Sunday, 28 December 2025

Yossi Cohen, former Mossad Chief


Inside the mind of Yossi Cohen: A Mossad chief’s adventures 

In conversations over the years, there were moments when Cohen left the Post speechless


There are still many things about former Mossad chief Yossi Cohen that The Jerusalem Post Magazine cannot reveal.

But after he published his book in September – The Sword of Freedom – bringing the world much deeper into his personal world and history, the Post can reveal a somewhat more inside picture of the ex-spy chief than has been conveyed to date.

Many top Israeli defense officials waffled over the years about whether they could physically stop the Iranians’ nuclear program.

For Cohen, Israel and the Mossad’s ability to stop the Islamic Republic’s march toward a nuclear bomb was never in question.

The former Mossad chief backed up his confidence with results when it came to combating Iran’s nuclear progress.

As he revealed to the Post in July, only weeks after the Iran war, much of the Mossad’s operations against Tehran had their forerunners during his term.

Another aspect of Cohen’s personality the Post saw firsthand is Cohen’s temper.

The former Mossad chief was a phenomenal recruiter.

In an early meeting with the Post, he made several cultural references to show how much he knew about the reporter’s lifestyle, encouraging a remarkable amount of positive motivation for the relationship from the start.

Cohen tries to mesmerize

But there is that inevitable point in any journalist-source relationship, where regardless of whether certain levels of friendship have been reached, reporters – in order to do their job – must ask unwanted questions.Suddenly, Cohen could turn on a dime from being your best friend to your scariest enemy, just as he explains he sometimes had to do as a handler of certain spies he was recruiting if they did not produce what he wanted or failed to follow the rules of spycraft in a way that could endanger all involved.

This anger was not reserved for the Post but also came out loud and clear against political officials.

Regarding policy the Mossad chief is a strong right-winger and has plenty of criticism for excessive judicial activism.


Cohen will say publicly that he has never committed to going into politics.
His tremendous talents as an intelligence agent and his natural charisma have not translated into forming anywhere near the concrete political power and leverage he would need.

New operational revelations

The intel chief had some fascinating new disclosures.

The three most important ones were the process of detecting where Iran was keeping its nuclear secrets hidden; that the operation was accelerated when the Mossad found out that Tehran was planning to move the materials to a different location; and that the operation was delayed for 24 hours by the commander on the ground, essentially overruling Cohen, who wanted to move ahead.

Regarding detecting where the materials were, Cohen identified sources involved in the movement of the materials to help identify, film, and follow shipping containers with the nuclear archives, surveillance of the trucks that were used to move the materials, intercepting communications, and spying on the sites from the sky and from street level.

Cohen’s said there was no one piece of intelligence but a sophisticated puzzle of many different ones.

The operation had to be replanned from scratch after the nuclear archives were moved.

Mossad also had to deal with guard dogs and their surveillance covered many nearby buildings to avoid any external force surprising them, besides just the facility’s immediate guards.

Cohen's book also has a variety of new details relating to the assassination in November 2020 of Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, Iran’s nuclear program founder.

How did Cohen evolve from being an academic student in London into a spymaster with a list of stunning accomplishments to his name?

Becoming a spy

In his account, Cohen details how, as a young man fresh out of the army, the Mossad initially made contact with him. He admits that he didn’t know at first what the agency saw in him, aside from his clear commitment to Israel – and that, as a potential recruit, it is impossible to determine with precision what traits you are being assessed for.

Still, the tests prospective cadets are put through, as confusing and incomprehensible as they may seem, are “designed to tease out a way of operational thinking.”

Cohen describes tasks he was given, from breaking into apartments to planting microphones in hotels, where things are supposed to go wrong. Under these conditions, where it is unclear what is or isn’t part of the assessment, you have to be clever, calm, self-sufficient, subtle, and quick enough on your feet to withstand the pressure designed to break your cover in order to succeed.

After being accepted as a Mossad cadet, those traits are stressed and tested even further during training. By the time you’re approved to work in the field, Cohen notes, you’ve proven that you can handle danger, interrogation, and physical stress.

Being able to perform under intense pressure was indispensable for him to work as a case officer in the field.

“Everything is a risk from the moment you take off from Ben-Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv to the instant you plant your feet back on home soil,” Cohen writes.

During that time, to accomplish the mission, Mossad operatives have to adopt alternative roles that must be airtight. For an extended period of time, they cannot be themselves.

“Playing a different person is what you do for a living. You swap roles like an actor.” And just like in improv, where acting is reacting, the former Mossad chief notes that it is imperative for agents to not just be in control of their own emotions but to have a grasp on those of their targets as well.

As a case officer, one of Cohen’s primary areas of focus was human intelligence, or HUMINT, a field where a lot of the work is related to turning targets into assets.

Target courtship process

In order to accomplish this, a case officer must understand his target on a profound level; everything from his interests, likes and dislikes, to what motivates him in life. What follows is a sort of courtship process. The agent forms a relationship with the target that grows closer and closer, involving them bit by bit in the mission at hand. Ultimately, the target will understand that he is working with the Mossad.

It’s an inherently risky endeavor, and it’s not always successful. At the moment of truth, when the Mossad agent reveals who he is, the target may pull back.

Being a Mossad agent attempting to penetrate the ranks of groups like the IRGC, Hezbollah, or a Palestinian terror organization, the risks associated with failure are severe. It is a job rife with danger, but one on which Israel’s national security relies.

As an agent, Cohen emphasizes, you must know everything and trust no one. Writing about the international intelligence community, he puts the need for distrust succinctly: “If you are inside the Mossad, you are my colleague. If you are outside the organization, you are regarded as my enemy.”

On the other hand, while the agent must be the phantom in plain sight – the passenger on the Metro, the shopper in the mall, the stranger you see but don’t register or know anything about – it is also vital that the operative know everything, Cohen reiterates.

“We have a saying in intelligence circles that you don’t know what you don’t know, so you have to know everything, or know that you don’t know everything,” he writes, noting that when he was Mossad director, he lived by the tenet that ignorance was something inexcusable.

Cohen writes about a perception that those who want to harm Israel should have: “We are the Mossad. We know you. We know where you live. We know your apartment number. We know your car. We know your movements. We know what you are working on – so be aware.”

Cohen and his interactions with world leaders

Cohen details how, in his roles as Mossad director and national security adviser, as well as afterward, his position and expertise brought him in contact with a number of international leaders and security establishment officials.

Among those are former US presidents, as well as the current one. Cohen reveals that for President Donald Trump, whom he lauds throughout the book, he undertook a mission at his “personal request.” He doesn’t go into details about what the operation entailed, but he notes that it was approved by Netanyahu and that it was successful.

Cohen offers consistent praise for Trump, celebrating the American leader as an “unorthodox peacemaker” for his success in various peace deals, such as the signing of the Abraham Accords. He also applauds Trump’s decision to back out of the 2015 Iran deal.

In mentioning the other two American presidents he worked with, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, Cohen refrains from criticism, but his praise is certainly less forthcoming.

With Obama, he describes a somewhat colder relationship than the one he had with the Trump administration.

He writes that in a 2015 conversation he had with Obama, Cohen warned the then-American president against the Iran Deal, or Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. In response to his warning, Cohen recalls, Obama told him, “Yossi, you are so wrong.”

In a nearly identical conversation with Trump the following year, he recalls that Trump told him, “You’re so right – it’s the worst deal ever.”

Cohen describes his relationship with president Biden as somewhere in between. He notes that he “unequivocally” views the former president as a friend of Israel, and adds that Biden frequently quoted David Ben-Gurion.

Additionally, the Biden administration, Cohen emphasizes, did support Israel, pointing to the THAAD antimissile battery the Americans sent following Iran’s 2024 missile attacks. Nevertheless, there were areas of discordance.

“So, we are best friends, but we may have disagreements,” Cohen recalls Biden telling him.

The former Mossad chief describes good relationships with other world leaders beyond Israel’s closest ally.

One of those is the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), whose wisdom Cohen says he values. Notably, in a November interview with Fox News, Cohen predicted that the Saudis would “be in line” for negotiations for peace.

In the book, he writes, “I have great faith in MBS as a pivotal figure in the region. I have found him to be tough, but fair, perceptive, and pragmatic.”

Writing of an interaction with the Saudi leader, Cohen recounts, “I once asked him, at a pre-dawn meal, to expand on his solution to the Palestinian problem. ‘What is yours?’ he replied, with a knowing smile.”

The same practicality is a trait he says is mirrored in Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Cohen says that when he first met the Russian president at the Kremlin, he joked that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu didn’t need to introduce him to Putin because the Russian president already knew everything about Cohen – a reference to their shared intelligence background.

Putin laughed in response, Cohen writes, setting the tone for their professional relationship. Given their shared background, the former Mossad head notes, the Russian president referred to him as his kollega, his colleague.Having met with Putin a number of times, including in a couple of private meetings, Cohen likens him to a chess grandmaster, always thinking a number of moves ahead.

The former Mossad director presents a dual vision of Putin. On the one hand, Cohen assesses him as “a great listener” and skilled negotiator, thinker, and leader who is “far stronger and infinitely smarter” than his Ukrainian foe and counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky.

On the other hand, he slams Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, calling it a “ruinous, nationalistic war.”

Overall, Cohen’s attitude toward Putin seems to be captured in recollections he shared from his days working with the Obama administration.

During one visit to the Obama White House after a meeting with Putin, he writes, then-national security adviser Susan Rice sourly asked him, “How are your Russian friends, Yossi?”

Cohen responded, “They are not my friends. I work with them to improve Israel’s defense.”

Like a tightrope walker

The former Mossad head acted like a tightrope walker, balancing his apparent professional admiration for his Russian “kollega” – and desire to not burn bridges with one of the most powerful world leaders – with a recognition that he is a leader who continually chooses to assault his neighbors – in part because he knows the world will not militarily force him to stop.

Between righteous condemnation and good-faith negotiation, Cohen writes, he chose the latter because ultimately, Russia is a critical player in the Middle East, particularly in Syria. Therefore, he emphasizes, Israel must be able to work with Moscow in order to secure its regional interests and meet its security requirements.

The former Mossad chief’s book is an adventure into the shadows of the clandestine services, a journey that shaped him and framed much of his future.

What new chapters he may write going forward are yet to be seen.

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-881315

Saturday, 27 December 2025

Airstrikes on Muslim Terrorists in Nigeria


Donald Trump announced a 'powerful and deadly' Christmas Day strike on ISIS 'terrorist scum' in Nigeria and warned that radicals will continue to pay for the persecution of Christians.

The President, who previously threatened to send the US military to the West African nation 'guns-a-blazing,' made the announcement in a Truth Social post.

'Tonight, at my direction as Commander in Chief, the United States launched a powerful and deadly strike against ISIS Terrorist Scum in Northwest Nigeria, who have been targeting and viciously killing, primarily, innocent Christians, at levels not seen for many years, and even Centuries!' he wrote. 

A spokesman for the Pentagon confirmed to the Daily Mail that the Nigerian government approved of and worked with the US military on the strikes. 

The US Africa Command posted on X that it had 'conducted a strike at the request of Nigerian authorities in Soboto State killing multiple ISIS terrorists.' 

Nigeria's foreign ministry said the strikes were carried out as part of ongoing security cooperation with the United States, involving intelligence sharing and strategic coordination to target militant groups.

'This has led to precision hits on terrorist targets in Nigeria by air strikes in the North West,' the ministry said in a post on X.

A video posted by the Pentagon showed at least one projectile launched from a warship. A US defense official said the strike targeted multiple militants at known ISIS camps.

A video posted by the Pentagon showed at least one projectile launched from a warship. A US defense official said the strike targeted multiple militants at known ISIS camps

A video posted by the Pentagon showed at least one projectile launched from a warship. A US defense official said the strike targeted multiple militants at known ISIS camps

Trump, 79, said in his lengthy post that the ISIS militants have had it coming for some time.

'I have previously warned these Terrorists that if they did not stop the slaughtering of Christians, there would be hell to pay, and tonight, there was.'

'The Department of War executed numerous perfect strikes, as only the United States is capable of doing. Under my leadership, our Country will not allow Radical Islamic Terrorism to prosper,' Trump added. 

The president signed off with a warning: 'May God Bless our Military, and MERRY CHRISTMAS to all, including the dead Terrorists, of which there will be many more if their slaughter of Christians continues.'

Trump's post did not include information about how the strike was carried out and what effects it had. The White House did not immediately provide further details. 

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth affirmed the President's message in a social media post of his own. 

'The President was clear last month: the killing of innocent Christians in Nigeria (and elsewhere) must end. The @DeptofWar is always ready, so ISIS found out tonight — on Christmas. More to come… Grateful for Nigerian government support & cooperation. Merry Christmas!'

Nigeria has been roiled by internal violence in the wake of a jihadist insurgency spearheaded by extremist group Boko Haram in the northeast since 2009

Nigeria has been roiled by internal violence in the wake of a jihadist insurgency spearheaded by extremist group Boko Haram in the northeast since 2009 

Trump, 79, had already designated Nigeria a 'country of particular concern,' but he took his condemnation of the situation in the country even further after hearing it on Fox News

Trump, 79, had already designated Nigeria a 'country of particular concern,' but he took his condemnation of the situation in the country even further after hearing it on Fox News

 Nigeria has been roiled by internal violence in the wake of a jihadist insurgency spearheaded by extremist group Boko Haram in the northeast since 2009, which Obama encouraged.

In November, Trump threatened to take on the terrorists with 'guns-a-blazing.'

He had already designated Nigeria a 'country of particular concern,' but he took his condemnation of the situation in the country even further after hearing about it on Fox News, threatening to cut aid and even send in US troops. 

Some Christian communities have welcomed the US President's menace, believing that foreign armies are needed to restore peace in their homeland. 

Amid the various forms of bloodletting around the country - including ethnic rivalry and banditry - the Islamist militants have been slaughtering Christians as well as Muslims they regard as 'apostates' for failing to comply with their brand of Islam. 

There has also been a separate onslaught by Fulani Muslim tribesmen against mainly Christian farming communities.

Nigeria's President Bola Tinubu has said that the country 'welcomes' the US help

Nigeria's President Bola Tinubu has said that the country 'welcomes' the US help

Nigeria, a country of more than 200 million people and around 200 ethnic groups, is divided between the largely Muslim north and mostly Christian south.

Islamist insurgents such as Boko Haram and Islamic State West Africa Province have wrought havoc in the country for more than 15 years, killing thousands of people.

In central Nigeria there have been frequent clashes between mostly Muslim herders and mainly Christian farmers.

In the northwest of the country, gunmen routinely kidnap residents for ransom.

In mid-December, Trump placed the country on a list of 15 that faced partial travel bans to the US in a response to anti-Christian violence in Nigeria. 

'The United States is taking decisive action in response to the mass killings and violence against Christians by radical Islamic terrorists, Fulani ethnic militias, and other violent actors in Nigeria and beyond,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said. 

Trump had threatened to send the US military to the West African nation 'guns-a-blazing'

Nigerian School

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15413601/Trump-military-airstrike-ISIS-Nigeria.html

Arkansas Republican Senator Tom Cotton praised the actions in Nigeria. 

'I commend President Trump, Secretary Hegseth, and our brave troops for these strikes against bloodthirsty ISIS savages who are not only persecuting Christians, but also have killed many Americans,' Cotton, a former army officer who is chairman of the Senate intelligence committee, wrote on X. 

Brad Brandon, chief executive of Across Nigeria, exclusively told the Daily Mail that 'There is no doubt that this action was fully justified and that the use of US military capabilities disrupted ISIS's ability to continue massacring innocent civilians.'

Nigeria has been roiled by internal violence in the wake of a jihadist insurgency spearheaded by extremist group Boko Haram in the northeast since 2009

Nigeria has been roiled by internal violence in the wake of a jihadist insurgency spearheaded by extremist group Boko Haram in the northeast since 2009, due to Obama's encouragement.

The US has been conducting intelligence-gathering flights over large parts of Nigeria since late November.

Since Boko Haram's terrorist insurgency began in 2009, jihadist groups have torched and destroyed 19,100 churches, averaging nearly 100 each month. In that time, 125,009 Christians were slaughtered, as well as "60,000 Liberal Muslims... unless urgent action is taken, within the next 50 years Christianity in Nigeria is set to disappear."


     Some damage from the strikes

      One strike hit a field

     Best map I found so far. Nigeria is in West Africa on the Bay of Benin, where "one comes out for forty goes in", as British sailors used to say :)
      Nigerian Catholics protest Muslim killings of Christians



     Nigerian children who were kidnapped by Muslim terrorists, after being released


     Good Friday ceremony by Nigerian Christians


Friday, 26 December 2025

Human Zoos in late 1800s Europe


Human zoos: images show how primitive tribesmen were caged and exhibited

Caged in enclosures in Madrid's Retiro Park, they were described as 'strange', 'disfigured', 'brutal' and 'subhuman'. 

It was in the spring of 1887 that Spain's Queen Maria Cristina inaugurated the Exhibition of the Philippines, and over the course of six months, thousands flocked down to the iconic location to observe natives from the Igorot tribe.

They had been shipped from the Philippines, then a Spanish colony, and were put on display.

The human exhibit was one of many across Europe at the time and was part of a widespread practice of displaying colonised populations in what came to be known as human zoos. 

The first display in the Spanish capital featured 43 men, women, and children from the Filipino tribe and were described by newspapers with a mix of fascination and condescension.

Journal El Imparcial wrote that in their 'constitution, appearance, language, manners, customs, color, and even clothing,' they differed from the 'most civilized and hitherto known Filipinos.'

European societies had developed an appetite for the 'exotic,' fueled by colonial expansion and a growing market for human exhibits. 

Organisers shipped colonised peoples from across the world to cities such as Paris, London, Madrid, and Berlin, where visitors paid to observe them in staged 'villages' meant to represent their daily lives.

One of the few existing images of Madrid's human zoo, which exhibited people from the Filipino Igorot tribe for six months in 1887 in the iconic Retiro Park

One of the few existing images of Madrid's human zoo, which exhibited people from the Filipino Igorot tribe for six months in 1887 in the iconic Retiro Park

Filipino natives pose for a photograph in 1887 after they were brought over to Madrid to take part in a 'human zoo'

Filipino natives pose for a photograph in 1887 after they were brought over to Madrid to take part in a 'human zoo' 

A poster depicting human displays, which became a common practice across Europe in the 19th and 20th centuries

A poster depicting human displays, which became a common practice across Europe in the 19th and early 20th centuries

Many were placed in fenced-off enclosures or makeshift settlements, forced to perform routines, rituals, dances, or simply go about their day while onlookers watched closely with morbid enchantment. 

An entire village complete with thatched huts and places of worship was built in Madrid's Retiro Park to exhibit the Igorot in an enclosure called 'Casa de las Fieras', or 'House of Beasts'. 

Organisers even built boats for the tribe and stocked the park's pond with fish so that they could catch them for the public with their spears.

The tribe was eventually sent back home after Madrid rejected Paris' request to borrow them for a display in the French capital.

Little else is known about the fate of the Filipinos who formed part of the human display in Madrid, but records suggest that at least four Igorots died as a result of poor living conditions during the exhibition.

A pamphlet produced by Spain's Ministry of Culture for a 2017 exhibition revisiting the original 1887 Exhibition states that this 'reaffirmed stereotypes surrounding these people, who were considered primitive or savage throughout the 'civilised' world'.

The document contains the few surviving photographs of the Igorot display, with the staged images showing naked tribes-people, depicting them as aggressive.

From the mid-19th century into the early 1930s, thousands of people - some voluntarily recruited, many not - took part in these exhibitions across Europe and the US. 

Inside a mock Congolese village set up at the Brussels International Exposition in 1897

Inside a mock Congolese village set up at the Brussels International Exposition in 1897

Tribes people had been shipped from the Philippines and displayed in an enclosure where they were stripped of their dignity and reduced to curiosities for the entertainment of the public. Pictured: A Filipino man in Madrid's human exhibit

Tribes people had been shipped from the Philippines and displayed in an enclosure for the entertainment of the public. Pictured: A Filipino man in Madrid's human exhibit

Africans are seen posing for a photo during the 'Savage of South Africa' exhibition in Earl's Court, London

Africans are seen posing for a photo during the 'Savage of South Africa' exhibition in Earl's Court, London

Some of the people in the exhibits, in the late 19th and early 20th century, were treated like animals and many died. 

They included Ota Benga, a Congolese man exhibited in New York's Bronx Zoo in 1906, who was shockingly described as a 'missing link' of evolution.

The dreadful exhibit sparked protest and outrage and Ota was eventually released. But six years later he tragically took his own life after being unable to assimilate into American life.

Estimates suggest that as many as 600,000 people were trafficked or contracted for such displays over several decades. 

As public demand grew, the exhibitions became more elaborate, featuring reconstructed huts, enclosures, and entire mock villages inside major zoos and parks.

Some of Europe's largest institutions hosted them, including the Tierpark in Hamburg, the Dresden Zoo in Berlin, the Jardin d'Acclimatation in Paris, and in Berlin's Zoologischer Garten.

They became staples of world fairs and international exhibitions, where nations used them to showcase the populations of their colonies - and Britain was not exempt from the practice of human zoos.

Germany's Kaiser Wilhelm II is pictured meeting Ethiopians standing behind a wooden fence in Hamburg, Germany in 1909

Germany's Kaiser Wilhelm II is pictured meeting Ethiopians standing behind a wooden fence in Hamburg, Germany in 1909

Filipinos are pictured in loin cloths sitting in a circle together at Coney Island in New York in the early 20th century while crowds of white Americans watch on from behind barriers

Filipinos are pictured in loin cloths sitting in a circle together at Coney Island in New York in the early 20th century

Ota Benga, a Congolese man, is shown, right, in New York's Bronx Zoo in 1906

Ota Benga, a Congolese man, is shown, right, in New York's Bronx Zoo in 1906

From the mid 19th-century until the early 20th century hundreds of Africans were brought over to Britain to be used as a form of touring entertainment. 

Footage dating back to 1899 shows a huge group of Africans taking part in a mock battle that was performed multiple times a day in front of paying spectators in London's Earl's Court. 

They were recruited from the Zulu and Swazi tribes by English circus impresario Frank Fillis to re-create the British defeat of the Matabele people in the 1890s.

The battle scenes were part of a show called Savage South Africa, and spectators could also wander around Kaffir Kraal, a mock-up of a Matabele village where they would see the same performers acting out their lives. 

Also in London, an 1895 African Exhibition in Crystal Palace presented around 80 people from Somalia. 

Elsewhere, citizens from French colonies such as Sudan, Morocco and the Democratic Republic of Congo were displayed in Paris's Jardin d'Agronomie Tropicale between 1877 and 1912. 

The first two human exhibits to be set up in the French capital presented Nubians - a Saharan ethnic groups, and Inuits from the Arctic regions. 

Over the span of 35 years, around 30 human exhibitions were displayed in Paris, and they were so successful that they were even integrated in the city's World Fair.

Racking up millions of visitors, the 1889 fair displayed 400 indigenous people and even exhibited a 'Negro Village'. 

This Inuit girl, pictured with a girl, was born at World's Fair in Chicago. She was transferred to World's Fair, St. Louis in 1904

Inuit girl, around 1904 in the Chicago World's Fair

A Senegalese village set up inside of a human zoo at the World's Fair in Brussels, Belgium in 1958

A Senegalese village set up inside of a human zoo at the World's Fair in Brussels, Belgium in 1958

Tuareg camp at the 1907 Paris Exposition

Tuareg camp at the 1907 Paris Exposition

A human zoo exhibition of the German animal merchant and zoo director Carl Hagenbeck, Germany 1930s

A human zoo exhibition of the German animal merchant and zoo director Carl Hagenbeck, Germany 1930s

A poster for the 1931 human zoo in Paris

A poster for the 1931 human zoo in Paris 

In 1907, residents of these mock settlements were returned to their homes and although more exhibitions were held, the space was left to ruin after the First World War. 

It was reopened as a park in 2006 and visitors today can still see the abandoned pavilions and greenhouses once used by those who took part in Paris' human zoos.  

In 1883, Amsterdam displayed natives of Suriname at the International Colonial and Export Exhibition, and the 1897 Brussels International Exposition in Tervuren featured a 'Congolese Village' that displayed African people in what was meant to resemble a native setting. 

 Norway had a human zoo for five months in 1914, which included 80 people from Senegal living in a 'Congo Village'. 

More than half of the Norwegian population paid a visit to the exhibition in Oslo as the Africans wore traditional clothing an went about their daily routine of cooking, eating and making handicrafts. 

The industry also affected Australian aboriginals in the late 19th and early 20th century. 

The practice was detailed in a documentary called 'Inside Human Zoos'. 

Australian cinematographer Philip Rang, who worked on the film, said Aboriginal people were put on display as 'boomerang throwing savages.'

The rise of the human zoo phenomenon is often linked to Carl Hagenbeck, the German animal trader who organised what is considered the first documented display of Indigenous people in Germany in 1882. 

His model proved commercially successful and was soon adopted across the continent.

The practice continued in various forms well into the 1930s, leaving behind a largely forgotten chapter of European cultural history.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15299263/human-zoos-indigenous-caged-animals-paraded-Europe.html