury pool because of their faith,” the report continues.

Later, the trial team requested that the court limit the defendants’ ability to wear “Jesus buttons” to the trial. The report also reveals how a second AUSA, Sunita Doddamani, compared pro-life Christians to cult members and described them as “culty” while drafting her rebuttal in the case.

The report also honed in on the 2022 case of Mark Houck, a Christian father of seven who was arrested at gunpoint in front of his wife and children. The case drew national attention, with conservatives and Republicans accusing the Biden DOJ of trying to intimidate and silence abortion opponents. The DOJ accused Houck of violating the FACE Act in a shoving incident that local law enforcement had declined to pursue, and he was ultimately found not guilty. Last week, Houck won a seven-figure settlement against the DOJ.In that case, Patel spent months persuading his supervisors to let him bring FACE Act charges against Houck after Planned Parenthood tipped the FBI off to the incident and requested federal action, the report states.The report details how, despite Houck’s willingness to self-surrender, the FBI ended up arriving at his home with 16 armed agents and seven vehicles in an early morning raid in front of his wife and children.After public outcry, Patel internally blamed the FBI and said he urged them to allow Houck to self-surrender — a claim that is unsupported by a review of internal communications, the report alleges.“In a later assessment of lessons learned for upcoming Tennessee FACE indictments, Patel gave his view that the FBI’s ‘main reason’ for arrest rather than allowing self-surrender was to seize phones for search warrants, but that ‘I think the unspoken reason is bc the FBI really likes to make arrests.'”One AUSA also complained about how Houck’s family spoke out about the aggressive arrest.“The tragedy is that Mrs. Houck is attempting to taint the public’s view of the arrest and prosecution,” one AUSA reportedly said.The DOJ also found that the Biden DOJ pursued significantly harsher sentences for pro-life defendants than for violent pro-a Under Biden, the DOJ requests an average sentence of 26.8 months for pro-defendants, compared to 12.3 months for pro-abortion defendants.

DOJ FACE Act Weaponization Report: Biden Admin Targeted Pro-Lifers at Demand of Abortion Groups, Mocked Christian Views as ‘Culty’

Courtesy of the Department of Justice

The report states how the Biden DOJ appears to have only begun following up on attacks on pro-life pregnancy centers after “significant public outcry and congressional response” to the Houck case. After that, Patel oversaw three cases out of Florida, Texas, and Ohio related to attacks on pregnancy centers.

The DOJ also found that despite the FACE Act’s application to houses of worship, the Biden administration did not pursue any cases related to attacks on churches.“During the Biden Administration, there were numerous violent attacks against religious institutions in connection with those organization’s pro-life views. Indeed, in light of that violence, members of the U.S. Senate specifically requested that Attorney General Garland use the FACE Act to protect houses of worship,” the report reads. “Despite the increased hostility faced by houses of worship, the Biden DOJ did not pursue a single FACE Act case involving houses of worship during this time.”The report concludes by laying out all the ways the DOJ under President Trump has worked to correct the Biden DOJ’s actions.The report points to Trump pardoning more than 20 pro-life activists prosecuted, and some imprisoned, by the Biden DOJ and notes that the DOJ has settled civil cases and taken “personnel action” against those responsible. The DOJ also said it dismissed three civil lawsuits against pro-life activists and issued a directive that prosecutors may only bring abortion-related FACE Act prosecutions under extraordinary circumstances.“The behavior unearthed in this report is shameful,” said Assistant Attorney General Daniel Burrows, Office of Legal Policy. “Lawyers who should have known better withheld evidence, worked to keep committed religious people off juries, and generally allowed the Department of Justice to be used as the enforcement arm of pro-abortion special interests.”