Saturday 14 September 2019

Bone Stock - Chicken (with tips for Beef and Pork)

Bone Stock - Chicken (with tips for Beef and Pork)

This recipe requires a six-quart crock pot. Don't try this on your stove unless you have a large, heavy stock pot AND a heat diffuser. If you do, you'll have to stir more often.

Also, this is a BASE stock. You'll note I add no aromatic vegetables, salt, pepper or herbs -- especially no salt. Remember, this will concentrate the flavors, and if you plan to use this as the base for an au jus or a reduction, you'll be increasing the salt concentration as well.

However, if this is for soups, stews, gravy or noodles, and you want to add flavor, remember to add any fresh herbs only in the last hour of simmering. Although, you're better off just doing that in the next recipe you make with this stock.

I use Kitchen Basics Low-sodium Stock instead of water because it really boosts the overall flavor. It does have seasonings in it, but not enough to interfere with the flavor or ramp up the sodium level. Also, since it's a stock and not a broth, you get more gelatin from the get-go.

This is a BONE stock, which means this is high in calcium as well as a lot of lovely, unctuous gelatin. Far more nutritional, and it tastes wonderful.

Note: this recipe/process also works for other bone stocks. I use roasted neck bones and low-sodium beef broth for the beef, or filtered water (because nobody does pork broth) and roasted pork neck bones for the pork stock. However, if you're making chicken stock do NOT use neck bones. It just doesn't give the right flavor and you don't get the gelatin levels (meaning it won't "set"). Backs are best, plus, you get a lot of schmaltz.

Recipe

Chicken:
4 lbs. Chicken Backs
4 qt. Low-sodium Chicken Stock (Kitchen Basics) or Filtered Water

Beef:
4 lbs. Beef Neck Bones
4 qt. Low-Sodium Beef Stock (Kitchen Basics) or Filtered Water

Pork:
4 lbs. Pork Neck Bones (unsmoked)
4 qt. Filtered Water

Instructions

Preheat oven to 425°. Spray large, deep roasting pan with Pam, place bones in the pan and then spray them as well. Place in oven, check after 30 minutes, flip bones in pan, continue roasting another 10-15 or until bones are thoroughly caramelized.

While backs are roasting, place crock pot on a large tray (for spillover issues), turn on high. Preheat the boxed broth or water a quart at a time in the microwave (doesn't have to be boiling, just hot) then add to the pot. Hold back a cup or so for pan scraping (next).

Place roasted bones in the crock pot. Using a hard plastic or wooden spoon, scrape off the fond from the pan with the reserved fluid, and pour ALL the drippings and nummy brown bits into the crock pot.

Let simmer AT LEAST 18 HOURS! Do not bother stirring the pot for at least 8 hours. When you do, make sure nothing is "stuck" to the bottom or sides. You'll probably only stir the pot three times max for the whole process.

When done, turn off crock pot, remove lid, and allow to cool for at least an hour. Then use a slotted spoon or spider to remove most of the bones. Do not forget to run a spatula along the rim/top of the crock pot, so you can get the fond from there (really makes a difference to the flavor, don't skip this step). Squeeze out any additional liquid from the bones/skin/meat you skimmed out, and add it back to the pot.

When the stock is cooled enough, strain stock into a separate pot. I like to use two lengths of cheesecloth, overlapped, and placed between two fine metal strainers (the first catches the larger bone bits, the second with the cloth filters out the fine materials). Cover and refrigerate overnight.

Next day, take the stock from the fridge, scrape off the fat and save separately (chicken fat/schmaltz is wonderful stuff for hash browns or roasted potatoes). Separate stock into one pint containers, freeze. Will last 4 months frozen that way, or 12 months if you vacuum-store the stock after freezing.

Warning: Try to avoid using your kitchen extractor fan while making Chicken Stock, otherwise you will end up the next morning with several Jewish Grandmothers milling about on your lawn in a state of confusion and envy...

🍔🍟☕ Please recommend this page and be sure to follow TCW

https://disqus.com/home/forum/the-coconut-whisperer/

Global central banks are in a rate-cutting frenzy. Here are the 7 other meetings coming up this month, and what's expected at each.

Carmen Reinicke, Sep. 12, 2019

https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/global-central-bank-september-meeting-schedule-rate-expectations-7-countries-2019-9-1028521610

AP/Mark Lennihan

The European Central Bank announced rate cuts and stimulus for the eurozone on Thursday.
Turkey and Denmark also slashed rates on the same day.
Seven more major central banks including the Federal Reserve will meet in September, meaning more rate cuts are on the table.
Read more on Markets Insider.

On Thursday, the European Central Bank announced a round of stimulus for the eurozone that included both a rate cut and quantitative easing.

Interest rates were slashed 10 basis points to -0.5%, the lowest level ever and the bank said it will begin purchasing 20 billion euros of bonds a month starting in November to inject money back into the economy.

It's the first time the ECB has changed the deposit rate since 2016, a bold cut for outgoing president Mario Draghi, who will be replaced by Christine Lagarde - the former International Monetary Fund Chairman - on November 1. The move is the latest in a trend of central banks lowering rates to boost local economies.

In addition, smaller banks have also handed down rate cuts. Turkey's central bank also surprised with a jumbo rate cut early Thursday before saying that it will begin to slow its pace of monetary easing going forward. Later in the day, Denmark also cut its interest rate to a historical low, following in the ECB's footsteps, Bloomberg reported.

Read more: 'Being boiled like frogs': A Wall Street investment chief unloads on how the Fed's behavior is actually hurting the middle class it's supposed to be helping

However, not every central bank has handed down a rate cut this month. Earlier in September, Australia's central bank held interest rates at a low 1%, and Canada's held its rates at 1.75%.

But going forward, there are likely more cuts from major central banks on the horizon. After the ECB decision, all eyes are on the Federal Reserve, which meets September 18. Most investors think that the Fed will cut rates, but it remains to be seen by how much. President Trump has stepped up his bashing of the Fed and Chairman Jerome Powell, saying they should cut faster.

Trump has even gone as far to say that the US should have zero or negative interest rates, following in the footsteps of countries in Europe and Japan that have had very low and even negative rates for years.

Here are the seven central banks that have yet to meet in September, as well as what markets and investors expect them to do at upcoming meetings:

more ....

Recommend this post and follow TCW

Recipes: Roasted Garlic Potatoes

Roasted Garlic Potatoes

Easiest garlicky roasted potatoes!

by AnitaCooks, Mar 10, 2018, https://anitacooks.com/reci...

Course Breakfast, Dinner, Lunch, Cuisine American
Prep Time 10 minutes, Cook Time 50 minutes, Servings 4

INGREDIENTS
4 Potatoes
1 Head garlic
1 tsp Coarse Salt
1 tsp Ground Black Pepper
1 tbsps olive oil
2 tbsps Butter
2 tbsps parsley

INSTRUCTIONS
Heat your oven to 425 degrees Fahrenheit or 218 degrees Celsius

Peel potatoes and cut into wedges. Toss the potatoes with 1 tsp ground black pepper, 1 tsp salt and 1 tablespoon olive oil. Put the potatoes on a baking sheet in a single layer.

Cut off the top of 1 head of garlic and place in a piece of foil. Drizzle a little olive oil on top and rub all over. Cover it up and put it on the same baking sheet.

Roast the potatoes for 25 minutes and turn over the pieces. Roast another 20-25 minutes or until golden brown.

Open the foil packet and look at that garlic, it’s soft and a beautiful amber color. Squeeze out the garlic cloves into a bowl. Remove any of the peel that may have fallen in. Mash the soft garlic into a paste.

Melt 2 tablespoons butter in a saucepan. Add the mashed garlic and stir into the butter. Add 2 tbsps chopped parsley and stir.

Spoon the garlic sauce over the potatoes and toss to coat evenly.

For more instructions watch the video:

🍔🍟☕ Please recommend this page and be sure to follow TCW

https://disqus.com/home/forum/the-coconut-whisperer/

Crime: Homicides in SF Bay Area out of control

Former NFL player Terrell Roberts killed at grandmother's Richmond home

ASSOCIATED PRESS

September 12, 2019, 4:21PM

Updated 18 hours ago

RICHMOND, Calif. — Police say former NFL defensive back Terrell Roberts was shot and killed while visiting his grandmother's home in a San Francisco Bay Area suburb.

Richmond Police spokesman Sgt. Enrik Melgoza says Roberts, who played two seasons with the Cincinnati Bengals, died in the backyard of a gunshot wound to his chest Wednesday after an altercation. Police were called to the home around 4:10 p.m.

The Mercury News of San Jose reports that police say the relationship between the men is not clear, but it was not a random incident.

The 38-year-old graduate of El Cerrito High School signed with the Bengals in 2003 after going undrafted out of Oregon State. He played 23 games over two seasons, starting once and intercepting a pass.

The Bengals released him in 2005.

Former NFL player Terrell Roberts killed in Richmond

El Cerrito High grad died after altercation at grandmother’s home

CLICK HERE if you are having a problem viewing the photos or video on a mobile device

RICHMOND — A former NFL defensive back and El Cerrito High School sports star was shot and killed at this grandmother’s home Wednesday, police said.

Terrell Roberts, 38, who played two seasons for the Cincinnati Bengals, died in the backyard with a gunshot wound in his chest, Richmond police spokesman Sgt. Enrik Melgoza said. Officers were called to the home in the 1200 block of Fascination Circle around 4:10 p.m., he said.

Police did not identify a suspect, but Melgoza said Roberts and his killer had an altercation in front of the garage.

“The relationship between the suspect and Mr. Roberts is still unclear at this time,” Melgoza said. “The home belongs to his grandmother. Lots of family members live there. This was not something that was random.”

Police said the suspect was a black male, approximately 20-35 years old, bald with a short beard and weighs about 250 pounds. He wore a black shirt, police said.

Roberts signed with the Bengals in 2003 after going undrafted out of Oregon State. He played 23 games over two seasons, starting once and intercepting a pass.

The Bengals released him in 2005.

Before that, Roberts was a star for the Gauchos, playing cornerback and running back and emerging as one of the top high school defensive talents on the West Coast.

“He was an outstanding talent, and he wasn’t a selfish player,” former longtime El Cerrito coach Frank Milo, 78, said Thursday. “He always worked hard for what he achieved. I can recall when he was a sophomore, I brought him up to varsity about halfway through the season, and he started at cornerback that year. The next two years, he was just tremendous. He started both ways and never came off the field. He also returned punts and kickoffs on special teams.”

Roberts’ family told news station KPIX that her had a “heart of gold” and was “not mixed up in anything bad.” This paper was unable to reach the Roberts family on Thursday.

“He was just a really good kid,” Milo said. “He made an effort in the classroom and made sure he was always eligible. I remember spring of his junior year he spent Saturday mornings at Cal taking a class to prepare for the SAT. He was top-notch on the field, and top-notch off the field. I really loved the guy.”

What Are Boris Johnson’s Options?

national review

What Are Boris Johnson’s Options?

Richard M. Reinsch IISeptember 13, 2019 6:30 AM

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson outside Downing Street in London, England, September 5, 2019. (Simon Dawson/Reuters)

His hands are tied by Parliament, but perhaps not completely.

A coalition of Labour, Liberal Democratic, and Conservative rebels voted last week to force U.K. prime minister Boris Johnson to extend the deadline for the British exit from the European Union from October 31 to Jan. 31, 2020. As an alternative, the bill stipulates that the prime minister must accept whatever other exit date the European Union’s representatives propose and the House of Commons accepts. Johnson responded by removing from the Conservative party the 21 Tory rebels who voted for the so-called Benn-Burt bill, including luminaries such as Kenneth Clarke, the longest-serving member of Parliament, and Nicholas Soames, grandson of Winston Churchill. Jo Johnson, the prime minister’s brother, preemptively resigned, and now Amber Rudd has resigned as a member of Johnson’s cabinet. Johnson also called for a general election under the norm that defeat of a key measure of the government triggers a call for new political leadership. He was refused by Parliament, which under the 2011 Fixed-term Parliaments Act must provide a two-thirds assent to such a plea. The prime minister has lost his majority and sits atop a nearly impotent government. Johnson has vowed that he will not follow Parliament’s order to delay Brexit, opining that he would rather be “dead in a ditch” than agree to an extension with the EU. What are his options, though?

Johnson seems short on choices to achieve Brexit. Perhaps the best way out is to resign, compel the opposition to install Jeremy Corbyn, its most likely leader, and call for elections. The shambolic Johnson would frame the election as “Parliament vs. the People,” whose vote in 2016 for an exit from the European Union is perpetually frustrated by Parliament. Current polls indicate that the Conservatives would win that election, and, with that victory, likely acquire a majority strong enough to finally exit the European Union, come what may. There are many “ifs” in that option. Red Corbyn would likely enter No. 10, carrying with him all the collectivist baggage of Labour parties past. What if the Conservatives lose the next election, Corbyn grows stronger, and the screws get turned into the U.K. economy?

The best option is for Johnson to defy the Benn-Burt bill itself by refusing its demands to obtain extension for Britain’s EU exit. The possibility of following such a course has predictably drawn the widest criticisms from members of Parliament. David Lidington, who was deputy prime minister in Theresa May’s government, remarked that “it is a fundamental principle that we are governed by the rule of law that I hope no party would question it.” An anonymous cabinet minister stated, “As a government we abide by the rule of law, or you don’t stay in office.” Sir Ken MacDonald, a Liberal Democratic MP and former prosecutor, noted that Johnson could be jailed if he refused to heed the Benn-Burt legislation. This crew, though, should be careful what they wish for. They are members of the same body that refuses to provide any means for an effectual withdrawal of Britain from the EU, the instructions they were given by the people in the Brexit vote and which everyone understood during the Remain/Leave campaign were to be conclusive on this matter. It is a bit rich.

What Johnson has understood from the moment he stepped into No. 10 Downing Street, unlike his predecessor, Theresa May, is that movement and pressure from his office are required to achieve Britain’s reclaiming of its sovereignty. He has acted as an executive leader, fully accountable and fully energized, taking the fight to his domestic opponents and his foreign enemies. To Brussels he has given every indication of a so-called “No-deal Brexit.” Such a path will inflict short-term pain on the U.K., but it will also inflict pain on its trading partners in the EU. Thus, Brussels knows that with Johnson, unlike with May, the unthinkable is now a distinct possibility: Is it time to make a better deal with the U.K.? Benn-Burt aims to cripple Johnson on this point, taking his leverage off the table by foreclosing a No-deal Brexit, and giving the initiative back to Brussels, delaying (perhaps permanently) Britain’s exit.

To his domestic opposition, Johnson prorogued Parliament, shortening their hour of dissent. What he failed to contemplate was that his opponents would both pass a bill demanding an extension of EU membership and refuse new elections. They would rather impair government at will and refuse responsibility for the results. Such an opposition undermines its own seriousness.

Strangely, we might recall another founding moment, this one in America, where supporters of the status quo were content with paralysis and muddling through, forgetting the essential ends of government. Johnson’s opponents resemble the more recalcitrant of the Antifederalists in their resistance to the proposed Constitution of 1787 that was to replace the Articles of Confederation. There were many causes of disagreement, and the Antifederalists themselves were hardly a united voice, but one argument pressed was the clause in the Articles of Confederation that permitted its amendment only by a unanimous agreement by the member states. Proponents of the Constitution had not secured unanimous assent to amend the Articles, making it an illegitimate replacement of them. In short, those called the Federalists had allegedly violated the rule of law.

In response, the Federalists argued that the country stood in a popular-sovereignty moment. The people must decide what Constitution they would live under as determined by their representatives in state ratifying conventions. Such a moment was called for because the Articles failed to carry out the ends of government and could result, ultimately, in the continental union of republican governments splitting apart into numerous squabbling states. Other fears included property rights’ being usurped by majorities in the states. Shays’s Massachusetts rebellion would be merely a warm-up to societal anarchy, trade would break down amongst the states, and the final result and insult would be invitations from jealous states to various European partners to reenter the North American continent on their behalf and against their enemies. The dream of a republican union would be permanently hobbled before it could walk.

Think of Johnson’s opposition in light of the Benn-Burt bill, which shackles Johnson to surrender the fortunes of British sovereignty to EU grandees. The EU’s purpose the last three years has been to prepare Britain for a ritual sacrifice in front of EU members: See what happens if you try to leave Club EU; we will attempt to cripple your economy; intervene in your domestic politics — supporters of Benn-Burt reportedly collaborated with the EU on the legislation — refuse good-faith negotiations with you at every turn; and we are willing to cut our own noses off if it means we undermine your new existence.

What kind of an opposition contents itself with torpor, paralysis, and permanent infighting, and refuses to express the referendum of the people’s vote for an exit from the European Union? What kind of an opposition prevents its elected leader from using every power he holds to secure the best future for the sovereign nation he leads? What could be more essential to the ends of government than sovereignty: robust and full? Benn-Burt is the outcome of not only political imprudence and anti-democratic sentiment, but also, it would seem, of unconstitutional principles.

Supporting that last judgment is recent British constitutional analysis by Robert Craig, a lecturer in law at the London School of Economics, who argues that Benn-Burt violates “Queen’s Consent.” In ordering the prime minister to delay Britain’s exit, the bill intrudes on the prerogative powers of the Crown, executive powers exercised by the prime minister. There is nothing more essential to such powers than treaty-making and negotiation, the precise powers that have been unlawfully commandeered by Johnson’s opponents.

Johnson should assert this constitutional norm against his opponents. No government can lead a nation with its executive’s hands held behind its back by committee. The ancient constitutional wisdom knows this. What remains is for full vindication of British constitutionalism in the service of British sovereignty. Prime Minister Johnson stands at the edge of a new founding moment for the United Kingdom, one where it reclaims its powers of the earth. The British people voted in a referendum in 1975 to remain in the Common Market; they have now voted to leave. Parliament has squatted on this judgment. Johnson is fully within his powers to bring Britain out of the EU, as requested by a democratic vote. To achieve that will require violating Benn-Burt, but it is a law worth violating because it is not a law at all.

Friday 13 September 2019

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/13/uk/john-bercow-boris-johnson-brexit-intl-gbr/index.html

John Bercow vows to stop Johnson 'robbing a bank' with no-deal Brexit

London (CNN) — John Bercow, the outgoing Speaker of the UK House of Commons, has warned Prime Minister Boris Johnson against ignoring the law and implementing a no-deal Brexit on October 31, a move that he compared to "robbing a bank."

Bercow said he would allow Parliament to use "additional procedural creativity" to thwart any attempt to circumvent legislation.

His speech, at the annual Bingham lecture in London on Thursday, comes after a bill aimed at preventing a no-deal Brexit was made law Monday. Later that day, Parliament was suspended, or prorogued, for five weeks at Johnson's request.

But Johnson, who came to power on the promise that he would deliver Brexit by October 31, "do or die," has said he would rather be "dead in a ditch" than ask Europe for any delay. The new legislation compels him to do so if no deal is reached by October 19.

British politics is turning Trumpian because of Brexit

"One should no more refuse to request an extension of Article 50 because of what one might regard as the noble end of departing from the EU as soon as possible, than one could excuse robbing a bank on the basis that the cash stolen would be donated to a charitable cause immediately afterwards," Bercow said.

The Speaker announced on Monday that he will stand down by October 31 -- the day the UK is set to leave the European Union -- after a decade in the position.

Bercow said in his Thursday speech that it was "astonishing" that anyone entertained the idea of Johnson disobeying the law, as such a move "would be the most terrible example to set to the rest of society."

He said that if the government came close to ignoring the bill, Parliament "would want to cut off such a possibility and do so forcefully."

"If I have been remotely ambiguous so far, let me make myself crystal clear. The only form of Brexit that we have, whenever that might be, will be a Brexit that the House of Commons has explicitly endorsed," Bercow added.

He said that if "that demands additional procedural creativity in order to come to pass, it is a racing certainty that this will happen." Neither the "limitations of the existing rule book nor the ticking of the clock will stop it doing so," he continued.

'Sort it out, Boris'

Bercow's speech added to another tough week for the Prime Minister, who rejected accusations Thursday that he lied to the Queen over his controversial prorogation of Parliament in the run-up to the Brexit deadline.

Johnson has always insisted that his decision was a routine move that allowed the government to start a new parliamentary session with a fresh legislative agenda. Critics describe it as an audacious ploy to reduce the amount of time available to the opposition to block a no-deal Brexit.

But the Prime Minister has faced a string of setbacks since he announced his intention to prorogue Parliament.

He has lost his working majority in Parliament and failed to secure a new election. He also ousted rebellious Conservative lawmakers, including former Cabinet ministers and Winston Churchill's grandson, after they voted against him on the legislation passed on Monday.

On Friday, Johnson was heckled by a protestor while he spoke in Rotherham, northern England.

"Why are you not with them in Parliament sorting out the mess that you have created?" the man shouted.

"I'm very happy to get back to Parliament very soon," Johnson replied as he attempted to return to his speech.

"Sort it out, Boris. Why don't you sort it out, Boris? Why don't you sort it out?" the protestor yelled.

Boris Johnson says he didn't lie to the Queen over suspension of Parliament

On Wednesday, a Scottish court ruled that his government's advice to the Queen, which led to the five-week prorogation, was "unlawful."

According to the full ruling, released Thursday, one of the three judges said the suspension was motivated by the "improper purpose of stymying Parliament."

"There was, and is, no practical reason for a prorogation for what is, in modern times, an extraordinary length of time," Lord Carloway, Scotland's most senior judge, said.

The ruling paves the way for a showdown in the UK Supreme Court next week -- where judges will hear appeals on the Scottish case as well as an English challenge filed by prominent anti-Brexit campaigner Gina Miller.

Bercow added on Thursday that the chaos since the 2016 referendum vote to leave the EU has opened him to the idea that the UK may need a written constitution.

CNN's Samantha Tapfumaneyi contributed to this report.

EFE section- Skin-crawling discovery: 'body farm' scientists find corpses move

SEPTEMBER 13, 2019

https://phys.org/news/2019-09-skin-crawling-discovery-body-farm-scientists.html

Researcher Alyson Wilson studied the movements of a corpse over 17-months and found humans don't exactly rest in peace

An Australian scientist has proved that human bodies move around significantly for more than a year after death, in findings that could have implications for detectives and pathologists around the world.

After studying and photographing the movements of a corpse over 17-months, Alyson Wilson told AFP on Friday that she found humans don't exactly rest in peace.

In one case study, arms that began held close to the body ended up flung out to the side.

"We think the movements relate to the process of decomposition, as the body mummifies and the ligaments dry out," she said.

To carry out her unusual form of people watching, Wilson took the three-hour flight from Cairns to Sydney every month to check on the progress of a cadaver.

Her subject was one of seventy bodies stored at the Southern Hemisphere's only "body farm", which sits at a secret bushland location on the outskirts of Australia's largest city.

Officially known as the Australian Facility for Taphonomic Experimental Research (AFTER), the farm is carrying out pioneering research into post-mortem movement.

Wilson and her colleagues were trying to improve a commonly used system for estimating the time of death using time-lapse cameras and in the process found that human bodies actually move around significantly.

Alyson Wilson started her research project after a trip to Mexico to help classify Mayan-era skeletal remains

Her findings were recently published in the journal Forensic Science International: Synergy.

A better understanding of these movements and the rate of decomposition could be used by police to estimate time of death more accurately.

She hopes the knowledge could, for example, narrow down the number of missing persons that could be linked to an unidentified corpse.

A better understanding of post mortem movement could also help to reduce the incorrect cause of death or misinterpretation of a crime scene.

"They'll map a crime scene, they'll map the victim's body position, they'll map any physical evidence which is found, and they can understand the cause of death."

The CQ University criminology graduate says she started her unique project after a trip to Mexico to help classify Mayan-era skeletal remains.

"I was fascinated with death from a child and was always interested in how the body breaks down after death."

"I guess that comes about from being raised on a farm and seeing livestock die and watching that process," she said.

"Once I observed a movement in a previous study, I started researching and couldn't find anywhere in the world that looks at quantifying the movement, so I thought OK, I'm going to do this."

Recommend this post and follow TCW

Recipes: Cheese and Herb Omelette

Cheese and Herb Omelette

A rolled French omelette is a quick, creamy and moist egg dish. It starts out like scrambled eggs, but when the eggs start to set, the omelet is rolled over. It is better to make a rolled omelet in a small non-stick pan.

VideoCulinary.com - Recipes & Cooking Ideas, Published on Sep 13, 2014 https://videoculinary.com/r...

Ingredients
Eggs - 3
Parmesan cheese, grated – 15- 20 grams (½ oz.)
Fresh herbs (dill, parsley, tarragon, etc.) - a few sprigs
Scallion- 1 piece
Salt - ⅓ teaspoon
Butter or oil - 20 grams (2/3 oz)

Step by step: Cheese and Herb Omelette
Step1
Chop a few sprigs of fresh herbs. Use parsley, dill, chervil, tarragon or any other herbs you may have. Wash and thinly slice a scallion.

Step2
Break 3 eggs into a bowl. Add 1/3 teaspoon of salt. Use a whisk to blend the eggs into a smooth mixture.

Step3
Heat a pan over high heat. Add 20 grams of butter or oil. When hot, add the eggs into the pan. Use one hand to swirl the pan over the heat, and use the other hand to mix the eggs using a rubber spatula.

Step4
When the eggs are beginning to set, stop mixing and spread the omelet in the pan evenly. Garnish with the chopped fresh herbs and with about 20 grams of grated parmesan cheese.

Step5
Roll the omelet using the rubber spatula and then roll it onto the plate.

Step6

Serve with fresh vegetables and homemade bread, like brioche, ciabatta or Middle Eastern pita.

For more directions watch the video

🍔🍟☕ Please recommend this page and be sure to follow TCW

https://disqus.com/home/forum/the-coconut-whisperer/