SCOTUS strikes down NY gun law

 

Source: https://therightscoop.com/breaking-supreme-court-strikes-down-new-york-gun-law-says-it-violates-2nd-amendment/

The Supreme Court just ruled that the ridiculous concealed-carry requirements imposed by the state of New York, which resulted in the denial of concealed-carry licenses to gun owners for self defense outside the home, violates the 2nd Amendment.

The vote was 6-3 and the opinion of the court was written by Justice Thomas.

In short, “The court holds that New York’s “proper-cause” requirement to obtain a concealed-carry license violates the Constitution by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in public for self-defense.”

The dissenters were the activists on the court, of course: Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan.

You can read the full opinion here.

UPDATE: Here’s a few quotes from the opinion via Amy Howe at Scotusblog:

The New York “proper cause” requirement violates the Constitution, Thomas explains, because it only allows public-carry licenses when an applicant shows a special need for self-defense.

The court rejects the “two-part” approach used by the courts of appeals in Second Amendment cases. “In keeping with Heller,” Thomas writes, “we hold that when the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct.”

The government will have to show, Thomas says, that a gun regulation “is consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.”

This test, Thomas adds, “accords with how we protect other constitutional rights.”

The Thomas opinion indicates that it is “settled” that places like polling places and courthouses “were ‘sensitive places’ where arms carrying could be prohibited consistent with the Second Amendment.” And courts can analogize to similar sensitive places, he adds.

On the other hand, Thomas adds, “expanding the category of ‘sensitive places’ simply to all places of public congregation that are not isolated from law enforcement defines the category of ‘sensitive places” far too broadly.”

In this case, Thomas explains, nothing in the Second Amendment distinguishes between home and public “with respect to the right to keep and bear arms.”

“None of the historical limitations on the right to bear arms approach New York’s proper-cause requirement because none operated to prevent law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from carrying arms in public for that purpose.”

This is a great ruling for the people of New York, who will now be able to concealed-carry firearms to protect themselves in a state where lawlessness abounds.

Pro-Israel ‘Gun-Toting Grandma’ Takes On Rashida Tlaib

 By Pesach Benson, United With Israel

 Apr 6, 2022

 

  

“You cannot hate a group of people and expect to serve a community,” said Janice Winfrey, who is challenging Rashida Tlaib in upcoming elections.

 

Michigan Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib is facing a serious challenge for her House seat from a pro-Israel Democrat affectionately referred to as a “gun-toting Detroit grandma” in a recent feature by the New York Post.

Since declaring her candidacy for Michigan’s 13th congressional district in February, Democrat Janice Winfrey has raised an impressive $200,000. Detroit-area political consultants describe that as an impressive amount for six-weeks, suggesting the 62-year-old long-time Detroit City Clerk is a viable challenger to Tlaib.

The Democratic primary is scheduled for August 2.

In an interview with Jewish Insider (JI) published on Tuesday, Winfrey accused Tlaib of being “more interested in political gain than she is in serving our constituents.

Winfrey also stressed her opposition to the Boycott Divestment and Sanctions campaign against Israel.

“I don’t say [Israel is] a perfect country, but I do know it’s an important country to Americans. I do know that, without Israel, we’re much, much weaker and vulnerable,” Winfrey said. “So how can we not support Israel?”

“I don’t care what your dislike is with the Jewish people, you don’t just wipe out a whole country, a whole group of people — that’s never the answer,” she said.

Winfrey also voiced support for the two-solution without pressuring Israel to make concessions.

“We must have confidence in Israel’s ability to determine what is best for her own security and well-being,” Winfrey said.

“While I support the U.S. conducting Middle East peace talks, the United States should not infringe upon Israel’s sovereign right to pursue peace accords best aligned with her national interests. The United States has a role to facilitate in peace talks, but not dictate them.”

A position paper issued by Winfrey slammed BDS, the United Nations and the International Criminal Court for “efforts… intended to weaken and delegitimize the Jewish State,” saying they will “stop at nothing to compromise the shared Israeli-American values.”

Winfrey also challenged antisemitism in the Democratic party.

“You cannot hate a group of people and expect to serve a community or a nation or people period if you’re anti-anything,” she noted. “As an African American woman, it angers me to my soul that you hate another group of people just because [of who] they are… It grieves my soul and I will work against it, and I have always worked against it all my life.”

She also pointed to crime as a weakness for the Democrats, and for Tlaib in particular.

Crime “needs to be handled in a better way,” she said, adding that her neighborhood was locked down because of a shooting the same morning she spoke to JI.

Winfrey recently told the New York Post that her district has become so unsafe, she bought herself a .22 caliber pistol.

“I can’t go to the park by myself anymore and that is concerning to me,” she said. “I would like not to have to carry the gun. I don’t want the gun in my house. I have a 2-year old granddaughter. It’s locked in a safe in a closet on the top shelf. I don’t like it. We don’t believe in that, but I have to feel safe.”

Winfrey has served as Detroit City Clerk since 2005.

Tlaib, who amplifies the Palestinian narrative and has been repeatedly accused of antisemitism, is a member of The Squad, a group of Democrats, including Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who face accusations of anti-Israel and anti-Jewish bias.

Tlaib supports BDS and calls Israel an “apartheid” state. She and Omar were barred from entering Israel in 2019 over their support for BDS.

Tlaib also supports defunding police, saying policing is “inherently and intentionally racist.”

 

 

Throwback Thursday: Chocolate mousse

Light, airy, fluffy – these words are always associated with chocolate mousse. You do get denser versions, depending on whether you choose egg whites or cream to fold into the basic mousse. Either way, it’s all about the chocolate.eyondWords

Here’s a recipe you might want to make for Valentine’s Day. It uses cream, because I was seeking richness, and plenty of it. Lighter versions favour beaten egg whites, which will give you the airy, fluffy finish that is so sought-after in a chocolate mousse. But there’s a certain lightness to a creamy version too, as long as you remove it from the refrigerator for an hour or so before tucking in while gazing deeply into each other’s eyes, somewhat annoyingly for everyone else.

There is no exact picture of who invented chocolate mousse or exactly where and when, though the French artist Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec is often credited with having invented the recipe which came to be named Mousse au Chocolat. That recipe consisted of cocoa, beaten egg white and butter; today that would be seen as a cheat version, but is easy enough to achieve. Toulouse-Lautrec was a noted cook when he wasn’t hanging around brothels or deep into the bottle, or both, and he called his recipe mayonnaise de chocolat. The only thing mayonnaise and chocolate mousse really have in common is that they contain eggs, but the lack of oil in the latter mocks his choice of a title.

Wikipedia claims that it was the invention of the Swiss chef Charles Fazi who cooked for Louis XVI, the last king of France, who lived from August 1754 until his execution by guillotine in 1793. The French culinary author Joseph Menon, who lived in the latter half of the 18th century, is credited with having first described a version of the dish as a chocolate mousse in 1755. Given that Louis XVI was only born in August of the previous year, we must presume that it was not invented for the doomed prince. The Sydney Morning Herald described “Louis XV’s favourite chocolate drink as a mixture of melted chocolate, boiling water and beaten egg (white or yolk)”. But, didn’t they mean Louis XVI and, if they did, was he even one year old yet? Perhaps they were influenced by Alain Ducasse’s famous recipe for a Louis XV, a layered mousse cake served at his Monte Carlo restaurant.

A recipe for chocolate mousse appeared in print in 1820 in Cuisinier Royal by André Viard, which Wikipedia tells us helped to create the fame that has remained to this day.

Key, at the core, to a chocolate mousse are egg yolks and chocolate. It can exist without either egg whites or cream, though there are experts who would insist that without whipped egg whites, it’s just not light enough and consequently not a mousse. Some recipes include butter, many don’t. Some are enhanced with a liqueur or Cognac, while other aficionados regard any alcohol in a chocolate mousse as an imposter that spoils the essential chocolatiness of it. (I use a dash of brandy in my recipe and there’s no loss of chocolateness whatsoever.)

The word mousse means foam, so those who argue that it absolutely must contain egg whites do have a fair point. In Champagne, the “mousse” refers to the fine bubble and its quality; the finer, the tinier, the better the product. But mousse au chocolat is far from being the first edible mousse. Or foam, in French cuisine. Many mousses, some made of fruit and a host of them savoury, preceded its invention.

My recipe uses whipped cream, not egg whites, but if you like you can swop out the cup of cream for two egg whites, whipped until soft peak stage, and fold those in instead, at the same point. I do however like the texture that the combination of egg yolks and cream give. It’s super-rich, and isn’t that the other thing, apart from its light and airy quality, that a chocolate mousse deserves?

Ingredients

1 cup of cream, chilled

2 large egg yolks

1 ½ Tbsp sugar

1 tsp brandy

100 g 70% dark chocolate

100 g Lindt Intense (orange and almond) chocolate

Method

First make a chocolate custard. Heat ½ cup cream in a heavy saucepan but do not boil. Whisk the egg yolks, sugar and a pinch of salt in a bowl, and add the heated cream very slowly, while whisking briskly. Transfer this to a saucepan and simmer on a lowish heat, stirring constantly, until it thickens. It shouldn’t take long at all, 3 to 5 minutes. Pour the mixture through a fine sieve into a bowl and stir in the brandy.

Melt chocolate in a metal bowl over a pot of barely simmering water while stirring. Whisk the first mixture into the melted chocolate until well incorporated, then allow it to cool.

Whisk the remaining cream in a bowl until it forms stiff peaks. Whisk a quarter of this into the chocolate mixture, then fold in the rest. (Or do the same with egg whites.)

Spoon into glasses and chill, covered with cling film, for several hours. Remove from the fridge an hour before serving, to lighten the mousse a little. This quantity made two glasses, so multiply to suit your needs. DM/TGIFood

https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2022-02-10-throwback-thursday-chocolate-mousse/

How Objective Are Human Rights NGOs When it Comes to Israel?

19 minutes ago

Elizabeth Blade

In 2020, the Jewish state was hailed as the world's most condemned country. Much of that criticism stemmed from local human rights groups and international bodies but an analyst says the real abusers have been largely overlooked.

Israel is no stranger to criticism. In 2021 it was blasted for its operation Guardian of the Walls that kicked off in May following a barrage of rockets that were launched by Hamas militants.

Then it was criticised for the violence that broke out in cities following the confrontation in Gaza. And, more recently, it was rebuked for its ongoing settlement activity in the West Bank.

Some of this criticism stems from Israeli human rights organisations such as Breaking the Silence, B'Tselem, and Gisha. Much of it also comes from international bodies, including various United Nations bodies, Human Rights Watch (HRW), and Amnesty International.

The Roots of the Bias

Mitchell Bard, an American foreign policy analyst and author who specialises in US-Middle East policy, says this "bias" has been "consistent for many years now."

"There is a desire to fight for the underdogs and the Palestinians are seen as victims of a stronger neighbour," said the expert.

"[Also] there is an element of anti-Semitism [in these bodies] as Israel is singled out far more often than true human rights abusers," he added.

Both HRW and Amnesty International dedicate entire reports to the coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In 2019, it was reported that the head of Amnesty devoted 70 percent of his tweets to the "illegal" acts of the Jewish state.

But the problem does not stop there, believes Bard. Over the years international human rights organisations have also been slammed for a lack of independence.

Amnesty International, for example, has been accused of bias against non-western countries, including Israel.

The Human Rights Watch has been condemned for releasing reports that are based primarily on Palestinian eyewitnesses testimony. It has been accused of suspecting anyone wearing a uniform, of relying on poor research and receiving information from elements that are hostile to Israel, like the militants of Hamas or various Boycott, Sanctions, and Divestment groups.

Money Dictates Policies?

These groups' sources of income have also been questioned. NGO Monitor, an Israeli organisation that scrutinises the activities of such bodies, claims the funding of HRW has not been fully transparent.

Although the organisation doesn't accept any governmental funds, throughout the years it was revealed that it received a number of generous donations.

Some of those poured in from individual donors from Saudi Arabia and Qatar, both of which don't maintain diplomatic relations with Israel.

Marred Reputation

Those major investments have eventually borne fruit. In 2018, Israel became the most condemned country in the world at the UN General Assembly, with the international body passing at least 20 resolutions against the Jewish state.

Many resolutions on Israel and its treatment of the Palestinians have also been passed in 2019, and a year later the Jewish state obtained the status of the most condemned country in the world once again.

"[These organisations] are very damaging to Israel because their reports are accepted by the media without any questions so their views are parrotted and amplified. [And the practical meaning of this is] that Israel's detractors can always point to their conclusions as supposedly objective to validate their opinions," argued Bard.

Such was the case with the HRW's false comparison of Israel to apartheid, with its claims that the Jewish state carried legal obligations to provide 4.5 million Palestinians with vaccines, or with their coverage of the conflicts with Gaza, where the attacks of Hamas have been overlooked, whereas the retaliation of the IDF has been harshly criticised.

However, the future doesn't look promising for Israel, thinks the author, primarily because it cannot do much to change the situation: "Israel can disseminate the facts but they are not always reported in the media. Frequently, government statements are deemed to have less credibility than the supposedly objective NGOs. Israel can expose their biases but they have a halo effect of the false image of neutrality."

https://sputniknews.com/20211210/how-objective-are-human-rights-ngos-when-it-comes-to-israel--1091411503.html

Farm attack, family assaulted, dad hospitalised, vehicle lookout, Rawsonville

 

South Africa: Farm attack, family assaulted, dad hospitalised, vehicle lookout, Rawsonville

Oorgrens veiligheid

November 15, 2021

Farm attack, family assaulted, dad hospitalised, vehicle lookout, Rawsonville. Photo: Oorgrens Veiligheid

A farm attack took place on 14 November 2021, at 00:15, on a farm in Rawsonville near Worcester in the Western Cape province of South Africa. Three attackers, armed with a firearm, crowbar and knife, overpowered a family in their home.

The man was seriously assaulted and the wife and child were tied up with cable ties and locked in a room.

The attackers ransacked the home and fled in the victims vehicle, a silver Renault Sandero with registration CJ 34164.

The family was deeply traumatized and the man was hospitalised for injuries sustained.

All role players responded and a manhunt was launched.

There have been no arrests.

There is no other information available at this stage.

Read about more farm attacks here

Information supplied by Oorgrens veiligheid

South Africa Today – South Africa News

https://southafricatoday.net/south-africa-news/western-cape/farm-attack-family-assaulted-dad-hospitalised-vehicle-lookout-rawsonville/

Farm attack, 4 attackers severely beat farmer with knobkerries, Delmas

 

South Africa: Farm attack, 4 attackers severely beat farmer with knobkerries, Delmas

Oorgrens veiligheid

October 19, 2021

Farm attack, 4 attackers severely beat farmer with knobkerries, Delmas

A farm attack took place on 18 October 2021, at 18:40 on a farm between Leandra en Delmas in the Mpumalanga province of South Africa. A farmer, Joppie Victor was overpowered and assaulted by four attackers with knobkerries.

It is not clear at this stage what, if anything, was robbed during the attack.

After the assault the attackers fled the scene.

All role players responded but there were no arrests.

Joppie Victor was taken to a doctor for medical attention. SAPS Delmas is investigating the attack.

There is no other information available at this stage.

Read about more farm attacks here

Information supplied by Oorgrens veiligheid

South Africa Today – South Africa News

https://southafricatoday.net/south-africa-news/mpumalanga/farm-attack-4-attackers-severely-beat-farmer-with-knobkerries-delmas/

 

Election Officials Don’t Know What Happened to 15 Million Mail Ballots in 2020 Election

Real data -- from a federal agency.

Fri Sep 17, 2021 

J. Christian Adams

 

Share to Facebookhare to Twitterhttp://Share to More
Share to Print/

As any casual observer could tell, the 2020 election was a mess. Now we have real data—from a federal agency, no less—that proves it.

Based on data from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, an analysis by the Public Interest Legal Foundation shows almost 15 million mail ballots effectively disappeared after election officials gave them to the U.S. Postal Service to deliver to voters.  

Gone, like the Bermuda Triangle of the election.

Some of the mail ballots may have ended up on the floors of apartment complexes. Some were sent to deceased registrants. Some went to addresses where the registrant no longer lives. Some may have gone to vacant lots and businesses. Some, having never been requested by the voter, were never returned.

In 2020, we put the election in the hands of the people who regularly deliver you your neighbor’s mail.

The data also shows that an additional 1.1 million ballots were sent to the wrong addresses in 2020 – the U.S. Postal Service saying they were “undeliverable.” Think on that. One million ballots went to the wrong house or apartment.

This report proves that mass voting by mail leads to chaos, is ripe with opportunities to commit fraud, and disenfranchises voters.

What was the effect on the election outcome?  That depends on other unknowns.  What we do know is that massive numbers of lost ballots present enormous potential for abuse.  The fact of untracked, nearly 15 million ballots triggers an unavoidable cascade of serious, fundamental, deeply troubling questions. 

Such as, how many of those were voted by unintended recipients?  This can’t be known.  Another obvious question is, how many people failed to vote because their ballots went astray?  This too can’t be known.  Another question is why are the voter rolls so inaccurate that wrong addresses are so common? 

Places like Pennsylvania had to be sued to be forced into correcting them.  Another question is why do so many election officials not care?  

To put that 15 million figure in perspective, consider this in Pennsylvania 440,000 mail ballots went missing or were undeliverable in the 2020 election. President Biden won the state by only 81,000 votes.

Pennsylvania is not the only battleground state that lost more ballots than the difference between winning and losing its Electoral College votes.

In Wisconsin, 83,000 mail ballots went missing or were undeliverable. President Biden won the state by only 20,000 votes.

 In Georgia, 244,000 ballots went missing or were undeliverable. President Biden won the state by only 11,000 votes.

When states lose track of more ballots than the difference between winning and losing its Electoral College votes, that is a core system failure.  It means that a genuine accurate count is impossible. We just close our eyes and cross our fingers and hope the margins are big enough to not call into question the outcome of an election.

Mass mail balloting with inaccurate voter rolls leads to chaos. That is exactly what we saw in 2020.   

Many states have significant issues in their voter rolls including duplicate and deceased registrants. The Public Interest Legal Foundation’s 2020 analysis of voter rolls in 42 states found nearly 38,000 people registered twice and nearly 350,000 deceased voters who were still registered.  

Mail balloting also disenfranchises people. The left harps on disenfranchisement, but wholly ignores the role of mail balloting in disenfranchising voters. 

The new PILF report also shows an alarming number of mail ballot rejections. Sometimes the error is the lack of a signature or other mistakes made by legitimate voters; other times it is something less innocent. Regardless, in 2020, over 560,000 mail ballots were rejected, many, no doubt, cast by legitimate voters who were effectively disenfranchised. In California alone, nearly 93,000 mail ballots were rejected in 2020.

When people vote in person, they are less likely to be disenfranchised. Election officials can help catch mistakes at the ballot box such as a forgotten signature on a ballot.

Mass voting by mail is not the way to run an election. Voting in person is supervised and transparent. It stops disenfranchisement of legitimate voters and increases confidence that voting matters and elections are honest and accurate.

It is critical that we work to clean the voter rolls before the next election, implement much-needed reforms to fix existing vulnerabilities, and do not let mass mail balloting become the new norm for our elections.

J. Christian Adams is the president and general counsel for the Public Interest Legal Foundation and a former Justice Department Voting Section lawyer.  He is also a member of the United States Commission on Civil Rights.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/09/election-officials-dont-know-what-happened-15-j-christian-adams/

 

 South Africa: Zuma's bid to have his conviction rescinded crashes in ConCourt

Entertaining application would be permitting appellant to blow hot and cold – justice Khampepe

17 September 2021 - 11:32

Siviwe FekethaPOLITICAL REPORTER

Former president Jacob. File photo.
Image: Sandile Ndlovu

Former president Jacob Zuma’s last chance to have the ruling ordering his imprisonment rescinded was dealt a blow on Friday after the Constitutional Court dismissed his application.

Delivering the judgment, justice Sisi Khampepe said entertaining Zuma’s application would be equal to permitting him to “blow hot or cold”, as he had deliberately refused to participate in the litigation that resulted in him being jailed.

In June, the apex court sentenced Zuma to 15 months behind bars for contempt of court relating to its order that he complies with the directives of the Zondo commission what he was required to answer to allegations of state capture.

Zuma had refused to attend the commission as he accused its chairperson, acting chief justice Raymond Zondo, of bias and called for his recusal.

Zuma had also refused to participate in the court proceedings initiated by the commission before the apex court as he also accused judges of being politically biased against him.

With no prospects of appealing the conviction, Zuma challenged his conviction through a rescission application.

Rule 42 of the uniform rules of court states that a court may “rescind or vary an order or judgment erroneously sought or erroneously granted in the absence of any party affected thereby or an order or judgment granted as the result of a mistake common to the parties”.

Khampepe said the majority for the ConCourt justices had ruled that Zuma’s rescission application be dismissed with costs.

“It would fly in the face of the interest of justice for a party to be allowed to willfully refuse to participate in litigation and then expect the opportunity to reopen the case when it suits them. It is simply not in the interest of justice to tolerate this manner of litigious vacillation,” Kampepe said.

 Zuma’s legal counsel has argued that the ConCourt had violated his constitutional rights by not first affording him the chance to mitigate his sentence before it slapped him with direct imprisonment.

Zuma’s lawyer, advocate Dali Mpofu SC had told the apex court that it had exceeded the bounds of the Constitution by slapping him with direct imprisonment without a formal trial in lower courts where he would have had an opportunity to appeal.

Mpofu also pointed out that Zuma was very old and sick to be thrown into jail.

This was however refuted by the commission’s counsel, which argued that Zuma had squandered repeated opportunities to mitigate his sanction as he had chosen to abandon all court proceedings and instead to publicly attack the commission and the ConCourt.

The commission’s lawyer, advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi SC, counter argued that Zuma had known about his age and medical condition but that he had deliberately “reconciled himself with the possibility of imprisonment”.

Khampepe said there had been no new information brought by Zuma which warranted for the rescission of the judgment against him.

“Although there may be circumstances in which the interest of justice requires rescission, those circumstances must be exceptional to justify a departure from the doctrine. There is nothing in Mr Zuma’s case that can be construed as truly exceptional to the extent that the court should depart from the underlying principle and ordinary tenets of the rule of law,” she said.

Khampepe said the court had emphasised that the importance of protecting the principle of finality in litigation.

“It is precisely to protect this principle, that the orders of the ConCourt are immune from appeal,” she said.

https://www.sowetanlive.co.za/news/south-africa/2021-09-17-zumas-bid-to-have-his-conviction-rescinded-crashes-in-concourt/

Iris Potgieter hijacked, beaten to death whilst delivering a TV in Dewetsdorp township

 

South Africa: Iris Potgieter hijacked, beaten to death whilst delivering a TV in Dewetsdorp township

Iris Potgieter hijacked, beaten to death whilst delivering a TV in Dewetsdorp township

A week ago Postmasburg’s milk delivery man, Andries de Klerk (57), was attacked and thrown with a stone against his head by youths whilst delivering milk in the black township of Postmasburg – he died the next day – and now a 64 year old grandmother of Dewetsdorp in the Free State has been brutally beaten to death during a vehicle hijacking whilst she was in the black township of Dewetsdorp to take a TV set to somebody there.

Clearly “our people” have declared black areas as no-go zones and death acres for white people and this whilst the ANC and the liberal world establishment fought so long and hard to have “apartheid” abolished.

Iris Potgieter (64), was brutally murdered, and possibly also raped, in the black township of Dewetsdorp. She had transported a TV set to somebody in the township on Wednesday afternoon 25 August 2021, when she was attacked on her way back.

She was beaten with a blunt object against her head. Her body was later found in a field. Her vehicle is still missing.

She was driving a very old red City Golf with registration number CNF842MP, which was barely running. Yet she was murdered for it.

The couple Annie Liebenberg (62) and Michel Zantow (64) was also brutally murdered last weekend in Sasolburg. They were brutally hacked to death with axes.

Police arrested their black gardener and an accomplice in connection with the murders. The motive for the attack was robbery.

The 82 year old Flo Schwartz was also murdered by her black gardener in her home in East London about a week ago. Robbery was also established as the motive.

Analysis:

Why are white people seemingly still under the impression that it is not dangerous to go into a black township alone?
What is a white sickly female doing alone in a black township?
Yes according to her she was being a Samaritan and all that. But the young black barbarians in the township did not get that memo.
It appears as if white folk, especially the elderly, are easily indoctrinated by the liberal mass media that we live in a peaceful ” rainbow nation” whilst it is clearly just a big lie.

Warnings have been sent out on a regular basis that it is becoming increasingly deadly to appoint black workers in your garden and house because the white employers get attacked and murdered by these black workers on a regular basis. Whole white families have been murdered by their black garden and house workers before. So why still do it?

It has also been proven on numerous occasions that black farm workers are the ones giving out detailed information to farm attackers. That is why farm attackers are always so well informed about the movements of white farmers and their families.

The reality is that there is a lot of incitement by black political leaders from the ANC and EFF against white people. This is causing hate and resentment amongst black people against white people which lead them to believe that white people are legitimate targets for attacks.
The hate mongering against us white people leads to the fact that we are seen as less than human and that it is actually justified that we are stolen from.

The liberal mass media also maintains the worldwide anti-white narrative which largely contribute to the same problem.
We can just look at the statistics of tens of thousands of white people who have been murdered by attackers from the black majority since the ANC started to rule South Africa.

Unfortunately many white people, especially the elderly, will still die for their gardens and lawns or because they want to be Mother Theresa type do-gooders.

It seems old habits die hard and the white community is very resistant to changing old habits. It is incumbent upon children to warn their parents against appointing black house and garden workers because chances are good you will be attacked and murdered by them eventually.

It is time to wake up to the reality that a slow war is being fought against us white minority as a racial group.

We are the targets of daily violent attacks emanating from the black majority and also on the receiving end of numerous laws discriminating against us on the basis of race.

It is high time to realise charity starts at home and that we will have to return to our own people to provide goods and services, and trade with our own people, if we want to live and not be murdered in this country.

Crime Correspondent

August 27, 2021

https://southafricatoday.net/south-africa-news/free-state/iris-potgieter-hijacked-beaten-to-death-whilst-delivering-a-tv-in-dewetsdorp-township/