Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts

Sunday, 9 August 2026

Growing Wings builds a home front for Israel’s lone reservists

As repeated IDF call-ups stretches into a third year, the nonprofit is helping lone reservists rebuild their civilian lives after months on the battlefield. 

By Tania Shalom Michaelian


 




When Israeli reservists return from the battlefield, many come home to families who have kept life moving while they were away. Someone has paid the bills, spoken to the landlord, opened official letters and made sure there is food in the refrigerator.
A lone reservist may return to an empty apartment and face it all alone.

“For years, the system saw reservists as soldiers while they were in uniform, but it did not always account for what happened when they went home,” Levi Preger told JNS in a recent interview.

Preger is community manager of Growing Wings, a nonprofit supporting lone soldiers and lone reservists. Since Oct. 7, 2023, he has served more than 300 days in the IDF reserves while trying to maintain his university studies and civilian life. 

                                                       Levi Preger, community manager of Growing Wings, a nonprofit 
                                                       that supports lone reservists in Israel as they transition from military 
                                                       service back to civilian life. Photo by Asher Smith.


His own journey to Israel began in an unexpected way. 

When he was 17, his grandmother received a letter from the German government informing her that she was eligible for benefits as the descendant of someone persecuted by the Nazis.

That was how Preger, who grew up in a small town in the Netherlands in a family that celebrated Christmas and Easter, learned that his great-grandmother had survived the Holocaust and concealed her Jewish identity after the war.

He began researching Judaism, contacted a Chabad rabbi and celebrated his bar mitzvah at 18. After visiting Israel on a Birthright trip, he decided to make aliyah. He moved to Israel at 20, studied Hebrew and enlisted in the Nahal Reconnaissance Battalion.

“I did not just want to move to Israel,” he said. “I wanted to integrate, contribute and take responsibility for the country I had chosen to make my home.”

In the summer of 2023, after completing his mandatory military service, Preger returned briefly to the Netherlands before beginning studies in government and international relations at Reichman University in Herzliya.

On Oct. 7, he watched in horror as news of the Hamas attack unfolded.

He immediately began searching for a flight back to Israel. It took him four days to find a seat.

After landing, he rejoined his reserve unit, which was helping evacuate civilians and rescue wounded soldiers.

His parents remained in the Netherlands while Preger returned to war without close family in Israel.

A gap exposed by war

During their mandatory service, lone soldiers are formally recognized by the Israel Defense Forces. They receive assistance from welfare officers, social workers and dedicated military programs, as well as support for housing and finances.

After discharge, however, much of that framework disappears, even though many former lone soldiers continue serving in the reserves for years.

“The biggest difference is that a lone soldier serves within a clearly defined support framework, while a lone reservist often does not,” Preger said.

Before Oct. 7, Israel’s reserve system was generally built around relatively short call-ups. It was not designed for thousands of reservists serving for months at a time, returning briefly to work or university and then being mobilized again.

For those without family support, prolonged reserve duty can threaten their housing, education, income and, in some cases, even their ability to remain in Israel.

Preger experienced firsthand how quickly an informal support network can disappear. For a time, his girlfriend’s family provided the kind of practical help his own family could not offer from abroad. When the relationship ended, so did that support.

During a Knesset Immigration and Absorption Committee hearing, he described lone reservists sleeping on a different couch every night. Others returned from duty to find their businesses had collapsed or their studies had fallen apart.

“The war did not create every one of these challenges,” he said. “But it exposed their scale.”

Not only new immigrants

The term “lone reservist” may bring to mind a young immigrant whose parents live abroad. That describes many, but not all.

Growing Wings estimates that 55% of the lone reservists in its network are immigrants, while 45% were born in Israel. The latter include orphans, people who grew up in foster care or the welfare system, individuals estranged from their families and those who left closed religious communities.

Many are in their late 20s or early 30s. They are students, professionals, small-business owners, spouses and sometimes parents themselves. They may have built independent lives, but they lack the extended family network that many Israelis take for granted.

“What unites them is not where they were born,” Preger said. “It is that when they leave the battlefield and return to civilian life, there is often no parental or extended-family safety net waiting for them.”

The IDF now officially recognizes lone reservists as a distinct population. According to Preger, that gives commanders and welfare personnel a clearer way to identify those who may need assistance.

It has also opened access to additional welfare support, mental-health resources, administrative accommodations, assistance in urgent cases, special leave to handle personal matters and, in certain circumstances, reimbursements for reservists who returned from abroad to serve.

Preger sees the recognition as an important first step. The real test, he said, is whether lone reservists know what assistance is available and can access it when they need it.

Some are unaware of the benefits to which they are entitled. Others encounter complex bureaucracy or narrow eligibility requirements. A housing crisis cannot always wait for formal approval, and many of the problems reservists face fall outside the military system.

That is where Growing Wings steps in.

More than financial assistance

Growing Wings was founded in 2019 by Max Long, a former lone soldier and active IDF reservist. Today, more than 700 lone reservists participate in its active networks and community channels.

Since Oct. 7, 2023, the organization says it has assisted more than 2,000 lone soldiers and lone reservists with emergency aid, housing, furniture, moving services, mental-health referrals, bureaucratic guidance, and legal and professional support.

Its role is often to help reservists navigate a maze of assistance spread across the IDF, government agencies, universities, employers and nonprofit organizations. Someone returning from months in the field may not know which office is responsible, or have the energy to tell the same story over and over again.

Preger believes the support that matters most is often the kind families provide without thinking about it.

“When you do not have parents or close relatives in the country, you may not have someone to review a lease, help you understand a government letter, host you for dinner after weeks in the field, connect you to a job or recognize that you are struggling before you ask for help,” he said.

One incident in Gaza showed Long how the community built around lone soldiers can endure long after the original need has passed.

His reserve squad was positioned far from the rest of its unit and was running short of food, water and other supplies. He entered a building where other Israeli soldiers were stationed and asked whether they had anything to spare.

Someone inside called his name.

The soldier was a former lone soldier whom Long and Growing Wings had helped several years earlier. After learning what the team needed, he quickly gathered food, water and whatever other supplies he could find.

This time, the person who had once received support was providing it.

For Preger, the encounter captures the meaning behind Growing Wings’ guiding principle: “For lone soldiers, by lone soldiers.”

“The goal is not only to intervene when someone cannot pay rent or needs a place to sleep,” he said. “It is to build relationships that continue long after the immediate crisis has passed.”

From emergency response to permanent support

Preger said he experienced firsthand what effective institutional support can look like at Reichman University.

After repeated reserve call-ups disrupted his studies, the university appointed an adviser who communicated with his professors and helped him develop a plan to catch up.

But not every reservist has an employer, landlord or university willing to make similar accommodations.

At the beginning of the war, civil society mobilized with meals, equipment, grants and housing. As the war continued, however, that first wave of assistance began to recede. The consequences of repeated reserve service did not.

Nearly three years after Oct. 7, reserve duty remains part of daily life in Israel. Under the government’s framework for 2026, as many as 40,000 reservists may be serving on an average day, moving constantly between combat and civilian life.

“The systems were largely designed for short-term emergencies,” Preger said. “Lone reservists are now living through a marathon.”

He is calling for a permanently funded national framework that would accompany lone soldiers into reserve service and coordinate military, government, academic, employment, housing and mental-health support.

Civil-society organizations would remain an important part of that framework because they can respond to personal circumstances that do not fit neatly into official categories. But basic protections, Preger said, should not depend on a reservist finding the right nonprofit or knowing whom to call.

“If someone gives hundreds of days to defend the country, they should not have to prove their isolation over and over again or risk losing the civilian life they are serving to protect,” he said.

For most reservists, family is an unspoken part of Israel’s military system. It is the support structure that keeps civilian life functioning while they serve and helps them regain their footing when they return.

Growing Wings is trying to build that home front for those who do not have one.

“The central challenge is no longer simply helping someone survive one call-up,” Preger said. “It is making sure repeated service does not destroy the civilian future they are trying to build.”


Friday, 8 April 2022

Pro-Israel ‘Gun-Toting Grandma’ Takes On Rashida Tlaib

 By Pesach Benson, United With Israel

 Apr 6, 2022

 

 Janice Winfrey 

“You cannot hate a group of people and expect to serve a community,” said Janice Winfrey, who is challenging Rashida Tlaib in upcoming elections.

 

Michigan Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib is facing a serious challenge for her House seat from a pro-Israel Democrat affectionately referred to as a “gun-toting Detroit grandma” in a recent feature by the New York Post.

Since declaring her candidacy for Michigan’s 13th congressional district in February, Democrat Janice Winfrey has raised an impressive $200,000. Detroit-area political consultants describe that as an impressive amount for six-weeks, suggesting the 62-year-old long-time Detroit City Clerk is a viable challenger to Tlaib.

The Democratic primary is scheduled for August 2.

In an interview with Jewish Insider (JI) published on Tuesday, Winfrey accused Tlaib of being “more interested in political gain than she is in serving our constituents.

Winfrey also stressed her opposition to the Boycott Divestment and Sanctions campaign against Israel.

“I don’t say [Israel is] a perfect country, but I do know it’s an important country to Americans. I do know that, without Israel, we’re much, much weaker and vulnerable,” Winfrey said. “So how can we not support Israel?”

“I don’t care what your dislike is with the Jewish people, you don’t just wipe out a whole country, a whole group of people — that’s never the answer,” she said.

Winfrey also voiced support for the two-solution without pressuring Israel to make concessions.

“We must have confidence in Israel’s ability to determine what is best for her own security and well-being,” Winfrey said.

“While I support the U.S. conducting Middle East peace talks, the United States should not infringe upon Israel’s sovereign right to pursue peace accords best aligned with her national interests. The United States has a role to facilitate in peace talks, but not dictate them.”

A position paper issued by Winfrey slammed BDS, the United Nations and the International Criminal Court for “efforts… intended to weaken and delegitimize the Jewish State,” saying they will “stop at nothing to compromise the shared Israeli-American values.”

Winfrey also challenged antisemitism in the Democratic party.

“You cannot hate a group of people and expect to serve a community or a nation or people period if you’re anti-anything,” she noted. “As an African American woman, it angers me to my soul that you hate another group of people just because [of who] they are… It grieves my soul and I will work against it, and I have always worked against it all my life.”

She also pointed to crime as a weakness for the Democrats, and for Tlaib in particular.

Crime “needs to be handled in a better way,” she said, adding that her neighborhood was locked down because of a shooting the same morning she spoke to JI.

Winfrey recently told the New York Post that her district has become so unsafe, she bought herself a .22 caliber pistol.

“I can’t go to the park by myself anymore and that is concerning to me,” she said. “I would like not to have to carry the gun. I don’t want the gun in my house. I have a 2-year old granddaughter. It’s locked in a safe in a closet on the top shelf. I don’t like it. We don’t believe in that, but I have to feel safe.”

Winfrey has served as Detroit City Clerk since 2005.

Tlaib, who amplifies the Palestinian narrative and has been repeatedly accused of antisemitism, is a member of The Squad, a group of Democrats, including Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who face accusations of anti-Israel and anti-Jewish bias.

Tlaib supports BDS and calls Israel an “apartheid” state. She and Omar were barred from entering Israel in 2019 over their support for BDS.

Tlaib also supports defunding police, saying policing is “inherently and intentionally racist.”

 

Tuesday, 8 February 2022

Amnesty’s anti-Israel report false and malicious

 Amnesty International's  False and Malicious Report

By Ivo Vegter


Amnesty International has produced a travesty of a report, rehashing old antisemitic tropes and falsely denouncing Israel as an apartheid state. It says a lot more about Amnesty than it does about Israel.


The international non-governmental organisation (NGO) Amnesty International, is a troubled entity, having been entangled in major controversies recently.

It caught flak over its close association with Moazzam Begg, a high-profile jihadi supporter of the Taliban. It has been accused of making outrageous fat-cat payments to departing executives. It admitted in 2019 to a massive hole in its budget, prompting questions over the number and remuneration of its top managers, and leading to the resignation of its recently-appointed secretary-general, South African activist Kumi Naidoo. 

An independent report the same year exposed the organisation’s toxic workplace culture of bullying, which led to at least two suicides. An internal review the following year confirmed the claims of whistleblowers that the organisation has a culture of discrimination and outright racism, including systemic anti-black bias and the use of racial slurs by senior staff.

Back in 1990, Amnesty endorsed the false testimony of Nayirah Al-á¹¢abaḥ, who was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the US, to the effect that Iraqi soldiers invading Kuwait had stolen incubators from a hospital, leaving the babies to die. This ‘atrocity propaganda’, later exposed to be part of a public relations campaign paid for by the Kuwaiti government, was cited as a cause for going to war against Iraq in the Gulf War three months later.

In 1963, Amnesty limited its support for refugees fleeing from South Africa into the then-protectorate of Bechuanaland (now Botswana) to only those people not engaged in the struggle against apartheid. Amnesty’s founding secretary-general, Peter Benenson, wrote: ‘I would like to reiterate our view that these [British] territories should not be used for offensive political action by the opponents of the South African Government. Communist influence should not be allowed to spread in this part of Africa, and in the present delicate situation, Amnesty International would wish to support Her Majesty’s Government in any such policy.’

A year later, upon learning of Nelson Mandela’s conviction for the ‘violent’ crime of sabotage, Amnesty promptly dropped him from its list of ‘prisoners of conscience’.

While its early opposition to communism was laudable, albeit inconsistent with its later ideological drift, it was clearly very selective in the human rights abuses it sought to highlight, and – at least under its founding secretary-general – didn’t care much about apartheid at all. 

Travesty of a report

Clearly not occupying the high ground on matters of human rights, Amnesty has doubled down on its effort to deligitimise, demonise and ultimately, destroy the state of Israel, by publishing a travesty of a report in which it accuses Israel of perpetrating a system of apartheid against Palestinians. 

By doing so, it reheated decades-old Soviet propaganda into an antisemitic diatribe that casts Israel as an apartheid state, systematically oppressing innocent Palestinians. 

The Abraham Accords signed in 2020 signalled the normalisation of relations between Israel and a number of Islamic states, from Morocco in the west, to Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates in the east. This has led to a surprising warming of perceptions in the Arab world towards Israel as a legitimate Jewish homeland. 

Amnesty, however, remains committed to the destruction of Israel, and in pursuit of that goal perpetuates the fiction created by the Soviet Union, that Zionists are colonial oppressors of the Palestinian people. 

While whipping up Nazi-like hatred for Jews among Arabs, the Kremlin needed a more subtle way to convince other countries to join the opposition to Israel and its main supporter, the United States. The victims-of-oppression narrative was designed to do just that. 

In 1975, the Soviet bloc, together with its Arab allies and the very much aligned Non-Aligned Movement, managed to pass United Nations Resolution 3379, which denounced Zionism as racism. 

Around that time, Yuri Andropov, then head of the KGB, said: ‘Islam was obsessed with preventing the infidels’ occupation of its territory, and it would be highly receptive to our characterisation of the US Congress as a rapacious Zionist body aiming to turn the world into a Jewish fiefdom.’

Long after the demise of the Soviet Union, Amnesty remains a ‘useful idiot’.

‘Defence’

In its report, Amnesty claims the origins of ‘apartheid’ in Israel go right back to its founding, thus attempting to delegitimise the country’s entire existence.

By placing the word ‘defence’ in quotation marks, and using phrases like ‘under the guise of maintaining security’, Amnesty denies not only Israel’s right to peaceful existence, but also its right to defend itself against wars of aggression launched by its Arab neighbours, and against the numerous unprovoked attacks aimed at its civilians from the occupied territories. 

Absurdly, it claims that Israel’s sole motive is ‘to establish or maintain a system of racial oppression and domination’. 

If this were true, Israel would surely expel the Arabs in its territory, as Jews have been forcibly expelled from almost all Muslim Arab countries. Yet, it has not done so. 

If this were true, Israel would surely maintain discriminatory laws aimed at its own Arab citizens. Yet, it does not. Its Arab citizens enjoy full equal rights, and even serve in the present coalition government. 

Amnesty’s working definition of apartheid is summarised as: ‘The crime of apartheid is committed when inhuman or inhumane acts are committed within the context of a widespread or systematic attack directed at a civilian population with the intention of creating or maintaining such a system of oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups.’

So Amnesty considers the defence of Israeli civilians against attacks by Palestinians to be ‘an attack’ by Israel ‘directed at a civilian population’. This is a perverse lie. 

The same Nelson Mandela whom Amnesty hung out to dry after his imprisonment in 1964, said in 1993: ‘As a movement we recognise the legitimacy of Palestinian nationalism just as we recognise the legitimacy of Zionism as a Jewish nationalism. We insist on the right of the state of Israel to exist within secure borders, but with equal vigour support the Palestinian right to national self-determination.’

Misinformation and lies

There have been many hearty denunciations of Amnesty’s apartheid report, but perhaps one could start with Bassem Eid, a Palestinian living in Jericho and an internationally-recognised human rights campaigner. 

For 15 years Eid ran the Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group, focusing initially on human rights violations committed by Israeli armed forces, but later expanding its scope to include rights violations by Palestinian authorities and armed forces against their own people. 

Eid released a video in which he minces no words: ‘While it is not a perfect country, Israel is definitely not an apartheid state,’ he said, calling the Amnesty report ‘full of misinformation and lies about Israel’.

He said: ‘Amnesty International and other Israeli haters can’t seem to live with the fact that the world is embracing Israel with open arms. They want to continue demonising Israel and denying it the right to exist as the one and the only Jewish state.’

He continued: ‘So here are the facts. The state of Israel is a strong and vibrant democracy that upholds equal rights for all its citizens. The Amnesty report’s claims, that the state of Israel was founded on the basis of discriminating between Jews and Arabs, indicates the ignorance of its authors. Israel was established as a refuge for persecuted people with different backgrounds, identities, languages and cultures. Apartheid which is defined as a policy or system of segregation or discrimination on the grounds of race simply does not exist in Israel. Look at Israeli’s current government. It is a comprise of Christians, Muslims and Jews, people with disabilities, members of the LGBT community, descendants of Holocaust survivors, and immigrants. Every sector of Israeli society is inclusive and diverse. Everyone can vote. Everyone can attend school. Everyone can work. In Israel everyone can dream for peace and a better future. So let us set the record straight. Amnesty international and its secretary-general, Dr. Agnès Callamard, are just promoting false propaganda that has been discredited time and time again.’

False and malicious

Justice Richard Goldstone, formerly of the South African Constitutional Court and leader of the 2008/9 United Nations fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict, was equally clear: ‘The charge that Israel is an apartheid state is a false and malicious one that precludes, rather than promotes, peace and harmony.’

In 2014, professor Alan Johnson, the founder and editor of the journal Fathom: for a deeper understanding of Israel and the region, published an excellent and in-depth paper on the ‘Apartheid smear’. He concludes that describing Israel as an apartheid state is ‘factually wrong, malicious, politically polarising and damages the peace process.’

In an article on the subject, Daniel Ben-Ami perceptively notes a disclaimer buried on page 37 of the 280-page Amnesty report: ‘Amnesty International notes and clarifies that systems of oppression and domination will never be identical. Therefore, this report does not seek to argue that, or assess whether, any system of oppression and domination as perpetrated in Israel and the OPT is, for instance, the same or analogous to the system of segregation, oppression and domination as perpetrated in South Africa between 1948 and 1994.’

It is, in fact, so non-identical, that describing it as a system of oppression and domination, or as apartheid, is entirely false.

David Suissa, the publisher and editor-in-chief of the Jewish Journal, says that the world needs a Justice International to ‘root out the poison’ that is Amnesty. 

He points out that Amnesty overlooks the countries with the worst human rights performance in the world, in order to focus on its campaign against Israel.

According to Statista.com, the list of the worst offenders starts with Egypt, Syria, Yemen, China, Iran, North Korea, the Central African Republic, Burundi, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Burma/Myanmar, Libya, Venezuela, Eritrea, Russia and Nigeria. 

A Freedom House ranking of countries places Israel among the world’s free countries, the only country in the Middle East and North Africa to enjoy that distinction.

Inaccurate and irresponsible

The Anti-Defamation League, which campaigns against antisemitism, said: ‘We have reviewed Amnesty International UK’s … report on Israel and strongly condemn it as an effort to demonise Israel and undermine its legitimacy as a Jewish and democratic state. In an environment of rising anti-Jewish hate, this type of report is not only inaccurate but also irresponsible and likely will lead to intensified antisemitism around the world.’

NGO Monitor, a Jerusalem-based research institute, has published a detailed analysis of the Amnesty report, finding it is filled with stock antisemitic tropes, denies the Jewish people the right to self-determination, has an opaque methodology inconsistent with recognised standards, deliberately omits ‘violations committed by Palestinian authorities or armed groups … which are not the focus of this report’, appeals to an arbitrary legal definition of apartheid which is inconsistent with international law, includes recommendations that would effectively eliminate the state of Israel as a Jewish homeland, whitewashes violence and terrorism directed at Israeli civilians with no acknowledgements that these constitute war crimes, and describes terror campaigns by Hamas and Hezbollah as mere ‘popular resistance’ to the Israeli occupation. 

‘Every aspect of the Amnesty International version of the apartheid campaign reflects its political agenda of exploiting tragedy to delegitimise Jewish sovereign equality and self- determination,’ it concludes. ‘Essentially, Amnesty demands the elimination of the Jewish State, and justifies doing so by perverting international law, misrepresenting Israeli laws and practices, and presenting an apologetic view of the murder of Israelis by Palestinian terrorists.’

‘The State of Israel absolutely rejects all the false allegations that appear in the report that Amnesty [published],’ said a spokesperson for the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs in a statement. ‘The report consolidates and recycles lies, inconsistencies, and unfounded assertions that originate from well-known anti-Israeli hate organisations, all with the aim of reselling damaged goods in new packaging. Repeating the same lies of hate organisations over and over does not make the lies reality, but rather makes Amnesty illegitimate.’

The statement quoted Foreign Affairs Minister Yair Lapid: ‘Amnesty was once an esteemed organisation that we all respected. Today, it is the exact opposite. It is not a human rights organisation, but just another radical organisation that echoes propaganda with no serious examination. Instead of seeking facts, Amnesty quotes lies spread by terrorist organisations. Five minutes of serious factchecking were enough to know that the facts that appeared in the report published this week were a delusion divorced from reality. Israel is not perfect, but it is a democracy committed to international law and open to scrutiny, with a free press and strong Supreme Court.’

Hijacking apartheid

Just as it is disrespectful to the victims and survivors of the Holocaust to draw casual, unmerited parallels between the Nazi extermination camps and lesser, or different, events, so it is an insult to the victims and survivors of apartheid to hijack the term for propaganda purposes, as Amnesty has done with this report.

The parallel is also entirely false, as evidenced by the views cited above, and as I explained in a previous column about the bullying campaign directed against Miss South Africa, Lalela Mswane. 

It is time to recognise Amnesty International for what it is. It is no longer impartially dedicated to highlighting human rights abuses. It has become a highly partisan propaganda group on the side of antisemites and terrorist organisations.

While the Jewish state of Israel, the only free democracy in the Middle East, is busy making peace with its Muslim Arab neighbours, Amnesty International remains on the side of warmongers who seek to destroy Israel and push the Jews into the sea. 

Amnesty International no longer campaigns against human rights violations. It now agitates against human rights.

https://dailyfriend.co.za/2022/02/08/amnestys-anti-israel-report-false-and-malicious/

Thursday, 20 January 2022

Mogoeng Mogoeng ordered to apologise for Israel comments

 

South Africa: Mogoeng Mogoeng ordered to apologise for Israel comments

File: Former Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng

JOHANNESBURG - Former Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng has been ordered to apologise for his comments regarding the Israel, Palestine conflict.

In June 2020, Mogoeng commented that he was under an obligation as a Christian to love Israel and pray for peace in Jerusalem, during a webinar with the Jerusalem Post.

The Judicial Conduct Appeals Committee says Mogoeng breached the Judicial Code of Conduct by involving himself in matters that caused political controversy.

Mogoeng refused to retract his statements, saying his comments on the Israel Palestine conflict didn't undermine South Africa's Constitution.

He's been ordered to apologise to the office of the Chief Justice and to release a statement to the media within 10 days.



Friday, 7 January 2022

'You're Pissing Me Off!': Meeting of European, Israeli Officials Allegedly Turns Into Verbal Brawl

 

'You're Pissing Me Off!': Meeting of European, Israeli Officials Allegedly Turns Into Verbal Brawl


Two weeks ago, a delegation of over a dozen European diplomats and ambassadors arrived in Israel in order to discuss the situation in the West Bank. However, the atmosphere of the meeting was reported to be rather far from diplomatic.
A recent meeting between an Israeli Foreign Ministry official and a European diplomatic delegation devolved into a shouting match when the participants tried to discuss the situation in the West Bank and the treatment of Palestinians, Walla News has reported, citing three European and Israeli diplomats.
According to the report, the British-led European delegation arrived in Jerusalem in order to lodge a protest against the treatment of Palestinians in the West Bank, particularly voicing concerns about violence by settlers against them.
Aside from this, the officials were said to have highlighted their objections to settlement building plans and other issues. Concerns were expressed regarding Israel's advancement in the contentious E1 area between Jerusalem and the settlement of Ma'ale Adumim, along with building plans in the Givat Hamatos neighbourhood of East Jerusalem. f
The delegation's concerns, however, met little appreciation from Aliza Bin Noun - Israel's former ambassador to France, now serving as the director of the European Affairs Department at the Foreign Ministry, who took part in the meeting.

"After everything the new Israeli government has been doing for the Palestinians, you come to complain?", she shouted at the European officials. "You are pissing me off!"

The European diplomats who participated in the meeting shared with Walla News that the atmosphere of the meeting quickly spiralled out of control and deteriorated. Some of the officials tried to smooth things over but failed, and the discussion ended up in a "major crisis".
Israel welcomed a new government last June. Shortly after being sworn in, the new authorities announced thousands of permits for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip to work in Israel and approved many building applications in Area C of the West Bank - a move that has not been seen in years, as noted by The Times of Israel.

https://sputniknews.com/20220107/youre-pissing-me-off-meeting-of-european-israeli-officials-allegedly-turns-into-verbal-brawl-1092089664.html

Saturday, 1 January 2022

Israel doesn’t need US permission to strike Iran – FM

 

Israel doesn’t need US permission to strike Iran – FM

The Jewish state possesses capabilities the world can’t even imagine and will use them against Tehran if necessary, the Israeli foreign minister has warned
Israel doesn’t need US permission to strike Iran – FM

Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid has made it clear that his country can use force to curb Iran’s nuclear development without informing US President Joe Biden.

“Israel will do whatever it needs to do to protect its security. And we don’t need anybody’s permission for that. That’s been the case since the first day we established this state,” Lapid told Israel’s Channel 12 on the last day of 2021.

When asked if his country possesses the means to successfully carry out this type of attack, the foreign minister said that “Israel has capabilities, some of which the world, and even some experts in the field, cannot even imagine. And Israel will protect itself against the Iranian threat.”

Israeli officials and military figures have been mulling a strike on Iran since talks on the revival of the 2015 nuclear deal (the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA) between Tehran and world powers began under the Biden administration.
Tehran has expressed skepticism over the warnings coming from Israel, calling them “empty threats,” though promising a harsh response to any aggression. 
Under the JCPOA, Iran agreed to curb its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of international sanctions.

Former President Donald Trump unliterary withdrew the US from the JCPOA in 2018, calling it the “worst deal ever.” The Jewish state fully shared his view, vigorously opposing the agreement which, it insisted, was not enough to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear bomb.

During his interview on Friday, Lapid said there has not been a “capitulation” to Tehran during the ongoing talks in Vienna. “Israel is not against a good deal, it is only against the wrong deal,” he added.

https://www.rt.com/news/544958-israel-us-iran-jcpoa/