Saturday, 27 September 2025

Transantifa



Transantifa

33 children shot by transgender terrorists.


Three years before a leftist transgender-linked gunman murdered Charlie Kirk, a transgender assassin tried to carry out his plan to kill three Supreme Court justices to wipe out humanity.

At one in the morning, Nicholas Roske allegedly showed up outside Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s home carrying a gun, zip ties and tools for breaking and entering. Roske was angry about the Supreme Court’s ruling on abortion because he believed that abortion should be “mandatory for pregnant women” so that “no new people would be born” and “humanity will end”.

Roske wanted to kill three Supreme Court justices so that “there are more liberal than conservative judges”, so that abortion would be legal and the human race would end.

While Roske’s first name was listed as Nicholas, he used ‘Sophie; and his lawyers have announced that they will from now on refer to him “as Sophie and use female pronouns.”

Later the same year that a transgender assassin tried to murder a Supreme Court justice, a transgender cult was beginning its own spree of violence thousands of miles away in California.

That fall, a group of the ‘Zizian’ transgender cult members impaled their 80-year-old landlord with a sword after he tried to evict them for not paying rent and then over the winter, the elderly parents of one of the cult members were found brutally murdered in their own home.

Three years later, Border Patrol Agent David Maland was killed in a shootout at the Canadian border with two transgender men who were members of the cult:, Felix ‘Ophelia’ Bauckholt, a German math genius who had been working on Wall Street, and Milo ‘Teresa’ Youngblut

By this point, six people were dead in three states by the activities of a transgender cult animated by veganism, animal rights and the belief that “the two hemispheres of the brain could hold separate values and genders” making it possible for there to be two sexes in one body. The pseudoscientific idea that there can be a “female brain” in a “male body” is the foundation of transgender identification. Combining the various suicides, eight people died for this transgender belief system. And it is possible that some elements of the cult, whose members had a tendency to fake their own deaths, still remain alive, active and waiting to strike.

When put on trial over the murder of their 80-year-old landlord, one of the cult members, the acne-scarred gruff Alexander Leatham claimed that he was being forcibly turned back into a man and that this was “a show trial to coordinate the genocide of transgender people!”

The attempted assassination of Justice Kavanaugh, the transgender Zizian cult connecting together at least a dozen men around the world and a rash of transgender school shootings was part of a larger phenomenon combining leftist politics and transgenderism into a violent combination that some have described as “Transantifa”.

Earlier this year, Robert ‘Robin’ Westman murdered two children and wounded 18 more children in a massacre at the Annunciation Catholic Church. The mass killing of children in a Christian setting echoed the massacre of three children and three staff members by Audrey ‘Aiden’ Hale at the Covenant School. Another transgender mass shooter had taken part in a school shooting in Colorado that killed one student and wounded 8 others. The murder of 6 children and the wounding of 27 more children by radicalized transgender school shooters for a total of 33 children who were shot was part of a wave of transgender terror that has shaken the nation.

Despite efforts to inflate their numbers through statistical gimmickry and aggressive recruitment of minors, the population of those deluded enough to believe, like the Zizian cult, that they were born into the wrong bodies, transgender represent a small fraction of the population, and troublingly transgender violence is out of proportion to their percentage of the population.

According to the gay rights Lambda Legal fund, “nearly one in six transgender Americans—and one in two black transgender people—has been to prison”. That contrasts with an estimated 1 in 20 for the general population and 1 in 10 for black people.

Transgenders were 233% more likely to have spent time in prison than ordinary Americans.

The rate of offenses is staggering with the 2015 National Transgender Discrimination Survey reporting that 5% minority transgender men who falsely claim to be women had been arrested in just one year.

And transgenders are not prone to just any crimes. A transgender survey by the pro-crime Vera Institute reported that 90% of transgender criminals had spent time in solitary confinement. While surveys in the United States are reluctant to publicize the rate of violent offenses by transgender criminals, in the UK, 74% of transgender inmates had been locked up for violent crimes and sex offenses.

The politicization of transgender identity takes an already violent and unstable group, radicalizes and weaponizes them to carry out assaults against religious and conservative targets, from Christian schools and places of worship to conservative figures like Justice Kavanaugh and Charlie Kirk. And while the murder of Charlie Kirk made national news, local activists and journalists like Andy Ngo have long reported the disproportionate presence of transgender Antifa members during street violence. This led Ngo to coin the name ‘Transantifa’.

The radicalization of a mentally unstable population isn’t just taking place in bizarre cults like the ‘Zizians’, but in schools, on college campuses, by the media and across social media.

33 children have been shot by transgender terrorists and mass shooters. Like Kavanaugh’s aspiring assassin and the Zizian cult, the radicalization often takes the form of embracing nihilistic and outright evil theories that threaten a sizable cross section of humanity.

And focus on attacks on religion, children, the elderly and public figures.

How many more must fall before we end the destructive transgender radicalization program that only leads to misery.

Or death.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/transantifa/


Friday, 26 September 2025

Nelson lost his arm at Battle of Santa Cruz, 1797



How Lord Nelson reacted to losing his arm: Letter reveals Battle of Trafalgar hero's stoic words after limb savaged by a musket ball was amputated... without anaesthetic


An emotive letter by Admiral Lord Nelson after he lost his arm has emerged after 228 years.

The British naval hero thanked God for a 'perfect recovery from a severe wound' and said he was desperate to return to the seas with utmost haste.

Nelson had his right limb blown off by a musket ball during the Battle of Santa Cruz in Tenerife in 1797.

He famously told his surgeon afterwards 'I want to get rid of this useless piece of flesh here'.

Showing his characteristic steely determination, he quickly trained himself to write with his weaker left hand.

On December 8, 1797, five months after his amputation, he wrote: 'An officer desires to return thanks to almighty God for his perfect recovery from a severe wound, and also for the many mercies bestowed upon him.'

The note was sent from Nelson to the Curate of St George's, Hanover Square.

Nine months later, Nelson won a decisive victory over the French at the Battle of the Nile as his legend grew.

An emotive letter by Admiral Lord Nelson after he lost his arm has emerged after 228 years. The British naval hero thanked God for a 'perfect recovery from a severe wound'

An emotive letter by Admiral Lord Nelson after he lost his arm has emerged after 228 years. The British naval hero thanked God for a 'perfect recovery from a severe wound'

The letter, which emerged from a private collection, sold for a hammer price of £3,200 at London-based auctioneers Spink & Son.

Spink & Son manuscripts specialist Thomas Fell said: 'Nelson famously lost his right arm in the Battle of Santa Cruz, Tenerife.

'This is a well-preserved and a dramatic note giving a sense not only of the severity of Nelson's wound but also of his deep faith.'

On learning that Admiral Adam Duncan had defeated the Dutch fleet at the Battle of Camperdown in October 1797, Nelson reputedly said he would have given his other arm to have been present.

He spent the final months of 1797 recuperating in London, before returning to the seas in March 1798 on HMS Vanguard.

The Battle of the Nile, where A British fleet, led by Rear-Admiral Sir Horatio Nelson, decisively defeated a French fleet under Vice-Admiral François-Paul Brueys d'Aigalliers, which had escorted Napoleon's army to Egypt.

The note was sent from Nelson to the Curate of St George's, Hanover Square

The note was sent from Nelson to the Curate of St George's, Hanover Square

An illustration of Nelson that shows the pinned sleeve of his missing right arm

An illustration of Nelson that shows the pinned sleeve of his missing right arm

Nelson masterminded his greatest triumph over the French and Spanish fleets at the Battle of Trafalgar on October 21, 1805.

After urging his men to 'do their duty', he was shot dead by a French sniper.


Battle of Trafalgar: Epic sea clash that laid foundations for Britain's global power - and claimed the life of Lord Admiral Nelson

Nelson's (above) triumph at Trafalgar gave Britain control of the seas and laid the foundation for Britain's global power for more than a century

 Nelson's (above) triumph at Trafalgar gave Britain control of the seas and laid the foundation for Britain's global power for more than a century

Fought on October 21, 1805, the Battle of Trafalgar is one of history's most epic sea clashes.

Not only did it see Britain eliminate the most serious threat to security in 200 years, but it also saw the death of British naval hero Admiral Lord Nelson.

This was not before his high-risk, but acutely brave strategy won arguably the most decisive victory in the Napoleonic wars. Nelson's triumph gave Britain control of the seas and laid the foundation for Britain's global power for more than a century.

Despite signing a peace treaty in 1803, the two nations were at war and fought each other in seas around the world.

After Spain allied with France in 1804, the newly-crowned French emperor Napoleon Bonaparte had enough ships to challenge Britain.

In October 1805, French Admiral Pierre-Charles Villeneuve led a Combined French and Spanish fleet of 33 ships from the Spanish port of Cadiz to face Nelson and Vice Admiral Cuthbert Collingwood.

Fought on October 21, 1805, the Battle of Trafalgar is one of history's most epic sea clashes. Not only did it see Britain eliminate the most serious threat to security in 200 years, but it also saw the death of British naval hero Admiral Lord Nelson

Fought on October 21, 1805, the Battle of Trafalgar is one of history's most epic sea clashes. Not only did it see Britain eliminate the most serious threat to security in 200 years, but it also saw the death of British naval hero Admiral Lord Nelson

Nelson, fresh from chasing Villeneuve in the Caribbean, led the 27-ship fleet charge in HMS Victory, while Vice Admiral Collingwood sailed in Royal Sovereign.

Battles at sea had until then been mainly inconclusive, as to fire upon the opposing ship, each vessel had to pull up along side one another (broadside) which often resulted in equal damage.

Nelson bucked this trend by attacking the Combined Fleet line head on - and sailed perpendicular towards the fleet, exposing the British to heavy fire. 

He attacked in two columns to split the Combined Fleet's line to target the flagship of Admiral Villneuve.

11. 30am Lord Nelson famously declared that 'England expects that every man will do his duty', in reference to the command that the ships were instructed to think for themselves. The captains had been briefed on the battle plan three weeks before, and were trusted to bravely act on their own initiative and adapt to changing circumstances - unlike their opponents who stuck to their command.

Vice Admiral Cuthbert Collingwood led the first column and attacked the rear of the line, and broke through. 

Nelson sailed directly for the head of the Combined Fleet to dissuade them from doubling back to defend the rear. But before he reached them, he changed course to attack the middle of the line - and Villeneuve's flagship.

Speeding toward the centre of the line, HMS Victory found no space to break through as Villeneuve's flagship was being tightly followed - forcing Nelson to ram through at close quarters. 

In the heat of battle, and surrounded on three sides, Nelson was fatally shot in the chest by a well-drilled French musketeer.

The Combined Fleet's vanguard finally began to come to the aid of Admiral Villeneuve, but British ships launch a counter-attack.

Admiral Villeneuve struck his colours along with many other ships in the Combined Fleet and surrendered.

4.14pm HMS Victory Captain Thomas Masterman Hardy dropped below deck to congratulate Nelson on his victory.

4.30pm With the knowledge he has secured victory, but before the battle had officially concluded, Lord Nelson died. 

5.30pm French ship Achille blew up signalling the end of the battle - in all 17 Combined Fleet ships surrendered.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15133393/Lord-Nelson-arm-stoic-words-amputated.html

A poignant first-hand account of Admiral Lord Nelson's death has come to light 219 years later, providing an alternative version of his famous last words

Admiral Lord Nelson

Nelson was shot and killed by a French sniper at the Battle of Trafalgar. Above: Benjamin West's painting 'The Death of Nelson'

Nelson was shot and killed by a French sniper at the Battle of Trafalgar. Above: Benjamin West's painting 'The Death of Nelson'

Pictured in all her glory: HMS Victory at Portsmouth Historic Dockyard with Royal Navy aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth in the the background

Pictured in all her glory: HMS Victory at Portsmouth Historic Dockyard with Royal Navy aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth in the the background 

Pictured is a depiction of what the Battle of Trafalgar looked like on October 21, 1805

Pictured is a depiction of what the Battle of Trafalgar looked like on October 21, 1805

Mr Wallrock, of Wick Antiques, Lymington, Hampshire, said: 'There is no doubt that this was Nelson's sword - he may well have used it in action against the French'

Nelson's sword

The telescope used by Lord Nelson at the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805 when he was killed

The telescope used by Lord Nelson at the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805

The telescope is in four parts and is understood to be in excellent condition

The telescope is understood to be in excellent condition

Vice Admiral Horatio Nelson from 'Drake's Drum and Other Songs of the Sea' by Henry Newbolt

Horatio Nelson 

HMS Victory, Nelson's flagship during the battle of Trafalgar, 21st October, 1805

HMS Victory, Nelson's flagship during the battle of Trafalgar, 21st October, 1805

Nelson's 'Band of Brothers' fought with him at Battle of the Nile

Of the 13 French ships that went into action against Nelson's at the Battle of the Nile, all but four were either sunk or captured.

Afterwards Nelson declared that 'victory is not a name strong enough for such a scene'.

He went on the quote Shakespeare's Henry V to describe his 14 loyal captains who served under him at the Nile and called them his 'Band of Brothers'.

Of the 13 French ships that went into action against Nelson's navy, all but four were either sunk or captured

Of the 13 French ships that went into action against Nelson's fleet, all but four were either sunk or captured

The British took the French by surprise and attacked their ships on both sides

The British took the French by surprise and attacked their ships on both sides, using daring and expert manoeuvres, sailing dangerously close to shore.

The British victory made Nelson a hero overnight.

'Forget Trafalgar... the Battle of the Nile was Nelson's finest hour'

Many historians agree that the Battle of the Nile was more significant than Trafalgar, the battle in which Nelson died. It was during this conflict that Généreux was nearly taken by the Lord Admiral's men but the ship managed to escaped - only to be captured two years later.

In August 1798, the French were at anchor in Aboukir Bay in shallow water, using the shore to protect the south-western side of the fleet, while the north-eastern faced open sea.

Although the ships were chained together, Nelson believed the chain between the last ship in the line and the shore was sunk deep enough to let a vessel pass.

In a daring night-time manoeuvre, his fleet slipped through the gap and attacked the French on their unprotected side.

The battle established Britain as the dominant sea power during the French revolutionary wars and was immortalised in the poem Casablanca, known for its opening line 'The boy stood on the burning deck'.

Nelson's flagship during the battle was the Vanguard. Other British ships commemorated by surviving copses include the Minotaur, Defence, Swiftsure, Theseus, Orion, Bellerophon and Alexander.

Stephen Fisher of the National Trust said: 'The Battle of the Nile in 1798 was one of Nelson's most significant clashes with Napoleon.

'Forget Trafalgar, this was Nelson's finest hour and at the time was his most famous victory.'

Divers pull out a 200-year-old canon (pictured) from the ship wreck of the Orient, the French fleet's flagship during the Battle of the Nile, in 1999

Divers pull out a 200-year-old canon (pictured) from the ship wreck of the Orient, the French fleet's flagship during the Battle of the Nile


Thursday, 25 September 2025

U.S. News: Iran Laundered Over $100 Million From Oil Sales Through Crypto

 

U.S.: Iran Laundered Over $100 Million From Oil Sales Through Crypto


The U.S. Department of the Treasury revealed that Iranian financial intermediaries operated a network of shell companies in Hong Kong and the United Arab Emirates, through which oil sale revenues were funneled to finance the Revolutionary Guard and the Ministry of Defense in Tehran

By Ami Rojkes Dombe, Israel Defense, 21/09/2025

                        Masoud Pezeshkian, President of Iran


The U.S. Department of the Treasury announced a series of measures against a large-scale financial network that assisted Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the Iranian Ministry of Defense in funding their activities. According to the Treasury’s report, the newly designated entities include two Iranian financial intermediaries and more than a dozen companies and individuals from Hong Kong and the United Arab Emirates.

These networks, described as “shadow banking services,” operate through shell companies and cryptocurrency transactions in order to circumvent international sanctions and finance terrorism, ballistic missile development, and unmanned aerial vehicles.

According to the Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, John K. Hurley, “Iranian actors rely on clandestine banking networks to move millions of dollars through the global financial system. Under President Trump’s leadership, we will continue to disrupt the key financing channels of Iran’s weapons programs and malign activities.”

The new measures were taken under an executive order targeting terrorism and follow several rounds of sanctions in recent months against similar networks. Among those identified as managing these operations are Alireza Derakhshan and Arash Estaki Alivand, who between 2023 and 2025 purchased over $100 million worth of cryptocurrency derived from Iranian oil sales. The two conducted transactions through shell companies and engaged with foreign firms, including Syria’s “Al-Qatirji” company, a central partner of the IRGC in the oil trade.

The investigation revealed that Derakhshan was involved in managing a network of companies in the UAE and Hong Kong, including “Alpha Trading,” “Alpha Hong Kong Limited,” and “Powel International.” These companies served as cover for transactions worth hundreds of millions of dollars, including deals intended for the procurement of equipment for the Iranian Ministry of Defense and the IRGC. Members of Derakhshan’s family were also tied to the management of these activities.

The practical implications of the sanctions are the freezing of all assets belonging to the designated parties in the United States or under the control of U.S. persons. In addition, foreign companies and financial institutions are prohibited from engaging with them due to the risk of secondary sanctions. The Treasury Department emphasized that any transaction, direct or indirect, with those on the list could result in civil or criminal penalties.

U.S. officials stressed that the sanctions are intended not only to punish but also to change behavior, noting that removal from the list remains possible if conditions are met.



God Bless and protect the United States of America and all its people!



Please Recommend this page and follow us at

https://disqus.com/home/forum/the-coconut-whisperer/

After UK Recognizes Pallystein, Pallys demand 2.7 trillion in Reparations


After PM Starmer Recognizes ‘Palestine’, Terror State Demands $2.7 Trillion in ‘Reparations’

Reparations "roughly the size of Britain's total economy," are "a good place to start."



They say that “no good deed goes unpunished”, but it’s actually “no bad deed, no shameful appeasement of Islamic terrorists and cowardly collaboration with the enemies of human civilization goes unpunished.”

And Islamic terrorists are more than happy to punish their own useful idiots, seeing any appeasement as a sign of weakness that they can jump on like an unaccompanied six-year-old girl not wearing a Burka.

After PM Keir Starmer recognized the PLO terrorist state, the terrorists now want $2 trillion.

Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas is reportedly demanding that the United Kingdom pay it reparations, which could be worth up to trillions of dollars, after U.K. prime minister Keir Starmer on Sunday formally recognized a Palestinian state.

The Daily Mail’s report says that “some international law experts” have said that reparations worth two trillion British pounds, “roughly the size of Britain’s total economy,” are “a good place to start.”

“Abbas, who has a long history of threatening to sue Britain, is demanding ‘reparations in accordance with international law’ based on the value of the land which was under British rule between 1917 and 1948,” the Daily Mail reported.

That’s about $2.7 trillion.

Why not? Starmer has shown he’s weak and an appeaser, so the terrorists are doing to him what they’ve been doing to Israel and America, pushing to see how far he’ll give. Even if they don’t get $2 trillion (the high offer), they expect to get something, billions more in foreign aid, or even millions.

The point is the leverage. And when you’re a cringing appeaser, they will never let up.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/after-pm-starmer-recognizes-palestine-terror-state-demands-2-7-trillion-in-reparations/