Trump was right.

 

HCQ and Ivermectin work

Two weeks ago, my war report triggered a bunch of major media outlets here and in  Africa, prompting them to publish hilarious attempts to discredit me.

They like to (unironically) call their agenda-driven nonsense as "fact checking".

For example, they all took issue with me saying that Trump was right to promote hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as a treatment for COVID-19.

Here's the thing.

Trump was right.

And this utterly destroys the fragile sensibilities of journalistic hacks.

I won't go into the data breakdown here, but you can click on the following summary which will take you to a website with all the HCQ studies.

Here's the conclusion of all the studies, thus far:

Database of all HCQ COVID-19 studies. 306 studies, 225 peer reviewed, 256 comparing treatment and control groups. Submit updates/corrections below. HCQ is not effective when used very late with high dosages over a long period (RECOVERY/SOLIDARITY), effectiveness improves with earlier usage and improved dosing. Early treatment consistently shows positive effects. Negative evaluations typically ignore treatment time, often focusing on a subset of late stage studies. In Vitro evidence made some believe that therapeutic levels would not be attained, however that was incorrect, e.g. see [Ruiz].

The Indian government promotes HCQ as a treatment for COVID-19, and you can read the dosage recommendations on the Indian government's website.

Speaking of India, the Indian Bar Association is suing the WHO's chief scientist for lying to the public about Ivermectin. You can download the full legal notice here. 

But HCQ isn't just used in India; it's used in a number of countries.

Mainstream journalists who perpetuate propaganda about HCQ are probably doing so because they don't want to lose their income, combined with having neither integrity nor desire to expose the truth.

Ivermectin also works

Predictably, another one of the aforementioned media attacks revolved around Ivermectin because it's cheap and, as such, opposed by the pharmaceutical giants and governmental puppets looking for multimillion-dollar backhanders.

There is no debate at all. The data is clear.

I mean, what would a mRNA biotech inventor know, right?

Don't trust anybody

By all means, don't trust what I say. Do your own research and test what I say. Test what others say. Challenge everything and everybody. Follow the money trails, and follow the power trails.

For example, would you put your faith in a clinical study, by a laboratory concluding that Ivermectin is ineffective, funded by a pharmaceutical company that manufactures a competing product?

Yes, this actually happened.

Remember that pharmaceutical companies don't actually care about your wellbeing. They are simply corporations selling products and turning a profit. Pfizer doesn't operate from a position of nobility or some sort of moral high ground; it sells a pill and it wants you to buy it, no matter the cost.

Keep that in mind next time you hear about why you must get the Covid "vaccine".

And never forget that political leaders are nothing more than wealthy actors laughing at us because we believe they are honourable and honest.

Just look at them with their masks and social distancing at the G7 Summit.

Oh, wait.

- Jerm

jermwarfare.com via amazonses.com