Tuesday, 9 December 2025

Historical ties between the Labour Party and the KGB


Comrade Starmer! The KGB's toxic propaganda machine and the hard-Left past Sir Keir would rather we all forgot

Visa picture of Keir Starmer, then 23, before he joined a youth work camp in Czechoslovakia

Visa picture of Keir Starmer, then 23, before he joined a youth work camp in Czechoslovakia

The visa was found by the Mail in the 'Foreign Intelligence Main Directorate - Operative Files'

The visa was found by the Mail in the Czech 'Foreign Intelligence Main Directorate - Operative Files'

Most extraordinarily, we found that a young Starmer was a driving force behind an ultra-Left publication that backed a campaign to free a convicted Marxist terror chief – and was a tool, unwitting or otherwise, of the KGB propaganda machine.

Not that you would know any of this from the man himself, despite Starmer putting his upbringing at the heart of his election campaign.

He launched his General Election campaign with a vivid description of his working-class youth in the Surrey town of Oxted. 

He proudly described how, despite the hardships, he became the first member of his family to attend university after he won a place to study law at Leeds. 

Sir Keir, however, has been rather quieter about the time that immediately followed his days as an undergraduate. 

Those formative years in his mid to late-20s, when he was a postgraduate student at Oxford and a trainee barrister in London, have hardly warranted a mention.

Last year offered a possible clue to that reticence, when the Daily Mail revealed the astonishing story of how, in 1986, just before his 24th birthday, Starmer travelled to Czechoslovakia to join an international work camp to restore a memorial to victims of a Nazi atrocity. It was a visit monitored by Communist spies.

Unbeknown to Starmer and other overseas volunteers, such camps were part of long-term and wide-ranging operation by the nation’s secret police force, StB.

In 1986, Sir Keir and a group of friends launched a magazine called Socialist Alternatives

In 1986, Sir Keir and a group of friends launched a magazine called Socialist Alternatives

Declassified Cold War security service files in Prague about other camps show the aim was to undermine Nato by identifying young high-fliers for potential future ‘exploration’ and use. 

Security experts have said that Starmer made a mistake on this occasion by signing up to a venture run by a totalitarian Communist regime.

But the MoS can reveal this was by no means the only time the future Labour leader brushed up against troubling influences during a period when, according to one contemporary, his politics were nakedly ‘hard-Left’.

It centres around a magazine called Socialist Alternatives, which was launched by Starmer and a small group of friends in 1986, just a few weeks before he crossed into Czechoslovakia to join his work camp. 

The publication was the brainchild of Benjamin Schoendorff, a charismatic Frenchman whom Sir Keir had met at the Oxford University Labour Club. Schoendorff was well connected in Marxist circles and arranged for the magazine to be fully funded by the Paris-based International Revolutionary Marxist Tendency.

The obscure Left-wing faction – who were known as Pabloists after the founder’s nickname – wanted to broaden socialism to include feminism and green politics and this found expression in Socialist Alternatives.

Mr Schoendorff has previously declined to speak to Sir Keir’s two biographers and did not respond to our requests for comment.

But in an online talk to the London Socialist Historians last year, he recalled how he and Sir Keir had been ‘radical anti-imperialist eco-socialists’. Schoendorff told the audience he first encountered Starmer outside the University Labour Club meetings. 

And he suggested that Starmer had rapidly accepted his invitation to join his Marxist Pabloists sect and soon became one of his ‘closest comrades’.

‘There is something strange about Keir in general,’ Schoendorff told the London meeting.

‘Normally when you recruit someone… it takes a while. You need to go through lots of stuff. I have no recollection of doing this with him, so that’s kind of strange.’

Starmer played a key role in Socialist Alternatives as the magazine launched just as he was finishing at Oxford. Officially, Starmer was one of the ‘editorial collective’ comprising a small group of fellow students or recent graduates. 

But Richard Barbrook, an unpaid contributor, has said that while Schoendorff was the leader, it was Starmer ‘who got the magazine done’. 

He got all the articles in, laid the pages out, delivered it to the printers then collected and distributed it at bookshops, he said. ‘The magazine wouldn’t have existed without him.’

Socialist Alternatives criticised the Labour Party under Neil Kinnock – which voters eventually rejected at the 1992 Election – for being nowhere near Left-wing enough. 

Its editorials called for a ‘radical extension of common ownership over wealth and power’ and argued that ‘prisoners should have much greater control over the conditions of their own imprisonment’.

Starmer’s bylined articles variously attacked ‘the authoritarian onslaught of Thatcherism’ and called for a ‘nationwide campaign of struggles’ to reduce the European working week to 35 hours.

He also lambasted the police for their conduct during the 1986 Wapping industrial dispute between print workers and Rupert Murdoch’s newspaper empire.

Denouncing ‘paramilitary policing methods’, Starmer said the clashes between officers and union workers led ‘to the question of the role the police should play, if any’ in civil society. ‘Who are they protecting and from what?’ he demanded.

Another intriguing article, penned by two of Starmer’s co-editors, is a stern critique of the British and Western ‘media hysteria’ over the devastating explosion at the Chernobyl nuclear plant three months earlier.

Headlined with the Russian ‘Katastropha’, it mocked Western superiority over the disaster, pointing out that there had already been grave accidents at the Three Mile Island plant in Pennsylvania and Windscale on the Cumbrian coast. 

‘The evidence from the West shows that we are no better,’ insisted the article. It also accused the West of being ‘hypocritical’ for attacking the Soviet’s secrecy over Chernobyl, claiming the US and British nuclear industries were also ‘deeply secretive’ and ‘highly centralised’.

It is an article that – fairly – raises questions as to whether the magazine had been duped into becoming a tool of Soviet propaganda. Neither of the authors of the Socialist Alternatives article responded to an MoS request for comment. 

It is not known how the bizarre text came to be written – which is relevant because of one remarkable coincidence: the Mail has discovered that, one month before its publication in July 1986, Moscow launched a secret push to ‘paralyse’ criticism of Chernobyl.

The point was to encourage Western media outlets to write stories highlighting their own nuclear accidents, instead of focusing on a Soviet disaster.

A summary of the KGB’s Operation Graphite found in the Czech state security service archives explains: ‘The aim was to defy and paralyse the enemy campaign against the USSR and other countries of the socialist bloc in relation to the Chernobyl nuclear disaster.’

The declassified files show that the KGB pushed disinformation dossiers together with key propaganda lines and instructions on how to promote these among sympathetic journalists and other officials in the West.

It involved ‘pointing to similar events that had occurred in the past’ in the West, including ‘accidents in nuclear power plants’ and repeating allegations that Western authorities had responded with secrecy. 

These dossiers were sent to Russian and other Soviet Bloc diplomats and secret collaborators working in the West.

The London Czechoslovak embassy was ‘involved in the preparation and implantation’ of the operation in the UK. Embassies in Paris were also engaged to spread the KGB disinformation.

The Czech files say the Soviet message was ‘spread verbally in diplomatic, business, political and journalistic circles’, that it had ‘contributed to the paralysis of the West’s enemy campaign against the USSR’ and had also ‘diverted public attention throughout the world’.

The following year, Socialist Alternatives ran an appeal from a group called the ‘Justice for Otelo Committee’. This referred to Otelo de Carvalho, a Portuguese brigadier who was later jailed for his role as a leader of FP-25, a far-Left terrorist group that carried out armed assaults, kidnappings, robberies and bombings, which left at least 14 dead and many wounded.

The group had fired rockets at the Royal British Club in Lisbon – in solidarity with the IRA – and at the British Airways office in Porto.

Supporters of Otelo put their name to a Socialist Alternatives appeal against the sentence, which claimed his trial had been ‘remarkable for its grave irregularities’. 

The signatories included future Left-wing luminaries Jeremy Corbyn, Tony Benn, Clare Short and US academic Noam Chomsky. It concluded with a note urging others who supported the campaign to write to an address in Archway Road, North London, which Sir Keir shared with several others also involved with the magazine and where editorial meetings often took place. Despite the efforts of his British supporters, Carvalho served five years in jail.

Asked about the articles, a Labour Party spokesman stressed that in his later role as Director of Public Prosecutions, Starmer ‘faced down the threat of international terrorism’ by ‘locking up 150 terrorists’, including the first ever conviction of an Al-Qaeda ringleader as well as the ‘liquid bomb plotters’ who tried to carry out a British 9/11.

But when speaking for himself, Starmer has appeared a little less ‘on message’ than his spin doctors. He has spent most of his Labour leadership trying to show he has made a clean break with Corbyn’s politics, so you might expect him to dismiss his time at Socialist Alternatives as youthful stupidity. Yet his sympathetic biographer Tom Baldwin says this is not the case. He wrote last year that Sir Keir told him, ‘surprisingly’, that his articles from the time do matter and that ‘what he wrote was part of his evolution and, as such, traces of it can still be found in his DNA’.

Other former comrades take a more downbeat view, notably Schoendorff, who today works as a clinical psychologist in Canada but is still a hardcore socialist and vocal critic of Starmer’s Labour Party on social media.

During the election campaign, he claimed there is ‘no sign’ that Starmer’s radical youth left any trace on his current politics.

‘The guy is an empty suit…’ he said. ‘I think he’s just a puppet saying whatever he’s being told to say and it’s going to be the worst you’ve ever seen. 

Every day it seems he’s able to insult our intelligence and morals in a new way, which is beyond comprehension… I don’t think he’s his own person. I think other interests have their hands firmly up his backside.

‘He’s pretty wooden, right? He’s not so inspiring. I don’t think there is anything special about Keir. Maybe I’m missing something.’

For all the efforts of Starmer and the ‘editorial collective’, Socialist Alternatives was a flop. Starmer’s attempts to move the political dial had no lasting impact and the magazine sold only a handful of copies. For all its sound and fury, even its founder Schoendorff conceded: ‘No one read it.’

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15359779/Comrade-Starmer-Labour-Nigel-Farages-KGBs-toxic-propaganda-machine.html


Monday, 8 December 2025

Right of Self-Defense


Muslim Jihadi Terrorist enemies and the right of self-protection against them

Jihadi rocket fire and terror attacks are the relentless product of “criminal intent.”



Jihadi Terrorists in Gaza, lined up and waiting for an opportunity to kill

"An intentional act of injustice is an injury. A Nation has therefore the right to punish it…. This right to resist injustice is derived from the right of self-protection.”- Emmerich de Vattel, The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law (1758)

In legal terms, intentional acts of injustice call for self-protection. Now faced with multiplying jihadi foes, the State of Israel has a corollary obligation to punish terrorist offenders. In this connection, a basic difference exists between terror violence (the crime) and Israel’s military response (the punishment). As a matter of international justice, this core difference is legally determinative and politically important.

There are pertinent details. By definition, terrorism is a crime under international law. A vulnerable state’s self-protective actions against terror crimes are law-enforcing ipso facto. This assessment holds true as long as the terror-beleaguered state (here, Israel) responds with aptly-measured uses of force; i.e., measures consistent with the codified and customary limitations of humanitarian international law.

During the Gaza War, large numbers of Palestinian Arab civilian casualties seemingly implied Israeli departure from jus in bello legal rules of distinction, proportionality and military necessity. Nonetheless, whether Israel is operating against Shiite Hezbollah in Lebanon, Sunni Hamas in Gaza or any other jihadi fighting forces based in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, etc., its operations intend to serve legitimate military objectives with minimum civilian harms.

To be sure, noncombatant harms can never be prevented altogether, especially when a perfidious enemy is hiding behind “human shields,” but Jerusalem does what it can reasonably do to keep collateral harms in check. Most relevant to proper legal appraisal of Israeli counter-terrorism, Jerusalem - unlike its Islamist foes - displays no “criminal intent” (mens rea).

There is more. In its law-enforcing wars against jihadist terror, Israel acts on behalf of all law-observant countries. While this point has been difficult to acknowledge by those who focus only on the tangible effects of Israeli counter-terrorism, it is authoritatively supported by long-established global obligations. These are indispensable obligations of “mutual aid.”

By this fundamental principle, one known formally under international law as a jus cogens (“compelling law”) rule, each state is required to assist other states imperiled by terror-violence. The most important historical figures in creating and explaining this requirement were Swiss jurist Emmerich de Vattel (The Law of Nations, 1758) and English jurist William Blackstone (Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1765-1769). Subsequently, Blackstone’s Commentaries became the recognizable foundation of US criminal law.

There is more. Palestinian Arab terror crimes of October 7, 2023 - murder, rape and hostage-taking - represent “Nuremberg-level” violations of humanitarian international law. Under compelling or “jus cogens” rules, all states - not just Israel - have a many-sided obligation to punish such criminals. Jurisprudentially, this obligation is “sacred;” it can never be diminished or removed for geo-political or “practical” reasons.

Principle 1 of The Nuremberg Principles (1950) stipulates unambiguously, “No crime without a punishment.” Among other conclusions, there would have been no Gaza War and no Palestinian Arab casualties if Hamas had not launched its October 7, 2023 criminal assault against Israelis and nationals of other assorted states (e.g., Thai agricultural workers simply trying to feed their families back home.)

Here, Hamas barbarisms had nothing to do with any expectations of sovereignty, self-determination or statehood. In law, rights can never stem from wrongs: Ex iniuria non oritur actio.

Hamas and kindred jihadist crimes were not committed to foster Palestinian Arab statehood. These offenses had no political objectives. Rather, they were singularly lascivious and conspicuously primal.

What about Israeli “proportionality”? Under binding laws of war, and contrary to “common-sense” meanings, proportionality has nothing to do with inflicting symmetrical or equivalent harms. Instead, it derives from a more basic legal principle, namely that belligerent rights always have variously specific limitations. The declaration that insurgents are entitled to fight “by any means necessary” contravenes Hague Convention No. IV (1907), Annex to the Convention, Section II (Hostilities), Art. 22: "The right of belligerents to adopt means of injuring the enemy is not unlimited.” In essence, this narrowly propagandistic declaration is just an empty witticism.

Unlike Israel, which expressly laments the collateral damage of its self-defense operations in Gaza and elsewhere, jihadi rocket fire and terror attacks are the relentless product of “criminal intent.” By unhidden design, jihadists aim to maim and kill Israeli noncombatants. In Jerusalem, this overtly criminal aim should now be re-imagined in tandem with growing jihadi access to drone weapons and incrementally/eventually to weapons of mass destruction.

There is more. If a “common-sense” definition of proportionality was authentically law-based, there could never be any legitimate argument for America's "disproportionate" attacks on European and Japanese cities during World War II. By common-sense standards, Dresden, Cologne, Hiroshima and Nagasaki must represent the nadir of inhumane belligerency. Prima facie, these US attacks would express the modern world's utterly worst violations of humanitarian international law.

It’s time for further legal details. Deception can be lawful in armed conflict, but Hague Regulations disallow placement of military assets or personnel in civilian areas. Related prohibitions of “perfidy” can be found at Protocol I of 1977, additional to the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949. These rules are also binding on the basis of customary international law, a principal jurisprudential source identified at Article 38 of the Statute of the InterInational Court of Justice (1945).

All anti-Israel combatants, including Palestinian Arab insurgents alleging fighting for "self-determination," are bound by the law of war. Among other things, this basic requirement can be found at Article 3, common to the four Geneva Conventions of 1949. It can never be suspended or abrogated. Israel, too, is bound by the law of war, but its Gaza War actions that killed and injured Palestinian Arab civilians were without mens rea.

There is something markedly ironic. The alleged jihadi goal of Palestinian Arab “self-determination” is founded on an intended crime - that is, total “removal” of the Jewish State by attrition and annihilation. This explicitly genocidal orientation has its origins in the PLO's "Phased Plan" of June 9, 1974. In its 12th Session, the PLO's highest deliberative body, the Palestinian National Council, reiterated the terror-organization’s aim "to achieve their rights to return, and to self-determination on the whole of their homeland."

In its 1974 plan, a clarifying sequence of Palestinian Arab violence was specifically identified: FIRST, "to establish a combatant national authority over every part of Palestinian Arab territory that is 'liberated'" (Art. 2);

SECOND, "to use that territory to continue the fight against Israel" (Art. 4); and

THIRD, "to start a Pan-Arab War to complete the liberation of the all-Palestinian territory” (Art. 8). Ironically, this was and still remains the annihilationist plan of a more mainstream Palestinian Arab terror groups than Hamas.

At some still-indecipherable point, Hamas or other jihadi criminal forces could launch mega-terror attacks on Israel. Such potentially “perfidious” aggressions could include chemical, biological or radiological (radiation-dispersal) weapons. Foreseeable perils could also include a non-nuclear terrorist attack on the Israeli nuclear reactor at Dimona. There is already a documented history of enemy assaults against this plutonium-production facility, both by a state (Iraq, in 1991) and by a Palestinian terror group (Hamas, in 2014).

International law is not a suicide pact. Even amid a long-enduring world-system anarchy, such law offers a binding body of rules and procedures that permits a beleaguered state to express its inherent right to “self-protection.” But when jihadists celebrate the explosive "martyrdom" of manipulated Islamic civilians and when Islamist leaders seek "redemption" (i.e., “power over death”) through the mass-murder of "Jews,” the wrongdoers have no correct claims to immunity from law-based punishment.

There is more. Under international law, terrorists are considered hostes humani generis or "common enemies of humankind." Among other things, this most egregious category of criminality invites punishment wherever the wrongdoers can be found. Concerning their required arrest and prosecution, all pertinent jurisdiction is “universal.” Also relevant is that the universality-declaring Nuremberg Tribunal reaffirmed the ancient legal principle of "No crime without a punishment."

An extra-legal but still important observation concerns Hamas allegations of Israeli "disproportionality." To wit, many Palestinian Arab commanders who create terror-mayhem against Israel seek shelter in safe towns and cities outside of Gaza and "West Bank" (Judea/Samaria). But these self-declared commanders are never eager to become "martyrs" themselves.

Why? This is the question that every impacted Palestinian Arab should finally be asking. Matters will not be helped by US President Donald Trump’s recent agreements with Syria, Turkey and Qatar, especially those “mutual self-defense” provisions that could make it impossible for Israel to strike jihadists taking refuge in those countries.

What next? In law, all law, truth is exculpatory. Regarding the Gaza War, that conflict is anything but over, Hamas any other jihadist forces are already rearming and Trump’s so-called international stabilization force is effectively a protracted cover for Israel’s jihadi enemies. Taken as a whole, the American President’s “peace” is merely a bitter self-parody.

In the end, Hamas and other jihadists argue they are fighting a “just war” and entitled to employ “any means necessary.” Under authoritative international law, however, even if a war is determinably “just,” it must still be fought with determinably “just means.” In this binding jurisprudence, ends can never justify means. Under no circumstances can there ever be law-based justifications for terror-violence.

Recalling 18th century Swiss scholar Emmerich de Vattel’s still-valid declaration: “An intentional act of injustice is an injury. A nation has therefore the right to punish it….This right…is derived from the right of self-protection.”

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/418957


Sunday, 7 December 2025

Ilhan Omar and the Somali Scammers


Ilhan Omar's links to Somali food fraud scheme in Minnesota revealed

New details reveal Ilhan Omar's links to those convicted in the Somali fraud case in Minnesota.

The progressive Somali-born congresswoman has connections to at least two convicted food fraudsters.

The Trump administration is investigating whether the millions fraudulently obtained were then funneled to terrorist organizations, including Somalia-based Al-Shabaab.

Salim Ahmed Said, 33, is the owner of Safari Restaurant, which is where Omar held her 2018 campaign victory party.

He was convicted in March 2025 on 21 counts including wire fraud, federal programs bribery and money laundering. He pocketed $5 million from the scheme funneling money through Feeding Our Future for his own enrichments rather than for the child nutrition program.

He is facing decades in prison and is one of the more than 70 defendants charged in the sweeping case. There are 45 convictions so far.

Additionally, Omar campaign official Guhaad Hashi Said, pleaded guilty in August to running fake food site Advance Youth Athletic Development, and pocketing $3.2 million from the program.

Omar introduced the 2020 MEALS Act bill that made the $250 million fraud scheme possible. 

Congresswoman Ilhan Omar held her 2018 election night party at Safari Restaurant (pictured). The owner, Salim Ahmed Said, was convicted in March 2025 on 21 counts of wire fraud, bribery and money laundering after funneling $5 million to himself through the Feeding Our Future charity

Congresswoman Ilhan Omar held her 2018 election night party at Safari Restaurant (pictured). The owner, Salim Ahmed Said, was convicted in March 2025 on 21 counts of wire fraud, bribery and money laundering after funneling $5 million to himself through the Feeding Our Future charity

And Omar's campaign staffer Guhaad Said (pictured) pleaded guilty in August 2025 to running fake food site Advance Youth Athletic Development, and pocketing $3.2 million from the program

Omar's campaign staffer Guhaad Said (pictured) pleaded guilty in August 2025 to running fake food site Advance Youth Athletic Development, and pocketing $3.2 million from the program

Omar's links to the two food fraudsters show the extent of her connections to the federal scheme

Omar's links to the two food fraudsters show the extent of her connections to the federal scheme

Omar's ties to the $1 billion welfare scam in her Minnesota congressional district are slowly being uncovered.

Not only did she dish out funds to hold her 2018 victory party at Salim Said's restaurant, but a Minnesota-based policy fellow told the New York Post that she often frequented the Safari Restaurant.

'Rep. Omar knew who these people were. People she personally knew were making tens of millions of dollars in this program.'

'She had been inside the [Safari] facility on numerous occasions and couldn't put two and two together? Either she's terminally naive, or knew and didn't care.'

Omar's congressional office did not respond to the Daily Mail's request for comment on the new revelations about the extent of her links to the convicted.

Safari restaurant received more than $16 million in funds for 'phantom meals' that were never provided.

Prosecutors note that he spent the money he enriched himself with on a $2 million mansion in Minneapolis and a $9,000-a-month shopping habit at Nordstrom.

Now the Trump administration is investigating whether the fraud scheme was laundering money to Somalian-based terrorist group Al-Shabaab

The Trump administration is investigating whether the fraud scheme was laundering money to Somalian-based terrorist group Al-Shabaab

Additionally, Omar campaign staffer Guhaad Said claimed he served 5,000 meals every day, but in reality was taking millions into his own coffers. He pleaded guilty to his fraud in August 2025.

He worked on Omar's 2018 and 2020 campaign as an 'enforcer' overseeing an aggressive voter mobilization strategy in the Somali community in Minneapolis.

Guhaad Said and Omar often attended the same events, according to Facebook photos of the pair together, including smiling selfies.

Some who donated to Omar's campaign received fraudulent money from the food charity scam. The congresswoman received $7,400 in donations from now-convicted fraudsters.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15353117/Ilhan-Omar-Somali-fraud-scheme-Minnesota.html

Somali refugees in Minnesota have committed the 'biggest theft of taxpayer dollars in US history' and local Democratic officials were 'fully complicit' in the scheme, White House officials declared.

Federal authorities announced this week that at least 86 people - mostly within small Somali communities in the state - have stolen more than $1 billion in public funds from programs meant to feed children, assist the homeless and provide autism therapy.

The suspects ran companies that billed Minnesota state officials for millions of dollars in social services that were never actually rendered in three separate fraud schemes.

Representative Ilhan Omar and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz had connections with at least some of the Somali refugees charged in the massive scheme.

They were also both pictured with Abdul Dahir Ibrahim, who was taken into Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody on Friday.

He had previously been convicted in Canada of asylum and welfare fraud, Fox News reports.

US Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller said authorities 'believe the state government is fully complicit in this scheme, and we believe that what we uncover is going to shock the American people.'

He added that the evidence federal prosecutors have already collected show that 'the Somali fraud operation in Minnesota is the single greatest theft of taxpayer dollars through welfare fraud in American history.'

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz is pictured with Somali refugee Abdul Dahir Ibrahim
Representative Ilhan Omar is pictured with Ibrahim

Representative Ilhan Omar and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz had connections with the Somali refugees charged in the massive scheme

Millions of dollars that were fraudulently obtained were funneled to terrorist organizations, including Somalia-based Al-Shabaab. 

75 percent of the Somali population in Minnesota is on welfare.

President Trump announced he was ending Temporary Protected Status for Somalis.

Ibrahim had previously been arrested for providing false information to police and driving without a valid license, a crime for which he was fined and sentenced to one year of probation.

In the years since, Ibrahim - who was also once pictured with former Minneapolis mayoral candidate Omar Fateh - has accumulated a dozen traffic or parking tickets as he repeatedly applied for asylum. 

Ibrahim was also photographed with former Minneapolis mayoral candidate Omar Fateh

Ibrahim was also photographed with former Minneapolis mayoral candidate Omar Fateh

He was taken into custody by Immigration and Customs Enforcement on Friday

He was taken into custody by Immigration and Customs Enforcement on Friday

In one of his applications, the fraudster claimed his sister and her five children to be his spouse and his own kids.

But a judge cited Ibrahim's 'complete lack of credibility' in rejecting the petition, according to the New York Post. 

Ibrahim also had deportation orders against him since 2004, but was still granted temporary protected status - which provided him with deportation protections for 10 years.

In announcing his arrest on Friday, the Department of Homeland Security noted that Ibrahim 'has been linked to Minnesota’s top sanctuary politicians.'

'Bye-bye, Abdul.'

Ibrahim is not the only fraudster Omar has connections with, as authorities were able to secure a conviction against 33-year-old Salim Ahmed Said, the owner of Safari Restaurant, where the woke congresswoman held her 2018 victory party.

Prosecutors have said Said pocketed $5 million by claiming to serve tens of thousands of meals to low-income children during the pandemic through the nonprofit Feeding Our Future.

Most of those meals never actually existed, authorities say, and the Safari restaurant allegedly received more than $16 million in funds for 'phantom meals.'

Said then used the money to enrich himself, with a $2 million mansion in Minneapolis and a $9,000-a-month shopping habit at Nordstrom.

The restaurant owner is now facing decades in prison.

Walz has defended what has gone on by saying his administration erred on the side of generosity during the pandemic and prioritized getting money out to people as quickly as possible

Democrat Presidential candidate Kamala, with her VP candidate Walz, who said his administration prioritized getting money out to people as quickly as possible

Walz is seeking a third term as governor next year.

President Donald Trump has derided Walz for allowing Minnesota to become 'a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity.'

He said the perpetrators should be 'sent back to where they came from.'

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem also hit out at the governor at a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday.

'You told me to look into Minnesota and their fraud on visas and their programs,' she told Trump, before declaring that half 'are fraudulent, which means that that wacko Governor Walz either is an idiot or he did it on purpose — and I think he's both.'

President Donald Trump has derided Walz for allowing Minnesota to become 'a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity.'

President Donald Trump derided Walz for allowing Minnesota to become 'a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity.'

A key reason the fraud wasn't stopped was due to a reluctance from civil servants to go after the criminals due to their race, and being fearful of alienating the Somali community.

Feeding Our Future, the largest nonprofit participating in the program, warned that if the state didn’t fast-track approvals for 'minority-owned businesses,' it would face a lawsuit accusing officials of racism.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15358599/Somali-fraud-Minnesota-Ilhan-Omar-Tim-Walz.html


Saturday, 6 December 2025

Unmanned Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA)


The CCA: A force multiplier the IAF should build

Unmanned Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) are going to be essential for air superiority. Turkey has already built them but Israel has not even begun. Someone in the IAF should get on with it.


It was recently reported that Turkey’s “Kizilelma” unmanned Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) successfully struck a target aircraft with a beyond-visual-range (BVR) air-to-air missile (AAM). This was apparently the first time such a remarkable feat was ever accomplished by a CCA or “loyal wingman” drone. Making this event even more significant was the fact that the AAM employed had been developed in Turkey, as was the AESA radar used by the Kizilelma to detect and track the target.

Not surprisingly, many observers reacted to this development by recognizing Turkey’s ongoing successful efforts to achieve a high degree of military self sufficiency. Israel, in contrast, it’s been noted, doesn’t even have a CCA under development, despite its pressing need to break its dependency on the U.S. for military equipment.

People have to understand that the CCA is going to be an essential force multiplier for future air superiority fighters like the F-47. Basically, future pilots will be able to control any number of them for missions such as reconnaissance, suppression of enemy air defenses, jamming and even dog fighting against manned enemy fighters.

It’s important to note, that the CCAs will also be capable of conducting these missions autonomously, thereby reducing the work load of pilots. What we should be particularly aware of, though, is that pilots flying sophisticated 5th generation planes like the F-35, could probably be able to operate CCAs, as well. I hope people realize what this could mean for the IAF.

Israel definitely has the ability to produce a competitive CCA. IAI can build the airframe, BVR AAMs and ballistic missiles like the ER LORA are currently available and can easily be improved, while the all important AI systems needed by the CCAs to operate independently are clearly within our capabilities.

Assuming we had a force of CCAs available to augment our Air Force, what impact would they have on our ability to deliver a war winning first strike? Operating in conjunction with volleys of highly accurate hypersonic glide vehicles that would be targeting enemy air defenses, command control facilities and early warning radars, our CCAs would constitute a second wave that could either finish off any surviving enemy SAM batteries or be directed to target enemy ballistic missiles being readied for launch.

Clearly, the possibilities would be endless. Perhaps most important of all, the CCAs would provide a first strike scenario with the ability to both saturate a high value target as well as destroy many other secondary targets that we wouldn’t have the ability to hit because of our limited numbers of manned aircraft.

So, what is holding up our production of a CCA? It’s a good question because it isn’t because we lack the technical ability to build them. Indeed, when I presented some local aeronautical engineers with a design based on a modernized version of the Horton 229, they immediately assured me we could build it. Roughly the size of an F-16, this CCA would probably outclass most of its competitors, thereby providing the IAF not only with a highly effective long range force multiplier, but would also generate tremendous export sales.

Perhaps someone should point this out to the IAF command staff and order them to get on with it.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/418865