Saturday 17 December 2022

Why Muslim Illegal Immigrants Can't Go To One of the 56 Muslim Countries Instead

BNI’s favorite Muslim commenter answers a question few, if any other practicing Muslims in the West, would ever dare to answer honestly

On a recent BNI post entitled Muslim migrant-wannabes are outraged that Bulgaria is sending them back to Turkey, I posed the question: “Why can’t they go to the nearest Muslim country? There are 56 of them, you know.”

BNI Muslim commenter Ghulam replied:
“NO Muslim-majority country is safe for a Muslim economic migrant.
In Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar, and other Gulf states, they will confiscate illegal migrant passports and throw them in prison FOREVER without access to their embassies.
You can buy your way out if your family sends money. Or else, prepare to rot in the cockroach-infested cells. Even Allah (swt) won’t help you.
Gulf Arab countries have a system called Wasta or wāsita which loosely translates as CLOUT. They only value human beings based on how much clout/influence they bring. That’s not how most civilized countries operate.
Generally, passport-holders from Western countries are exempt from that kind of scrutiny.
If you travel to any Middle-East country, you automatically forfeit your human rights on arrival at the airport (unless you’re a tourist with a genuine visa – even then you can get in trouble for saying stuff about the Saudi Prince, for example.)
Ghulam doesn’t like the Saudi royal family. So if I decide to visit Saudi Arabia, they will arrest me for my social media posts (you can imagine the kind of stuff I say about them) 😀
Most people beheaded in Saudi Arabia happen to be Muslims. They get a thrill out of harassing poor Muslims more than non-Muslims.
The concept of Muslim brotherhood worldwide, also known as Ummah, is a joke. The Gulf Arabs are the worst human beings on the planet.
Now let’s move on to Turkey. They do enjoy hosting Muslim illegal migrants. There are millions of displaced Iraqis and Syrians in Turkey – many are being exploited for forced labor (sexual exploitation in the case of women).
Again they don’t care if those migrants are Muslims. Turkey is one of the worst offenders in terms of human rights abuse.
Countries like Morocco, Tunisia and Libya are even more dangerous. They will harvest illegal immigrants ORGANS for the black market trade.
SUMMARY: the only countries where Muslim illegal migrants can expect to be treated humanely are the non-Muslim ones, especially Western nations.
A Muslim will sell his fellow Muslim down the river, and beg for Allah’s pardon during Ramadan prayers.
Most Muslims won’t trust Muslims from another country when it comes to human rights.”
The next question should be why is there no condemnation of these policies by the U.S., Europe (favored destinations of Muslim economic migrants), and especially the United Nations, where officials think it is the duty of Western nations to allow themselves to be flooded with ungrateful, unproductive, unassimilatable Muslims, more than half of whom end up living on welfare, with many being responsible for unprecedented  surges in crime and rape rates in the host countries? The UN and the rest of the world give a free pass to oil-rich Arab Gulf nations who refuse to accept any Muslim migrants at all, claiming they pose a terrorist risk to their nations.
What’s more, Muslim economic migrants are fussy about which country they will “honor” with their presence. A few years ago, Denmark decided to slash social benefits/salaries for unemployed Muslim migrants by 50 percent (from 10,000 kroner to 5,000); foreign nationals will not be able to bring family to Denmark for at least a year; and foreign nationals must wait at least five years for a permanent residence permit. In addition, only those who can speak and understand Danish will be granted a permit. 
That didn’t sit well with one of the Muslim freeloaders who decided to go to Sweden where benefits are better:

Turkish Interior Minister admits they are flooding Europe with Muslim invaders, knowing full well that they will destroy Europe:

Friday 16 December 2022

Escape from Egypt 🐪🗻 moment on the Coconut Whisperer: Alligators, elks and bears: The obscure pets of historical figures

 

Alligators, elks and bears: The obscure pets of historical figures


From a pug in prison to an anteater on a leash, these are some of the weird and wacky pets kept by important people throughout history.


Humans have always had a penchant for pets, with the earliest evidence of dog ownership dating back to the Paleolithic era, some 2,500,000–200,000 years ago.

However, while some chose to take in dogs, cats, pigeons and horses, others acquired menageries of more interesting pets. Here are seven such people, all of whom played notable roles in humanity's long history, and their unusual pets.

Thomas Jefferson's grizzly bears

Thomas Jefferson, the third President of the United States, was presented with an unusual gift in 1807, during his second term in office, when explorer and soldier Captain Zebulon Pike sent him a letter, with two bear cubs attached. The cubs, sent to Jefferson from the Rocky Mountains, lived in a special enclosure on the White House lawn until 1808, upon which Jefferson sent them to a museum in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

In a letter to his granddaughter, Ann Cary Randolph, Jefferson mentioned his decision to send them away, writing: "These are too dangerous & troublesome for me to keep. I shall therefore send them to Peale’s Museum."

Josephine Bonaparte's pug

In 1794, Joséphine de Beauharnais, the future Empress of France and wife of Napoleon Bonaparte, found herself imprisoned in Carmes due to her ties to counter-revolutionaries. In order to maintain contact with her family throughout her imprisonment, she received clandestine messages from her children concealed in the collar of her pet pug Fortune, who was the only member of her family to be granted visiting rights.

Tycho Brahe’s "drunken moose"

Imagine having a giant puppy-like moose living in your home with you. Can't imagine it? Well, that's exactly what 16th-century Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe did. The moose followed him around his home obsessively and was a frequent source of entertainment for the people who attended Brahe's top-notch parties.

Known not just for his precise and impressive astronomy observations, Brahe was famous for throwing lavish parties to entertain Europe's nobility. Not only was his moose granted permission to attend these parties, but he would partake in festivities, drinking merrily with the other guests.

Unfortunately, it was during one such party that the moose met his fate, after drinking too much and falling down the stairs.

Marquis de Lafayette’s alligator

French aristocrat Marquis de Lafayette fought in both the US Revolutionary war and the French Civil War and somehow still had time to keep a pet alligator on the side. Not only did he enjoy evoking fear in those closest to him, he also spread the love, gifting alligators to prominent leaders and allies. 

The 6th US President, John Quincy Adams, was one of the chosen people to whom Lafayette gifted an alligator, and he made the decision as Jefferson had before him, to keep his unusual pet on the White House Grounds.

Years later, 31st President Herbert Hoover followed in his footsteps, when his son kept two pet alligators on the grounds of the White House during his presidency. 


Audrey Hepburn's pet deer

During Audrey Hepburn's rise to fame, she filmed the movie Green Mansions, set in the Venezuelan jungle.

Her role required her to be followed around by small fawn, meaning she needed to bond with it ahead of filming. And bond they did. Hepburn named the fawn Ip and took it grocery shopping, bottle-fed it, and acted as a motherly figure.

Not long after parting ways with Ip, Hepburn suffered from a miscarriage and fell into a dark state. Luckily, her partner knew that Ip was the remedy she needed. He tracked down the fawn and they took it in as a pet. Her pet dog, a Yorkie, likely did not enjoy having to share the spotlight.

“A wicked parrot that was a household pet, got excited and commenced swearing so loud and long as to disturb the people.”

Reverend William Menefee Norment, attendee of President Andrew Jackson's funeral

Salvador Dali's anteater

The father of surrealism, Andre Breton, was nicknamed "le tamanoir" - or, the anteater. Many believe that it was artist Salvador Dali's respect for the man that led him to adopt a pet anteater, among his other exotic pets. Although it is not certain whether or not this really is the reason, what is certain is that Dali seemed to love his pet anteater, and took it on regular leashed walks through the streets of Paris.


Andrew Jackson's cursing parrot

America's seventh president, Andrew Jackson, was not known for being cool-tempered. One of the best examples of his overbearing temper was seen in the attitude his pet parrot held toward him. According to historians at the University of Virginia, this parrot used its deceased owner's funeral as a platform to air his grievances and scream like there was no tomorrow. 

At Jackson's funeral, his bird flew into quite a fit of rage. Reverend William Menefee Norment was a funeral attendee who witnessed this event, and later wrote in his diary that, “A wicked parrot that was a household pet, got excited and commenced swearing so loud and long as to disturb the people.”  


🐪🗻🐪🗻🐪🗻🐪🗻🐪🗻🐪🗻🐪🗻🐪🗻🐪


🐪🗻 This has been an Escape From Egypt  moment on the Coconut Whisperer blog in honor of the former Escape from Egypt channel on the Disqus channel  network 2018-2019 with 34K followers and was the absolute weirdest, wackiest and strangest news channel ever on Disqus !🐪🗻

The easiest way to open a Coconut is to whisper it a joke & it will crack up with laughter

Please Recommend this page and follow us at 

https://disqus.com/home/forum/the-coconut-whisperer/

Thursday 15 December 2022

#1 Best Seller in Russia: "1984", by George Orwell

The bestselling book in Putin's 'dystopian' Russia? Why, George Orwell's dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, of course!

  • George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four has topped Russian online bestseller list
  • Novel was based on Stalin's Russia and comparisons are being drawn with Putin
  • Dystopian classic was most popular fiction book of 2022 on Russian site LitRes

George Orwell's dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four has topped online bookshop bestseller lists in Russia this year after Putin's invasion of Ukraine drew comparisons.

The 1949 novel is set in a future where totalitarian government and relentless propaganda ensure support for unending wars.

Orwell's classic is the most popular fiction download of 2022 on the platform of the Russian online bookseller LitRes, and the second most popular download in any category, the state news agency Tass reported on Tuesday.

Stalin's Russia was used by Orwell as a model for the personality cult of the all-seeing Big Brother, whose 'thought police' force forced citizens to engage in 'doublethink' in order to believe that 'war is peace, freedom is slavery'.

A man reads a Russian translation of George Orwell's novel 1984 in Moscow

A man reads a Russian translation of George Orwell's novel 1984 in Moscow

George Orwell broadcasting over the BBC

George Orwell broadcasting over the BBC

A summary of George Orwell's 1984

  • George Orwell's dystopian novel was published in 1949 and tells of a future where the totalitarian IngSoc has taken over the state of 'Oceana', which includes Britain
  • Oceana is constantly at war with Eurasia and Eastasia. Although it changes who they are at war with, propaganda tells the people they were 'always at war with Eastasia'
  • The government created 'Newspeak', which is an overly simplistic form of English with no negative words to limit criticism and free though - e.g. very bad is 'doubleplus ungood'
  • The book follows Ministry of Truth worker Winston Bishop who wants to rebel against the party and leader Big Brother

'The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears,' the book famously said. Nineteen Eighty-Four was banned in the Soviet Union until 1988.

Since Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the invasion of Ukraine in February, new Russian laws controlling political opposition in Russia have been criticised as Orwellian.

Putin has eradicated political opposition and critical media from the public sphere in his two decades in power, as well as rehabilitating the memory of Stalin.

After the invasion of Ukraine, the Kremlin made it illegal to publish 'fake news' about the war.

But in reality they banned information about the war which contradicted official statements. The Kremlin does not even use the word 'war' instead referring instead to the invasion of Ukraine as a 'special military operation'.

Officials in Moscow continue to assert that Russia bears no malice towards Ukraine, did not attack its neighbour, and is not occupying Ukrainian territories that it has seized and annexed.

Last week, Russian opposition politician Ilya Yashin was sentenced to eight-and-a-half years in prison on charges of spreading 'false information' about the army.

She discussed evidence uncovered by Western journalists of Russian atrocities in Bucha, near Kyiv, which Russia said had been fabricated.

George Orwell's classic Nineteen Eighty-Four is the most popular fiction download of 2022 on the platform of the Russian online bookseller LitRes

George Orwell's classic Nineteen Eighty-Four is the most popular fiction download of 2022 on the platform of the Russian online bookseller LitRes

Since Russian President Vladimir Putin (pictured) ordered the invasion of Ukraine in February, new Russian laws controlling political opposition in Russia have been criticised as Orwellian

Since Russian President Vladimir Putin (pictured) ordered the invasion of Ukraine in February, new Russian laws controlling political opposition in Russia have been criticized as Orwellian

And last month the Kremlin's spokesman said there had been no attacks on civilian targets, despite waves of bombardment of Ukrainian power facilities that have left millions without heat or light in the depths of winter.

The Russian translator of a brand new edition of Nineteen Eighty-Four does not see parallels with Russia, but instead compares the model to 'liberal totalitarianism' in the West.

Darya Tselovalnikova said: 'Orwell could not have dreamt in his worst nightmares that the era of "liberal totalitarianism" or "totalitarian liberalism" would come in the West, and that people - separate, rather isolated individuals - would behave like a raging herd.'

Sunday 11 December 2022

US Politics: Top Biden National Security Official Served On Pro-Terror Group

 

Top Biden National Security Official Served On Pro-Terror Group



Our national security is being dismantled from the inside.



December 9, 2022, by Daniel Greenfield, Front Page Magazine
Matthew Glen Olsen, the Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division


When Jose Padilla, a Muslim terror convert was arrested, Human Rights First became his loudest defenders. The leftist group, originally founded under the auspices of France’s Human Rights League, which historically included many Communists including Ho Chi Minh, was one of the most extreme voices against our effort to fight the Islamic terrorists murdering us.

Human Rights First continues to demand that Gitmo be shut down and warned that even saying the words “Islamic terrorism” was wrong. It bizarrely argued that there is “no reliable data to substantiate a claim that the United States is disproportionately threatened by foreign terrorists”. And it warned that designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist group would only fuel more terrorism by the religion that shall not be named lest its members blow us up.

Last year, HRF commemorated the anniversary of September 11 by blasting “the post-9/11 policies that have given rise to anti-Muslim sentiment” and demanded that America “leave behind the short-sighted narrowly focused security approach… in the aftermath of the attacks of 9/11.”

With its own people on the inside, HRF is well positioned to dismantle our national security.

The Biden administration rewarded HRF with two high-profile roles for members of its board of directors. Secretary of State Blinken, who had been the vice chair of HRF’s board of directors, was put in charge of our overall foreign policy, and Matthew G. Olsen was nominated to serve as the Assistant Attorney General for National Security for the Justice Department.

Matthew Olsen, who had made millions working as the chief security officer for Uber, now, in the words of a bio, “leads the Department of Justice’s mission to combat terrorism, espionage, cyber crime, and other threats to the national security.” No one could be less fit for the job.

In the 2016 election, Olsen had authored a Time Magazine op-ed titled, “Why ISIS Supports Donald Trump”. The former National Counterterrorism Center official claimed that ISIS members supported Trump and then a year later joined the board of a group fighting to free terrorists.

Like most leftist smears, Olsen’s accusations were truer of the accuser than the accused.

Olsen went on to provide supportive briefs in Arab American Civil Rights League v. Trump and numerous other court cases filed to stop the Muslim travel ban and the border wall.

In 2019, Olsen co-authored an op-ed declaring, “we served at the highest levels of the U.S. national security community. We’re here to tell you that the president’s claim of an emergency along the border is bogus.” A year earlier, he had co-authored yet another editorial, alongside James Clapper, arguing, “We’ve worked on stopping terrorism. Trump’s travel ban fuels it.”

The one thing you could be certain of when it came to national security and Olsen, whatever he was saying about terrorism and national security, the exact opposite was bound to be true.

In reality, Olsen’s great achievement in counterterrorism had been lying about the Benghazi attack, falsely claiming that the attack was not planned and was a response to a YouTube video.

Olsen later testified that “it came — the discussion of taking the video down was part of our conversation in this call that was really focused on what was going on in Benghazi.”

The point man on national security has built his career on working to undermine it. He is very concerned about the civil rights of Islamic terrorists, much less so that of Americans.

Olsen, who had worked at the Washington Post before starting law school, had a resume that painfully demonstrated that the destruction of our national security had been an inside job.

After starting out as a trial attorney at the DOJ’s civil rights division, a hub of leftist activists, he somehow made the leap to chief of the national security section only two years later and after only being six years out of law school.

From there he became the special counsel to FBI Director Mueller and under Obama, was appointed to head the Guantanamo Review Task Force whose job was to close Gitmo and free as many terrorists as possible. Olsen would later insist that Obama was right and that only “politics” kept him from finishing the job that Biden is aggressively moving forward on.

A year later, he graduated to serving as the general counsel for the National Security Agency.

A fawning MSNBC profile claimed that Olsen’s job “required striking a balance on uncertain and often shifting legal terrain” between the Constitution and spying on people. Under Obama, the NSA would become notorious for spying on Americans, including members of Congress, especially when it was defending its plot to fund Islamic terrorism through the “Iran Deal”.

Olsen was also described as working on the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act.

In the first year of the Trump administration, as the illegal Russiagate surveillance was being explored, Olsen wrote an editorial arguing that forcing the FBI to get a warrant to search for information involving Americans would “severely harm national security investigations”.

When it came to spying on Americans, Olsen suddenly cared about national security.

Another editorial attacked a Trump appointee for advancing what Olsen deemed to be a “conspiracy theory that a secret society within the Department of Justice and FBI worked to prevent Trump’s election.”

A conspiracy? Radicals operating within the DOJ? Absurd.

By then, Olsen had left the government and joined WestExec Advisors, a consultancy co-founded by future Secretary of State Blinken, whose top personnel included future press secretary Jen Psaki, as well as Biden’s director of national intelligence, CIA deputy director, deputy attorney general and a host of other positions.

He worked as a contributor for ABC News and joined the board of Human Rights First, alongside Blinken and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mullen. At HRF, Olsen argued that restricting arrivals from terror states to stop Islamic terrorism would only help ISIS.

“The work of Human Rights First on issues ranging from national security to refugee protection has never been more important. I am excited and proud for the opportunity to support the mission of Human Rights First,” Olsen gushed.

The “mission” included calling for the federal government to “halt immigration enforcement during the coronavirus emergency” and opposing a crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood.

HRF didn’t just oppose the use of Title 42 to slow down the migrant invasion, but actually made a submission to the UN’s Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights accusing the United States of violating the 1951 Refugee Convention and urging the UN to take action.

This was one of a number of HRF submissions to the UN against the United States.

No one has asked Secretary of State Blinken or Olsen whether they support HRF’s work to undermine America through the auspices of the United Nations. While Olsen is no longer a member of HRF’s board, at least one of these submissions seems to have taken place during his tenure.

Olsen’s wife, Fern Shepard, serves on the board of trustees of the radical environmentalist group, Earthjustice. She’s also the president of Rachel’s Network, named after ecohoaxer Rachel Carson, which has worked hard to fight for illegal aliens and against border security.

Earthjustice, where Shephard was a lawyer, and Rachel’s Network, share a backer, the McIntosh Foundation, which dispenses the fortune of the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company. The Foundation’s ventures include ClientEarth, a legal operation claiming to represent the planet, which operates in a number of countries and collaborates with Communist China.

Communist China has eagerly supported environmentalism as a means of destroying our economy and making us dependent on its resources and industries. And China has also leveraged its own “environmental” policies to accelerate the depopulation of rural areas and to persecute minorities in order to provide a workforce for its industrial machine.

ClientEarth boasts that they “work with China’s Ministry of Ecology and Environment, the Supreme People’s Court and other government actors to draft better laws and regulations”, claims to have “have trained 1,200 judges and prosecutors to date” and celebrates the “80,000 environmental public interest cases have been brought by Chinese prosecutors across the country in 2020 alone.”

Working to expand the enforcement mechanism of a brutal totalitarian regime responsible for the mass murder and persecution of millions ought to be a badge of shame, not pride.

The proximity of the wife of the Assistant Attorney General for National Security to an organization entangled with China’s Communist regime raises questions, but there are far more serious issues with his role at Human Rights First. The elevation of a civil rights prosecutor to increasingly senior roles in counterterrorism eloquently speaks to the dismantling of national security. A process that began under Obama and is accelerating rapidly under Biden.

HRF has gone from attacking our security from the outside to dismantling it from the inside.

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.



The easiest way to open a Coconut is to whisper it a joke & it will crack up with laughter


Please Recommend this page and follow us at

https://disqus.com/home/forum/the-coconut-whisperer