Monday, 11 April 2022

Disney "Heiress" Who Blasted Ron DeSantis Comes Out as Transgender Man

Disney heir who works as a high school biology teacher comes out as transgender man and blasts Ron DeSantis' so-called 'Don't Say Gay' law: Family makes $500,000 donation to LGBTQ advocacy group

  • Charlee Corra Disney, a 30-year-old teacher, came out as transgender to their family four years ago
  • Last week their father Roy P. Disney, grandson of the company's co-founder, and great-nephew to Walt, issued a statement confirming his son's identity
  • He announced that he and his wife Sheri were matching donations to the LGBTQ advocacy group Human Rights Campaign, up to $500,000
  • Charlee told The Los Angeles Times that they felt they had not done enough in the past to speak up for LGBTQ causes, in particular the Florida bill
  • Ron DeSantis on March 28 signed into law the Don't Say Gay bill, which was condemned by LGBTQ activists and many Disney employees and executives 

A transgender heir to the Disney fortune has told of their guilt at not doing more to speak out against Florida's 'Don't Say Gay' bill, addressing the issue for the first time since their father announced to the world that he had a trans child.

Charlee Corra Disney, a 30-year-old high school biology and environmental science teacher, came out as a transgender man who uses the pronouns 'they/theirs' to their family four years ago.

Having avoided the spotlight for much of their adult life, Charlee was then thrown into the center of attention last week when their father Roy P. Disney - grandson of the company's co-founder, and great-nephew to Walt - issued a statement confirming his child was trans.

Roy and his wife Sheri announced that they would match donations to the Human Rights Campaign, the largest LGBTQ advocacy group in the country, up to $500,000.

'Equality matters deeply to us, especially because our child, Charlee, is transgender and a proud member of the LGBTQ+ community,' he wrote in a statement.

Charlee Corra Disney, a 30-year-old teacher, said on Sunday that they wished they had done more to speak out against Florida's 'Don't Say Gay' bill

Charlee Corra Disney, a 30-year-old teacher, said on Sunday that they wished they had done more to speak out against Florida's 'Don't Say Gay' bill

Roy P. Disney, grandson of the company's founder, and his wife Sheri Disney are pictured in October 2013. Last week they announced a grant matching donations to LGBTQ advocacy group Human Rights Campaign

Roy P. Disney, grandson of the company's founder, and his wife Sheri Disney are pictured in October 2013. Last week they announced a grant matching donations to LGBTQ advocacy group Human Rights Campaign

Charlee, who teaches biology, came out to their family four years ago

Charlee, who teaches biology, came out to their family four years ago

Disney's tepid response to the controversial bill led to protests and worker walkouts

Disney's tepid response to the controversial bill led to protests and worker walkouts  

Charlee told The Los Angeles Times, in an interview published on Sunday, that they were dismayed at Florida governor Ron DeSantis's signing of the controversial 'Don't Say Gay' bill, which forbids the discussion of homosexuality or transgender issues in classrooms for children through third grade.

Charlee said that they were dismayed at the bill, signed into law on March 28, and wished they had done more at the time to campaign against it.

'I feel like I don't do very much to help,' Charlee said. 'I don't call senators or take action. I felt like I could be doing more.'

Charlee said the new bill would isolate young people and make them feel uncomfortable in their own skin.

'I had very few openly gay role models,' said Charlee, whose mother remembers Charlee aged two or three tugging her away from the little girls' shoe section, saying: 'But mom, I'm a boy on the inside.'

Charlee added: 'And I certainly didn't have any trans or nonbinary role models.

'I didn't see myself reflected in anyone, and that made me feel like there was something wrong with me.'

Ron DeSantis, the governor of Florida, is pictured on March 28 signing the 'Don't Say Gay' bill

Ron DeSantis, the governor of Florida, is pictured on March 28 signing the 'Don't Say Gay' bill

What is the Parental Rights in Education bill?

HB 1557 was introduced by two Republican members of the Florida Legislature - Representative Joe Harding and Senator Dennis Baxley.

They say the bill's aim is to 'empower parents' in their children's education, and make teachers recognize the distinction between 'instruction' and 'discussion.'

'What we're prohibiting is instructing them in a specific direction,' Baxley said about how teachers lead students in a classroom. 

'Students can talk about whatever they want to bring up, but sometimes the right answer is, ''You really ought to talk to your parents about that.'''

The bill applies to children in kindergarten through third grade.

It states that 'classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur.'

It also requires districts to 'adopt procedures for notifying a student's parent if there is a change in the student's services or monitoring related to the student's mental, emotional, or physical health or well-being,' something LGBTQ advocates argue could lead to students being outed to their parents without the student's knowledge or consent.

It was passed on March 8 in a 22-17 vote. The state House had approved the bill late last month. DeSantis signed it into law on March 28 and it will come into effect on July 1.

Ron P. Disney's gesture was celebrated on Twitter by his sister Abigail Disney, a documentary maker.

'Today I am busting with pride at what my brother and his wife have done. So proud so proud so proud!!!' she said.

On Sunday, Abigail responded to criticism of the family firm for its move to be more inclusive and create more LGBTQ characters.

She said the attacks from right-wing critics were 'absurd'.

'There have been gay people whether or not the word was ever spoken,' she told CNN.

'It denies the fact that everyone, conservative or not, has a gay friend or a transgender family member.'

DeSantis, angered by condemnation from Disney employees and executives of the bill, has threatened to remove the company's self-governing privileges it has enjoyed in the state since construction began on Disney World in Orlando in 1967.

'Disney has alienated a lot of people now,' DeSantis said on April 1.

'And so the political influence they're used to wielding, I think has dissipated.

'And so the question is, why would you want to have special privileges in the law at all? And I don't think that we should.'

Abigail Disney said DeSantis, considered a likely Republican contender for the presidency in 2024, was playing a strategic game to win over conservatives.

'This attack against Disney was so timed and rolled out so strategically that it was really hard for me to imagine that it didn't come from a series of decisions that got made in the background,' Disney said.

She said the company's CEO Bob Chapek, who has been criticized for wavering in his support for protests against the bill, needed to be courageous and take a hard stance.

'You can't claim neutrality if you're supporting the people who write these laws,' Disney said.

'But on top of it, there is no neutrality anymore.'

Charlee's comments and their parents' grant comes amid a months-long standoff between Disney and the state of Florida, where it employs 77,000 people - a standoff that has seen Chapek criticized by his employees for not being vocal enough, and Florida threaten Disney's position in the state in response. 

Some Republican legislators in Florida are now considering punishing Walt Disney World for taking a public stand against the so-called 'Don't Say Gay' bill by repealing a 55-year law that allows the company to govern itself. 

DeSantis raised revoking Disney's special arrangement in the state on April 1, and Florida House Rep. Spencer Roach tweeted that lawmakers held two meetings to discuss scrapping the 1967 Reedy Creek Improvement Act, which he said 'allows Disney to act as its own government.' 

Spencer, a Republican, added: 'If Disney wants to embrace woke ideology, it seems fitting that they should be regulated by Orange County.'

The 1967 act, which was signed by then-Gov Claude Kirk, a Republican, created the Reedy Creek Improvement District, which encompasses about 25,000 acres in Orange and Osceola counties.

Florida House Rep. Spencer Roach tweeted that lawmakers have met twice to discuss repealing the 1967 Reedy Creek Improvement Act, which allows Walt Disney World to govern itself

Florida House Rep. Spencer Roach tweeted that lawmakers have met twice to discuss repealing the 1967 Reedy Creek Improvement Act, which allows Walt Disney World to govern itself

The 1967 act created the Reedy Creek Improvement District, which encompasses about 25,000 acres in Orange and Osceola counties and is controlled by its landowners, the biggest among them being Disney

The 1967 act created the Reedy Creek Improvement District, which encompasses about 25,000 acres in Orange and Osceola counties and is controlled by its landowners, the biggest among them being Disney 

The district is governed by its 19 landowners, the biggest of them being Disney World. It is responsible for overseeing land use and providing essential public services, including fire protection, emergency medical services, water services, electricity, sanitation. The district also operates and maintains all public roads and bridges. 

Walt Disney's 'Magic Kingdom': How 1967 law allowed the company to govern its vast Florida domain   

The Reedy Creek Improvement District, a semi-private, special-purpose government, is controlled by Disney. 

It was created in 1967 when then-Florida Gov. Claude Kirk, a Republican, signed into law the Reedy Creek Improvement Act authorizing it to regulate land use, enforce building codes, treat wastewater, control drainage, maintain utilities and provide fire protection at Disney World.

The district is governed a Board of Supervisors that is selected by its 19 landowners, the biggest and most influential of them being Disney World.

The district has the authority to tax the land, and use the revenue to provide essential public services and operate and maintain all public roads and bridges. 

Such private governments aren’t uncommon in Florida, which has more than 600 community development districts that manage and pay for infrastructure in new communities.

If the 1967 is repealed by GOP lawmakers, Disney World's property will fall under the control of Orange and Osceola counties.  

Disney World's special status is now at risk after the entertainment giant condemned the Parental Rights in Education bill - commonly known as 'Don't Say Gay' - which sparked an outrage amid LGBTQ activists and progressives.  

Its many critics argue that the law's true intent is to marginalize LGBTQ people and their families.

Disney, which is Florida's largest single employer and a major political donor, has found itself at the center of the escalating feud over the law, after progressive employees and customers blasted the company for donating money to all the sponsors of the so-called 'Don't Say Gay' bill and failing to denounce it.  

In response to the backlash, which included protests and walkouts, Chapek announced earlier this month that he would be meeting with DeSantis to oppose the bill.

'I understand our original approach, no matter how well intended, didn't quite get the job done,' the CEO said at the time.

After DeSantis signed the bill into law, Disney released a statement, saying: 'our goal as a company is for this law to be repealed by the legislature or struck down in the courts.' 

DeSantis responded to Disney's new stance on the law by accusing the company of being dishonest and hypocritical. 

'You've got to wonder why is the hill to die on to have transgenderism injected into kindergarten classrooms, or woke gender ideology injected into second grade classrooms. Why is that the hill to die on?' he asked in an interview with Fox News' Tucker Carlson.

'Meanwhile, if we've done a bill that prohibited talking about the abuse of Uyghurs in China, Disney would've supported that legislation. They won't say a word about that,' the Republican governor continued.

DeSantis pointed out that Disney Cruises sail to the Dominican Republic, which has laws that ban gay marriage and legalize discrimination against gay people.   

Disney faced backlash for initially failing to oppose the so-called 'Don't Say Gay' bill after donating money to all of its sponsors

Disney's tepid response to the controversial bill led to protests and worker walkouts

Disney's tepid response to the controversial bill led to protests and worker walkouts  

'So they're fine doing that and lining their pockets, they're fine lining their pockets from the CCP, and all the atrocities going on there,' he continued, referring to the Chinese Communist Party, which the company thanked in the credits of its live-action Mulan reboot.

Disney CEO Bob Chapek announced in March that he would be meeting with DeSantis to oppose the bill

Disney CEO Bob Chapek announced in March that he would be meeting with DeSantis to oppose the bill

'But it's those kindergarteners in Florida that they really want to have transgenderism as part of their core curriculum in school.'

Disney's about-face on the law prompted condemnation from some conservative employees, and calls for a boycott from the public.  

Jose Castillo, who works as a manager at a Disney resort and is also running for Congress in Florida, said his employer's decision to oppose the law could be 'bad for business' as not everyone is a 'raging liberal' who works there.

In an interview with Fox News, Castillo argued that many staff were in favor of the bill and the company's pushback against its own workers was killing democracy. 

One Disney employee, writing under the pseudonym Ethan L. Clay, claimed the company's leaders have 'surrendered' to the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) ideology and instilled a culture that forces employees who support the law to remain quiet out of fear of scrutiny or termination.

'I encourage everyone to ignore the bloviating of Disney executive leadership, from CEO Bob Chapek all the way down to park VPs,' Clay wrote in a blog post published on Quillette.com. 

'These people are not thought-leaders or cultural revolutionaries. 

'They are cowards held hostage by the prevailing narrative, and they will run in whichever direction that narrative dictates.'

On Thursday, a clip was shared online of a Disney executive admitting that the company is seeking to increase diversity within their ranks because it is good for business, and the embattled CEO apologized to the LGBTQ community 'for not being the ally you needed me to be'.

Karey Burke, head of entertainment, said that her son had told her: 'Gen-Z is 30-40 percent queerer than other generations Mom, so Disney better get with it.'  

Chapek, the CEO, meanwhile, begged forgiveness from the LGBTQ community.

'I want you to know that your words have made a real impact on me,' he said.

'I understand that we have made mistakes, and the pain that those mistakes have caused.'

The leaders of the entertainment giant were speaking at one of Disney's 'Reimagine Tomorrow' forums, which since September has worked to serve as 'our way of amplifying underrepresented voices and untold stories as well as championing the importance of accurate representation in media and entertainment.'

It vows that 50 percent of characters and content would be from underrepresented groups by 2022. 

Burke, president of Disney's General Entertainment Content, said in a clip from a session - obtained by journalist Christopher Rufo, who specializes in culture wars - that there was a commercial reason for increasing the number of LGBTQ characters.

Karey Burke, president of Disney's General Entertainment Content, told a Disney forum on increasing diversity that her son told her: 'Gen-Z is 30-40 percent queerer than other generations Mom, so Disney better get with it'

Karey Burke, president of Disney's General Entertainment Content, told a Disney forum on increasing diversity that her son told her: 'Gen-Z is 30-40 percent queerer than other generations Mom, so Disney better get with it'

She told how, when she headed Disney's cable channel Freeform, she realized it made business sense.

'It was very much in the brand ethos of Freeform to be the tip of the spear when it comes to inclusion,' she said.

'And we jumped up and down, we celebrated that, nobody stopped us, and it felt great.

'In part, I think, nobody stopped us because we were targeting Gen-Z and Millennials.'

Generation Z refers to those born between 1997 and 2012, now aged 10-25.

Millennials are born between 1981 and 1996, ranging in age from 26 to 41.

'We were targeting a younger, I think more open minded...' Burke continued.

'And now we know, as my son texted me this morning: 'Gen-Z is 30-40 percent queerer than other generations Mom, so Disney better get with it.'

Her comments came as Chapek apologized for not being more sympathetic to the challenges confronting the LGBTQ community.

Chapek, who took over in February 2020, has been dogged by questions as to why Disney did not speak out publicly against Florida's controversial 'Don't Say Gay' bill, which bans discussion of LGBTQ+ issues in schools among young children.

Chapek said that his team discussed the issues with Florida's governor, Ron DeSantis, behind the scenes.

Disney employees walked out of the company headquarters last week to protest the slow response to the Florida law.

Parents hit the company from the other side for what they said was pandering to liberal politics.

In the session, Chapek told the staff he would 'be a better ally', and said he had been profoundly moved by the stories his employees told.

'By now, I hope you have all read my most recent note in which I pledged to be a better ally for the LGBTQ+ community; apologized for not being the ally you needed me to be; and committed to ensuring that our company lives up to its values,' Chapek said.

'I meant every word.

'And that's what we are here to talk about today.

'I know we have work to do, and that work starts with listening.'

Bob Chapek, the CEO of Disney, apologized to LGBTQ staff for not being 'an ally'

Bob Chapek, the CEO of Disney, apologized to LGBTQ staff for not being 'an ally'

The 61-year-old CEO said he accepted he had handled the situation in recent months badly.

Disney CEO Bob Chapek has faced a storm of criticism for his handling of LGBTQ issues

Disney CEO Bob Chapek has faced a storm of criticism for his handling of LGBTQ issues

His predecessor, Bob Iger, dug the knife in last week, saying the issue was 'about right and wrong'.

The two men are reportedly at loggerheads about the direction of Disney, and at the end of last month CNBC reported that many felt Chapek would not last long as CEO.

Iger held the position for 15 years before retiring as one of Hollywood's most widely respected and liked CEOs.

Chapek, in the session, tried to quell the anger, and said he understood 'the pain'.

'I hope that you are as impacted as I've been by the voices I've heard over the past few weeks,' said Chapek.

'I've read many emails that have been sent; spoken with LGBTQ+ employees and their allies; met with advocacy groups; and convened my own leadership team.

'I have been taken by the honesty, the openness and the urgency of their stories.

'I want you to know that your words have made a real impact on me.

'I understand that we have made mistakes, and the pain that those mistakes have caused.

'And I know that our silence wasn't just about the bill in Florida, but about every time an individual or institution that should have stood up for this community did not.

'I and the leadership team are determined to use this moment as a catalyst for more meaningful and lasting change.' 

Another speaker at the event outlined procedures that Disney had put in place to help people in Disney who were transgender, and their children.

He said that Disney's benefits team would be able to provide information about what their healthcare policies included.

'The other big area is gender identity and expression,' he said.

'So doing all of this work to ensure our employees and cast can express their gender here authentically and proudly at the company.

'Coming up with guides to how to change your photo. Information about pronouns.

'Working with our benefits team to give information about gender affirmation procedures.

'Both for our employees who are transitioning and trans.

'But also our employees who have kids who have transitioning.' 

An unnamed man explained at the forum that the company was working to make Disney a more trans-friendly workplace

An unnamed man explained at the forum that the company was working to make Disney a more trans-friendly workplace

A demonstrator holding a sign takes part in a protest as Disney's employees demonstrate on March 22 in Caliifornia

A demonstrator holding a sign takes part in a protest as Disney's employees demonstrate on March 22 in Caliifornia

The animation and live-action movie company has already announced that it would increase the number of gay characters in its films. 

'I have heard so much from so many of my colleagues over the past few weeks in open forums, through emails and phone conversations,' Burke said in a previous forum. 

'I feel a responsibility to speak not just for my self but also for [my kids].'

She defended 20th Century Fox as 'the home of really incredible, groundbreaking LGBTQIA stories over the years.'

But she said that it hasn't been inclusive enough. 

'One of our execs stood up and said, 'You know we only have a handful of queer leads in our content,' Burke said. 

'I went, 'What? That can't be true. And then I realized it is true.'

Disney expressed support for the demonstration in a Facebook post Tuesday morning

Disney expressed support for the demonstration in a Facebook post Tuesday morning

Disney has reportedly reinstated a gay kiss in its upcoming Toy Story spinoff amid the criticism. Hawthorne (voiced by Uzo Aduba), a character in the film Lightyear, has a relationship with another female character in the film

Disney has reportedly reinstated a gay kiss in its upcoming Toy Story spinoff amid the criticism. Hawthorne (voiced by Uzo Aduba), a character in the film Lightyear, has a relationship with another female character in the film

Scar from the Lion King has been speculated to be a queer character

Scar from the Lion King has been speculated to be a queer character

Ursula of 'The Little Mermaid' has also said to be gender nonconforming

Ursula of 'The Little Mermaid' has also said to be gender nonconforming

Disney said their sensitivity to nonbinary people is nothing new they are working on eliminating gendered pronouns in their theme parks.

'Last summer we removed all gendered greetings in relationship to our live spiels,' Diversity and Inclusion Vivian Ware said at the town hall.

'We no longer say 'Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls,' she said. 'We've provided training to all our cast members so now they know it's 'Hello, everyone or hello, friends.' 

Disney's sudden sexual awakening may be a bit of rebranding.

The internet is awash with stories about gay characters in their animated films.

Governor Ratcliffe from 'Pocahontas', Ursula of 'The Little Mermaid,' and Scar from 'The Lion King' have all been speculated to be queer or queer-coded.

Le Fou, the bumbling sidekick in 'Beauty and the Beast' is said to be the first openly gay character.

In 2021, Forbes complained in a headline 'How Many Times Is Disney Going To Introduce Its 'First' Gay Character?'

Sunday, 10 April 2022

Darwin Awards: Russian Soldiers Stole Radioactive Items from Chernobyl

Russian forces who pillaged laboratories at Chernobyl stole radioactive substances that could kill them, say officials - after it was warned some may only have a year to live

  • Moscow's forces seized the defunct power plant on the first day of their invasion
  • The agency said that the Russian soldiers pillaged two laboratories in the area
  • They stole 133 highly radioactive substances from the Ecocentre research base

Russian forces who occupied the Chernobyl nuclear plant stole radioactive substances from research laboratories that could potentially kill them, Ukraine's State Agency for Managing the Exclusion Zone said on Sunday.

Moscow's forces seized the defunct power plant on the first day of their invasion of Ukraine on February 24. They occupied the highly radioactive zone for over a month, before retreating on March 31.

The agency said on Facebook that Russian soldiers pillaged two laboratories in the area and added that they entered a storage area of the Ecocentre research base and stole 133 highly radioactive substances.

Russian forces who occupied the Chernobyl nuclear plant (pictured) stole radioactive substances from research laboratories that could potentially kill them

Russian forces who occupied the Chernobyl nuclear plant (pictured) stole radioactive substances from research laboratories that could potentially kill them

'Even a small part of this activity is deadly if handled unprofessionally,' the agency said.

Earlier this week Ukraine's energy minister German Gulashchenko said Russian soldiers exposed themselves to a 'shocking' amount of nuclear radiation, saying some of them may have less than a year to live.

'They dug bare soil contaminated with radiation, collected radioactive sand in bags for fortification, breathed this dust,' Gulashchenko said on Facebook on Friday after visiting the exclusion zone.

'After a month of such exposure, they have a maximum of one year of life. More precisely, not life but a slow death from diseases,' the minister said.

'Every Russian soldier will bring a piece of Chernobyl home. Dead or alive. The ignorance of Russian soldiers is shocking.'

He said Russian military equipment was also contaminated. 

A dosimetrist measures the level of radiation around trenches dug by the Russian military

A dosimetrist measures the level of radiation around trenches dug by the Russian military

Earlier this week Ukraine's energy minister German Gulashchenko (above) said Russian soldiers exposed themselves to a 'shocking' amount of nuclear radiation, saying some of them may have less than a year to live

Earlier this week Ukraine's energy minister German Gulashchenko (above) said Russian soldiers exposed themselves to a 'shocking' amount of nuclear radiation, saying some of them may have less than a year to live

Yesterday, it was reported that hostage staff were forced to steal fuel from Russian invaders to prevent 'catastrophe' as Ukrainian officials claim the Kremlin's soldiers looted the plant for personal belongings and took off with 169 prisoners.

Photos from inside the site of the nuclear 1986 disaster show ransacked rooms meant to house plant staff, which are said to have been cleared of 'money, valuables' and 'laptops' by Russian soldiers who searched for goods 'like dogs'.

Russian forces are also said to have dug trenches in the highly contaminated Red Forest, which sits in the exclusion zone.

For a time they prevented staff maintaining facilities there from leaving or being spelled off by other workers.

According to Ukrainian Interior Minister Denys Monastyrskyy, 169 Ukraine National Guard Soldiers who guarded the site were locked in an underground nuclear bunker for a month with no access to natural light, fresh air or information.

A view of the rooms in the administrative building of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant where national guardsmen were said to be held as hostages

A view of the rooms in the administrative building of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant where national guardsmen were said to be held as hostages 

It is not known where they are now, but he suspects they may have been taken to Russia via Belarus.

He told CNN: 'They were kept here for 30 days without sufficient lighting and food. They were not allowed outside. On the last day they were taken away from here to an unknown direction. Today we know nothing about their fate unfortunately.

'The Russian military went through all Ukrainian clothes, personal belongings, like dogs, in search of, probably, money, valuables, laptops. There was looting here. The Russian military stole computers and equipment.'  

An engineer at the facility also told of tireless negotiations which staff had to undergo with Russian forces to ensure safe running of the plant.

Valeriy Semonov told the BBC: 'We had to constantly negotiate with them, and try hard not to offend them, so that they allowed our personnel to manage the facility.'

Reports from the infamous plant - which was the site of the 1986 disaster - show ransacked rooms in which plant staff slept, said to have been cleared of 'money, valuables' and 'laptops'

Reports from the infamous plant - which was the site of the 1986 disaster - show ransacked rooms in which plant staff slept, said to have been cleared of 'money, valuables' and 'laptops'

Mr Semonov said in one instance he ended up having to steal fuel from the Russians when power to the station was cut off for three days because the results could have been 'catastrophic'.

He added: 'Radioactive material could have been released. The scale of it, you can well imagine.

'I wasn't scared for my life. I was scared about what would happen if I wasn't there monitoring the plant. I was scared it would be a tragedy for humanity.'

It comes as drone footage taken from the exclusion zone around the Chernobyl nuclear power plant appears to have confirmed reports that Russian troops dug trenches and fortifications in some of the most irradiated parts of the region.

The footage, which has been geolocated and widely shared on social media, shows mounds of disturbed earth and fortifications dug on the outskirts of the Red Forest, just a few miles west of the Chernobyl plant.

After the drone camera zooms out from the abandoned Russian positions and pans out, the ominous steel confinement dome that encapsulates the destroyed reactor can be seen in the distance.

Denys Monastyrskyy told CNN : 'They were kept here for 30 days without sufficient lighting and food. They were not allowed outside'

Denys Monastyrskyy told CNN : 'They were kept here for 30 days without sufficient lighting and food. They were not allowed outside'

The Red Forest sits firmly inside the inner exclusion zone around Chernobyl, and was the area most heavily affected when the No. 4 reactor exploded in 1986, causing the world's worst nuclear accident.

It is considered so highly contaminated that even the nuclear plant workers are not typically allowed to go there. 

There have also been reports of Russian soldiers bringing in radioactive material from the forest back with them.

Ukrainian solider Ihor Ugolkov told CNN that radiation has increased since they came, and officials also claim it's a result of small particles and dust brought back in.

Mr Ugolkov said: 'They went to the Red Forest and brought radioactive material back with them on their shoes.

'Other places are fine, but radiation increased here, because they were living here. 

'They went everywhere, and they also took some radioactive dust on them (when they left).'

Authorities said the site was handed back to Ukrainian forces last week, after being occupied by Vladimir Putin's troops since the beginning of the invasion

Authorities said the site was handed back to Ukrainian forces last week, after being occupied by Vladimir Putin's troops since the beginning of the invasion

Chernobyl staff were forced to steal fuel off Russian forces to prevent 'catastrophic' consequences as Ukrainian officials claim the Kremlin's soldiers looted the nuclear plant for personal belongings and took off with 169 prisoners

Chernobyl staff were forced to steal fuel off Russian forces to prevent 'catastrophic' consequences as Ukrainian officials claim the Kremlin's soldiers looted the nuclear plant for personal belongings and took off with 169 prisoners

Last week, Ukraine's state nuclear energy company Energoatom reported that several Russian troops had been evacuated from the forest to Belarus for acute radiation syndrome (ARS) treatment - though this is yet to be verified by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

The last contingent of Russian troops retreated from their positions around Chernobyl on Friday last week, handing control of the territory around the power plant back to Ukraine for the first time since the start of the invasion on February 24.  

Rafael Grossi, the head of the IAEA, said last week he would be leading a mission to the Chernobyl as soon as possible to ascertain the damage caused by Russian troops and to ensure the plant safety protocols for storing nuclear waste have not been disrupted.

'I will head an assistance and support mission to the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant as soon as possible. It will be the first in a series of such nuclear safety and security missions to Ukraine,' Grossi said.

The Kremlin is yet to recognise the reports of its soldiers suffering ARS and has not commented on the withdrawal of its troops from Chernobyl.

 

South Africa: President Cyril Ramaphosa, now what the heck does the Hope you want us to sell cost? It’s a hard sell because, unlike you, we are all broke



The Prez wants us to be ‘merchants of hope’. But setting a price list for the merchandise isn’t easy.s

Oh, hope. Yes, we all need hope. This has become excruciatingly apparent during the past two years of plague, lockdowns and further economic decline in South Africa. But whatever is happening, whichever shit-storm is ravaging the land, we can’t do without hope.

It could be as simple as something to look forward to – having a nice glass of wine at the end of another day struggling to earn enough money to put petrol in your car, say, or, if you’re living on the streets, the hope of a piece of plastic to keep you dry.

It could also be somewhat more complicated, as it often is if we attach our hopes to large entities or important people. We might hope Ukraine will win the war against Russia, or that Vladimir Putin will finally get ousted by his oligarchs or shot by his bodyguards. We might hope that our own president, Cyril Ramaphosa, might stop licking the toes of the murderous dictator mentioned in the sentence before this one, or might actually start to tackle some of the corruption that has taken food from the mouths of the poorest and kept South Africa’s economy teetering on the edge of collapse.

I would in fact caution against building up hopes that are too big, because those are the ones that usually turn out to be forlorn. Either that, or you can enlarge your hopes to the cosmic scale and hope that there’s a benign God who’s directing human affairs with compassion and care, or that there’s life after death, say – cosmic hopes seldom get dashed because their fulfillment takes place in a realm beyond human understanding.

Either way, it’s clear to me that we need to be generating a lot of hope for South Africans in particular, though most of the rest of the continent could do with some too, and there are fairly large regions of the world beyond Africa also crying out for something to look forward to – but let’s focus our minds on home territory.

Scrounging about on the internet for some hope, as one does (though it often leads to more despair), I came across something I’d missed when I examined the President’s State of the Nation Address (Sona) a few months ago. It was a few months, wasn’t it? Feels like centuries have passed since that moment, a brave attempt to give hope to South Africans, broadcast from Cape Town City Hall because the Houses of Parliament had been burnt down just before Sona. At least the ravaging by fire of Parliament allows us to hope that it will eventually be rebuilt, and that South Africa’s democracy will one day be able to face itself in the mirror.

But that’s not what struck me about Sona. What struck me was one little phrase, a few words in which Ramaphosa struck precisely the note I am trying to strike here, though I take note that his note was perhaps a little flat.

Hope must be sold

We all have to be “merchants of hope”, said the President. Merchants of hope. Now that made me think. My first thought was that this shows very neatly that our President is truly the neoliberal that the ragged leftover left claims him to be. It is, after all, a central tenet of neoliberalism that anything that can be monetised must be monetised. So hope itself must now be sold, in some way, because that’s what merchants do – they sell things.

I began to wonder how this selling of hope might work. How does one place a monetary value on hope? Or any kind of value? Perhaps it’s a kind of exchange value, as befits a society in danger of sliding back into a barter economy.

Look at hope and elections. Now, during an election campaign some hopes may be relatively small, such as those who hope for a food parcel from the ANC or a free T-shirt from the DA, but there’s an exchange going on here. Your vote isn’t valueless, because you got a food parcel or a free T-shirt, right? That’s something to write home about, if you can write.

In exchange for the hope of “A better life for all”, in the case of South Africa’s first democratic elections, we gave votes to the ANC. We paid for our hope in votes. That hope may have proved illusory, but, as they say, hope springs eternal, and South Africans paid in votes again for the hope that Ramaphosa would counteract some of the depredations of the Zuma years and steady the ship of state. Voting is a form of hoping, and South Africans get that chance to hope by vote every few years. It’s in the Constitution.

The whingey bourgeoisie

In the recent local government elections, my hope certainly was that we could oust the useless ANC regime running the City of Johannesburg – a regime that spent pots of money on nothing in particular, a regime that can’t fill a pothole or send you the correct electricity bill. I hoped that my vote might generate the hope that Joburg can be fixed, that it can be made livable once more, not just for whingey bourgeois subjects like me but for the four or five indigents haunting every traffic light in the city.

But if we don’t have votes to trade for hope, what are we to do? We may not have any money to pay for those hopes, but we can at least neoliberally put a value on them, so that if one day enough of the population gets a job they can buy a little hope for themselves.

If I sell you the hope that every South African child can get a decent education, that hope is worth about R27-billion in total, which is our present budget for state-run educational institutions. But, as a merchant of hope, one is selling that hope to citizens one by one, so we’d have to divide that R27-billion by our population of 60 million – and that’s a mere R450 for each individual hope. A bargain, surely, if we’re talking about the future of the nation, or the hope that our nation actually has a future.

There’s the hope that our police force might actually be able to solve a few crimes and protect citizens instead of extorting money from the populace, harassing the aforementioned indigents and selling off all that cocaine recently seized at the airport. Call it R108-billion, overall, nationally budgeted for policing. Again, performing the calculation above, we can see that that hope would theoretically cost the citizens of the nation R1,800 each. That’s not an awful lot. It’s way less than the alcohol bill for one policy meeting of EFF office-bearers.

One can carry on performing such calculations, refined by province or local government entity, until the cows come home – the cows of hope, that is. We can work out exactly how much each hope is worth to us merchants of hope.

For example, Gauteng’s budget for human settlements is just under R6-million. Given that the province has about six million inhabitants, that’s a mere R1 per inhabitant to generate the hope that one day the provincial administration will build enough houses for those who need them. It’s certainly a cheaper hope than the hope of a decent education for all, or for competent policing, so that’s another lesson: if you restrict your hopes to your province, they cost little more than a few Chappies.

Still, that doesn’t look promising for the merchants of hope. At R1 per hope we’d have to sell an awful lot of hopes if we’re to cover our office overheads. Dear Cyril, how does neoliberalism work again? DM168

Shaun de Waal is a writer and editor.

https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2022-04-10-president-ramophosa-says-we-must-all-sell-hope-but-what-does-it-cost/