Thursday 17 October 2024

Why Achieving Peace with Islam is Impossible


Why Achieving ‘Peace’ with Islam Is Impossible

Just when the world had accepted the notion that Israel’s war on Palestinians and their supporters was wholly unjust, a Muslim scholar has — like so many before him — announced that it is Muslims who thrive on and must always wage unjust wars on Israel and everyone else.

During a Sept. 11 speech, Muhammad al-Dadow al-Shantiqi, former vice president of the International Union of Muslim Scholars, declared that the current conflict “is another chapter in the war that is ongoing since 1948 [the creation of modern Israel] and to this day. This is not a war against the Zionist entity, but against the infidel world in its entirety.” [emphasis added]

In other words, Muslims are not limited to fighting what is widely seen as a defensive war against an aggressive Israel — which many around the world might understand — but are in a de facto war against the entire non-Muslim world.

Surely this is an odd assertion? After all, many non-Muslim nations around the world are sympathetic to the Palestinians and highly critical of Israel. So why does this Muslim scholar see them also as enemies to be fought?

Here we come to the crux of the problem with Islam: Unlike all other major religions, it has a political mandate to conquer the entire non-Muslim world — which by default is its mortal enemy — through jihad.

The entry for “jihad” in the Encyclopaedia of Islam states that the “spread of Islam by arms is a religious duty upon Muslims in general … Jihad must continue to be done until the whole world is under the rule of Islam … Islam must completely be made over before the doctrine of jihad can be eliminated.”

Scholar Majid Khadurri (1909-2007), after defining jihad as warfare, writes that jihad “is regarded by all jurists, with almost no exception, as a collective obligation of the whole Muslim community.”

As such, it should be no surprise that wherever and whenever Muslims live alongside non-Muslims, conflict, violence, and outright wars tend to be the norm — or, as political scientist Samuel Huntington memorably put it in Clash of Civilizations, “Islam’s borders are bloody.” He continued:

Wherever one looks along the perimeter of Islam, Muslims have problems living peaceably with their neighbors. The question naturally rises as to whether this pattern of late twentieth century conflict between Muslim and non-Muslim groups is equally true of relations between groups from other civilizations. In fact, it is not. Muslims make up about one-fifth of the world’s population but in the 1990s they have been far more involved in intergroup violence than the people of any other civilization. The evidence is overwhelming. [p. 256]

Indeed, matters have only gotten worse since Huntington’s book came out nearly 30 years ago. Whether one looks in Africa, where Muslims everywhere are slaughtering their Christian neighbors — going so far as to commit a genocide in Nigeria — or in Europe, where crimes and other “anti-infidel” forms of violence have spiked in direct proportion to Muslim migration, Huntington’s words remain true: “Muslims have problems living peaceably with their neighbors.”

This is why prudent Westerners have for centuries been finding the question of achieving permanent peace with the Islamic world a vexatious problem. Law professor James Lorimer (1818-1890) succinctly stated this problem well over a century ago:

So long as Islam endures, the reconciliation of its adherents, even with Jews and Christians, and still more with the rest of mankind, must continue to be an insoluble problem. … For an indefinite future, however reluctantly, we must confine our political recognition to the professors of those religions which … preach the doctrine of “live and let live.” (The Institutes of the Law of Nations, p. 124)

In other words, political recognition — with all the attendant negotiations and diplomacy that come with it — should be granted to all major religions and civilizations except Islam, which does not recognize the notion of “live and let live,” and therefore must always and everywhere be suppressed by those who would have peace.

Surely in this context, Israel’s war becomes more logical. If it is going to extreme and uncompromising lengths, that is because Islam makes its adherents go to extreme and uncompromising lengths.

As if any more proof was needed, just a few days ago, İsmet Özel, a well-known “poet” from Turkey, boasted during a televised conference that

Muslims are terrorists. The first duty of Muslims is to be terrorists. Kafirs [infidels] should be afraid of Muslims. If they are not afraid, then a Muslim is not a Muslim.

In light of all this, it is for the reader to decide whether a variation of an old adage (once attributed to “Huns”) is valid: “The Muslim is always either at your throat or at your foot.”

https://www.raymondibrahim.com/2024/10/09/achieving-peace-with-islam-is-impossible/


Wednesday 16 October 2024

History of ChiCom Cannibalism


Communist Cannibals

The horrors of China’s Cultural Revolution are an urgent warning to us.


It was 1967. America was two years away from landing on the moon and Chinese Communists were eating people. The Communists hadn’t turned cannibal because of hunger, but politics.

Mao’s cultural revolution had already led to brutal lynchings of teachers and principals by the Red Guards unleashed by the Communist regime to purge all ideological deviation, but beating political opponents to death wasn’t enough for the radical mobs in the Guangxi region.

By the end of the cultural revolution, as many as 20,000 Communists had eaten human flesh.

While the four hundred people cannibalized were a relatively small number compared to the estimated three million killed in the cultural revolution, and the 100,000 or so killed for ideological reasons without being eaten by Communists in the Guangxi region, they serve as a reminder of the depths of horror and evil that the Communist movement had descended to.

And to which it may end up returning once again.

Cannibalism was only one of the atrocities of the cultural revolution which included “beheading, beating, live burial, stoning, drowning, boiling, group slaughters, disemboweling, digging out hearts, livers, genitals, slicing off flesh, blowing up with dynamite and more”.

Communist officials organized cannibal orgies as a test of political loyalty. Friends, associates and close family members had to eat the flesh of dissidents to prove their ideological allegiance.

The orgies soon gave way to a banality of evil best described in one of the passages in Zheng Yi’s definitive book ‘Scarlet Memorial’ about the culture war cannibalism. “Strolling down the street, the director of the local Bureau of Commerce carried a human leg on his shoulder, which he was taking home to boil and consume. On the leg there still hung a piece of a man’s trouser.”

The killings began with struggle sessions, the victims, whether they were doctors, teachers or peasants, men and women who had once had money, visited foreign countries or stood in the way of Mao’s agenda, were paraded up and down the streets, berated and humiliated, and then beaten to death by waiting mobs. But eventually just beating them to death was not enough.

Like their originators in the French Revolution, the Communist found new cruelties. They killed parents in front of children. They buried their victims alive. They mutilated them. And ate them.

What began as mob violence where Red Guard “students killed their principals in the school courtyard and then cooked and ate the bodies to celebrate a triumph over ‘counterrevolutionaries'”, became formalized as government cafeterias displayed “bodies dangling on meat hooks” and “served human flesh to employees.”

A geography teacher had his heart and liver cut out. The “flesh was cooked in three places: One was the school kitchen… when the flesh was cooked, seven or eight students consumed it together.”

In one typical incident, a self-criticism rally (a struggle session) was held during which the targets had to get up on stage while they were berated and denounced. During the cultural revolution, such ‘rallies’ often ended in murder, but what happened next was worse. Instead of just killing them, the bodies of the dead “were stripped of flesh, which was taken back to the front of the brigade office to be boiled in two big pots. Twenty or thirty people participated in the cannibalism. Right out in the open, they boiled human flesh in front of the local government offices.”

The horrors were all part of a calculated plan. The Communist leaders assigned quotas to the Red Guards for how many people had to be killed. Mobs were encouraged to beat people to death because then the “masses can be educated in a relatively more efficient way.” The order was that after three days “one-fourth of the social dregs must be bludgeoned to death.”

“Model demonstrations of killing” were held before ‘communes’ were turned loose to kill people on their own. Thousands of people were being killed with fists and stones across the region in the name of the Communist Party. Entire families, men, women and children, even babies, were brutally killed by the Cultural Revolution’s cadres. Some were raped and tortured.

Girls had been encouraged to take the lead in the Cultural Revolution from the beginning. During the mass killings they were encouraged, “to do the killing and later they would address them as ‘sister nine’ or ‘sister ten’ based on the number of people they had killed.”

Sons begged for the lives of their mothers. Mothers begged for the lives of their children. “Please leave me one.” Ropes were put around the necks of children and they were dragged to their deaths through the dust for the greater glory of the Communist cause.

A mother trying to hide the truth from her little boy until the end dressed him in his best clothes, telling him that his “‘uncles’ were coming to take him to grandma’s.”

The convergence of Communism and Chinese folk medicine with its emphasis on the value of particular organs led to mobs harvesting and eating human hearts and livers for their medicinal value. Peasants recruited into the Communist mobs believed that eating human hearts would help them live longer. While some were forced to eat body parts, others eagerly joined in.

“There are many varieties of cannibalism and among them are these: killing someone and making a late dinner of it, slicing off the meat and having a big party, dividing up the flesh so each person takes a large chunk home to boil, roasting the liver and eating it for its medicinal properties,” a report described.

Among the endless horrors of the Communist mobs was “the practice of cutting out a person’s organs and frying them in oil while the victim was still alive.” A man being castrated pleaded, “let me die first then you can cut it.” The Communist killers however paid no attention to his pleas.

“Party members, cadres, land reform activists and the poor and lower-middle peasants” demanded the death of one particular victim. And then his disemboweling. A report described how one of the killers “extracted the organs, cut them into pieces and laid everything out on a board.”

The killer, who was an old man when he was interviewed for ‘Scarlet Memorial’, described how “the heart was cut into finger-sized slices. People in the crowd struggled to get a piece. The people were so numerous that I didn’t even get a share.”

The Communist machine kept detailed records of all the various atrocities it had committed.

A report described how a teacher heard that “consuming a ‘beauty’s heart’ could cure disease. “He then labeled a beautiful 13-or-14-year-old student of his as a ‘target of dictatorship’ and singled her out for killing.

This term from the ‘Dictatorship of the Proletariat’, the essence of Communism, licensed all killings of those branded as enemies of the people as the revolutionary will of the people.

“After the little girl was done in”, he remained and “cut open the girl’s chest with a duck-beak shaped tool, dug out her heart and took it home to enjoy.” At the time she was killed, the girl had been carrying her baby brother in a sling over her front.”

Much as during the French Revolution, old women would appear with baskets, but in Communist China, they were not there to knit. “Immediately after a victim was killed, the crowd would rush forward. Those at the forefront would get the good pieces of flesh. Those who came later divided up the bones among themselves.”

A female vice chairwoman of the Wuxuan Revolutionary Committee “after engaging in several revolutionary actions, became something of a specialist in consuming male reproductive organs.” The Communist Central Committee became upset at this obscene behavior, but were reassured when “subsequent investigation revealed that her cannibalism had been limited to the flesh and livers so she was allowed to remain in the Party.” The Communist leader in question was notable for her kindness in bringing “two pieces of flesh back home to her mother.”

“Feasts of human flesh” presided over by high-ranking Party members were held at fairs. Livers and hearts were quickly cut out and in cases prepared and cooked on the spot. As the killings continued, the cannibalism took on a professional culinary tone. “The Huangmao Food and Supply Store was among the most prominent sites of cannibalism. A large pot, eight feet in diameter, was used to boil the victims.”

In 1968, the Communist cannibalism finally ended. The Chinese Communist Party at the national level gave the order to end it immediately and a prolonged cover-up began. But the violence had served its larger purpose in Mao’s Cultural Revolution power struggle.

While word of it reached America early on, American leftists refused to believe it. It was not until the publication and translation of ‘Scarlet Memorial’, which was reviewed by the New York Times and the Washington Post in the nineties, that the facts were established.

And then quickly forgotten.

American leftists had been complicit in the horrors of Communist China and the Cultural Revolution. And they still are. Why does this litany of horrors in a far off country matter?

As Gov. Tim Walz’s 30-year relationship with China is scrutinized, it’s worth noting that a news story described how,  “Walz has always been fascinated by Communist China. He remembers from his childhood pictures of Mao Tse-Tung hung in public places and carried in parades.”

While these horrors were taking place, Western intellectuals and journalists returned from Communist China (as they had the USSR and Nazi Germany), and denied that anything terrible was going on.

A few years after the cannibalism, American Communist sympathizers set up the US-China Peoples Friendship Association (USCPFA) to “advance the interests of Communist China and world communism.” And in 2019, Gov. Walz was scheduled to appear at USCPFA’s convention.

That romanticism of Maoism remains. Maoist movements continue to lead the way in what many are calling the contemporary ‘Cultural Revolution’ on college campuses and public life. They play a crucial role in some of the most violent riots calling for the destruction of America.

Americans certain that this litany of horrors in a far-off place could never happen here all too quickly forget the sudden permission structure that licensed the random violence of the BLM riots, the Hamas mobs rampaging through cities and campuses and the vandalism of public places by a long list of radical leftist movements including Occupy Wall Street.

The underlying permission structure for ideological violence, for the dehumanization and targeting of some individuals and groups for political reasons, is just as alive in America.

Past surveys showed that 1 in 5 Ivy League students “expressed some level of acceptance for violence” for stopping campus speeches they didn’t like. Last year’s Buckley Institute survey found that nearly half of students agreed that “physical violence can be justified to prevent that person from espousing their hateful views.” Last year, a FIRE survey found that 1 in 3 students “believe it can be acceptable in at least some circumstances to use violence to stop a campus speech.” The campus numbers are trending toward growing acceptability of political violence.

The cannibalism described in ‘Scarlet Memorial’ is at the farthest and most extreme end of leftist violence, but it is part of a continuum of ideological violence that we are seeing today. It is the final endpoint of the leftist argument that anything is acceptable for the sake of social change.

Political mob violence, once underway, unleashes the worst evils inherent in human nature. That is as true of Communist cannibalism in China as it is true of Black Lives Matter. Convince a mob that it is oppressed and duty bound to do anything to end the oppression and it will do anything.

Anything at all.

The history of the Left, from the French Revolution to the USSR to Cuba, China and Cambodia, testifies to the horrors unleashed by the same ideology that is now taking over America.

And unless we learn from the history of the untold millions killed by the Left, we will repeat it.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/communist-cannibals/




Tuesday 15 October 2024

Greta Thunberg turns to the Darkside

The Dark New Greta Thunberg and Our Celebrity-Industrial Complex



Troublemaker being arrested

Way back in the ancient time of 2015, Matt Drudge found himself befuddled about why he was suddenly seeing actress Amy Schumer everywhere, when he didn’t find her particularly funny, insightful, or enjoyable. “Who is Amy Schumer? Where did she come from? Why is she being force-fed on population?” (The actress is Chuck Schumer’s cousin, and looking back I wonder if Drudge was implying that family connections were a driving force behind her then-burgeoning fame.)

Every now and then, you see some figure plucked from obscurity who is touted as the Next Big Thing, often with very little sense of why this person is so magnificent and head and shoulders above the rest. It is as if someone — some Hollywood super-agent, or magazine editor, or television network executive — has hand-selected a person and declared, “This person is going to be a star, come hell or high water.” A switch gets flipped, a high-tech pop-culture media whirligig swings into action, and suddenly that person is everywhere.

Sometimes you see it in Hollywood — Why was Ezra Miller in so many Hollywood blockbusters for a stretch? Why did Shia LaBeouf become the sidekick to every 1980s pop-culture icon? — and sometimes you see it in the world of politics — Beto O’Rourke and Stacey Abrams come to mind. Back in 2022, I jokingly referred to it as the “celebrity-industrial complex,” all those glossy magazines that can put someone on the cover and make someone’s face recognizable and their presence seem ubiquitous.

I thought of that as I saw Greta Thunberg now wearing a keffiyeh and leading pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel marches in Europe, declaring, “If you as a climate activist don’t also fight for a free Palestine and an end to colonialism and oppression all over the world then you should not be able to call yourself a climate activist. . . . You cannot be neutral in a genocide!”

Then there’s this recent wrinkle regarding Thunberg:

Politicians in Germany think that climate activist Greta Thunberg should be banned from entering the country over her participation in pro-Palestinian protests, according to the domestic policy spokesman for Germany’s biggest opposition party, the Christian Democratic Union.

Alexander Throm told BILD newspaper that it would be “not only appropriate but even necessary that the Federal Minister of the Interior issues an entry ban against this anti-Semite in the future.”

Throm said of the climate activist, “anyone who enters Germany to incite hatred against Israel and denigrate our police has no place in Germany.”

Now, when even the Germans are saying that you’re too hateful toward Jews . . .

In March 2020, a book review by Caitlin Gibson of the Washington Post noted, “Before Greta Thunberg became the face of the global climate movement, before she was Time magazine’s Person of the Year and a nominee for the Nobel Peace Prize, she was an 11-year-old child who suddenly stopped eating.”

“She cried at night when she should have been sleeping. She cried on her way to school. She cried in her classes and during her breaks, and the teachers called home almost every day,” [Thunberg’s mother] writes, recalling her fifth-grader’s sudden spiral in 2014. “She had disappeared into some kind of darkness and appeared to stop functioning.”

Thunberg had stopped playing piano, stopped laughing, stopped talking. She would eat only minuscule bites of certain foods prepared in a certain way by her agonized parents, who watched as it took their daughter hours to finish a plate of three or four gnocchi. Within months, Thunberg had lost 20 pounds, and her pulse and blood pressure showed signs of starvation.

Does . . . that sound to you like a person who ought to be catapulted into the spotlight of global celebrity? A good person to elevate to the level of a child prophet?

Back in 2018, someone decided that 15-year-old Thunberg would address the United Nations Climate Change Conference, and with her sneering face and sanctimonious outrage — shrieking “How dare you!” — she instantly become the face of the climate-change movement, Veruca Salt crossed with Rachel Carson.

Within a year, Thunberg was declared Time magazine’s person of the year.

Now as we watch Thunberg insist that the only way to be a true climate activist is by adopting the notion that Israel cannot continue to exist — that’s what those “decolonize from the river to the sea” signs mean, whether those holding them understand it or not — can we all now recognize that perhaps turning a troubled young teenager into the face of a global movement wasn’t such a swell idea?


https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-dark-new-greta-thunberg-and-our-celebrity-industrial-complex/


Greta Thunberg shot to fame globally for her campaign to protect the environment (Pictured above attending Westminster Magistrates in London for a haring after being charged with a public disorder offence for a protest). Could Grace be the Greta Thunberg of food additives?

Greta Thunberg attending Westminster Magistrates in London for a hearing after being charged with a public disorder offence for a protest

Greta was seen laughing and smiling outside Westminster Magistrates' Court today

Greta was seen laughing and smiling outside Westminster Magistrates' Court

Climate activist Greta Thunberg attends a pro-Palestine demonstration in Malmo, Sweden, where the Eurovision song contest took place

Climate activist Greta Thunberg attends a pro-Palestine demonstration in Malmo, Sweden

Thunberg was speaking at an event in Helsinki organised by XR

Thunberg speaking at an event in Helsinki organised by XR



Monday 14 October 2024

Review of New Book: The 1929 Massacre in Hebron


'Ghosts of a Holy War': How the Israel-Hamas War is rooted in the 1929 Hebron massacre


Grand Mufti shows SS youngster how to use a rifle

Yardena Schwartz, author of Ghosts of a Holy War: The 1929 Massacre in Palestine That Ignited the Arab-Israeli Conflict, is an award-winning American-born journalist who spent 10 years living and working in Israel. In 2019, she was handed the sort of literary treasure that most journalists can only dream of.

Ten years earlier, Suzie Lazarus (née Shainberg) and her husband, Paul, were still living in the old Shainberg family home in Memphis, Tennessee, but were about to move. Clearing the attic, they found a box filled with documents.

Suzie found, together with cables, telegrams, photographs, and a diary, more than 60 letters, each up to 10 pages long, written from what was then Palestine and dated in the late 1920s, all sent from her uncle David to his family.


The letters fascinated Suzie’s daughter, Jill. Over the next decade, Jill organized and digitized all of them, and finally archived them at her synagogue. Then, feeling that the archive deserved to be more widely known, she located Yardena Schwartz and entrusted her with the letters and diary.

What Schwartz discovered was truly enthralling.



Grand Mufti with Hitler

An amazing discovery connecting the 1929 massacre to today


Aged 22, David Shainberg, intensely religious and possessed of a deep feeling for Judaism, decided that his purpose in life was to travel to the Holy Land and study Torah. Against the wishes of his parents and family, who called his mission crazy, he set sail from New York Harbor on September 12, 1928.

When he landed in Palestine two weeks later, he spent a few nights in Tel Aviv, visited Jerusalem and the Kotel, and then made for the Hebron Yeshiva, the largest in the Holy Land.

His letters home provide a detailed picture of Palestine at the time and portray Hebron as a peaceful city, with Jews and Arabs living and working side by side. He tells of Jewish holidays and weddings, says Schwartz, “attended by Hebron’s Arab leaders and sheikhs, who danced into the night alongside rabbis.”

On August 24, 1929 – a Shabbat – some 3,000 heavily armed Arabs marched into Hebron and attacked the Jewish Quarter. They went from house to house raping, stabbing, torturing, castrating, and burning alive their unarmed victims. Sixty-seven Jewish men, women, and children were slaughtered – among them David Shainberg.

Schwartz perceives a direct link between that Hebron massacre and the Hamas pogrom of October 7, 2023, also a Shabbat.


“The forces that drove Arabs in Hebron to slaughter their Jewish neighbors in 1929,” she writes, “were identical to the forces behind October 7.” Schwartz’s title, Ghosts of a Holy War, indicates the centrality she ascribes to the religious element in the two episodes – in 1929, passions about protecting al-Aqsa Mosque, and in 2023 the fact that Hamas named its onslaught Operation Al-Aqsa Flood.

Schwartz takes her readers through the hundred years separating the two pogroms. She records how Britain tried to reconcile the opposing interests of the peoples under its control – the Arabs and the Jews – and finally admitted the failure of its Mandate government and withdrew. She recounts the foundation of the State of Israel, the refusal of many of its Arab neighbors to recognize it, and their several attempts to crush it.

Extensive research and detailed interviews with people on both sides of the conflict lie behind Schwartz’s accounts of how controversy surrounding the Temple Mount and the Western Wall helped fuel Arab-Israeli conflict on and off throughout the century.

Always present were Arab fears, easily ignited, that Israel intended to restrict Muslim rights over al-Aqsa Mosque and the adjacent Dome of the Rock. Yet she is also alert to political realities and does not fail to mention that in waging the deadliest attack in Israeli history, Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar’s “alleged goal was to scuttle an imminent peace agreement between Saudi Arabia and Israel.”

Schwartz does her readers a real service by providing the historical background to the extremist philosophy at the core of Hamas jihadist rejectionism. She does this by tracing the rise of Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, endorsed in that position by the British Mandate authorities. She describes his anti-Jewish fanaticism and his powerful influence on Arab opinion. Among the numerous photographs that illustrate her text, Schwartz includes the notorious shot of al-Husseini in close discussion with Adolf Hitler in Berlin in 1941; and another, less well known, showing him giving the Nazi salute as he inspects Waffen-SS troops in November 1943.

Al-Husseini is on the record as participating in the planning of Hitler’s “Final Solution” and urging the Nazis to hasten the elimination of Europe’s Jews. The line of philosophy from these beliefs to the founding principles of Hamas is clear.

What Schwartz might have made a little more of are the realpolitik considerations that led the Shi’ite revolutionary regime of Iran into supporting, financing, and weaponizing the Sunni Hamas organization to help achieve their common goal of eliminating the Jewish state.

Ghosts of a Holy War tells a gripping story, recounting not only events of historical magnitude but also the reasons behind them. Schwartz has an especially attractive writing style, which keeps the reader turning the pages. For anyone interested in understanding the back history of Black Sabbath – namely, October 7, 2023 – this is a must-read volume.


https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-824086


Remembering the 1929 Hebron massacre


Before the mid-1980s, if a crowd gathered at the site of the Avraham Avinu synagogue in Hebron, they would have found crumbling walls and a sheep pen. The synagogue, built in 1540 by returning Sephardi Jewish exiles from the Spanish Inquisition, was abandoned after the infamous 1929 massacre.

But recently Hebron was filled with people snapping photos of the original Torah scrolls, which date back hundreds of years. Now reconstructed, the house of worship has daily services, using the same Torah scrolls used by the community that once lived there.

Dr. Yinon Elmakias, who lectured about the Torah scrolls, was one of the academics who led the seminar marking the anniversary of the 1929 massacre that took 67 lives and resulted in the expulsion of the Jewish community. Young and old walked through the now inhabited Jewish quarter in the city that suffered from the worst of the disturbances that year.

The conference began at Midreshet Hevron, a college in Kiryat Arba. Prof. Gershon Bar Kochba, a Hebron resident, spoke about what was called the Jewish ghetto of Hebron, the only place in Israel referred to by that name. With copious notes and photos of the neighborhood – including maps and diagrams of what 1920s Hebron Jewish life was like – Bar Kochba described a traditional, tight-knit, humble community on a lower economic stratum.

The next speaker was Dr. Yuval Arnon-Ohana of Ariel University. In contrast to the previous speaker, he was clean-shaven, bare-headed and spoke almost without any notes. He fascinated the crowd by his lecture on Arab riots, which were instigated by Haj Amin Husseini, the mufti of Jerusalem.
Arnon-Ohana explained that Husseini’s excuse for the riots was the increase in Jewish immigration. He countered, however, that in the late 1920s, Jewish immigration was at one of its lowest points. He argued that the real reason was a bid for power by Husseini, who sought to consolidate Arab factions by whipping them into a frenzy over a common enemy.
Husseini later became a supporter of Hitler, as evidenced by the famous photo of the two sitting together in Germany.
The cause and details surrounding the riots have filled volumes. Why did neighbors slaughter neighbors? Although tensions existed in the city between Jews and Arabs over generations, daily interaction was a fact of life. For example, the chief rabbi of Hebron, Rabbi Eliyahu Mani (c.1818-1899), mentioned frequently in the lectures, was revered by Jews and Arabs alike as a spiritual leader. The Chabad matriarch Menucha Rochel Slonim (1798–1888) was also respected, and offered advice to both communities despite her seemingly outsider status as an immigrant from Russia.

Sarah Tzipporah Segal (left) (Ben Bresky) Enlrage image
Sarah Tzipporah Segal (left) 
In the riots of 1921, also instigated by Haj Amin Husseini, Hebron was calm. This led to a lax attitude seven years later. But on that fateful Shabbat on August 24, 1929, mobs of Arabs broke into Jewish homes, torturing, raping and murdering 67 people. Their bodies were mutilated and their homes looted. Although many claimed they were only seeking revenge on “The Zionists” or “the strangers,” both Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews were murdered. Young and old, long-time residents and new immigrants were targeted. The remaining community was rounded up by the British Mandate authorities and sent off to Jerusalem. The memorial to the victims was later vandalized, and the cemetery plowed over.
One of the most violent and dramatic episodes of the riots involved that of Eliezer Dan Slonim, from the famous Chabad family that helped revitalize the backwater community when they immigrated en-masse in the mid-1800s. Slonim spoke fluent Arabic, and was the only Jewish member of the Hebron city council.
He was manager of the Anglo-Palestine Bank, and well-known by both Jews and Arabs. It was for this reason that Jewish community members sought refuge in his home.
The Jewish Telegraphic Agency reported on October 9, 1929, in an article titled “Hebron, Five Weeks After the Massacre,” that “it could not help hearing reports of the mob’s demand that Slonim should surrender the ‘foreigners,’ meaning the yeshiva students sheltered in his house, if his and his family’s lives were to be spared, and the martyr’s historic answer, ‘We Jews are one.’” Slonim and his family, including his wife and young children, were killed. One child, one-year-old Shlomo Slonim, survived. He was found with a knife wound in his forehead in his dead mother’s arms.
Shlomo Slonim, who died in 2014, used to attend the memorial in Hebron every year. This year, the few remaining survivors are all in the 90s.
One of the more vocal survivors, Miriam Sasson, died at the age of 92. She was part of the Castel family, whose roots in Hebron go back to the time of the Spanish Inquisition. Her family was in the group that returned to the city from 1931 to 1935, before the British again deported the Jewish residents amid countrywide rioting in 1936.
It was an Arab neighbor who saved Miriam and her family from the massacre by hiding her in his butcher shop. However another member of the Castel family, 60-year-old Rabbi Shlomo Castel, was burned to death by the mob.
The irony of some Arabs risking their lives to save their neighbors while others brutalized the defenseless has been debated for decades.
One lecturer at the conference had a more personal connection to the story. Tzipi Schissel, curator of the Hebron History museum, led a tour of the site located in the historic Beit Hadassah. The building, originally built in 1893, served as one of the first Hadassah hospital branches and treated residents of all backgrounds.
In 1929 it was the site of violence, and was subsequently ransacked.
The participants of the conference viewed the new 4D movie titled Touching Eternity, about the history of Hebron. As dramatic as the film was Schissel’s description of what her grandmother went through in those dark days. Standing in a hall dedicated in memory of the victims, she told the group about Sarah Tzipporah Segal, whom her family affectionately called “Tzippora’le.”
“She was approximately 14 years old during the pogrom,” Schissel stated. She and her sisters survived with the help of an old man named Abu Shaker Amru, who refused to allow the rioters to enter his house. But the rioters were so cruel that they attacked him and chopped his leg off.” Abu Shaker is mentioned in detail for his heroism, in the book Year Zero of the Arab-Israeli Conflict 1929, by Hillel Cohen.

Dr. Yinon Elmakias lectures about the Torah scrolls in Hebron’s Avraham Avinu synagogue, some of them dating back almost 500 years (Ben Bresky)Enlrage image
Dr. Yinon Elmakias lectures about the Torah scrolls in Hebron’s Avraham Avinu synagogue, some of them dating back almost 500 years 
In her role at the museum, Schissel meets a wide range of people including family members of the old community, something she says brings her inspiration.
“A soldier stationed in Hebron brought his 99-year-old grandfather, who recognized his own father in an old photo of the Avraham Avinu Synagogue,” she related.
Today, with only a handful of survivors, efforts are being made to preserve the memories. The Jewish Community of Hebron has posted interviews of many survivors on YouTube, which feel almost like many of the Holocaust testimonies prepared by Yad Vashem.
Both have mentions of ghettos, pogroms and lost communities.
Old newspaper articles are now accessible on website such as the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. One, dated September 27, 1929, describes the trial of the few rioters who were brought to justice: “The simple-worded testimony of thirteen-year-old Judith Reizman, of how she saw her father, mother and uncle pursued by a mob of howling... brandishing knives and daggers, later finding the bodies in the gutters, produced a dramatic atmosphere in the Hebron court.
“When the Reizman girl had told her story in the breathless silence of the courtroom, the judge asked her if she could identify anyone... she calmly walked up to Ibrahim Abd El Assiz, a young Hebron merchant, her father’s next door neighbor, saying, ‘Yes, Ibrahim was nearest my father with a knife uplifted when the mob overtook my father.’ Then addressing the Arab, who hung his head in shame, the girl asked him in the kindest voice imaginable, ‘Ibrahim, how could you?’” The article later described Hebron as “commercially a dead city. Merchants’ stalls are heaped high with unsold fruit and vegetables...”
In a follow-up on December 18, 1932, an article titled “Decline of Hebron Since Massacres of 1929” noted “nearly 50 percent of Hebron’s dwellings are untenanted.”
Reciting the Kaddish prayer at the city’s ancient Jewish cemetery (Ben Bresky) Enlrage image
Reciting the Kaddish prayer at the city’s ancient Jewish cemetery
Another article dated October 4, 1929, quotes Rachel, seven-year-old daughter of Eliahu Pelazzi (also spelled Palachi): “I remember the day of the riots. We were all at home, I, father, mother, grandmother and some neighbors,” she stated at the trial. “Muslims suddenly began knocking at the doors, broke one down and beat at another with iron bars. The room suddenly was filled with Muslims, but I recognized only Ismael. He had a knife in his hand. With this he stabbed my father. I saw it. I know Ismael from before,” the child declared.
A follow-up article dated April 24, 1930, stated the accused “was acquitted in the High Court, because the court was not satisfied with the witnesses offered by the prosecution.”
A video testimony posted on YouTube shows Rachel, an older woman with gray hair, describing life in Hebron in the 1920s.
Other articles that covered the trials describe Jewish witnesses identifying former Arab friends as those that participated in the massacre. Several of the victims were Americans, who had moved to Hebron to study in the prestigious Slobodka Yeshiva. The State Department listed eight Americans killed: William Zev (Wolf) Berman of Philadelphia; David Sheinberg of Memphis; Benjamin Hurvitz and Wolf Greenberg of Brooklyn; and Harry Frohman, Hyman Krasner, Aaron David Epstein and Jacob Wexler of Chicago.
Most of those caught received only light sentences.
After a dozen or so were sentence to death, the British government commuted the sentences. In the end, three rioters were executed by the British. A June 17, 1932, article stated that Arab leaders called to “remember the Arab ‘heroes’ who were executed... The Arab Executive announced a general strike on the day of the executions, and there were demonstrations by Arab school children.”
The conference ended with a memorial service at the ancient Jewish cemetery in Hebron. The graves of such Torah luminaries as Rabbi Eliyahu de Vidas (Reshit Hochma) and Rabbi haim Hezekiah Medini (Sde Hemed) are located here, as is a memorial to the 1929 victims. Kaddish and the traditional El Malei Rahamim prayer were said, and as the sun set over the city and the large Israeli flags waved over the plots, the mourners stood in silence.
Hebron seems to be a city of ironies. Today, almost 700,000 people visit every year, especially to see the monumental Cave of the Patriarchs, burial site of the biblical Matriarchs and Patriarchs. Yet the city is also known for violence and religious/ethnic tension.
As the mourners faced the quiet cemetery in the old section of the city, behind them in the distance could be heard the honking cars and busy factories of the Palestinian Authority side of Hebron, the commercial center of the region.
Perhaps Schissel summed it up best: “I think it’s impossible to understand the reality we face today, without knowing the history of Hebron.”
https://www.jpost.com/metro/remembering-the-1929-hebron-massacre-464460