Saturday, 31 January 2026

New Book: Ninette's War (Living in Vichy France in WW2)


LONDON — On the morning of June 23, 1940, 12-year-old Ninette Dreyfus’s family learned that Hitler had forced France into a humiliating armistice the previous evening.

Her father’s reaction to the news was visceral and physical. Edgar Dreyfus collapsed on the stairs, suffering an asthma attack and struggling to breathe. “I had never seen him show weakness before. For a moment, I feared he was going to die,” Ninette later recalled. “The whole world of my childhood was falling apart.”

But unbeknownst to Ninette, her father, or France’s Jews, much worse was to come.

Released in paperback in the UK on January 22, “Ninette’s War: A Jewish Story of Survival in 1940s France” tells the remarkable wartime odyssey of one of France’s most prominent Jewish families — and the Vichy regime’s knowing complicity in the Nazis’ crimes.

The story has been painstakingly pieced together — like “restoring a mosaic” — by British journalist John Jay, drawing on Ninette’s youthful diary entries, family papers, and interviews she gave to the author in the years before her death in 2021.

As Jay makes clear, Edgar’s reaction to news of the armistice did not reflect a sense of foreboding about the likely fate awaiting his family.

“He was completely dumbfounded that the mighty French army could collapse in the way that it had done,” he tells The Times of Israel. “French Jews at that point had no idea of what subsequently was going to hit them.”

     Ninette in 1939

Jay’s book tracks Edgar’s growing sense of disbelief and horror at Vichy’s brutal betrayal of France’s Jews.

The Dreyfus family — second only in influence to the Rothschilds in Parisian Jewish society — were, Jay says, a “classic cosmopolitan, Jewish Western European family, a mixture of Bohemians, Germans and Frenchmen.”

They were also fiercely patriotic and loyal to the French state, which, by and large, had treated French Jewry well. Edgar ran a bank owned by the family firm, La Maison, which had provided loans to help France’s war effort after 1914. A decade later, Edgar acceded to the government’s request to help fight off an inflation-induced run on the franc. He was made an officer of the Légion d’honneur in recognition of his services.

In their grand 16th arrondissement townhouse — which had once been owned by composer Claude Debussy — Ninette, her elder sister Viviane and parents Edgar and Yvonne lived a life of plenty and privilege. The family were secular and, until the outbreak of war, Ninette barely knew what being a Jew was. Occasional antisemitic playground slurs had little meaning for her.

nd slurs had little meaning for her.

Life as an ‘exode’

Hitler’s May 1940 blitzkrieg against France changed all that. One month later, with the sound of artillery growing closer and German forces crossing the Seine, the Dreyfus family joined the “exode” — one of the largest movements of people in history — as 6 million people took to the roads to flee the Nazi advance, among them some 100,000 to 200,000 Jews.

Refugees in the French ‘exode’ flee the invading Germans on June 19, 1940. (Bundesarchiv, Bild 146-1971-083-01 / Tritschler / CC-BY-SA 3.0)

After a three-week, 1,700-kilometer (roughly 1,050-mile) journey via Nantes, Bordeaux and Perpignan, Ninette and her family arrived in Marseille, where they took up residence in a hotel full of fellow exodians and Jews.

Already, the poisonous atmosphere caused by France’s defeat and humiliation had sparked a wave of antisemitism. Nonetheless, even as they traveled through Perpignan close to the Spanish border, Edgar, who had ties to the new Francoist regime, did not attempt to flee France.

The Riviera fell under the non-occupied “Free Zone,” which was governed from Vichy by the World War I hero Marshal Philippe Pétain. As Jay details, there was little to suggest Pétain — a onetime supporter of Alfred Dreyfus — harbored antisemitic inclinations. Indeed, alongside members of the International League Against Antisemitism, Edgar’s cousin, Louis, a senator, voted to grant Pétain authoritarian powers soon after the armistice.

But Pétain swiftly promoted antisemites to lead his new regime, creating a “permissive environment for antisemitism to flourish,” says Jay. In October 1940, the first antisemitic legislation barred Jews from certain professions, including teaching, journalism and the civil service, while sharply curtailing their role in the medical and legal professions. At Montgrand, Marseille’s grandest girls’ school, Ninette’s math teacher, Odette Valabrègue, was fired. Like the chief rabbi and French communal organizations, Edgar clung to the importance of the rule of law, even if the publication of now-infamous images of Pétain shaking hands with Hitler at Montoire in October 1940 led him to weep.


     Petain shakes hands with Hitler, October 1940

Any lingering illusions about Pétain ended with the passage of further, sweeping antisemitic legislation in 1941, which, in a sharp break with the Third Republic’s avowed secularism, required Jews to register in a special census and expanded the list of professions, including banking, closed to them. The measures, which forced Edgar to relinquish his role as chief executive of La Maison, came as a “personal hammer blow,” writes Jay.

“Pétain’s first statute drove his friends from public service and the media and limited their participation in law and medicine, but he was not directly affected,” he says. “Now, Pétain was depriving him of his career and driving his family into a legal ghetto.”

Ninette later captured the psychological impact of the measures on her father, recalling: “Work was everything to Daddy, and it was torture for him to contemplate life without work.” Nor was the future much brighter for Edgar’s daughters, with university places and professional work all but closed to Jews.

The legal assault, the establishment of the new Commissariat Général aux Questions Juives, which began to plunder Jewish wealth, and the promotion of antisemitism in the media were accompanied by, and fed, rising Jew-hate on the streets. Ninette’s family heard the thud of the bomb that exploded in Marseille’s synagogue in May 1941.


     Ninette and father at Cannes beach, 1942

Joining the resistance

No longer needing to be in Marseille, where La Maison had offices, Edgar moved his family to Cannes, which, although no less antisemitic, was filled with family and friends. Their new home, Villa Rochelongue, was a Belle-Époque seafront house near the Palm Beach Casino staffed with butlers and a cook, cleaner and gardener. Despite the war and food rationing — which led the family to keep a cow and rabbits — life “felt like the old Côte d’Azur,” says Jay. When not obsessing over her upcoming 15th birthday, Ninette penned diary entries about clothes, accessories and cosmetics, ballet, cinema trips, school and social life, sailing in the baie de Cannes, and her “passion” for football and volleyball.

Although somewhat cocooned by her parents, Ninette was not oblivious to the pernicious forces imperiling Vichy’s Jews. Her school headteacher, Marcelle Capron, was a résistante who later sheltered Jews and helped them flee. However, the school had its share of antisemitic teachers and pupils. Ninette, a self-described tomboy, fought girls who were members of Avant-Garde, the Pétainist youth movement.

Edgar, too, chose to resist, crossing what his daughter termed a “personal Rubicon” in spring 1943 by refusing to obey an order requiring all Jews to have the word “Juif” stamped in their ID and ration cards. While most French Jews followed their communal leaders’ advice to continue obeying Vichy’s laws, Edgar’s decision was, Ninette said, “the most significant moment of the war.”

“He was defining himself as an outlaw, no easy decision for a man in late middle age with teenage daughters and a position in society,” she said. Decades later, Ninette discovered files in France’s Archives Nationales revealing that he been denounced, triggering a police investigation. Six months late, Edgar led his family to the mairie to have their papers stamped.

Both Edgar — who joined a coastal reception committee for a Royal Navy boat carrying British agents and collecting résistants — and Vivian began to engage in secret resistance activities.

However, perhaps the most powerful example of the family’s resistance came in its evolving relationship to Judaism. As the atmosphere darkened, Yvonne recognized her daughters would be more resilient in the face of societal antisemitism if they felt pride in their heritage. She taught them that they should be both proud of Jews’ traditions and achievements, and recognize that with success came a responsibility to those in need. Those lessons bore fruit. Ninette remembered that her reaction to having her ID stamped with “Juif” was not one of humiliation, but pride.

“My parents became more interested in Judaism,” Ninette recalled. “Others ran away; we moved closer.” During Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur in 1942, Edgar and his wife and children attended services for the first time since participating in family bat mitzvahs in the 1930s. “For Mummy and Daddy,” Ninette believed, “taking part in a service after decades of non-observance was an act of defiance.”

However, back in Paris, which was occupied by the Germans, tragedy was enveloping members of the family — including Edgar’s sisters, Louise and Alice, Alice’s daughter, Maryse, and her husband, disabled veteran André Schoenfeld. André, a holder of the Croix de guerre and Légion d’honneur, was arrested in 1941 by French police at a reunion dinner for World War I wounded and sent to the notorious Drancy internment camp.

Maryse and André Schoenfeld with daughter Denise in Normandy, in this undated photo. (Courtesy of John Jay and Lady Swaythling and her family)

News of André’s arrest hit Edgar and his family hard. “Nothing would ever be the same again,” believed Vivianne; France was treating its Jews as “abject rot, putrid larvae to be crushed.” The family also learned of the horrors which had unfolded during the Val d’Hiv roundup in July 1942, when some 8,000 Jews, almost 4,000 of whom were children, were held together in the sports arena in appallingly overcrowded conditions for five days before being deported. “It is horrible, demonic, something that grabs you round the throat so you can’t cry out,” a letter from an eyewitness, a social worker, circulating on the Riviera revealed. “I’ll try to describe what it looks like, but if you multiply whatever you understand by 1,000, it will still be only part of the reality.”

But, even at this moment, elements of the family’s past life continued: That August, Edgar took his family on holiday to Mont-Revard’s Grand Hôtel, a luxury Alpine retreat they had visited before the war. In her diary, Ninette recorded she had “a fantastic time” riding horses and playing tennis, croquet, golf and ping-pong.

As Jay says, it is important to note that the family was “in ignorance of a lot of what was going on in the north and … didn’t know what was happening once the transports [took] people to the east.” As late as 1943, most exodians, he suggests, believed that forced labor was the worst fate awaiting French Jews. When two Auschwitz escapees, Haïm Salomon and M. Honig, returned to Nice looking for their families and detailed the horrors they had witnessed to a local Jewish committee, their testimony was dismissed. The men, it was decided, must have lost their minds, with one of Edgar’s prewar friends, who chaired the committee, telling a colleague: “Such atrocities… are not conceivable… in the middle of the 20th century.”


     Marseilles 1941

However, even as a series of Allied victories in 1942 pointed to defeat for the Nazis, it was clear that the danger had by no means passed. Indeed, for the family, the moment of maximum peril came in autumn 1943 when the Germans occupied the Riviera and, to prevent it from deserting the Axis, invaded Italy.

Going into hiding

Having acquired false identification papers forged by a former employee of La Maison, Edgar, his wife and daughters traveled by train from Cannes to Marseille and then onto Pau, close to the Pyrenees. “It was exciting to hold those false papers,” Ninette recalled. “I felt like a character in a book.”

Their escape highlights that, amid the betrayals and collaboration perpetrated by Vichy and its friends, there were also those who attempted to assist their fellow Jewish citizens. As the Germans searched for Edgar, the family’s neighbors in Cannes provided them with shelter.

Ninette Dreyfus photographed while her family was in hiding from the Nazis in Pau, southwestern France, in 1943 or 1944. (Courtesy of John Jay and Lady Swaythling and her family)

In Pau, Pierre Barthe, a horse breeder who knew the family, hid them in his villa while hatching the audacious plan that would see them safely guided across the mountains to Spain by Henri Delhiart, one of the Pyrénées’ great smugglers. The escape was hardly without incident. Barthe purloined an ambulance and had Ninette pose as a tuberculosis patient to speed their passage to the French spa town Cambo-les-Bains, where Delhiart took the reins. He chose a bar frequented by German border guards as their rendezvous point, correctly calculating, as Jay writes, that “the one place Germans would not suspect as a starting point for an evasion would be their own watering hole.” And Ninette remembered later hiding in a ditch from Germans troops who passed so close that she felt as if their dogs were breathing on her. Luckily, as Delhiart had planned, the wet night ensured the dogs couldn’t pick up her scent.

An undated photo of smuggler Henri Delhiart, who guided the Dreyfus family across the Pyrénées mountains from France into a safer Spain. (Courtesy of John Jay and Lady Swaythling and her family)

After reaching the safety of Spain, the family spent the final months of the war lodging at Madrid’s luxurious Palace Hotel, socializing with Anglophile monarchists and dodging the attentions of German spies and fascist sympathizers.

In April 1945, nearly five years after her departure, Ninette returned to Paris. But the occupation had shattered the family forever. As they slowly discovered, André and Maryse were murdered at Auschwitz in August 1943. With her possessions and property expropriated by the Nazis, Aunt Louise died alone in her attic room in Paris in May 1943, while, alongside 327 children, Aunt Alice was deported to Auschwitz four weeks before the city’s liberation.

     Return to Paris after the Allied armies recaptured it in 1945

Later in life, Ninette worked to ensure that those who had helped the family were recognized. Thanks to her efforts, in 1980 Yad Vashem declared Barthe and his wife Righteous Among the Nations.

But she would never shake the feeling that French Jews had been betrayed by their own.

“Her disdain for her countrymen was even greater than her abhorrence of German Nazis,” Jay writes. “The Germans were foreigners; the French were her people, yet they had turned their backs on her and worse during the years in which she came of age.”


https://www.timesofisrael.com/nazi-era-teen-girls-diary-charts-unraveling-of-france-and-her-prominent-jewish-family/


Erasing History


A year without antisemitism, a Holocaust Day without Jews

It is beginning to look as though Jews are being erased from history


Antisemitism erased:

Earlier this month, a number of major media outlets published their annual “year in photos" feature.

Time magazine presented 100 photographs about the year 2025. The New York Times featured 97. ABC-News published a similar story, using 45 photos.

The idea was to summarize the most important events of 2025-wars, political upheavals, athletic milestones, natural disasters.

Apparently, the editors at all three agencies agreed that antisemitism was not very important, even though this past year saw a record number of antisemitic incidents around the world. Not only swastika daubings and cemetery desecrations, but numerous murders and attempted murders.

Antisemites gunned down two attendees at a Jewish Museum event in Washington, DC; set Jews on fire in Boulder, Colorado; ran over and stabbed worshippers at a British synagogue on Yom Kippur; attempted to burn to death the governor of Pennsylvania and his family on Passover; and massacred fifteen Jews on a beach in Australia.

Neither Time nor ABC-News thought any of those developments was sufficiently important to be part of their photo spreads.

The New York Times was only slightly better. It did include one photo of a memorial at the site in Australia where Jews were massacred. The caption, however, did not include the words “Jews" or “antisemitic."

Yes, that was implied-the Times noted that the victims were “there to celebrate Hanukkah" and the attackers were “gunmen motivated by Islamic State ideology." But why not just say outright that the victims were Jews and the perpetrators were antisemitic terrorists?

It gets worse. Time, the New York Times and ABC all included multiple scenes of destruction in Gaza. Yet none of them showed the terrorists in Gaza who were embedded in the damaged residential areas.

Nor did they show the antisemitic rallies on college campuses and elsewhere, in which participants openly called for the mass murder of millions of Israeli Jews, and celebrated the antisemitic slaughter perpetrated by Hamas on October 7.

The New York Times did not ignore the campus turmoil entirely, however. Its “Year in Photos" included a sympathetic photo of a Columbia University alumna, dressed in cap and gown, in handcuffs. She was “arrested during pro-Palestinian demonstrations," the caption explained.

In reality, of course, she was not arrested for being “pro-Palestinian" (as if cheering for the murderous fascist Hamas regime is “pro-Palestinian"). Those who were arrested were setting documents on fire--an obvious public hazard--and engaging in other disruptions.

The Times also printed a touching photo of Mahmoud Khalil with his wife and newborn son, after he was, as the Times put it, “detained for his role in protests" at Columbia. There was no mention that Khalil and his comrades were “protesting" in support of antisemitic mass murderers and gang-rapists. Apparently that information was not fit to print.

Part II of The Holocaust without Jews:

The BBC has apologized for omitting mention of Jews in its Holocaust Awareness Day coverage, as if its 1.1 billion viewers will notice that apology As Stephen Pollard, former ediitor of the UK's Jewish Chronicle, wrote in an artticle titled Why the BBC is one of the most dangerously antisemitic organisations in the West:

"The sheer audacity of its blatant, calculated, deliberate decision to make its own contribution to wiping Jewish suffering from history - one of the foundations of the contemporary revival in Jew hate - yesterday’s BBC reporting of Holocaust Memorial Day surely tops everything.

"As the Campaign for Media Standards highlighted with clips on social media, much of the BBC’s coverage omitted any mention of Jews from the Holocaust. Both the BBC1 breakfast programme and the news bulletins on the Radio 4 Today programme referred to 'six million people' being murdered - a formulation then repeated throughout the day, which was clearly a deliberately constructed form of words to be used to reference the Holocaust.

It seems that, unless they can be falsely vilified as they are in coverage of the war in the Gaza Strip, Jews are being erased from history.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/421642

The emergence of Holocaust erasure

The world is missing the key point-that it was a uniquely monstrous crime aimed specifically at the extermination of the Jewish people


International Holocaust Memorial Day has become a spur to write the Jews out of their own history.

The United Nations chose Jan. 27-the date of the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration/death camp-to commemorate the Holocaust, the term that developed specifically to describe the Nazi genocide of the Jews.

Yet the message the United Nations posted on X on Tuesday omitted any mention of the Jews. It said: “The genocide started with apathy & silence in the face of injustice, and with the corrosive dehumanization of the other. Today and always, we need to remember this. And we must stand up for our shared humanity."

The post was quoting from a statement issued by the U.N.’s High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, who also said that “a group of deluded killers inflicted unspeakable atrocities on millions of Jews and members of other minorities."

As reflected in the U.N.’s abbreviated version of this statement on X, Türk universalized the Holocaust and thus blurred its real significance. But at least he mentioned the Jews. Others, shockingly, did not.

Throughout the day, the BBC’s news bulletins and presenters made no reference at all to the Jews murdered in the Holocaust. Instead, they referred to the “6 million people murdered by the Nazi regime."

But the Nazis murdered many more people than that. Six million was the specific number of Jews who were exterminated, larger than any other group that suffered.

Later on Tuesday, after a storm of criticism, the BBC apologized for failing to mention the Jewish victims. But just think about the implications of that omission.

The BBC had in its collective head the universally known figure of 6 million, but nevertheless erased their Jewish identity. That isn’t just a careless mistake. It suggests something pathological and very dark indeed is at work in the BBC psyche.

And so, another baleful milestone has been reached. We’ve previously seen antisemitism and gaslighting of the Jews through Holocaust revisionism and Holocaust denial. Now we are seeing the erasure of the Jews themselves from the Holocaust, and therefore from both their own history and their presence in that episode in the history of the world.

That world clearly hasn’t learned [or is purposely ignoring] the key point about the Holocaust-that it was a uniquely monstrous crime aimed specifically at the extermination of the Jewish people. Instead, the world learned something very different-that it demonstrated man’s general inhumanity to man.

Of course, many others perished in the Holocaust. But the driving force of the Holocaust was the Nazis’ obsessional and deranged intention to eradicate the Jewish people alone from the face of the earth. To that terrible end, it established an industrialized system of mass murder for the Jews.

It did not do that for any other people. The Final Solution was intended for the Jews alone. That’s what made the Holocaust of the Jews unique.

Yet those who established Holocaust education and memorialization have increasingly blurred this essential message, choosing instead to universalize it and thus obscure the singular victimization of the Jews.

The resulting message from much of this memorialization has been that anyone can be a Nazi. It was but a short step from there-for those intent upon exterminating the collective Jew in the State of Israel-to start calling Israelis “Nazis," and to accuse Israel of perpetrating a “holocaust" or “genocide" of the Palestinian Arabs.

Mass murder is an evil wherever it takes place. The murder of tens of thousands of Iranians who have been rising up against their tyrannical regime is unconscionable.

But it’s not genocide, the deliberate and systematic destruction of a people because of their ethnicity, nationality, religion or race. That’s what the Iranian regime threatens against the Jews.

The modern world, however, does not accept that this is a distinction of any value. With moral responsibility and duty having been trumped by individual rights, dominant Western secular thinking has erased the significance of intention altogether, focusing instead on consequences.

One reason why Westerners argue so preposterously that Israel’s war of self-defense against genocide is itself genocide is that they’ve redefined the word as meaning merely “a lot of people who’ve been killed"-and necessarily of the kind of whom they approve or, at least, don’t disapprove, as with the Palestinian Arabs.

This has fed into the madness about Gaza, in which the serial lies about Israeli starvation, war crimes and the wanton killing of the innocent have become established as incontrovertible facts even though they are demonstrably the very opposite of the truth.

This madness has been further fueled by an unholy alliance between intersectional identity politics, liberal universalism, Islamist holy war and lightly buried Christian theological Jew-hatred.

In Britain, the number of schools commemorating International Holocaust Memorial Day has more than halved since Oct. 7 in the face of opposition from parents and pupils-many of these Muslims, but non-Muslims, too.

And it’s the madness over Gaza that not only ensured the Jews would be wiped out of statements made on this day, but has actually turned the Holocaust against them by accusing them of perpetrating a “holocaust" of the Palestinian Arabs.

In British Columbia, Canada, parliamentarian Yuen Pau Woo posted on X: “On this International Holocaust Remembrance Day, let us pledge that ‘never again’ means ‘never again,’ even when Israel is the perpetrator #Gaza."

In Britain, Dov Forman, the grandson of a Holocaust survivor, found himself asked on BBC Radio’s flagship “Today" show what he’d say to the argument that, if we continue to talk about the Holocaust, “we need to talk about Gaza." The interviewer went on: “What is the universal message you want to be heard on this Holocaust Memorial Day?"

Bad enough that this morally degraded equation puts the genocide of the Jews on the same level as Israel’s attempt to prevent another genocide of the Jews. Worse, Gaza is being used to wipe out the particularity to the Jews of the Final Solution.

Underlying all this erasure is the unmistakable, if incredible, belief that the Jews have no right to their claim of victimhood-because their tormentors view the memory of the Holocaust as a moral bludgeon that the Jews wield to gain special privileges, such as avoiding “legitimate criticism" over the “crimes" of Israel.

Accepting that the Jews are the world’s greatest and most enduring historic victims gets in the way of the only permitted narratives.

-Arab Palestinianism erases the Jews from their own history in their ancestral homeland. -Universalism erases them from their history as victims in Europe. ------Anti-Zionism, which separates the Jewish people from the land that’s central to their ancient faith, erases Judaism altogether.

Erasing Jewish victimization is part of a global agenda by such people to erase the Jews-from their mind, from their conscience and from their world.

They won’t succeed. The Jewish Diaspora will need to change in the face of this onslaught, but Israel will emerge stronger than ever.

The more the West tries to erase the Jews, the clearer its suicide note becomes for the erasure of its own civilization.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/421689


Friday, 30 January 2026

Pakistani Muslim Rams Brooklyn Synagogue 4 times


Pakistani Man Rams Car Into Large Brooklyn Synagogue


   I wonder what his motive might have been.

A motorist rammed his car at least four times into a rear entrance of the global headquarters of the Chabad-Lubavitch Orthodox Jewish movement in Brooklyn Wednesday night, according to the police and video of the crash.

The car is registered to Dan Sohail, 36, of Carteret, N.J., an internal police document showed.

The episode unfolded at 8:45 p.m. at the Gothic revival structure at 770 Eastern Parkway in Crown Heights. Video taken at the scene shows a gray Honda sedan, with a cargo carrier on the roof and New Jersey plates, at the bottom of a driveway. The car slams into a set of wooden doors, one of which splinters and flies from its hinges. As people look on, yelling “Yo! Yo!” and “No!,” the car backs up and hits the doors again, breaking off another door, and again and again.

As onlookers cautiously approach the car, the driver, a heavyset man with a beard, wearing shorts despite the temperature of 16 degrees, gets out and starts walking up the driveway. He agitatedly explains to a bystander, “It slipped.” Two officers walk up to him and handcuff him behind his back. He does not resist. He appears to spit at the crowd as the officers lead him toward a police vehicle.

The 770 synagogue in Brooklyn is the headquarters of the Chabad Chassidic Jewish movement and the apparent attack was timed for a key commemoration for the movement.

Sohail is a Pakistani name. A search of public records turns up a Muslim family in New Jersey.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/pakistani-man-rams-car-into-large-brooklyn-synagogue/


     Perp ramming his car into the doors


     Insane Muslim perp

     Cleaning up the mess afterwards


     Front of building



Thursday, 29 January 2026

History's Worst Slavers Demand Reparations


History’s Worst Slavers Now Demand Reparations


On December 24, 2025, Algeria’s parliament unanimously passed a law declaring France’s 132-year colonization of the North African nation a crime. The Algerians are further demanding a formal apology and reparations from France. Interestingly, this new law also stipulates prison sentences for any Algerian who speaks well of French colonialism, or makes any “remarks with colonial connotations.”

This is a clear example of selective outrage. Yes, France colonized Algeria for over a century. But it also brought to that what it did not have before—functional governance, infrastructure, technology, medicine, and, in a word, progress. (Hence why this new law criminalizes speaking well of the colonial era—as many, especially older, Algerians still do.

Moreover, France did give its former colony priority in migration, allowing millions of Algerians to relocate to France for a better life, as a form of compensation or reparations.

On the other hand, what has Algeria done to atone for the centuries of crimes it committed against the Europeans, including the French?

For over three hundred years, from around the 16th to the early 19th century, the Muslims of North Africa—also known as “Barbary,” that is, land of the barbarians—thrived on enslaving Europeans. According to the conservative estimate of American professor Robert Davis, “between 1530 and 1780 there were almost certainly a million and quite possibly as many as a million and a quarter white, European Christians enslaved by the Muslims of the Barbary Coast.”

Virtually no part of coastal Europe was safe from these Muslim pirates. From 1627 to 1633, Lundy, an island off the west coast of Britain, was actually occupied by them. From it, they pillaged England at will. In 1627 they raided Denmark and even far-off Iceland, hauling a total of some 800 slaves.

In 1631, the fishing village of Baltimore in Ireland was raided, and, according to an early source, “237 persons, men, women, and children, even those in the cradle” were seized and taken to the miserable slave markets of North Africa—the most notorious and largest of which was centered in, irony of all ironies, Algeria.

Then there were the sadistic torments Christian captives were subjected to: many were forced into hard labor in quarries, with barely any food or water. Others were rowers on Ottoman galleys, chained for hours, beaten by their overseers, and worked to death.

Women and girls were sold into concubinage, enduring sexual abuse—as did not a few boys and even men. With countless European women selling for the price of an onion, little wonder by the late 1700s, European observers noted how “the inhabitants of Algiers have a rather white complexion.”

Punishments for those who resisted or in any way spoke negatively of Islam, Muslims, and especially Muhammad, beggared description and included being “impaled alive” and “roasted alive.” Other European slaves were “thrown from the city walls, and caught upon large sharp hooks, on which they hang till they expire.”

After a Muslim man tried to engage in homosexual relations with his young male European slave, and the latter, outraged, killed him, the hapless Christian was, to quote an eyewitness source,

dragged to the place of execution over the rough and pointed stones, subjected to the insults of an excited and brutal crowd. On his arrival there each of the spectators seemed to take a pleasure in assisting at the work. He was crucified against the wall with four large nails; a red-hot iron was thrust through his cheeks to prevent him from speaking, and, in this condition, he was slowly burnt to death with firebrands. Such acts of cruelty were by no means uncommon.

Nor was America spared. In 1785, Muslim pirates from Algiers captured two American vessels. Considering the horrific ways Christian slaves were treated in Barbary —tortured, pressured to convert, and sodomized, as described in the writings I’ve been quoting from missionaries and redeemers (such as John Foxe, Fr. Dan, Fr. Jerome Maurand, Robert Playfair; see pp. 279-283 of my book, Sword and Scimitar) — when Captain O’Brian later wrote to Thomas Jefferson that “our sufferings are beyond our expression or your conception,” he was not exaggerating.

As ambassadors to France and England, Jefferson and John Adams met with one of Barbary’s envoys to Britain, one Abdul Rahman. In a March 28, 1786 letter to Congress, Jefferson explained the source of Barbary hostility:

We took the liberty to make some inquiries concerning the grounds of their pretentions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury, and observed that we considered all mankind as our friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation. The ambassador answered us that it was founded on the laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Musselman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.

And yet, here is Algeria today, lecturing Western people about morality, branding France a “criminal” colonizer, and demanding “reparations”—because France colonized, that is, civilized Algeria, including by forcing it to stop subsisting on slavery.

The irony is staggering, indeed: it’s not just that Muslims in general had a long history of enslaving Europeans, but that Algeria was arguably the worst of all these Muslim slavers of Europeans.

At any given time for three centuries, Algiers held tens of thousands of European slaves. Entire coastal regions of France, Italy, and Spain were repeatedly raided, leaving devastation in their wake. European captives endured unspeakable horrors: torture, forced labor, sexual abuse, starvation, and death.

Incidentally, there’s another great irony here: France’s entire rationale for invading Algeria in the first place was precisely to put an end to its Muslim slave market, which had for centuries preyed on Europeans.

At any rate, and when it comes to reparations, whatever one thinks of France’s colonial history in Algeria, it has, at least, and as mentioned, privileged its former colony by allowing millions of Algerians to move to and pursue a better life in France.

Meanwhile, what has Algeria done to atone for the millions of Christians it enslaved, tortured, and killed? Nothing. Not a word of apology. Not a single dinar in reparations. Not even acknowledgment in its schoolbooks.

Before closing, and speaking of reparations, between 1795 and1800, the United States was forced to spend 16 percent of its entire annual federal budget on ransom payments to Algiers, in order to release some American sailors and buy a few years of peace, before Algiers became more demanding again, and the First Barbary War broke out.

So by Algeria’s own logic, shouldn’t it be making reparation payments to the U.S.?

In short, Algeria has just exposed itself, in front of the whole world, as a shameless hypocrite.

https://www.raymondibrahim.com/01/16/2026/history-s-worst-slavers-now-demand-reparations