(Updated: )
www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/china-defends-barring-rights-chief-from-hong-kong-12258806
Kenneth Roth was supposed to give a press conference in Hong Kong to
unveil the New York-based rights group's latest global survey. (Photo:
AFP/John Macdougall)
BEIJING: China on Monday (Jan 13) defended barring the head of Human
Rights Watch from entering Hong Kong, saying non-governmental
organisations were responsible for political unrest in the city and
should "pay the proper price"
Kenneth Roth was supposed to give a
press conference in Hong Kong this week to unveil the New York-based
rights group's latest global survey, which accuses China of prosecuting
"an intensive attack" on international human rights agencies.
The long-time executive director said Sunday that he was turned back by authorities at the city's airport.
China
last month announced sanctions on American NGOs, including HRW, in
retaliation for the passage of a US bill backing Hong Kong's
pro-democracy movement.
"Allowing or not allowing someone's entry
is China's sovereign right," foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said
at a regular press briefing.
"Plenty of facts and evidence show
that the relevant NGO has through various means supported anti-China
radicals, encouraged them to engage in extremist, violent and criminal
activity, and incited Hong Kong independence separatist activities,"
Geng said.
"They bear major responsibility for the current chaos in Hong Kong.
These organisations should be punished, and should pay the proper
price."
Hong Kong has been battered by nearly seven months of occasionally violent protests, its biggest political crisis in decades.
Millions have turned out on the streets of the semi-autonomous financial hub to demand greater democratic freedoms.
Hong Kong has been battered by nearly seven months of occasionally
violent protests, its biggest political crisis in decades. (Photo:
AFP/Isaac Lawrence)
"Why does Beijing
advance the ludicrous fiction that @HRW incited the Hong Kong
pro-democracy protests?" Roth fired back on Twitter.
"Because it
is desperate to pretend that hundreds of thousands of Chinese citizens
aren't protesting Beijing's increasingly dictatorial rule."
NOT THE FIRST
Roth
joins a growing list of openly critical academics, researchers,
politicians and activists who have been refused entry in recent years.
Financial
Times journalist Victor Mallet was denied a visa renewal without reason
in 2018 after he hosted a talk with the leader of a small and now
banned independence party at the city's press club.
Last
September, an American academic was barred from entering after he
testified in a Congressional hearing alongside prominent Hong Kong
democracy activists.
"I had hoped to spotlight Beijing's deepening
assault on international efforts to uphold human rights," Roth said.
"The refusal to let me enter Hong Kong vividly illustrates the problem."
Phil
Robertson, deputy director of Human Rights Watch's Asia division, said
that when Roth asked why he was prevented from entering Hong Kong, he
was only told that it was "immigration reasons".
"What we believe
is that he was stopped because the Chinese government is afraid to have
the world know what they are doing to the people of Hong Kong and the
people of China," Robertson told AFP in Bangkok.
The unrest that
began last June is the biggest crisis the former British colony has
faced since its return to Chinese rule in 1997.
Under the terms of
the handover, Hong Kong enjoys unique freedoms unseen on the mainland,
but in recent years fears have increased that these liberties are being
chipped away as Beijing exerts more control over the territory.
China
and the Hong Kong administration have refused to cede to the
protesters' demands, which include fully free elections in the city, an
inquiry into alleged police misconduct, and amnesty for the nearly 6,500
people arrested during the movement -- nearly a third of them under the
age of 20.
Hong Kong's Foreign Correspondents' Club, which was to
host Roth's press conference on Wednesday, said in a statement it was
concerned that the city's government was using the immigration
department to "act punitively against organisations and media
representatives it does not agree with, which is a violation of the
commitment to free expression and free speech in Hong Kong law."
Source: AFP/ec
No comments:
Post a Comment