Friday, 10 June 2022

BDS Gone Wild: New Boston BDS Group Map Targets All Jews in Massachusetts

BDS map targets all Jews in Massachusetts

Posted 

As a Pew Research Institute study recently revealed, the overwhelming majority of Americans have little or no idea what the debate about the BDS movement is about. With 84 percent of those polled confessing ignorance about the topic, that left only 11 percent to express an opinion about it one way or the other. Those who understand the anti-Semitic nature of BDS activism may take some cold comfort from the fact that its supporters haven’t made all that much headway in the public square. But the fact that only 6 percent opposed it, while a mere 5 percent backed it, is a frightening result when one considers the consequences of the way many on the left-wing of the Democratic Party are buying into the intersectional ideology that is the foundation of BDS lies about Israel.

That’s the context for the news that a Boston BDS group is promoting a “Mapping Project” that is supposed to illustrate “how local support for the colonization of Palestine is structurally tied to policing, evictions and privatization locally, and to US imperialist projects worldwide.”

It’s not clear whether such extremism has much support even in the most woke sectors of one of the country’s most liberal communities. But what makes it truly sinister is the way that it creates maps of synagogues and other Jewish institutions, including schools in the state of Massachusetts, and attempts to hold them out as bastions of “harms” such as “racism,” “policing, “US imperialism” and “ethnic cleansing.”

It should be understood clearly what Boston BDS and its leftist allies are doing here. They are placing a target on American Jews — declaring that anything and everything associated with Jewish life in this country is fair game for false accusations of crimes against minorities, delegitimization, and, at the very least, hounding out of the public square and, perhaps, ultimately violence. These maps are tangible evidence of how elements of the ideological left have crossed over to the kind of open anti-Semitism that many Jews are only prepared to acknowledge when it comes from the far-right.

• • •

Some on the Jewish left have urged Americans to understand BDS as a cry of protest against what they mischaracterize as oppressive Israeli policies and a way to pressure Israel to withdraw from the West Bank. They say that progressives who support BDS — like the members of the left-wing congressional “Squad” — should not be treated as anti-Semites or beyond the pale of normal politics. But it should be noted that the kind of rhetoric from the BDS movement — in which talk of “colonization of Palestine” refers to Tel Aviv, not remote settlements in the territories — actually reflects exactly the sort of toxic stuff that is routinely spouted by both the Hamas terrorists who rule the Gaza Strip and their supposedly moderate rivals of the Palestinian Authority that autonomously governs the Arab population of the West Bank in their official media.

So, while the instincts of much of the organized Jewish world will be to ignore or downplay this story, it is actually quite important. For those in the 84 percent of the American public that is ignorant of BDS — a demographic that probably includes a great many secular and unaffiliated Jews — the Mapping Project is telling you exactly what BDS means. It is pure, unadulterated hatred for Jews that engages in the sort of eliminationist rhetoric about Israel and Zionism that matches even the most extreme screeds heard on the far-right.

What’s more, it also is reflected in the actions and positions of anti-Zionist groups that have been demanding that they be given a place at the communal Jewish table, like IfNotNow and Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP).

When JVP first unveiled its “Deadly Exchange” campaign in the last decade, few American Jews understood just how far ahead of the leftist curve the organization really was. Launched after the Black Lives Matter movement emerged from protests over a 2014 police shooting in Ferguson, Mo., that despite the claims of most of the group’s supporters in the media proved to be entirely justified, “Deadly Exchange” was a classic anti-Semitic blood libel cloaked in the language of human rights and “anti-racism.”

Its conceit was that Jewish and non-Jewish groups that help fund trips to Israel by American first responders were racist actions that led to the slaughter of African-Americans on the streets of American cities by police trained to kill by the Jewish state.

• • •

As with blood libels of the past in which Jews were blamed for crimes — both real and mythical — in which they had no role, the point was to demonize both Israel and its supporters, and to falsely accuse them of murder. The irony that a group with the word “Jewish” in its title was employing a classic trope of Jew-haters was lost on the group, which was banking on the idea that when it comes to defaming Israel, no limits on rhetorical excess or fabulism need be observed by those whose cause it is to work for its destruction.

That this claim was pure fiction was beside the point. Those who were sent to Israel in various programs — a practice that was encouraged and subsidized by largely liberal groups like local Jewish Community Relations Councils or the Anti-Defamation League — were able to benefit from the country’s unfortunately vast store of knowledge about dealing with public emergencies, including terrorist attacks that resulted in mass casualties.

They were not taught how to deliberately kill innocent civilians without cause — something that, despite the libels hurled at the Israel Defense Forces for its actions in seeking to suppress the efforts of terrorists like Hamas — the Jewish state forbids.

JVP hasn’t gotten many communities to heed their slanders and ban public employees from going to Israel for training. But the group is undeterred and got a huge boost when, in the aftermath of the police murder of George Floyd in 2020, BLM went mainstream.

It was even supported by many Jewish organizations, even if not all of them endorsed the movement’s calls for defunding of the police, which dovetails with the anti-Zionist group’s assumption that law enforcement is inherently racist.

• • •

The pro-BDS JVP has been stealing the thunder of liberal Jewish groups like J Street in recent years on college campuses and other woke precincts, where it is allied with the Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) group. Its ardent support of BLM and its “Deadly Exchange” libel illustrate how intersectional ideology works. Those who believe that all struggles of oppressed people of color are linked and that all “white privilege” oppressors are similarly united believe that the Palestinian war on Israel’s existence is morally equivalent to the struggle for civil rights in the United States. BLM and its associated ideologies are predicated on the absurd yet somehow fashionable notion that the cure for racism that the overwhelming majority of Americans rejected generations ago is more racism.

By the same token, the BDS movement believes that the one people on the planet who must be deprived of sovereignty in their ancient homeland and left defenseless against genocidal Islamist and nationalist Arab movements are the Jews. Far from promoting peace, its platform is a path to Jewish genocide in Israel.

All of this amounts to a wake-up call for American Jews, both those that are affiliated with the organized community and those who never visit any of the sites that the Mapping Project seeks to target as bastions of everything they think the woke should protest.

BDS seeks the destruction of the one Jewish state on the planet and is, by definition, anti-Semitic. But its intersectional ideas lead this movement inevitably to a position that treats Jews as hateful oppressors and legitimate objects of protest — something that always leads to violence. BDS isn’t about human rights, helping the Palestinians, peace or justice. At its core and in action, it is a hate group, and it and all who support it should be treated accordingly.

Thursday, 9 June 2022

The Rape of Britain: Tommy Robinson Expose of Muslim Sex Grooming Gangs

“THE RAPE OF BRITAIN” Damning exposé of Muslim sex grooming gangs by Tommy Robinson

For 40 years, young British girls have been the victims of Muslim sexual grooming/rape gangs and the police have done virtually nothing about it, in fear of being labeled “racists” or “Islamophobes.” Tommy Robinson has been jailed for trying to expose them. Now, he has produced a shocking documentary about the horrific problem nobody wants to talk about in ‘polite society’ and his car was firebombed after he announced its impending release.

Tommy Robinson Car Was Firebombed After Trailer of New Documentary is Released

National Review  Tommy Robinson is a British political activist and “citizen journalist” who came to prominence in Britain almost a decade ago when he founded the English Defence League. The EDL was a street-protest movement in Britain whose aims could probably best be summarized as “anti-Islamization.”
From their earliest protests the EDL’s members sought to highlight issues including sharia law, Islam’s attitudes toward minorities, and the phenomenon that would become euphemistically known as “Asian grooming gangs” despite the fact that there were no Chinese or Japanese, but predominantly south Asian Pakistanis.
Muslim grooming gangs proliferate in Britain
But the whole subject is so ugly and uncomfortable that very few people care to linger over it. Robinson is an exception. For him — as he said in an interview with the BBC’s Jeremy Paxman — the “grooming gangs” issue isn’t something that afflicts some far-off towns but people in the working-class communities that he knows. And while there are a few journalists who have spent considerable time and energy bringing this appalling phenomenon to light, most of British society has turned away in a combination of embarrassment, disgust, and uncertainty about how to even talk about this.
Anyone who thinks Britain is much further along with dealing with the taboo of “grooming gangs” should remember that in 2017, the Labour MP for Rotherham, Sarah Champion, had to leave the shadow cabinet because she accurately identified the phenomenon.
Robinson was filming outside Leeds Crown Court, where a grooming-gang case was going on. What happened next went around the world: The police turned up in a van and swiftly arrested Robinson for “breach of the peace.” Within hours Robinson had been put before one Judge Geoffrey Marson, who in under five minutes tried, convicted, and sentenced Robinson to 13 months. He was immediately taken to prison.

The primary issue is that for years the British state allowed gangs of men to rape thousands of young girls across Britain. For years the police, politicians, Crown Prosecution Service, and every other arm of the state ostensibly dedicated to protecting these girls failed them. As a number of government inquires have concluded, they turned their face away from these girls because they were terrified of the accusations of racism that would come their way if they did address them. They decided it wasn’t worth the aggravation.
By contrast, Tommy Robinson thought it was worth the aggravation, even if that meant having his whole life turned upside down. Some years ago, after crawling over all of his personal affairs and the affairs of all his immediate family, the police found an irregularity on a mortgage application, prosecuted Robinson, convicted him, and sent him to prison on that charge. In prison he was assaulted and almost killed by Muslim inmates.
What can be said with absolute certainty is that Tommy Robinson has been treated with greater suspicion and a greater presumption of guilt by the United Kingdom than any Islamic extremist or mass rapist ever has been. That should be — yet is not — a national scandal. If even one mullah or sheikh had been treated with the presumption of guilt that Robinson has received, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the rest of them would be all over the U.K. authorities. But different standards apply to Robinson.

[There is an hour long video at the source article: https://barenakedislam.com/2022/02/07/the-rape-of-britain-damning-expose-of-muslim-sex-grooming-gangs-by-tommy-robinson/]

PART 2 The Rape of Britain: Tommy Robinson’s shocking exposé of Muslim sex grooming gangs in Telford

For 40 years, young British girls have been the victims of mostly Pakistani and Bangladeshi Muslim sexual grooming/rape gangs and the police have done virtually nothing about it, in fear of being labeled “racists” or “Islamophobes.” Tommy Robinson has been jailed for trying to expose them. Now, he has produced a shocking documentary about the horrific problem nobody wants to talk about in ‘polite society’ and his car was firebombed after he announced its impending release.

[there is another hour long video at the source article: https://barenakedislam.com/2022/06/06/part-2-the-rape-of-britain-tommy-robinsons-shocking-expose-of-muslim-sex-grooming-gangs-in-telford/]

Wednesday, 8 June 2022

What Is a Woman?

 

What Is a Woman?


The Daily Wire’s new documentary will make you laugh, cry, and run screaming down the street.



Bruce Bawer 

Having consumed an extraordinary amount of information (and misinformation) about transgenderism - whether through terrific books like Helen Joyce’s Trans and Abigail Shrier’s Irreversible Damage or YouTube videos by transgender “influencers” like Noah Finnce or canny critics of transgender ideology like Mr. MennoArielle Scarcella, and Kellie-Jay Keen - I worried that the just-released Daily Wire documentary on the topic, What Is a Woman?, produced and directed by Justin Folk and starring Daily Wire commentator Matt Walsh, wouldn’t offer anything new.

In a sense I was right. My mind wasn’t changed. I went in knowing that transgenderism is deranged and dangerous, and the film confirmed my point of view. But what confirmation! Folk, Walsh, and company have put together a serious and definitive piece of work - at once a comprehensive survey, a chilling indictment, and, strange though it may sound, an often laugh-out-loud piece of entertainment.

Structurally, What Is a Woman? borrows from, of all things, Michael Moore’s debut documentary, Roger & Me (1989), about the effect of GM factory closings on the increasingly bleak economy of his hometown of Flint, Michigan. Moore structured his film around the conceit that he was on a quest to track down, and confront, GM chairman and CEO Roger Smith, the tongue-in-cheek premise being that, if informed about the town’s suffering, Smith would certainly take remedial action. The conceit propelling Folk’s documentary is that Walsh, the 35-year-old father of two boys and two girls, is hopelessly confused by the new concepts of sex and gender, which posit that a man can become a woman and vice-versa, and is traveling around the U.S. to learn from experts on the subject - and to pose one question in particular: What is a woman?

To be sure, his first interviewee, “gender-affirming therapist” Gert Comfrey, is right there in his own hometown of Nashville. How, Walsh asks, do we know that this whole gender thing is true? “I learned it,” replies Comfrey, “by listening to transgender people.” “What,” Walsh then asks, “is a woman?” Comfrey’s reply: “Great question! I’m not a woman so I can’t really answer.” In fact, Comfrey is very obviously a biological female. A perfect start for a journey on which almost nothing is what it seems. 

In San Francisco, Walsh talks to Marci L. Bowers, “the nation’s pre-eminent sex-change surgeon.” Bowers, very obviously a biological male, presents as a woman - although when asked to confirm that he’s a trans woman offers an odd reply: “I have a transgender history.” (No, buddy, you have a transgender present.) Asked whether some people who undergo “sex-change” surgery ever regret doing so, Bowers replies, dishonestly, that such occurrences are “really, really uncommon”; asked about the similarity between transgenderism and body dysmorphia (whose sufferers want to cut off an arm or leg), Bowers says that the latter “doesn’t have anything to do with gender identity…..That’s someone who has a…psychiatric condition….Pardon my non-medical language: kooky.”

But of course nobody finds transgender ideology kooky. Asked about its critics, Bowers says that “there aren’t many” and that those who do exist are “dinosaurs” - killjoys in an “exciting” new era of maximum gender fluidity. “You know who gets it right?” Bowers enthuses. “This next generation!”

Brown University pediatrician Michelle Forcier, who helps plop children onto the trans assembly line, also finds the whole thing exciting. She tells Walsh that when first meeting her very young patients, she asks them: “Where have you been in terms of your gender and your gender identity? Where are you right now and, more excitingly, where would you like to be in the future?” When Walsh pushes back a bit, asking her if she’s ever met a four-year-old who believes in Santa Claus - and, when she answers in the affirmative, asking whether this indicates that such a child “maybe has a tenuous grasp on reality” - Forcier replies that “they have an appropriate four-year-old handle on reality” and that the child’s belief in Santa Claus shows just “how wonderful that four-year-old and their imagination is!” Like Bowers, she obviously feels that - along with her pre-teen patients, whom she praises for recognizing that “our antiquated ways just don’t apply to them” and for “rejecting a lot of our social mores” - she’s on the cutting edge of a super-duper social revolution.

Cheery stuff. But things turn dark when Walsh asks Forcier about her prescription to children of the drug Lupron, which is also used to chemically castrate sex offenders. “You know what?” she says, her tone suddenly chilly. “I’m not sure we should continue with this interview.” Why not? Because by using the word drugs and the term sex offenders, “you’re being malignant and harmful.”

Walsh also gets blowback from Patrick Grzanka, director of the program in Women, Gender, and Sexuality at the University of Tennessee. At first he’s quite the smug, voluble chap, banging on eagerly about how gender “infuses itself into all aspects of social life” and how gender and sex, although “different constructs,” are “deeply intertwined with each other.” But when Walsh asks if a “trans woman” can fairly be categorized as a male, Grzanka is uneasy. “Why are you asking the question? I want to understand why that’s so important.” When Walsh says he’s out “to understand reality,” Grzanka, echoing Comfrey, replies that you should simply trust what trans people tell you. And when Walsh explains that he’s “just trying to start by getting to the truth,” Grzanka declares angrily that he’s “really uncomfortable with that language”: to speak about “getting to the truth,” he complains, sounds “deeply transphobic.” Like Forcier, he threatens to stop the interview. Then, asked to define woman, he calls it “a curious question” before sitting there ruminatively, apparently stunned into silence by the query. 

This isn’t the last time in the film that an interviewee freaks out over a simple question. Later on, a gay guy on a San Francisco street tells Walsh that only a woman knows what a woman is. In response, Walsh asks: “Do you know what a cat is?” At once flustered and outraged, the guy stalks off. Then there’s Congressman Mark Takano (D-CA), a pro-trans Harvard grad who’s proud of being the “first openly gay person of color elected to Congress.” When confronted with the fact that letting “trans women” use public women’s bathrooms makes biological females uncomfortable, he hems and haws inanely for what seems like a full minute before finally declaring: “You know what? I think this interview is over.” 

Fortunately, the documentary also provides voices of sanity. Miriam Grossman, an adolescent and adult psychiatrist, notes that since gender dysphoria only afflicts “between one in 30,000 and one in 110,000” people, almost all of the young people who now claim to be trans aren’t really trans at all. About the likes of Forcier, Comfrey, and Bowers, Grossman declares: “It’s unspeakable what these people have done to our children.” And she sums up the baleful influence on current thinking of Alfred Kinsey (whose belief “that children are sexual from birth” led him to perform repulsive “sexual experiments on children”) and psychologist John Money (whose quack notions about the fluidity of gender were utterly - and tragically - disproved by his most notorious experiment but nonetheless shape today’s gender ideology). 

Walsh talks to many others whose lives have been touched by transgenderism. Selina Soule, a track-and-field athlete, explains that after biological boys started competing as girls, she went from a winner to a loser. Jordan Peterson, who shot to fame by opposing a Canadian law compelling the use of trans pronouns, vents his fury: “There’s no such thing as a gender-affirming therapist. It’s a contradiction in terms….You don’t get a pat on the back from a therapist for your pre-existing axiomatic conclusions. That’s not therapy. That’s a rubber stamp.”

In the one part of the film that I’d have left out, Walsh travels all the way to Kenya to ask Masai tribesmen about sex roles and tell them about transgenderism. The results are predictable: of course they laugh at the idea of a woman trapped in a man’s body. Funny stuff, I guess. But does Walsh really want to imply that the West should turn to African tribes for wisdom about anything? Surely this sequence is all too easy for the pro-trans crowd to dismiss: well, they can say, we’re more scientifically advanced than they are. (Then again, who on the left would dare to suggest that Masai tribesmen are primitive?)

Walsh’s most moving interviewee is Scott (Kellie) Newgent, a pretty woman who went through several operations before she ended up looking like a dumpy guy, and who, regretting all of it, now devotes her life to trying to talk young people out of “sex-change” surgery. “The truth,” she tells Walsh, ”is that medical transition is experimental,” with side effects that aren’t yet fully understood. She notes that there’s a 70% complication rate in female-to-male surgery, and displays for the camera the horrifying rectangular patch on her lower arm from which skin was stripped to create a fake phallus. 

No, I didn’t need to see this film to know what I think about transgenderism. But it did bring some key points into greater focus. First, like the promoters of abortion, who’d rather speak about “choice” than discuss in detail the procedures by means of which a baby is forcibly removed from a uterus, the pro-trans community rely heavily on euphemism. Don’t call drugs drugs; don’t say mastectomy, say top surgery; don’t say castration, say bottom surgery. (These people mangle language as eagerly as they mangle healthy sexual organs.)

Another thing: folks like Comfrey and Forcier and Bowers hold important-sounding positions and are supposed to be respected, distinguished experts. But they’re freaks. Comfrey’s a wild-eyed wacko. Forcier has a crazy smile. Bowers (to borrow Truman Capote’s description of Jacqueline Susann) looks like a truck driver in drag. The more they talk - barely able to conceal their glee at the thought of butchering children’s genitalia - the more you realize you’re in the presence of a very special kind of evil and a very special kind of madness. In a sane society, these creatures would be recognized as outcasts, reprobates, degenerates, creeps. That’s what they are: creeps. It’s striking that when Grossman, the sensible psychiatrist, first appears onscreen, you know immediately - even before she’s opened her mouth - that she’s not one of them.

And yet what comes through so clearly in this documentary is that, for the time being anyway, these people have won - and they’ve won without a fightTheir ideas - if you can call them that - have swept society, shaping new laws and policies and school curricula before the sane majority has had a chance to notice and to say: “Wait just one second.” These creeps may blithely pretend, as Bowers does, that nobody dissents from trans ideology except for a few “dinosaurs,” but they know very well that that’s not true - in fact, despite all their boosterism, they have to be aware, with their predilection for circular logic and their allergy to honest inquiry, that they’re selling a lie (hence Grzanka’s astonishing reaction to the word truth) and that there’s a sleeping giant out there waiting to call them on it. Which is why, the moment they realize that Walsh isn’t there to promote their ideology but to compel them to defend it, they’re prepared to call the interview to a halt.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2022/06/what-woman-bruce-bawer/

If the Road to Hell Is Paved With Good Intentions, With What Do We Pave the Road to Heaven?

 

If the Road to Hell Is Paved With Good Intentions, With What Do We Pave the Road to Heaven?

Good intentions without wisdom leads to evil.


There is a reason nearly everyone is familiar with the saying, “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.”

The reason is, of course, that it is true and therefore it helps explain why there is so much evil.

Take the 20th century, the bloodiest century on record, in which about 100 million people — all noncombatants — were murdered by despotic regimes, nearly all of them communist. Many of the people who supported communism — both outside and inside communist countries — thought they were doing good.

The Soviet Communist Party’s Gulag Archipelago; the Holodomor (the communists’ deliberate starvation of 5 million-plus Ukrainians); the Cambodian killing fields (the communist massacre of about a quarter of the Cambodian people); the Chinese communist government’s mass starvation and other forms of killing of more than 60 million of its own people; and the creation of the world’s largest prison camp, communist North Korea — the roads to all these communist hells were paved by many people who had (or believed themselves to have had) good intentions.

Were it not for many well-intentioned people who believed in communism, the truly evil people who implemented these genocides might not have come to power. To cite but one example, it was Western men and women (primarily Americans and Brits), presumably with good intentions, who delivered to Stalin the secrets to making an atom bomb. But what about the Nazis’ rise to power in Germany?

Not every German who voted for the Nazis in 1932, in Germany’s last free elections until after World War II, had evil intentions, let alone the aim of murdering all Jews. In fact, in campaigning that year, Hitler toned down his antisemitism in order to appeal to a broader base of German voters. The Nazis won only a third of German voters in that election, and the primary reason they voted for that party was not antisemitism. The primary reasons were the Great Depression and Germany’s hyperinflation, fear of communism, widespread political violence and resentment of the Versailles Treaty. In other words, even many of the minority of Germans who voted for Hitler did so with the good intention of solving Germany’s economic and political crises.

I use the Nazi example only to show that even those Germans who voted for the man and party that unleashed the greatest documented evil in history were not all motivated by bad intentions.

Thank God there is no mainstream movement in America with genocidal aims. But the road to lesser hells in this country is almost always motivated by people with good intentions.

I am sure that most of the many teachers who are robbing young children of their sexual innocence are motivated, certainly on a conscious level, by good intentions. Most of the Americans who vote for politicians who seek to defund the police — a true recipe for increased evil — do so with good intentions. The great majority of those who stormed (not to mention those who merely saw open doors and strolled into) the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, had good intentions. Most of the vast number of Americans who believe that free speech does not apply to anything they deem “hate speech” have good intentions — the elimination of hate speech; yet they comprise the first mass movement against free speech in American history. They pose a mortal threat to liberty in this country. But they believe they mean well.

The truth is that, on a conscious level, only a small minority of people wake up on any given day with an intent to do bad. The 51 heads of intelligence agencies who signed a statement a month before the 2020 presidential election declaring the Hunter Biden laptop story “Russian disinformation” lied. Yet, they probably believed that their mendacious assertion was morally justified because, in their view, the larger good was to ensure that then-President Donald Trump not be reelected.

The road to hell is paved by good intentions because most people who do harm, even many who do evil, are motivated by good intentions.

So, then, given that good intentions are almost always morally worthless, what are we to do if we wish to see good triumph over evil? Or, to pose the question another way, if good intentions are morally useless or, worse, actually pave the road to hell on Earth, with what should we pave the road to heaven on Earth?

The answer is wisdom. Good intentions without wisdom leads to evil.

The reason to worry about the future of America and Western civilization is not that its elites are composed of people with bad intentions; it is that the elites are composed of people devoid of wisdom.

The word for those who lack wisdom is “fool.” Most college professors, deans and presidents and, increasingly, most teachers in high schools and elementary schools; most editors and other journalists; most of the businesspeople who run big companies; most “experts”; and most of the rest of the elite (including, frighteningly, in the medical profession) are fools.

Why are they fools? Why are these men and women devoid of wisdom?

Because they were never taught wisdom. One must study wisdom to know how to do good, just as much as one must study physics to know how to do physics. If you are taught wisdom, there’s a good chance you will become wise. If not, there’s a good chance you will be a fool. And fools do a great deal of harm.

But wisdom is no longer taught by most parents and nearly all schools.

Until the early decades of the 20th century, American students were expected to know the greatest sources of wisdom — the ancient Greek and Roman writers, Shakespeare and, most important of all, the Bible.

But about 100 years ago, America embarked on the road to hell when it stopped teaching wisdom — and what wisdom is all about, moral virtue — when it secularized all education. First the universities and then the lower grades decided that knowledge could substitute for wisdom. Now American young people get no wisdom and, for that matter, little knowledge.

It is not a coincidence that the most foolish institutions in America and the rest of the West are the universities. They are the most radically secular.

You don’t have to be religious to realize that the most secular institutions are also the most foolish institutions. You just need not to be a fool.

The road to a good world is paved with wisdom.

DENNIS PRAGER

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/88900-if-the-road-to-hell-is-paved-with-good-intentions-with-what-do-we-pave-the-road-to-heaven-2022-06-07


San Francisco Politics: Soros Weatherbaby DA Chesa Boudin Recalled 60% to 40%

Woke San Francisco DA Chesa Boudin is RECALLED by voters in notoriously liberal city as murders soar 11% and locals furious with rising crime say his progressive policies are to blame

  • Voters in San Francisco have kicked out the city's progressive district attorney, Chesa Boudin, with 60.5 percent voting to recall him
  • Boudin, a former public defender, was elected as part of a wave of progressive Soros prosecutors
  • Boudin, 41, had been the target of a multi-million-dollar recall campaign by residents who say the liberal city has become an increasingly unsafe place to live
  • The election has ramifications beyond San Francisco, with national polls showing Americans increasingly worried about violent crime 

San Francisco on Tuesday voted to recall its progressive district attorney amid rising anger at the city's crime-ridden state.

Chesa Boudin, 41, had been widely expected to lose his job and 60.5 per cent of voters made their feelings clear over his woke policies by deciding to recall him.

Only 24 percent of the city's electorate of 495,000 turned out, with 70,730 voting against the DA

Recall proponents cheered the news at a victory party, with California state leaders of the hotel and retailers associations lauding Boudin's removal as a sign that visitors, shoppers and employees will be prioritized again in a city that relies heavily on tourism.

Boudin, a former public defender elected in January 2020, was the target of a multi-million-dollar recall campaign earlier this year by residents who say the city has become an increasingly unsafe place to live due to his soft-on-crime policies. 

San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin was voted out of office on Tuesday, with citizens irate over the city's crime ridden state pushing out the progressive politician


Boudin said voters were understandably frustrated by a city government that has failed to deliver on safety. 

'We have two cities. We have two systems of justice. We have one for the wealthy and the well connected and a different one for everybody else.'

Leanna Louie stands with a sign and bullhorn on 19th Avenue urging motorists to recall the District Attorney

Leanna Louie stands with a sign and bullhorn on 19th Avenue urging motorists to recall the District Attorney

Boudin said the recall effort was driven by businesspeople and police officers.

Boudin's parents were members of the radical 80s activist group Weather Underground.

Progressive laws have been widely blamed for rising crime and homelessness in the Bay Area, where brazen looters have been seen ransacking stores and breaking into cars in greater numbers.

So far this year, statistics show that the crime wave has worsened, with the city's murder rate rising 11 percent, and rapes up by nearly 10 percent.

Boudin's time in office has also seen a marked rise in vagrancy - a stand-out issue in the Bay Area, where homelessness and drug use has run rampant.

Many of those backing the recall were Democrats, in a city where Republicans are a distinct minority. 

But the election has ramifications beyond San Francisco, with national polls showing Americans increasingly worried about violent crime.

Republicans hope to seize upon that anxiety in their bid to assume control of the U.S. Congress in the November midterm elections. Republican-backed ads are already running in states such as North Carolina and Wisconsin addressing fears of rising crime.

The concerns in San Francisco resemble those in other large Democrat cities in the United States.

Critics blame Progressive policies for an uptick in murders, shootings and property crimes.

Residents who support the recall say that Boudin's policies have made the liberal California enclave - which has seen  vagrancy and crime rates soar in recent months - an increasingly unsafe place to live

Residents who support the recall say that Boudin's policies have made the liberal California enclave - which has seen  vagrancy and crime rates soar in recent months - an increasingly unsafe place to live 

San Francisco police report 20 murders so far this year, an 11 percent increase from the 18 reported in the same time last year. 

Larceny theft, meanwhile, has skyrocketed under Boudin, with 13,424 cases reported this year - a 20.4 percent rise from the 11,151 reported last year. 

Assaults also saw a spike of 11 percent with 1,035 cases reported so far this year, and rapes have gone up by nearly 10 percent, with police reporting 97 cases in 2022 - compared to the 89 seen this time last year.

As larceny continues to see the largest increase in crime, the Bay Area has contended with a series of smash-and-grab robberies in the past year, with brazen thieves raiding stores in the middle of day. 

Video from a Walgreens in San Francisco last month shows three shoplifters empty the store's shelves and pack everything they can into bags, before running out the pharmacy.

Recall backers claimed Boudin’s policies have made San Francisco less safe. They have aired ads highlighting shocking videos of smash-and-grab robberies and looting from stores in the city. Under Boudin's lax crime laws, the perpetrators regularly avoid prosecution

Recall backers claimed Boudin's policies have made San Francisco less safe. They have aired ads highlighting shocking videos of smash-and-grab robberies and looting from stores in the city. Under Boudin's lax crime laws, the perpetrators regularly avoid prosecution

As larceny continues to see the largest increase in crime, the Bay Area has contended with a series of smash-and-grab robberies in the past year, with brazen thieves raiding stores in the middle of day

As larceny continues to see the largest increase in crime, the Bay Area has contended with a series of smash-and-grab robberies in the past year, with brazen thieves raiding stores in the middle of day 

Because of policies implemented by Boudin, whose criminal justice reform policies often allow the offenders off scot-free, the clerks are left only able to watch

Because of policies implemented by Boudin, whose criminal justice reform policies often allow the offenders off scot-free, the clerks are left only able to watch


Drug store chains like Walgreens and CVS have become attractive and easy targets for shoplifters, leading to numerous store closures in the Bay Area. 

In the area's largest city, San Francisco, low-level offenses, such as retail thefts, have been effectively de-criminalized under Boudin's leadership.

Walgreens said last year that retail theft in San Francisco was five times the chain average and security costs were 46 times the chain average, the Chronicle reported.

According to the latest available crime data, grand larceny rates in California's liberal bastion were up 26 per cent in mid-April, compared with the same period last year.

California Gov Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has vowed to crack down on gangs of retail thieves, despite a controversial 2014 law - Proposition 47 - that barred prosecutors from charging suspected shoplifters accused of stealing less than $950 worth of merchandise with felonies. 

San Francisco's woke DA: A former public defender whose parents spent decades in prison over an armed robbery that left a cop dead

Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert, Chesa Boudin's radical leftist parents, spent decades in prison after taking part in a botched armored vehicle robbery that left three dead

Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert, Chesa Boudin's radical leftist parents, spent decades in prison after taking part in a botched armored vehicle robbery that left three dead 

Chesa Boudin, a progressive Democrat, had entered the San Francisco district attorney's race and won by fewer than 3,000 ballots. 

When Boudin was just a year old in 1981, his parents, who were members of the far-left Weather Underground, dropped him off with a babysitter and took part in an armored car robbery in upstate New York that left two police officers and a security guard dead.

His mother, Kathy Boudin, served 22 years behind bars and his father, David Gilbert, was jailed for life - until outgoing NY Governor Andrew Cuomo commuted his sentence for murder in August.

They didn't fire shots that day and the victims were killed by the Black Liberation Army.

Boudin was cared for by members of a radical left-wing group and says his experiences of visiting his parents in jail galvanized his progressive views on law and order. 

Gilbert and other former members of the Weather Underground, a militant group that grew out of the anti-Vietnam War movement, had joined with members of the Black Liberation Army in the October 20, 1981, robbery. 

They stole $1.6 million in cash from an armored car outside the Nanuet Mall near the Hudson River community of Nyack.

Brink's guard Peter Paige and two Nyack police officers, Sergeant Edward O'Grady and Officer Waverly Brown, were killed in the holdup and ensuing shootout at a nearby roadblock.

Though unarmed, Gilbert was charged with robbery and murder, since people were killed during the crime. Also charged was Chesa Boudin´s mother, Kathy Boudin. The boy was 14 months old when his parents were imprisoned.

Boudin was raised by his parents´ Weather Underground compatriots, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.


George Soros-backed groups have spent $40 million to elect 75 progressive prosecutors over the last decade - meaning one in FIVE Americans now live in areas covered by his criminal justice reformers


George Soros has spent $40 million over the past decade to elect 75 progressive prosecutors, a new report has found - who are now being blamed for soaring crime in some of America's largest cities.

George Soros, 91, is pictured on May 24 at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. He has funded, through his foundation, the election of 75 progressive prosecutors in the last decade

George Soros, 91, is pictured on May 24 at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. He has funded, through his foundation, the election of 75 progressive prosecutors in the last decade


Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan DA, was backed by Soros
Kim Foxx, Cook County DA, was supported by the billionaire progressive philanthropist

Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan DA (left), was backed by Soros, as was Kim Foxx, DA for Cook County, Illinois (right)

Buta Biberaj was given $922,000 for her election campaign, to become the district attorney for Loudoun County, Virginia

Buta Biberaj was given $922,000 for her election campaign, to become the district attorney for Loudoun County, Virginia