Monday, 2 December 2019

US Life Expectancy Drops For Third Straight Year in Alarming Reality Check

AYLIN WOODWARD, BUSINESS INSIDER, 2 DEC 2019

Ambulance medics care for a patient in Massachusetts. (Brian Snyder/Reuters)

The US is the only wealthy country in the world where the life expectancy needle is moving the wrong way.

Between 1959 and 2014, the average length of time that Americans were expected to live was on the rise. Now, for the third year in a row, it's declining, according to a new study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

"Americans operate under a lot of misconceptions about how superior we are in many facets of our lives and this is not one of them," the study's lead author Steven Woolf told Business Insider. "We may think we have best medical care in world and highest life expectancy … but that's not the case."

This decline can't be linked to just one ethnicity, gender, or geographic area, either: It originates among an entire age group. People between the ages of 25 and 64 in the US are dying at higher rates, wracked by health problems like opioid addiction, obesity, alcoholic liver disease, and suicide.

Despite having the highest per capita health care spending in the world, Americans are "more likely to die before age 65 than people in other countries," Woolf added. "Their children, too, are less likely to live as long".
A terrifying trend

Woolf and his co-author Heidi Schoomaker's new study looked at more than 50 years' worth of data on US life expectancy from the US Mortality Database and the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention's WONDER database.

Results showed that, in the 1970s, the country experienced a rapid and significant jump in life expectancy. But by the 1990s, that increase started to level off.

In 2011, US life expectancy plateaued, and three years later it started to drop.

"We've reached the point where we're going into a free fall," Woolf said.

Medical advances, particularly in the realms of cancer treatment and heart health, prompted an almost 10-year increase in the average American's lifespan. Between 1959 and 2013, life expectancy rose from 69.9 years to 78.9 years. Now, however, that average has dropped to 78.6 years.

The news isn't good if you compare it to other countries, either. In 1960, Americans had the highest life expectancy of any country in the world. But in the past couple of years, the US has plummeted to the bottom of the list of countries with a similar GDP and high average income, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

In fact, the US is currently ranked in the mid-40s globally in terms of life expectancy, squished between countries like Lebanon, Cuba, and Chile, which have GDPs that fall far short of our own.

That troubling dip, according to Woolf, can be linked to the fact that deaths among Americans ages 25 to 64 are increasing.

'Working-age' Americans are dying

These deaths can't be traced back to a single cause, either. Woolf's research revealed that mortality among members of this age group has increased from 35 different causes. However, drug overdose, alcohol abuse, and suicide – referred to by some as "deaths of despair" – appear to be the primary culprits.

This age group experienced a nearly four-fold increase in fatal drug overdoses between 1999 and 2017.

Suicide rates went up by nearly 40 percent for people between the ages of 25 and 64, and by 56 percent for people ages 55 to 64 during the same time frame. For Americans between the ages of 25 and 34, the rate of alcohol-related disease deaths spiked almost 160 percent, as well.

Obesity-related mortality rates among this age group also went up by 114 percent, and deaths linked to high blood increased by about 80 percent.

"Working-age Americans are more likely to die in the prime of their lives," Woolf said. Between 2010 and 2017, midlife US adults experienced a 6 percent total increase in mortality rate.

The largest increases in death rates occurred among people living in New England states (middle-aged New Hampshirites saw a 23.3 percent uptick; Maine residents, 20.7 percent; Vermont dwellers, 19.9 percent) and residents of the Ohio Valley (West Virginians experienced a 23 percent increase and Ohioans, 21.6 percent).

Not all parts of the US experienced the same trend, however. Life expectancy between 2010 and 2017 increased for Americans living in Hawaii, California, and parts of the Pacific Northwest.

All told, men are dying in overall higher numbers than women. However, Woolf's research reveals that women experienced an greater increased risk of drug overdoses, suicides, and alcohol-related liver disease compared to previous decades.

"There's an obvious implication of this for employers," Woolf said. "If this trend continues, they're going to have a less healthy, less productive workforce that's more likely to die prematurely compared to employees in other countries."
Why is this happening when the US spends so much on healthcare?

This counterintuitive trend – of an affluent, first-world country that spends billions on privatised healthcare losing swaths of their middle-aged working class – could be traced back to one massive elephant in the room.

"It's a quandary of why this is happening when we spend so much on healthcare," Woolf said, adding: "But my betting money is on the economy."

The "Rust Belt," the Midwestern US states nearest to the Great Lakes like Ohio, were among the hardest hit by changes to the economy and related loss of factory jobs, the researcher said. "Steel mills and coal mines have been closing, while in contrast, California has done well in terms of its economics."

Upticks in suicides, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related diseases "are all symptoms of people struggling in a poor economy who can't afford housing, find consistent jobs," and despair because of it, according to Woolf.

"We are seeing social determinants of health shaping well-being and outcomes," Howard Koh, a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of public health who was not involved in the study, told Business Insider.

"Forces like income inequality and unstable employment cause psychological distress and drive conditions by which diseases and deaths occur," he added.

In countries around the world, research has shown that people with lower incomes die sooner than their wealthier counterparts. A 2017 study linked low socioeconomic status to significant reductions in life expectancy.

But what makes the US unique, according to Woolf, is that "poor people in other countries live longer than poor people in our country".

The gap between America's rich and poor has widened not only from a socioeconomic standpoint but also in terms of health inequality.

"The price you pay in terms of your health for not being on the top rung of the economic ladder is getting more dire," Woolf said.

According to Koh's editorial commentary on the new study, the difference in life expectancy between America's top and bottom 1 percent can be up to 14 years for men and 10 years for women.
'A troubling new norm'

"Everyone assumed life expectancy would continue to rise, but the nation now risks declining life expectancy to be a very troubling new norm," Koh said.

The only way to find out whether Koh's prediction is true is by analysing the most recent life expectancy data from 2018. Those numbers will be released by the CDC in the next few months, Woolf said. "But all signs from research we've done indicate it's not going to be good news."

And neither Woolf nor Koh think that the life expectancy situation will improve over time unless the underlying social and socioeconomic issues are adequately addressed. Woolf said state governments need to invest in marginalised communities and work to alleviate financial burdens on middle-class families.

The Harvard researcher added that US policy-makers need to pay more attention to what he calls "leading causes of life," like building stronger communities that precipitate more vibrant social connections and help Americans rebuild a sense of purpose in the face of financial despair.

"The public health world is rapidly understanding that health is much more than what happens to you in a doctor's office," Koh said. "It happens where people live, learn, play, and pray."

Recommend this post and follow TCW

Klobuchar hints she'll vote to convict Trump if impeachment trial reaches Senate

https://www.foxnews.com/media/klobuchar-hints-at-vote-convict-trump-impeachment-trial-senate

20/20 presidential hopeful Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., will likely vote to convict President Trump if his impeachment inquiry moves to the Senate for a trial, she said during a Sunday television interview.
Klobuchar appeared on CNN's "State of the Union," where host Dana Bash asked her if she would consider acquiting Trump, based on the current crop of evidence.
"At this point, I don’t see that," the Minnesota Democrat replied. "But I’m someone that wants to look at every single count. I’ve made very clear -- I think this is impeachable conduct."
She said Democrats should be ashamed of themselves if they fail to stop Trump's reelection bid, and urged the party to embrace a bigger tent of constituents.

"If Donald Trump gets elected, shame on us," Klobuchar said. "We need to bring our party together and bring with us independents and moderate Republicans, just like I’ve done in all my races where I’ve run in suburbs, rural and suburban areas."

More fro

She also said her fellow 2020 candidates have not appealed to suburban voters and claimed she is the only one who can bridge the gap, and come up with enough votes to beat the president.
"We need to put someone at the head of the ticket that can actually bring people with us. And I am the only one on the debate stage that has led a ticket over and over again where I have brought in suburbs, rural areas and urban areas in a big, big way," Klobuchar said.

"And every time I’ve led a ticket, we flipped the statehouse in my state. And I could do the same nationally. I think that matters," she added. "I think that experience of winning and knowing how to build that coalition matters. And that is the argument I’m going to keep making."

KLM passengers spend 11 hours in the air going nowhere thanks to volcanic eruption and horses

https://www.foxnews.com/travel/klm-11-hours-volcano-horses


Passengers spent 11 hours in the air only to end up right where they started.
A flight from Amsterdam to Mexico was forced to turn around about five-and-a-half hours into the flight due to a volcanic eruption. The plane was reportedly unable to land at another airport because it was also carrying a cargo of horses.

KLM flight KL685 from Amsterdam’s Schiphol airport to Mexico City was over Canada when the decision was made to turn around, The Independent reports. The plane returned to the airport it originated from, making this a very long flight that ultimately went nowhere.

The plane was unable to land at its original destination because of volcanic activity from Popocatepetl, an active volcano near Mexico City. The eruption had created “unfavorable flying conditions.”
Normally, the airline would look to land the plane at an alternate airport but was unable to do so with flight KL685 because it was also carrying a cargo of horses.

In a statement obtained by The Independent, a spokesperson for KLM said, “Due to a volcanic eruption in Mexico, the flight KL685 Amsterdam-Mexico returned to Schiphol on Thursday 28 November.”
The statement also confirmed that the horses contributed to the flight’s issues.

“The flight landed safely at Schiphol at 2:30 a.m.,” it continued, “where the passengers disembarked normally and have been taken care of in Amsterdam. They will be rebooked on an alternative flight. Landing at another airport was not possible, because of the visa requirements of passengers and as there was a large cargo of horses onboard.”

Supreme Court to take up first gun rights case in nearly a decade

https://www.foxnews.com/us/supreme-court-gun-rights-case-decade

The U.S. Supreme Court, in its first gun rights case in nearly a decade, will hear arguments Monday from Second Amendment advocates challenging a New York City law that restricts licensed holders to a handful of shooting ranges within the city.
Gun rights groups are hoping the high court will extend its landmark rulings from 2008 and 2010 that enshrined the right to have a gun for self-defense at home.

The National Rifle Association (NRA) and its allies have for years tried to get the court to say more about gun rights.
The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments on a gun rights case for the first time in nearly a decade. 
The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments on a gun rights case for the first time in nearly a decade.  (AP)
The lawsuit in New York began as a challenge to the city's prohibition on carrying a licensed, locked and unloaded handgun outside the city limits, either to a shooting range or a second home.
Lower courts upheld the regulation, but the Supreme Court's decision in January to step into the case signaled a revived interest in gun rights from a court with two new Trump-appointed justices: Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.
Gun control advocates at both the city and state levels scrambled to find a way to remove the case from the justices' grasp. Not only did the city change its regulation to allow licensed gun owners to transport their weapons to locations outside New York's five boroughs, but the state enacted a law barring cities from imposing the challenged restrictions.

"There is no case or controversy because New York City has repealed the ordinance and the New York State Legislature has acted to make sure it remains repealed," said Jonathan Lowy, chief counsel and vice president of the gun control group Brady's Legal Alliance.
But those moves failed to get the Supreme Court to dismiss the case.
Paul Clement, who represents three New York residents and New York's NRA affiliate challenging the transportation ban, said New York City “still views firearm ownership as a privilege and not a fundamental right, and is still in the business of limiting transport and denying licenses for a host of discretionary reasons."
The city had contended that what it calls its "former rule" did not violate the Constitution. But that is unlikely to persuade the court’s conservative majority.

A decision is expected by late June.

Lawrence Jones: Trump will 'filet' Biden in 2020 general election

https://www.foxnews.com/media/lawrence-jones-trump-will-filet-biden-in-2020-general-election


With moderate Democratic presidential candidates topping recent polls, "The Five" discussed whether  the Democratic Party has come "back to reality" and moved away from the "far-left" candidates in their party.
"I think the bottom line is, is that the Democratic Party voters, they want to win," co-host Lawrence Jones said Friday. "And they realize that the socialism, no matter how crazy the activists and the Twitter activists are, they want to beat the president."

A Quinnipiac University poll released Tuesday shows Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren's numbers slashed in half from 28 percent to 14 percent from the month before. After leading the pack in Quinnipiac’s October poll – which was seen as a sign of her surge in the race – Warren’s 14-point drop has her now in third place behind former Vice President Joe Biden and South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg.
–– ADVERTISEMENT ––

Co-host Dana Perino believe's the party's more centrist voters are now paying attention to the race.
"Early on in a primary process the most active is wing of your party is going to be the most active. And then as you get now, we're 65 days till the first votes in Iowa," Perino said. "Now everybody else starts paying a little bit more attention."
Jones pointed out frontrunner Biden was problematic for Democrats.
"But it's still problematic for them because Joe Biden is a weak candidate," Jones said, calling him "wounded."

The Fox Nation host predicted Biden would win the nomination but would ultimately fall to President Trump in the 2020 general election.
"I think it's going to be Joe Biden at the end of the day," Jones said. "And I think the president is going to filet him."

Tom Homan: Colorado sheriff's department decision to release illegal immigrant 'political' not 'legal'

https://www.foxnews.com/media/tom-homan-sanctuary-city-colorado-murder-detainer-ice



A Colorado sheriff's department decision to release an illegal immigrant who is now accused of attempted murder was a "political" decision and a searing indictment against sanctuary city policies, former Acting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Tom Homan said Saturday.
Osmani Garces-Ortiz, 37, was arrested in October in Arapahoe County on trespassing and drug charges, authorities said. ICE said it asked the sheriff's office for a detainer on Garces-Ortiz after he posted bond.
The sheriff's policy, however, is to not hold inmates for extra time unless ICE has a warrant, which follows a state law. Less than a month after being released, Garces-Ortiz was arrested on an attempted murder charge stemming from an assault in which a victim was stabbed, according to USA Today.

Homan, appearing on "Fox & Friends: Weekend" with hosts Ed Henry, Pete Hegseth, and Nicole Saphier, said the crime could have been prevented if ICE had been allowed to take the suspect into custody.
"Sanctuary city policies [are] just ridiculous," he said. "Here's a person who was in the custody of local officials because he was arrested for a crime, so they chose to lock him up and put him in a jail cell, and ICE notified them: 'We want him before you release him.' And, it didn't happen. They didn't honor a detainer."
"And I've read the story," he said. "They were saying, 'Well, there's a legal issue.' There is no legal issue. The detainer's honored by most law enforcement agencies across the country. This is a political decision -- not a legal decision."
Garces-Ortiz, a Cuban national, illegally entered the U.S. in 2008 via boat near Key West, Florida, according to ICE. He had previous encounters with immigration officials, and in 2015 he was denied permanent residence in the U.S. due to a criminal history
In a statement released Friday, ICE Denver said that although they were advised of Garces-Ortiz's imminent release, "a notification that an alien is about to be released to the lobby is not a functional way to ensure transfer of custody."
Chief Vince Lane reported that the sheriff's office notified ICE Garces-Ortiz would be released and that "at the time of the inmate's release from custody a legal reason to continue to hold the inmate did not exist."
"Arapahoe Country -- this isn't new for them," Homan said. "They've been a sanctuary jurisdiction for a long time, along with most of Colorado."
"The most recent decision legal on the detainer is out of the Fifth Circuit [U.S. Court of Appeals], and it says detainers are constitutional," he told the "Friends: Weekend" hosts.

Homan said the Arapahoe County Sheriff's Department's decision to release Garces-Ortiz was based on an old detainer which "didn't clearly show that they had probable cause to make the arrest."
"The new detainer, [which] has been in place for three years now, has that probable cause statement in the detainer, which makes it a legal document," he explained.
"So again, they have their own attorneys. Their attorneys can certainly look at the Immigration Nationality Act to see detainers are the tool established by Congress within the federal law to take custody of [illegal] aliens within 48 hours," Homan stated.