Monday, 26 October 2026

Bruce Blakeman: Can a Jewish Republican Become NY Governor?

 



Bruce Blakeman’s campaign for governor of New York rests on a straightforward argument: The state has become too expensive, too dangerous, and too out of touch with common-sense values.

As Nassau County executive, Blakeman is trying to turn his experience governing Long Island’s most populous county into a statewide victory. His opponent, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul, has defended her record on public safety, economic development, and support for religious communities while criticizing Blakeman’s close relationship with President Donald Trump. The contest has become a debate not only over policy but also over the direction of New York’s political culture.

For Jewish New Yorkers, the election is a chance to examine what each candidate proposes to do about the issues that affect their families, institutions, and communities.

From Long Island to Statewide Politics

Blakeman is a lifelong Long Island resident, born in Oceanside and raised in Valley Stream. An attorney by training, he graduated from Arizona State University and California Western Law School before building a career in public service and politics. He served on the Hempstead Town Council and the Nassau County Legislature and as a commissioner of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. In November 2021, he was elected Nassau County executive, the first Jewish person to hold the office.

Throughout his career, Blakeman has paired local government experience with a longstanding emphasis on public safety, fiscal restraint, and opposition to policies he considers overly permissive toward criminal offenders. His administration points to police recruitment, investment in law enforcement, and efforts to contain spending as its central accomplishments. According to Nassau County’s official account, it eliminated $150 million in planned tax increases inherited from Blakeman’s predecessor, implemented fiscal restraints, and earned credit-rating upgrades. The county also reports that it added police officers and invested in law-enforcement infrastructure.

Before Blakeman was even sworn in as county executive, he hosted local rabbis and Jewish communal leaders to hang a mezuzah at his new office. For him, it was more than a ceremony. He says his faith is where he draws his strength, and he still thinks back to a serious talk his grandfather had with him in the kitchen when he was nine years old, a memory he says guides him in the job.

He attends Shabbat morning services at the Jewish Center of Atlantic Beach, a Modern Orthodox synagogue. At home, he and his wife, Segal Magori Blakeman, who is Israeli-American, keep a kosher kitchen, and he credits her with deepening his observance. He doesn’t claim to have fully arrived: He has called himself “AOB,” or “Almost Orthodox Blakeman.”

(Credit: Benny Polatchek/Blakeman Campaign)

Blakeman has also cultivated ties with Jewish organizations and political leaders. His administration organized a large pro-Israel rally and established a bipartisan task force on antisemitism on Long Island. Those initiatives now anchor his broader argument that Nassau County offers a model for protecting Jewish communities throughout New York.

Public Safety and Cost of Living

Public safety and affordability are the two most prominent themes of Blakeman’s campaign. He has criticized Hochul’s approach to criminal justice, arguing that state policies have made it harder to hold offenders accountable, and has challenged her on taxes, utility costs, and the broader expenses of living in New York. At the candidates’ October 13 debate, the two clashed over criminal justice, immigration, energy prices, and the state’s economic direction.

For Jewish families, these concerns often reach beyond the issues dominating statewide campaign advertisements. Many Orthodox households face substantial costs for housing, food, transportation, and Jewish day-school tuition. In neighborhoods where families depend on nearby synagogues, yeshivas, and kosher businesses, the cost of living can influence whether younger generations stay in New York or move elsewhere.

Blakeman’s emphasis on tax relief may resonate with families worried about their financial future. Its practical effect, however, will depend on the details: which taxes he would reduce, how much households would save, how he would pay for the changes, and whether a Democratic-controlled legislature would approve his plans.

Public safety matters just as much. Families want to feel secure traveling to synagogue, attending communal events, and sending their children to school, and Blakeman argues that stronger policing and consistent enforcement are essential to that goal.

“My approach to law enforcement is no-nonsense: Enforce the law, fund the police, and back the police. The whole culture, tone, and tenor of the criminal justice system will be different with me as governor, and we will no longer be a sanctuary state,” Blakeman said in a meeting with the editorial board of The Jewish Press.

The question is how his proposals would translate into measurable improvements, particularly in New York City, where crime patterns, police operations, and public transportation differ from those in Nassau County.

Fighting Antisemitism

Blakeman has made combating antisemitism a central part of his political identity. Since the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack on Israel and the ensuing war, Jewish communities across the United States have faced heightened concerns about threats, harassment, and hostility connected to debates over Israel. Jewish New Yorkers have also confronted questions about security at synagogues, schools, and communal institutions.

For many in the Orthodox community, those concerns are part of daily life. Leon Goldenberg, a board member of Agudath Israel of America and a Brooklyn business owner, put it bluntly. “Antisemitism is the number one issue for our community,” he said. “[In] the Orthodox community, where we are wearing yarmulkes and hats, everyone is looking behind their back when they go outside their own community. There is a fear factor in our children too. And I have one question: Is your church locked? No. My shul is. Why?”

In his meeting with The Jewish Press, Blakeman also described the stakes in personal terms. “I’m not doing this because I want to be governor – I’m doing this because I’m afraid of what’s going to happen to my kids and my grandkids if I don’t do it,” he said. “This is a carbon copy – or a mirror image – of 1938, whether people want to see it or not.”

He argues that his approach in Nassau County shows how government can respond through law enforcement and restrictions meant to prevent disorder. He has defended policies addressing protester face coverings and stressed the importance of holding people accountable when demonstrations cross legal boundaries. His campaign presents these measures as part of a broader commitment to protecting Jewish residents, while critics of some of his policies have raised concerns about civil liberties and the effect of restrictions on lawful expression.

Both considerations matter. A governor must protect religious communities from threats and violence while respecting constitutional rights, including freedom of speech and peaceful assembly. Blakeman would have several avenues for doing so, including coordination among law-enforcement agencies, support for security funding, enforcement of existing civil-rights protections, and engagement with Jewish communal organizations. What voters still need to know is which specific measures he would implement, how much funding they would require, and how his administration would measure their effectiveness.

Israel Support

Support for Israel is also a prominent part of Blakeman’s public messaging. He has criticized politicians whose statements or policies he considers hostile to Israel and has emphasized his own commitment to the Jewish state’s security, a message reinforced by his appearances before Jewish organizations and his administration’s pro-Israel initiatives. The issue has taken on added weight in New York’s political debate as disagreements over Israel, Zionism, and the war in Gaza have intensified.

Blakeman has also used Hochul’s relationship with New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani to challenge the governor’s judgment and political alliances. At a private meeting with hasidic leaders in October, he raised concerns about whether city leadership would adequately protect Jewish neighborhoods during potential unrest. Political opponents criticized his remarks as irresponsible, fear-based rhetoric. The controversy illustrates how intense the debate has become over who can best protect Jewish communities.

Alan Dershowitz, Harvard Law School professor emeritus, made the case for Blakeman in starker terms. “The best reason Jews and others who love America should vote for Blakeman is Hochul,” he told The Jewish Press. “She is a Mamdani-El-Sayed Democrat. That party under its current leadership endangers America in general and Jews in particular.”

For Jewish voters, though, support for Israel is only one consideration among several. Voters may share concerns about antisemitism and Israel’s security while disagreeing about taxation, abortion, immigration, education, or the role of government. A meaningful evaluation of Blakeman’s candidacy therefore means looking past his statements of support for Israel to the policies he would pursue as governor and how they would affect New York’s Jewish population.

Yeshivas & Affordability

Tuition at day schools and yeshivas can place a heavy financial burden on families, and parents also care deeply about school security, access to legally required educational services, and the ability of religious institutions to operate in keeping with their missions. Blakeman’s emphasis on parental rights and his opposition to certain state education policies may appeal to voters concerned about government regulation of religious schools.

Whatever concerns are specific to Jewish voters, the issue driving the race is one nearly every New Yorker shares: According to a poll released by Quinnipiac University on September 23, the cost of living is the most important issue for 28% of likely voters. The economy follows at 21%, and health care comes next at 11%. Both candidates have built their campaigns around these priorities.

Energy has become the sharpest flashpoint, because it ties directly to rising electricity rates. Hochul advocates a mixed energy strategy and a moratorium on new data centers. Blakeman blames clean-energy mandates for the increases and proposes a return to fracking.

Immigration is a different kind of issue, with a narrower but more intense constituency. It is the top concern for 20% of Republican voters, and it centers on whether the state should cooperate with federal ICE enforcement, a question on which the candidates sharply disagree.

Taxes may be the most direct test of each candidate’s pitch, and the issue carries particular weight among upstate and suburban voters. Blakeman proposes eliminating the income tax for individuals earning under $50,000. Hochul counters by pointing to her record of passing tax cuts for middle-income New Yorkers.

The Challenge of Winning Statewide

Despite his profile on Long Island and his support among conservative voters, Blakeman faces a state with a substantial Democratic registration advantage. His campaign must appeal to Republicans while also drawing independents, suburban voters, and Democrats dissatisfied with the incumbent. His positions on taxes and public safety may help define that appeal, but his association with Trump could complicate efforts to reach voters who oppose the president.

Hochul has repeatedly tied Blakeman to President Trump, noting that Trump himself called him “100% MAGA” – and her campaign has portrayed him as a puppet of the president. She has applied that argument to affordability, blaming Republicans in Washington, including Trump, for rising costs, and cited tariffs, the conflict with Iran, and what she describes as politically motivated efforts to withhold federal disaster aid. She points to her record of passing tax cuts for middle-income New Yorkers as her answer to the squeeze on household budgets. On immigration, she called federal enforcement “out of control” and stressed her opponent’s broad support for it.

Blakeman answers that the problem lies in Albany, not Washington. He blames Hochul for the state’s high taxes and for repeated utility-rate increases, and he says she brings up Trump because she does not want to discuss her own record. He offers his own remedies: eliminating the income tax for individuals earning under $50,000, and, on energy, blaming clean-energy mandates and proposing a return to fracking. On immigration, he argues that Hochul’s sanctuary policies have made the state less safe. At the October 13 debate, during which Trump was mentioned at least 42 times, he sought to show he is not beholden to the president and at times distanced himself from Trump.

The outcome will depend on turnout, the candidates’ ability to persuade undecided voters, regional voting patterns, and the extent to which voters prioritize state issues over national political divisions.

Rabbi Dr. Hank Sheinkopf, one of New York’s leading political consultants, told The Jewish Press that it is crucial at this stage for the Blakeman campaign to generate direct voter contact to increase its chances of victory – street campaigning, door-knocking, phone banks. He also sees a need, and a strong rationale, for Jewish community support. “Jewish voters must feel fully invested,” he said. “Those who understand what the Democrat[ic] Socialists of America represents have only one choice. And that’s not the Democrats.”

Blakeman made clear in his editorial board interview that he sees turnout as central to the effort, saying, “You should put it on the front page of your newspaper every week: that it is a disgrace not to vote when your property rights, your religious rights, and your freedom are at stake.”

The campaign is a test of whether Blakeman can broaden his appeal beyond his core supporters. Jewish voters across the state should also be asked directly what they want most from their next governor – whether that’s action on antisemitism, a clear stance on Israel, affordable housing, or continued support for yeshiva education.

What’s ultimately at stake goes beyond the question of whether a Jewish Republican can win New York. Blakeman’s candidacy is a moment of reckoning for the state: How seriously will its leaders take the concerns of Jewish communities, and what specific, concrete commitments will candidates make to address them?


See next week’s JP, for an exclusive interview with Blakeman.

jewishpress.com/bruce-blakeman-can-a-jewish-republican-become-ny-governor/

National Library of Israel launches projects to memorialize Oct. 7

 

A visitor at the Bound in Memory exhibit at the National Library in Jerusalem. Photo by Dor Pazuelo/National Library of Israel.



The last WhatsApp messages that Hersh Goldberg-Polin sent his mother, Rachel, and father, Jon, before Hamas gunmen took him hostage are searing in their brevity. “I love you,” read the first one as he hid in a roadside bomb shelter near the Supernova festival, and his best friend Aner Shapira caught and threw back hand grenade after hand grenade before he was killed.

“I’m sorry,” read the second one, just before Hersh, then 23, was severely wounded and taken captive.

Similar messages came from Eden Yerushalmi.

“They caught me,” she wrote, followed soon afterwards by “Find me, OK?”

Hersh and Eden were held captive in Hamas tunnels for 11 months before their Hamas captors brutally murdered them. Their last WhatsApp messages are part of the Bearing Witness project at the National Library of Israel, which has become the repository for many of the physical and digital artifacts of Oct. 7, 2023.

Maya Gan Tzvi, the director of the Bearing Witness Project at the National Library in Jerusalem, says the library is working with partners—in this case Memorial 7/10—to collect all of the messages. She said that so far they have 8,375 chats from people who survived Oct. 7 and many who were killed on Oct. 7. It is the first time in Israel’s history that WhatsApp has played such an important role.

“From an archival perspective you can compare it to letters written during past wars,” she said. “The big difference is that because this correspondence is digital it captures the events while they are still unfolding and documented it in real time. People who wrote these messages didn’t think about them becoming a historical document.”

She said that even if the messages had been previously published in news reports, they are hesitant to publish personal details because of privacy issue.

In a separate project, the library has also received hundreds of GoPro cameras worn by Hamas gunmen who were captured or killed on Oct. 7. Staff are still trying to process the huge amount of information they have recovered, which Gan Tzvi says holds more than 16 million files.



The books in the Bound in Memory display offer a look at the lives of those killed on or after Oct. 7, 2023. Photo by Dor Pazuelo/The National Library of Israel.

Another project you can actually see at the library is an exhibit called Bound in Memory, a display of books, booklets, pamphlets and e-books written by family members of those killed on or after Oct. 7.

Nachum Zitter, the head of Reference Services at the National Library of Israel, says they have already received 250 books, most of them in Hebrew.

“This adds to the general understanding that each person has an entire life story,” he said. “In some cases, they even tried to look at what the future of this person’s life would have looked like. This display is hands-on. You can go into the reading room and flip through the books themselves.”

Quite a few of them are children’s books.

“In the past memorial children’s memorial books were very rare,” he said. “But this war was very much in the public eye and every child knows about it. In addition, many of those killed were married soldier with children, and these books were written for them.”

Some of the authors were people later killed who had left drafts of a book or collections of letters.

Zitter said that reading the books and curating the exhibition took a personal toll on him, and that he got sick just after the exhibit opened. Other staffers at the library say they have needed psychological help after working on the project.

Yet they say they believe the library is playing a crucial role in preserving the history of the events of Oct. 7.


https://www.jns.org/feature/national-library-of-israel-launches-projects-to-memorialize-oct-7
Linda Gradstein
Linda Gradstein is a freelance writer for JNS

Hula Valley Elephants

https://www.jpost.com/science/article-912524

Using an 800,000-year-old tooth, researchers unlock the secrets of Israel’s ancient elephant haven

Archaeologists uncover clues to the lives of giant elephants and early humans who shared Israel’s Hula Valley nearly 800,000 years ago.


Long before modern history, the Hula Valley’s Gesher Benot Ya’aqov was as close to a Garden of Eden as the ancient world could offer. The site at the “Daughters of Jacob Bridge” is so even today.

Nearly 800,000 years ago, during the Middle Pleistocene Era, giant straight-tusked elephants, hippos, and rhinoceroses roamed a lush sanctuary of woodlands, wetlands, and waterways.

Living alongside these massive creatures were the region’s earliest humans – hominin toolmakers who left behind a remarkable record of survival along the Levantine corridor.

Nestled in northern Israel, the Hula Valley has long served as a vital bridge between Africa and Eurasia. Today, remarkable finds –including a well-preserved ancient elephant tooth and basalt handaxes – provide evidence of giant elephants and early toolmakers that together made the Hula Valley their home.

Saber-tooth tigers, rhinoceroses, hippopotami, giant wild cattle deer, gazelles, wild boars, freshwater turtles, lizards, and snakes shared the lush landscape of woodlands, wetlands, and waterways during the Middle Pleistocene Era that began some 780,000 years ago. But among the most impressive creatures were giant elephants alongside hominids – the Hula Valley’s most ancient humans.

Prof. Gonen Sharon.
Prof. Gonen Sharon. (credit: TEL-HAI UNIVERSITY OF KIRYAT SHMONA IN THE GALILEE)

Today, elephants, or other large animals, are kept in Ramat Gan’s Safari or Jerusalem’s Biblical Zoo, but the area remains verdant and bountiful, according to archaeologists from Tel-Hai University of Kiryat Shmona in the Galilee and colleagues at the University of Haifa and Tel Aviv University.

They found a remarkably preserved elephant tooth and tusk fragments at the prehistoric site in northern Israel, where early humans made stone tools – basalt handaxes and cleavers that were hallmark tools of the Acheulian tradition, one of the earliest and most widespread stone-tool technologies in human history.

The resource-rich environment that helped sustain both large mammals and early humans along the Levantine land bridge connecting Africa and Eurasia remains.

After studying the area for more than three decades, the archaeologists have just published their latest findings in Quaternary Science Reviews under the title “Elephant dental remains from the Acheulian site at North Bridge Acheulian-Gesher Benot Ya’aqov: hominin behavior and environmental implications.”

The study was led by University of Haifa doctoral student Hannah Farrell, at the site and excavated by Prof. Gonen Sharon of Tel-Hai. The team included Cheryl Makarewicz (isotope studies) and Nimrod Marom (archaeozoology) from the University of Haifa, along with Minji Jin and Dafna Langgut (pollen studies) from Tel Aviv University.

The research focuses on a giant elephant molar and tusk fragments discovered alongside Acheulian stone tools at Gesher Benot Ya’aqov’s northern locality located in the valley in northern Israel. The remains belonged to Palaeoloxodon antiquus, the straight-tusked elephant, one of the largest land mammals of the Pleistocene.

Rather than studying the elephant alone, researchers said they used the tooth as a biological archive to reconstruct the broader ecosystem shared by large mammals and early human toolmakers. “We applied high-resolution CT scanning of the tusk and molar recovered from the site,” Sharon noted.

The valley has abundant water, emanating from the Hermon Mountain range (mostly as melted snow), feeding underground springs and accounting for much of the abundant water. Today, the Jordan River with its three main tributaries – the Dan, the Banias and the Hatzbani – is the primary water body of the valley. From as early as the Lower Paleolithic, humans have opted to occupy the Hula Valley.

Today, the bridge is located south of the Hula Valley, probably due to the presence of high basalt there. A stone bridge was built by the Mamluks (an Arabic word that literally means “one who is owned” or “slave”) sometime in the 13th century that was replaced in 1934 by a modern bridge further south during the draining of Lake Hula.

The existing bridge was built almost two decades ago and now forms part of Israeli Highway 91, straddling the boundary between the Galilee and the Golan Heights.

Alongside the broad exposure of archaeological bearing sediments, there are uniquely well-preserved ancient flora specimens – wood, bark, seeds and fruits that provide exclusive data on the environment of the area during the Pleistocene Era and the behavior and diet of early humans in this landscape, Sharon told The Jerusalem Post in an interview. “Understanding how humans and animals responded to environmental change hundreds of thousands of years ago helps us better understand the forces that shaped our species.”

Using CT scanning, 3D reconstruction, microscopic wear analysis, isotope geochemistry, and pollen studies – each field being the expertise of a variety of experts – the team found evidence for a long-lasting landscape of woodlands, grasslands, marshes, rivers, and shallow-water habitats.

Carbon isotope values suggest the elephant lived in a consistently well-watered environment, while pollen recovered from sediments revealed abundant wetland vegetation, including reeds, sedges, willow, tamarisk, and aquatic plants.

Wildlife and human groups both moved via the Levantine Corridor land bridge. “We didn’t actually find human bones because we excavated just 100 square meters, so we would have needed a lot of luck to find them,” he explained. “But we have found tens of thousands of animal bones and tools at the site.”

Conditions for wildlife to survive

The availability of water, vegetation, and animal resources shaped where humans and wildlife could survive, Sharon added. “The wetlands, rivers, and woodlands helped sustain life along one of the world’s earliest migration corridors, offering a rare opportunity to understand the ecological conditions that supported both animals and human populations in that era.

Sharon, who heads the Tel-Hai Prehistory Laboratory, is also curator of the Upper Galilee Museum of Prehistory at Kibbutz Ma’ayan Baruch. He earned his three degrees in archaeology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and lives at Kibbutz Lehavot Habashan just 15 minutes away from the archeological site.

Asked what the single most important discovery that you could not have made without this particular elephant tooth and that the stone tools, other animal bones or sediments alone could not, he said: “The elephant helped us reconstruct the environment; we didn’t find any human skeletons. We found one elephant’s tooth, out of eight altogether that grow in its jaws, but this is what we do. Quite impressive.

“They eat leaves and other vegetarian food, and this wears down their teeth. When all are worn out, they die of hunger.” The teams were able to establish that both the tooth and the stone tools made by humans were contemporaneous, because they came from the same layer. Humans imported the animal tooth to the site.”

They knew that the environment could support a population of elephants, each of which consumed more than a hundred kilos of food per day. “We have collected bones there from the other animals – wild cows. Boars, bears, and birds. We know that the tooth we found belonged to an elephant species weighing about 10 tons.

“The largest in the Safari Zoo – born in 1974 and named Yossi – is only 6.5 to seven tons. The ancient humans were involved in very sophisticated activities, making stone tools and using nuts, wood, and animals. The ancient elephants couldn’t have been easy to hunt and eat. They apparently killed them with spears.”

The site endured seven or eight ice ages, but even if it got colder in the Hula Valley, the inhabitants survived. Europe was covered by destructive ice, but here, the climate didn’t bother the people and environment much even if the temperature dropped by five degrees.”

The latest findings were a pilot study. “We will study more elephants and animals and combine all the evidence. Dozens of people forming many teams – each with expertise on pollen, seeds, frogs, elephants, fish, isotopes, and much more – worked together since 1989. I joined in 1995. I suppose we have 700 or 800 more years to keep us busy,” Sharon joked.

https://www.jpost.com/science/article-912524





























Sunday, 25 October 2026

Voters Guide: By Martin Sherman

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/435061

The coming elections: A voter’s guide to Israel’s perplexing “polito-sphere"

The decision of whom not to vote for is no less consequential than that of whom to vote for.

Eizenkot, Netanyahu, and Liberman
Eizenkot, Netanyahu, and LibermanFlash 90

With the October 27th election approaching with disconcerting speed, the decision of whom to vote for is becoming increasingly persistent in the public consciousness.

But while wrestling with the dilemma of who to vote for, the inevitable converse quandary-of who not to vote for-is no less pertinent. Indeed, given the copious blemishes of most political parties, it is hardly surprising that numerous voters base their decision on election day on a process of elimination-i.e., on who not to vote for-with a sense of rejection rather than of attraction, having the greater role.

Bennett: Unprecedented deceit

Clearly, in my opinion, topping the list of whom voters should avoid is none other than Naftali Bennett, who has brought deceit and deception on the part of politicians seeking election to unprecedented heights-or is that “depths"? Readers will recall his breathtaking about-face when he reneged on his pledge (written and televised) not to facilitate leftist Yair Lapid becoming Prime Minister-"neither by rotation nor otherwise"-and then did precisely that.


No less grave was the fact that, in order to enable the establishment of a non-Netanyahu government, Bennett agreed to include the Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated Ra’am in his coalition. Indeed, on the very night of the election, Bennett declared with great flourish and fanfare: “I won’t allow Yair Lapid to be prime minister, including in a rotation (agreement)" and “I will not establish a government based on the support of Mansour Abbas from the Islamic Movement." He did both.

Apparently, for Bennett there is no taboo-social, security, or ethical - that he will not violate in his seemingly pathological pursuit of power. Accordingly, voters should avoid him like the political plague that I feel he is.

Liberman: Personal vindictiveness eclipses national interest

Next on the rung of the ladder of infamy is the odious Avigdor Liberman, the man to blame, more than any other, for the political deadlock that resulted in five elections in less than four years. Indeed, solely because of his personal enmity towards Netanyahu, Liberman preferred to partner with racial Left-wing elements and even with the Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated Ra’am, rather than serve in a Netanyahu-led government.

This choice comprised an act of twofold hypocrisy.

The first being that Liberman’s party repeatedly submitted/supported petitions to the Central Election Commission of the Knesset to bar Ra’am from taking part in the election on the grounds that the party does not conform to the provisions of Clause 7A of Israel’s Basic Law: The Knesset-which mandates(a) recognition of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state and (b) prohibition of support for armed struggle against Israel.

None of this prevented Liberman, as Minister of Finance, from approving the allocation of tens of billions of shekels to the Arab sector-raising concern that significant portions thereof might find their way into the coffers of Arab crime syndicates.

Secondly, Liberman’s barefaced hypocrisy was further amplified by the fact that although he has served in multiple pre-2019 coalitions that included Haredi factions, he suddenly insisted on ensuring Haredi conscription into the IDF as a condition for his joining Netanyahu’s government-this despite the fact that he initially recommended that Netanyahu be designated by then-President Rivlin for the premiership. Curiously, the fact that the Ra’am electorate does not serve in the IDF seems not to have bothered him in the slightest...

Lapid: Ensconcing anti-Zionists in positions of power

Thus, both Bennett and Liberman have proven that neither can be counted on to fulfill their election platform or their campaign promises. But worse, they have shown that they are quite capable of undertaking precisely what they pledged to avoid/prevent-and thus are utterly unworthy of the trust of the voters.

Another outstanding hypocrite is the current head (in name only) of the ineffectual opposition, Yair Lapid, who likewise provides the electorate with a myriad of reasons for not voting for him. Like Bennett and Liberman, he has demonstrated that he has scant regard for national interest. Thus, driven by his almost pathological Bibiphobic animus, he set up a government comprised of a motley collection of post/non/anti-Zionists, thus ensconcing radical extremists in positions of power, from which the general public has long wished to exclude them.

Likewise, readers will doubtless recall the scandalous concession of potentially resource-rich stretch of maritime waters adjacent to Lebanon, under the specious claim that this would placate Hezbollah and reduce the threat of hostilities with the Islamist terror group.

And we all know how splendidly that worked out!

Even more outrageous was his refusal to bring the measure to parliament for approval, under the shameless claim that the Knesset composition was not to his liking and unlikely to authorize/ratify the handover. No kidding!

Topping off Lapid’s list of ignominious misdeeds was his government's hurried appointment of Herzi Halevi as IDF Chief-of-Staff-at the very end of his incumbency as interim prime minister. Traditionally, interim governments are required to refrain from senior appointments so as not to impose such choice on any duly-elected successor government. Significantly, Halevi was later forced to resign in ignominy following the disastrous failure of the IDF in October 2023, something that reflects poorly both on Lapid’s judgement and on his utter (dis)regard for democratic principles.

Golan: The Despotic “Democrat"

Probably the easiest choice of whom not to vote for is Yair Golan, a former IDF general and deputy Chief-of-Staff. Thus, despite a measure of personal charm and charisma, he has allowed his animus toward his political rivals to eradicate any constraints on his political rhetoric-providing Israel’s most vehement foes with ample affirmation for their vitriolic condemnation of the Jewish state. Thus, while still in uniform, he alleged outrageously that he could identify in Israeli society developments reminiscent of the “abhorrent processes that took place in Europe, and Germany in particular" in the 1930s, lending credence to those accusing Israel of being a “fascist state". Later, as a deputy-minister in the short-lived Bennett-Lapid government, he himself adopted Nazi-like terminology, dubbing some of his fellow countrymen as “sub-human."

In 2024, Golan gathered up the shreds of the far-Left Mertz faction and remains of the once-hegemonic Labor party in a new party under his leadership, perversely named “The Democrats"-as his political credo seems antithetical to anything “democratic". Indeed, Golan has repeatedly threatened that if his party attained a position of power, it would shut down media channels and educational institutions, of whose political orientation he disapproves -all in the interests of “freedom of speech," of course. The prospective targets of Golan's future vindictiveness would, according to him, be the popular TV outlet Channel 14 and the legendary pre-military academy Eli, many of whose former students have given their lives and limbs in defense of the country in IDF combat units.

So, unless one is in favor of monolithic uniformity of thought and opinion, Yair Golan’s party is one to avoid.

Eisenkot: Exceptionally unequipped to PM post

Lastly, there is Gadi Eisenkot, currently the leading candidate to challenge Netanyahu for the premiership. Eisenkot, a former IDF Chief of Staff who served between 2015 and 2019, and together with his predecessors (Ehud Barak, Gabi Ashkenazi, Benny Gantz, Moshe Yaalon, Amnon Lipkin-Shachak) makes up half a dozen former IDF chiefs who tried-and failed to remove Netanyahu from power-sharply underscoring that military rank is a poor predictor of effective political leadership.

Indeed, a wide swathe of opinion in Israel points to Eisenkot’s misguided doctrine of restraint and moderation in Gaza as creating the conditions that precipitated the disastrous events of October 2023. Moreover, after retiring from the IDF, and during the war, he did little to dispel misgivings over his strategic judgement. Significantly, had his positions been accepted, the IDF would have been denied some of its most important achievements in Gaza, particularly regarding Rafah and the Philadelphia Route adjacent to the border with Egypt.

Today, even after all previous contenders have fallen by the wayside. Eisenkot is manifestly devoid of the qualities to lead Israel in these challenging times-most importantly a stiff backbone, and is acutely lacking international stature, governmental experience, and language skills.

And this is hardly time for on-the-job training.

An uncluttered view

So dear reader, having discarded all of the foregoing options from your list -along with the multitude of micro-splinter parties that have little chance of passing the 3.25% electoral threshold-and of course, the dominantly Arab anti-Zionist factions, you should now have an uncluttered view of whom to choose from 38 (!) parties that have registered for next week’s poll.

Choose wisely!

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/435061