Saturday, 20 November 2021

Escape from Egypt🐪🗻 moment on the Coconut Whisperer: Gen Z and millennials are hung up on penis size during sex: survey

Gen Z and millennials are hung up on penis size during sex: survey

By Andrew Court, New York Post, November 19, 2021

https://nypost.com/2021/11/19/gen-z-millennials-hung-up-on-penis-size-during-sex-study/

A new survey has found that Millennials and members of Gen Z are more likely to say size matters in the bedroom. — A new survey has found that Millennials and members of Gen Z are more likely to say size mattes in the bedroom.Getty Images

Millennials and members of Generation Z are hung up on penis size, a new survey has found.

Medical website Medzino quizzed 1,003 American adults of all ages about their penis preferences — under the subject “Manhood Shame” — and discovered younger respondents are more likely to say size matters in the bedroom. Around 580 of the survey respondents were men and 420 were women.

While 61% of Baby Boomers and 60% of Gen X’ers believed penis size was crucial to sexual pleasure, the numbers were noticeably higher among those in their 20s and 30s.

Almost three-quarters (74%) of millennials said size is important between the sheets, while the number increased to a whopping 85% among members of Gen Z.

Americans are becoming exposed to online pornography at a younger age, possibly shaping their ideas about mammoth members. Almost one in five straight men surveyed said porn was the biggest reason for body insecurity during sexual interactions.

A new survey has found Millennials and members of Gen Z are more likely to believe penis size is important to sexual pleasure. — Almost three-quarters (74%) of millennials said size is important between the sheets, while the number increased to a whopping 85% among members of Gen Z.

Sadly, almost half of all male respondents (44%) said they’d experienced sexual performance anxiety due to the size of their penis, and 39% of men said they had felt “shame” about their manhood.

The survey also revealed some insights into ideas about the “ideal penis.” 41% of men and women believed a penis between 6 and 8 inches is best, while 31% said a smaller–sized pecker — between 4 and 6 inches — was optimal.

Generally speaking, women said a thicker, circumcised penis was ideal, prioritizing girth over length. Only 11% of respondents said an uncut one was preferable.

However, men shouldn’t be too concerned about size, with a majority of female respondents not even thinking about penises when it comes to finding a mate.

Almost half of all male respondents (44%) said they’d experienced sexual performance anxiety due to the size of their penis.

Personality (71%) and humor (49%) were the most important assets for women seeking out a sexual partner.

In the bedroom, exactly half of the surveyed females said foreplay was the most important part of a fulfilling sexual experience, followed by confidence and open-mindedness.

And while the length of the average American penis is 6 inches, there appear to be some benefits to being on the smaller side.

Most women surveyed said a sense of humor and personality were more important to them than penis size when seeking out a mate.

Despite a survey by dating site Big One finding 8 inches is the optimal penis size to make a woman orgasm, those with small willies are likely to make more money.

A survey by online bazaar OnlyBuy found that men with units measuring 7 and 8 inches earned an average of about $35,700 and $50,300 per year. Meanwhile, men packing 3-inch penises — the threshold for a micropenis — made an annual income of about $76,780 on average

Meanwhile, the man who allegedly has the world’s largest penis said it’s not what it’s cracked up to be.

Jonah Falcon, who claims to have the world's largest penis, says having an enormous asset isn't all it's cracked up to be. — Jonah Falcon, who claims to have the world’s largest penis, said having an enormous asset isn’t all it’s cracked up to be.

“For some reason, having 13-plus inches means I’m a bad person, or I’m egotistic, or I’m a porn star, or I’m dumb, or I’m a slut,” Brooklyn-based Jonah Falcon said of his massive phallus, which is 13.5 inches — or the size of an Academy Award statue — when it’s erect.

Meanwhile, a “Small Dong March” was held in Los Angeles last month, seeking to end the so-called “shame” associated with having an undersized penis.

🐪🗻🐪🗻🐪🗻🐪🗻🐪🗻🐪🗻🐪🗻🐪🗻🐪

🐪🗻 This has been an Escape From Egypt moment on the Coconut Whisperer blog in honor of the former Escape from Egypt channel on the Disqus channel network 2018-2019 with 34K followers and was the absolute weirdest, wackiest and strangest news channel ever on Disqus !🐪🗻

This page was posted by Sputnik One of the Sputniks Orbit blog
https://disqus.com/home/forum/thesputniksorbit-blogspot-com/

Please Recommend this page and follow us
https://disqus.com/home/forum/the-coconut-whisperer/

Liberalism and the woke spectre of CRT that haunts it

By David Matthews

The world as we have always known it, is seemingly coming to an end, culturally, socially, and politically.

This is evident in the inability of the liberal democratic philosophy upon which it is founded, to fend off the quasi-religious attack on it by the Woke, Neo-Marxist ideology of CRT (Critical Race Theory).

The enormous political success that CRT is currently enjoying, is attributable principally to its success in identifying and attacking Liberalism’s greatest weakness. This is Liberalism’s failure ever to face up to, and address, the social problem of racism (more comprehensively described as cultural prejudice) that violates numerous fundamental Liberal principles, such as those of diversity, tolerance, and moral equality.

Liberalism had, understandably, not seen racism as a significant social problem in the largely culturally homogeneous Western societies of the early 19th century, when cultural prejudice, or racism, was, in fact, regarded as normal. It soon became evident that it had become a problem in the increasingly racially mixed, and so culturally heterogeneous societies of the 20th century. It was from only about 1950, however, that racism leapt into the Western public consciousness, principally as a black/white issue.

By 1950, despite the extraordinary success of the liberal/capitalist economy and the democratic form of government that it had enabled, the vigorous Liberalism of the 19th century had started to compromise certain of its basic principles, primarily in order to accommodate the concept of a welfare state, encouraged by the enormous World War-facilitated growth in the bureaucratic state.

Major social problem

Accordingly, when racism finally became recognised as a major social problem, Liberalism, instead of perceiving and analysing the phenomenon of racism secularly as negative human social behaviour, like drunkenness or theft, calling for its amelioration or possible elimination, instead passively accepted the quasi-religious, Woke definition of it. This defined racism, not scientifically as a malign and undesirable, yet normal form of human behaviour, but as a spiritual sin, and, incredibly, a sin of which only whites are guilty.

The Neo-Marxist and fundamentally infantile belief-system of Critical Race Theory has, astonishingly, come intellectually to dominate the centres of power in the Western world, and is currently undermining Liberal Democracy. It is a teleological political ideology that, like religion, utilises a spiritual belief system, rather than secular reasoning to attain its objective, which is political power. Capitalising on the legitimate social grievances of select Western minority groups, which modern Liberalism has still failed to address fully, CRT declares that it has revealed in racism, not a secular social problem, but a spiritual and moral evil haunting Western society.

Just as mortal sin was deemed to be inherent in humanity, in terms of Christian theology, so the sin of racial prejudice is deemed by the Woke to be inherent in all whites. And, inexplicably, Liberalism shares the Woke basic premise that racism is uniquely a moral sin.

Tacit agreement

This tacit agreement is manifest in Liberals’ unwillingness to acknowledge that, as individuals, they, like every other human, experience at times feelings of racial prejudice, however mild. They deny ever feeling racial prejudice, even though to be able honestly to declare oneself totally free of all racial prejudice, one would have at all times to feel absolutely no difference whatsoever between one’s feelings for people of one’s own culture and for people of a different ‘race’. And who, with a straight face, would claim that?

To be in a rational position to address the problem of racism, Liberals need to acknowledge that racism is not a spiritual phenomenon or a mortal sin, but a negative human psychological trait common to everybody, including themselves, that needs to be addressed secularly and sociologically, if the problem is ever to be resolved.

And in order to do this, they have first to come to understand counterintuitively what racism is (i.e, an archaic, once beneficial, human behavioural trait that altered social circumstances have now rendered malign).

Only after having done this, can Liberals escape the intellectual trap into which they have fallen, and so be able to deal effectively with the infantile Woke ideology of Critical Race Theory, as well as the other racial problems that face us.

https://dailyfriend.co.za/2021/11/20/liberalism-and-the-woke-spectre-of-crt-that-haunts-it/

Farm attack, man assaulted, tied up, farmhouse ransacked, Atlantis

South Africa: Farm attack, man assaulted, tied up, farmhouse ransacked, Atlantis

Oorgrens veiligheid

November 20, 2021

Farm attack, man assaulted, tied up, farmhouse ransacked, Atlantis

A farm attack took place on 19 November 2021, at 02:00, on the farm Grammadoelas, on the Klein Dassenberg Road, Saxonworld Farms, Atlantis, in the Western Cape province of South Africa. Richard Walton was overpowered in his home by five balaclava clad attackers. He was assaulted and tied up.

Walton was sleeping when he was woken by his dogs that entered the room with the five attackers wearing balaclavas.

The attackers demanded firearms and money. He was then assaulted and tied up with his shoe laces and locked in a room.

At 08:00 on that morning his wife came to the house and found Walton tied up. While not seriously injured he suffered bruising all over his arms and legs from the assault.

Five flat screen tv’s, a printer, laptops, and cell phones were among items robbed.

The police are investigating the attack but there have been no arrests. There is no other information available at this stage.

Read about more farm attacks here

Information supplied by Oorgrens veiligheid

South Africa Today – South Africa News

https://southafricatoday.net/south-africa-news/western-cape/farm-attack-man-assaulted-tied-up-farmhouse-ransacked-atlantis/

The FBI seems to think ‘vocal parents’ are the new ‘domestic terrorists’

Robert Bridge

Robert Bridge is an American writer and journalist.

17 Nov, 2021 23:59 / Updated 1 day ago

The FBI seems to think ‘vocal parents’ are the new ‘domestic terrorists’

A whistleblower has revealed the FBI has been targeting parents critical of the curriculum in schools. This shocking overreach of power by authorities threatens the freedom of all Americans.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has gone on some wild goose chases in its time – from pursuing imaginary communists in Hollywood under the McCarthy era, to searching for proof that the Kremlin put Donald Trump in the White House. None of these flights of fancy, however, have been crazier than agents tracking suburban moms and dads, all for the ‘crime’ of being increasingly vocal at school board meetings across the country.

Yes, you read that correctly. The G-men have been activated to track parents who’ve had the audacity to exercise their First Amendment right to free speech ever since public schools started looking more like indoctrination camps than educational facilities. Not long ago, parents could rest at ease knowing their children were receiving a wholesome education by instructors who checked their political beliefs at the door of the schoolhouse. Those days have taken a long recess.

Today, parents are struggling to wrap their brains around the fact that their kids are receiving an ideological brainwashing on wildly misinformed ideas, like Critical Race Theory, which teaches, in a nutshell, that all white people (the very people, by the way, who supported passage of the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965) are natural-born racists. And then there’s transgenderism, which preaches that the easily observable biological classification of ‘male’ and ‘female’ are mere figments of the imagination; every person, the theory goes, is able to determine their ‘true’ gender identity, of which there are said to be over 100 varieties.

In response to this outpouring of public criticism, did school officials show some humility and rethink the curriculum being taught in the classroom? Did they consider the possibility that the views of the parents just might deserve some consideration? Dream on; ideologues rarely admit they are wrong. What happened instead is that the National School Boards Association called on the Biden administration to protect teachers and schools from the threat of – are you ready for it – “domestic terrorism.”Should anyone apologize that many parents are vociferously opposed to their children being educated on such unconventional subjects? This mounting frustration has turned once monotonous school board meetings into electrically charged shouting matches.

When asked to testify before the House Judiciary Committee last month over the reckless rhetoric, Attorney General Merrick Garland said that he “could not imagine any circumstance” under which parents complaining about their children’s education would be “labeled as domestic terrorism.” It appears that either Garland lied to Congress, or he is grossly unaware of madness happening on his watch.

This week, an anonymous FBI whistleblower released an email from early October, showing that the FBI’s counterterrorism and criminal divisions created a “threat tag” to “track instances of related threats… against school board administrators, board members, teachers, and staff.” To say that sends a chilling message to all Americans, who simply wish to have a say over what their children are learning, would be an understatement. But it gets worse.

In the very same week that the FBI email was made public, Jann-Michael Greenburg, the president of the Scottsdale Unified School District board, was allegedly found to have access to a dossier on school parents who had criticized the board and protested mask mandates. The file, which made a brief appearance online, contained the social security numbers, divorce records, financial data, Facebook comments, and photos of children of the targeted parents.

This sort of Stasi mentality makes one wonder what strange virus has contaminated the American mind? At what point in history, aside from our current cancel culture dark ages, has a meeting between parents and teachers – no matter how testy it got – ever been identified as a potential terrorism risk? Do these fragile wallflowers forget that democracy was never intended to be pretty? In fact, only a fool would be surprised if it occasionally resembles two fat guys mud-wrestling at the carnival fairground. Each individual has a unique way of looking at the world, so raw emotions will naturally rise on occasion. And here is where the situation takes on dark connotations.

The very fact that some parts of society are accusing others of being the equivalent of Timothy McVeigh for not wanting ‘White Fragility’ on the reading list does not bode well for the future of American democracy, nevermind school board meetings. Worse, it shows exactly how unrepentant and entrenched the left has become in its thinking, and I use the word 'thinking' loosely.

These ‘Cultural Marxists’, as these radicals have been called, view the political opposition not as fellow citizens worthy of debate and possibly even compromise. Rather, they see the other half of America as an enemy that must be identified, vilified, and liquified. These dedicated ideologues will do anything they can, even if it means enlisting the FBI, to impose their weird, cultural experiments on everyone, including schoolchildren. The only good news is that a whistleblower inside the agency spilled the beans, meaning there is still hope. Not everyone has been brainwashed by the radical progressive creed that would go so far as to deny parents the freedom of speech.

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/540570-fbi-parents-domestic-terrorists/

Friday, 19 November 2021

A big setback for lawless ANTIFA & BLM thugs : Kyle Rittenhouse found not guilty on all charges

Kyle Rittenhouse found not guilty on all charges

Rittenhouse shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, and fired a bullet that tore a chunk off the arm of Gaige Grosskreutz, 28.

By REUTERS, NOVEMBER 19, 2021

https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/jury-finds-kyle-rittenhouse-not-guilty-on-charges-685496

Kyle Rittenhouse speaks with his attorneys before the jury is relieved for the evening during his trial at the Kenosha County Courthouse in Kenosha, US, November 18, 2021.

(photo credit: SEAN KRAJACIC/POOL VIA REUTERS)

A jury acquitted Kyle Rittenhouse on Friday on charges that he murdered two men and attempted to kill a third with his semi-automatic rifle during chaotic 2020 racial justice protests in Wisconsin, determining that the teenager acted in self-defense.

A 12-member jury found Rittenhouse, 18, not guilty on two counts of homicide, one count of attempted homicide and two counts of recklessly endangering safety during street protests marred by arson, rioting and looting on Aug. 25, 2020 in the working-class city of Kenosha.

US President Joe Biden on Friday said he would "stand by" a Wisconsin jury's decision to acquit teenager Kyle Rittenhouse of murder in the fatal shooting of two men. "I stand by what the jury has concluded," Biden told reporters. "The jury system works. We have to abide by it."

Biden urged people to express their views peacefully and consistent with the rule of law. Biden said in a statement he had spoken with Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers to offer support and any assistance needed to ensure public safety.

‍"Violence and destruction of property have no place in our democracy," Biden said in the statement.

Protesters demonstrate outside the Kenosha County Courthouse, during the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, in Kenosha, Wisconsin, US, November 17, 2021. (credit: BRENDAN MCDERMID/REUTERS)

His trial polarized America, highlighting gaping divisions in US society around contentious issues like gun rights.

Rittenhouse shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, and fired a bullet that tore a chunk off the arm of Gaige Grosskreutz, 28.

In reaching their verdicts after more than three days of deliberations, the jury contended with duelling narratives from the defense and prosecution that offered vastly different portrayals of the teenager's actions on the night of the shootings.

The defense argued that Rittenhouse had been repeatedly attacked and had shot the men in fear for his life. They said he was a civic-minded teenager who had been in Kenosha to protect private property after several nights of unrest in the city south of Milwaukee.

The unrest followed the police shooting of a Black man named Jacob Blake, who was left paralyzed from the waist down.

The prosecution portrayed Rittenhouse as a reckless vigilante who provoked the violent encounters and showed no remorse for the men he shot with his AR-15-style rifle. Live-streamed and dissected by cable TV pundits daily, the trial unfolded during a time of social and political polarization in the United States. Gun rights are cherished by many Americans and are enshrined in the US Constitution even as the nation experiences a high rate of gun violence and the easy availability of firearms.

Rittenhouse, who testified that he had no choice but to open fire to protect himself, is viewed as heroic by some conservatives who favor expansive gun rights and consider the shootings justified. Many on the left view Rittenhouse as a vigilante and an embodiment of an out-of-control American gun culture.

Protests against racism and police brutality turned violent in many US cities after the police killing of Black man George Floyd in Minneapolis three months before the Kenosha shootings.

The Rittenhouse verdict ended the highest-profile US civilian self-defense case since a man named George Zimmerman was acquitted in the fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin, an unarmed Black teenager, in Florida in 2013.

With so much of that night in Kenosha caught on cellphone and surveillance video, few basic facts were in dispute. The trial instead focused on whether Rittenhouse acted reasonably to prevent "imminent death or great bodily harm," the requirement for using deadly force under Wisconsin law.

The prosecution, led by Kenosha County Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger, sought to paint Rittenhouse as the aggressor and noted he was the only one to kill anyone that night.

FULL METAL JACKET

Rittenhouse's gun was loaded with 30 rounds of full metal jacket bullets, which are designed to penetrate their target. The jury saw a series of graphic videos, including the moments after Rittenhouse fired four rounds into Rosenbaum, who lay motionless, bleeding and groaning. Other video showed Grosskreutz screaming, with blood gushing from his arm.

Rittenhouse testified in his own defense last Wednesday in the trial's most dramatic moment - a risky decision by his lawyers given his youth and the prospect of tough prosecution cross-examination.

Rittenhouse broke down sobbing at one point but emphasized that he fired upon the men only after being attacked.

"I did what I had to do to stop the person who was attacking me," he said.

Rittenhouse testified that he shot Huber after he had struck him with a skateboard and pulled on his weapon. He said he fired on Grosskreutz after the man pointed the pistol he was carrying at the teenager - an assertion Grosskreutz acknowledged under questioning from the defense. Rittenhouse testified that he shot Rosenbaum after the man chased him and grabbed his gun.

This page was posted by Sputnik One of the Sputniks Orbit blog

https://disqus.com/home/forum/thesputniksorbit-blogspot-com/

Please Recommend this page and follow us

https://disqus.com/home/forum/the-coconut-whisperer/

World News: Don’t give Turkey an F-16 consolation prize

Don’t give Turkey an F-16 consolation prize

By Natalie Armbruster and Jordan Cohen, Defense News, Nov.18, 2021

https://www.defensenews.com/opinion/commentary/2021/11/18/dont-give-turkey-an-f-16-consolation-prize/

Solo Turk, the aerobatic team of the Turkish Air Force, flies its F-16 fighters over Istanbul's airport on Sept. 20, 2018. (Ozan Kose/AFP via Getty Images)

At the November G20 meeting, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and U.S. President Joe Biden met to discuss ongoing tensions and Turkey potentially purchasing the F-16. Washington should be skeptical.

The Turkish government has repeatedly ignored alliance commitments and used U.S. weapons sales against both U.S. and NATO interests, such as its provocations in the Mediterranean and aggressions against the Kurds. Selling Turkey advanced fighter aircraft, which it will then use without constraint, defeats the purpose of the G20 meeting.

Solo Turk, the aerobatic team of the Turkish Air Force, flies its F-16 fighters over Istanbul's airport on Sept. 20, 2018. (Ozan Kose/AFP via Getty Images)

The G20 talks focused on Washington’s partnership with Kurdish forces in Syria and Turkey’s 2019 purchase of Russian S-400 missile defense systems. Turkey described the purchase as a “necessity” due to the “intensive attacks” from Kurdish forces on the border, as Erdoğan has long maintained that U.S. support for the Kurds is “unacceptable” and goes against its NATO obligations. Ankara’s frustration in Syria gave Russia a leg up on its competition.

In response, the U.S. sanctioned and booted Turkey from the F-35 program, stating that the coexistence of the two programs meant Russian President Vladimir Putin’s military could receive tactical information on U.S. weaponry and military operations. The S-400 can track the F-16 and perhaps provide tactical information to Russia, an action Turkey engaged in during 2020. Nevertheless, Erdoğan continues to prod the Biden administration for the recovery of the $1.4 billion that Turkey spent on its F-35 system. Recently, Erdoğan suggested a U.S. sale of F-16s as a way to meet this debt and continue to provide Turkey with NATO weaponry.

This is not unusual. Much of Turkey’s military capability comes from U.S. weapons and training. Turkey’s entire stock of air combat fleets and the majority of its battle tanks are composed of U.S.-supplied weaponry. Between 2019 and 2020, the U.S. gave Turkey nearly $5 million for international military education and training.

Washington justified this beneficence under the guise of the interoperability that Turkey’s NATO membership demands. In October 2021, a State Department representative noted that “the United States and Turkey have long-standing and deep bilateral defense ties, and Turkey’s continued NATO interoperability remains a priority.” This theory is not without merit. In 2019, Turkish forces composed the second-largest army assisting in Afghanistan, Bosnia and Kosovo.

A continued partnership with Turkey does more harm than good. For starters, Turkey’s anti-Kurdish efforts are undermining American interests in the fight against ISIS. Turkey is using U.S.-supplied weapons to fight U.S.-supported Kurdish troops in Syria rather than ISIS, prolonging U.S. involvement in Syria. It is in the United States’ best interest to prevent a further Turkish incursion against the Kurds, encourage a cease-fire in northeastern Syria and withdraw troops. An easy way to do this is by limiting weapons sales to the combatants, including Turkey.

Further, Turkey consistently ranks as one of the largest human rights offenders that receive U.S. weapons. U.S. defense officials have also previously claimed they believe Turkey is using American weapons to commit war crimes. A U.N. report of Turkey-led human rights abuses against civilians in Syria confirms this reality.

While one may argue that if the U.S. does not sell Turkey arms, Russia will, that is less possible in the case of Turkey and the F-16. The Turkish Defence Ministry recently found the Russian warplanes were technically insufficient and extremely costly because Ankara would need to adapt to the Russian systems.

Even if the U.S. ceases arms sales to Ankara, Turkey is not going to commit to wholly siding with Russia and risk alienating its European partners or losing the benefits of NATO membership. Erdoğan still supports Turkey’s possible ascension into the European Union, declaring in an address to EU ambassadors in January 2021 that he was “ready to put our relations back on track” and that negotiations in 2021 “will be the harbinger of a new era.”

It is clear that Erdoğan recognizes the benefits of playing both NATO and Russia off of each other. Regardless of whether Erdoğan has any intention of entering the process of EU accession, Turkey will continue to maximize its gains from both partnerships and avoid an overcommitment to either side.

The costs of further exacerbating tensions with Turkey are minimal. The benefits, though, are worth paying to avoid the strategic folly and human rights abuses that come from these sales. Turkey made its bed, flirting with both Russia and the West. Instead of rewarding Ankara’s estrangement from NATO, the United States should allow Erdoğan to lie in it and end arms sales to Turkey.

Natalie Armbruster is a research associate at Defense Priorities. Jordan Cohen is a defense and foreign policy analyst at the Cato Institute, and a PhD candidate in political science at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University.