Wednesday, 19 August 2026

Suspect detained in Jerusalem tunnel-infiltration plot

www.jns.org/news/israel-news/suspect-detained-in-jerusalem-tunnel-infiltration-plot


Authorities arrested a 36-year-old Qalandia resident who confessed to excavating a shaft beneath the security barrier.



Israeli Border Police officers stand with a 36-year-old suspect from Qalandia arrested for allegedly digging a shaft near the Jerusalem security barrier to infiltrate Israeli territory. Credit: Israel Police.




A 36-year-old Palestinian arrested near the Jerusalem security barrier admitted to digging a tunnel in an attempt to infiltrate Israeli territory, police told JNS on Tuesday.

“The suspect led the officers back to the shaft and, during an initial questioning, claimed that the intention was to dig a tunnel in order to infiltrate Israeli territory,” Israel Police Spokesperson Dean Elsdunne said in a written statement.

Jerusalem periphery Border Police officers were dispatched to the Qalandia area, near Ramallah in Samaria, after lookouts from the Atarot Command Center spotted several individuals digging beside the barrier.

Elsdunne added more details about the incident, following an initial Israel Police report on Monday, which stated that the suspects fled as officers approached, prompting a foot chase during which police fired shots into the air.

“At the conclusion of the pursuit, officers arrested a 36-year-old suspect, a resident of Qalandiya,” Elsdunne said, adding that the suspect “did not have any valid documents or permits to enter Israel.” During initial questioning, the man claimed the group intended to dig a tunnel to illegally cross into the country.

Authorities discovered digging tools and buckets at the excavation site.

Digging tools and buckets sit inside a shaft excavated near the Jerusalem security barrier that authorities say was part of an infiltration tunnel plot. Credit: Israel Police.
Digging tools and buckets sit inside a shaft excavated near the Jerusalem security barrier that authorities say was part of an infiltration tunnel plot. Credit: Israel Police.

The suspect, along with the recovered evidence, was transferred to the Jerusalem periphery Border Police Investigations and Intelligence Office. The investigation remains ongoing, with additional arrests expected.

Taking over Gaza

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-905837

Smotrich calls on Netanyahu to conquer Gaza under military rule, re-establish settlements

"There is no one in the world who will do the work for us. There is no country in the world that will send its soldiers to shed their blood and forcibly disarm Hamas," he told the students.


Smotrich backed voluntary emigration, decried Trump's new plan

The minister also called for voluntary emigration from Gaza, a proposal popular among the Israeli right-wing, to be encouraged by the government. 

Smotrich criticized Trump's 20-point plan for Gaza, which calls for an international force to take security control over Gaza.

"There is no one in the world who will do the work for us. There is no country in the world that will send its soldiers to shed their blood and forcibly disarm Hamas," he told the students.

"I have been telling the prime minister since the first day of the war: It is either us or them," he added.

"Either the State of Israel will courageously rule Gaza and tell the entire world, 'We will not allow two million, or 1.8 million, Nazis to live on our border and plot against our communities and our children,' or terror will rule Gaza."

Turning to the students, Smotrich reiterated his position of "conquest, military government, settlement."

Located about one kilometer from Gaza, Hamas' brutal October 7 attacks hit Sderot hard. Dozens of civilians, and a number of police officers and soldiers were killed during the terror group's onslaught. 

Efforts to rebuild the city have been underway and most residents have returned after initially evacuating to other regions.

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-905837


Tuesday, 18 August 2026

I study antisemitism for a living: El-Sayed’s rhetoric is a case study

www.jns.org/opinion/r-amy-elman/i-study-antisemitism-for-a-living-el-sayeds-rhetoric-is-a-case-study


Like those before him, the aspiring politician grasps the appeal of blood-curdling myths.





Dr. Abdul El-Sayed’s victory in Michigan’s Democratic primary undoubtedly brings excitement to numerous students and faculty members across various campuses in the state. Yet as a political science professor and a researcher focused on male violence and antisemitism, I have witnessed the damaging rhetoric expressed by him and many of his supporters.

Well before the election was called, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel announced that she will not be attending the Michigan Democratic Convention in September because, as a Jewish public figure, “I don’t feel safe going … I don’t want to get chased around. I don’t want to get harassed. I don’t want to get yelled and screamed at. … And I believe that if I go, that is what will happen.”

Her statements echo those of my students and colleagues who avoid spaces others insist are “inclusive.”

With just 1% more votes than his opponent in the state’s primary, El-Sayed inched closer to the Senate, the very institution that some “progressives” insist they want abolished. The hypocrisy does not end there.

In an effort to facilitate his success in the upcoming November election against his Republican rival, El-Sayed sought to reassure the public and the Jewish community, whom he and many of his supporters have placed in their crosshairs for over a year, of his goodwill. The reassurance was compelled by conduct, not just his campaign rhetoric, within El-Sayed’s own political orbit.

Consider, for instance, the indictment of one of El-Sayed’s staff, who, along with seven others, stands accused by a federal jury of alleged threats and vandalism against the University of Michigan, pro-Israel organizations and their family members. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the accused “also discussed methods by which to harm the targets and their families, including poison, bombs and psychological torture.”

As FBI special agent Jennifer Runyan explained: “In the dead of night, masked and hooded defendants allegedly threw noxious chemicals through the windows of families’ homes and taped demand letters to their front doors. At every step, they attempted to cover their tracks and delete evidence of their crimes.”

When concealing Jew-hatred is no longer possible or politically preferable, there is greater candor and/or the suggestion that it does not matter. Seven months after the Hamas-led terrorist attacks in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, El-Sayed’s most notorious supporter, Hasan Piker stated, “It doesn’t matter if rapes happened on October 7th” … “It doesn’t change the dynamic for me.” That’s because Piker admires the terrorist organization Hezbollah and its “dope flag.”

“It’s got an AK [rifle] on it and a f**king hand holding it up,” he exclaimed, podcasting beside an LGBTQ flag and wearing a T-shirt that read “show me your d**k.” It strains credulity that the provocative podcaster is oblivious to the fact that leaders of both Hezbollah and Hamas claim that homosexuals should be executed in accordance with Quranic principles. Despite posing with peace signs beside the candidate, Piker’s support for terror could not be clearer.

For those voters who continue to insist hatred of any kind is simply unacceptable comes the promise of protection against it. And, as any abused woman knows, one of the most effective ways an abuser conceals his behavior is through offering his victims protection from it.

This came to mind when I heard El-Sayed’s paternalistic statement to Jewish Americans. He declares: “My commitment to Jewish safety is the same commitment I have to the safety of my own daughters.” As is common in such instances of insincerity, he never noted the role that his own rhetoric has played in fostering the fear he claims to safeguard against.

Most concerning was that, on the morning his victory was declared, El-Sayed appeared on national television and invoked the ancient blood libel against Jews by characterizing the world’s only Jewish state as having been “bloodthirsty” for decades. This libel was not a criticism of the particular policies of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or any Israeli government, but instead a condemnation of Israel’s very existence, and thus her people and supporters.

Like those before him, the aspiring politician grasps the appeal of the blood-curdling myth. It is worth recalling that, in 1943, Heinrich Himmler, the head of the SS, instructed Berlin’s Chief of Police to investigate ritual murders long attributed to Jews, with the intention of disseminating the ostensible findings to the press. This strategy was aimed at promoting the narrative that would support the “evacuation” of Jews from Europe. Himmler understood that virulent Jew-hatred could be leveraged to the advantage of his movement.

That today’s aspiring politicians seem eager to do the same reveals our country is under serious threat and that unless such forces are soundly defeated, the future of substantive democracy will be bleak.

By R. Amy Elman, a professor of political science and the William Weber chair of social science at Kalamazoo College in Michigan.

Zionism and Planting Trees

https://www.jpost.com/judaism/torah-portion/article-905419

What is the connection between Zionism and planting trees?

Trees have repeatedly been destroyed by war, fires, and other causes, but we have always planted again as an expression of resilience and rebuilding.


The Torah prohibits the unnecessary destruction of resources. This principle is known as bal tash’hit, the ban against needless waste.

Of course, what constitutes waste depends on context. Behavior that is wasteful in one era or circumstance may not be considered wasteful in another. In a modern world where, thank God, food is abundant, discarding leftover food may not carry the same implications that it did in generations marked by scarcity.

What is striking is the setting in which this prohibition appears. The Torah introduces bal tash’hit, the prohibition against waste, amid warfare, rather than in the more predictable setting of agriculture or everyday life.

Ancient wars were fought by laying siege to cities, requiring enormous quantities of timber. Wood was needed for military camps, battering rams, siege towers, and fuel. Recognizing these genuine military needs, the Torah permits the felling of non-fruit-bearing trees for such purposes, while protecting fruit trees from wanton destruction.

Why do we plant trees?

When outlining this prohibition, the Torah offers an iconic analogy: ki ha’adam etz hasadeh, “man is like the tree of the field.” Just as human life must be carefully protected, a tree that produces and sustains life cannot simply be felled for utilitarian purposes.

The comparison reflects the unusual connection human beings have always felt toward trees. More than almost any other part of nature, we identify with trees and sometimes even personify them.

The 19th-century naturalist W. H. Hudson observed nature through an almost spiritual lens. In his memoir Far Away and Long Ago, he recounts the story of a landowner who possessed a “reverential feeling for his old trees.” Before retiring for the night, “he would walk round to visit them, one by one,” resting his hand on the bark and whispering good night. Hudson writes that the man believed his trees possessed “intelligent souls” and appreciated his devotion. To him, trees were alive, individual, and deeply personal.

Unlike this landowner, we do not believe that nature is animate, and trees certainly do not possess human souls. Yet the prominence of trees throughout Tanach suggests that our attachment to them is more than sentimental.

Human history begins among the trees of the Garden of Eden. Abraham receives his angelic visitors beneath a tree, and Jonah becomes deeply attached to his kikayon tree. Again and again, trees appear in Tanach as part of the human landscape.

Even the anatomy of a tree invites comparison to the human form. A mature tree has a clearly defined structure: hidden roots supporting a central trunk which rises and spreads into an intricate network of branches. There is something almost “bodily” about this structure, with a stable core and limbs reaching outward in different directions.

Our Sages drew on this structure in Pirkei Avot, comparing a person whose wisdom exceeds his deeds to a tree with many branches but few roots, easily overturned by the wind. The comparison works because we so readily recognize human qualities reflected in trees.

More than almost any other feature of nature, trees really do seem alive. As Shakespeare wrote, there are “tongues in trees.” Each tree has its own shape and something resembling a distinct personality. An old oak conveys strength, a willow gentleness, a cypress dignity. Trees grow and mature; they age and become scarred, and each develops its own shape and character.

The comparison between a tree and a human being reminds us to guard against wasting human potential. A productive tree still has fruit to bear; a person still has talents, abilities, and contributions to offer. Wasting either means cutting short what could still have been produced.

The connection between trees and war

However, there is a particular reason why the Torah draws this analogy between human beings and trees, specifically in the context of war. The qualities represented by trees carry special importance during wartime. Preserving sensitivity toward trees can help counter some of the pressures that war creates.

Planting for Israel's future

Trees teach us to think about the future. The Talmud in Ta’anit tells of a man planting a carob tree even though he will not live long enough to enjoy its fruit. When asked why he is planting for a future he will not see, he explains that he entered a world filled with trees planted by earlier generations and must do the same for those who will follow him.

Unlike crops that must be replanted each year, a tree planted today can continue producing fruit for decades. Trees naturally extend our vision beyond our own lives. We plant and nurture them, knowing that their fullest benefits may only be enjoyed by generations who had no part in planting them.

War demands that we extend our vision into the future. It is painful and exhausting, exacting enormous sacrifices at many levels. Without a clear vision of what we are fighting for, those sacrifices become much harder to sustain. A war without a larger purpose can easily become a succession of battles without hope.

During the past three years, we have endured an extraordinarily difficult war; the strain on our society has been enormous. The war has dragged on without a clear and decisive victory on the horizon.

We must keep reminding ourselves that our generation is struggling so that future generations will not face the violence and pogroms that we experienced on October 7. Sometimes a generation is called on to carry a burden whose benefits will be realized only by generations to come. We plant and nurture a tree today, knowing that others may sit beneath its branches and enjoy its fruit.

Every tree is different

Trees also possess remarkable individuality. No two mature trees are identical. Each develops its own shape and carries its own history. Trees are battered by storms, afflicted by disease, scarred by injury, and sometimes recover in ways that permanently alter their appearance. An old tree possesses something resembling a biography, with much of its history written into its trunk and branches.

War reduces individuals to numbers and statistics. Behind every person lies a world of relationships, dreams, achievements, and hopes. Every loss is the loss of an entire world. Every serious injury can radically alter a person’s life and the lives of those around them. Amid the scale and intensity of war, it is easy to lose sight of the individuality of each person and the unique story of every family.

The Torah’s concern for each individual tree reminds us to preserve that same sensitivity toward every individual human life.

Building, not destroying

Finally, trees remind us that humans are meant to be productive in this world. Trees are among nature’s great providers. They give us fruit, shade, shelter, fuel, and, through photosynthesis, the oxygen we breathe. Their presence sustains the environment around them.

War is fundamentally destructive. It destroys lives and what human beings have spent years building. Sometimes we are forced into war, but we should never develop a culture that celebrates war or destruction.

The comparison between people and trees reminds us of our deeper calling. We are meant to produce, build, and improve our world. War may sometimes be necessary, but destruction can never become our purpose. Man is meant to be a tree.

Planting again in Israel

From its earliest days, the Zionist movement viewed planting trees in Israel as an expression of confidence in our future. I remember collecting money as a child in the little blue Keren Kayemeth LeIsrael-Jewish National Fund boxes to help plant forests in Israel.

Trees have repeatedly been destroyed by war, fires, and other causes, but we have always planted again as an expression of Jewish resilience and rebuilding.

https://www.jpost.com/judaism/torah-portion/article-905419