Thursday, 13 January 2022

ISIS Bride sees Desolation of Muslim Middle East, Repents: But It Was Too Late

Supreme Court refuses to hear appeal of 'remorseful' ISIS bride who traveled from Alabama to Syria where she married THREE jihadis, had a child, and called for Memorial Day terror attacks - before begging to return to US

  • Hoda Muthana, 25, who left the US to join ISIS in Syria in 2014, has been legally fighting to return to her to the US — her country of birth 
  • However, the US Supreme Court has now refused to hear an appeal she filed for to return to her family's home in Alabama with her toddler son
  • While she was overseas, the Obama administration determined she was not a U.S. citizen and revoked her passport, citing her father's diplomatic status 
  • The Supreme Court argued that children of diplomats aren't entitled to birthright citizenship, and Muthana's parents were diplomats from Yemen
  • The family's lawyers appealed, stating that her father's diplomat status to the U.N. had ended before her birth, making her automatically a citizen 
  • A federal judge previously ruled that the Obama administration was within its rights to rescind Muthana's passport  

Supreme Court justices have refused to hear the appeal of a US-born ISIS bride who was stripped of her passport after traveling to Syria, marrying three jihadis and calling for Memorial Day terror attacks.   

The justices declined without comment on Monday to consider the appeal of Hoda Muthana, 27, who was born in New Jersey in October 1994 to a diplomat from Yemen and grew up in Alabama near Birmingham. She claims to be remorseful, and has begged to be allowed back into the US. 

Muthana left the U.S. to join the Islamic State in 2014, apparently after becoming radicalized online.

While she was overseas the government determined she was not a U.S. citizen and revoked her passport, citing her father's status as a Yemeni diplomat at the time of her birth. Her family sued to enable her return to the United States.

A federal judge previously ruled in 2019 that the U.S. government correctly determined Muthana wasn't a U.S. citizen despite her birth in the country. Children of diplomats aren't entitled to birthright citizenship. The family´s lawyers appealed, arguing that her father's status as a diplomat assigned to the U.N. had ended before her birth, making her automatically a citizen.

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal of Hoda Muthana, 27, who left her family's home in Alabama to join the Islamic State terror group, but then decided she wanted to return to the United States. Muthana, who was born in New Jersey in 1994 and grew up in Alabama.

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal of Hoda Muthana, 27, who left her family's home in Alabama to join the Islamic State terror group, but then decided she wanted to return to the United States. Muthana, who was born in New Jersey in 1994 and grew up in Alabama.

This photo of female jihadis waving the ISIS flag was found on a now-deactivated Twitter account which reportedly belonged to Muthana

This photo of female jihadis waving the ISIS flag was found on a now-deactivated Twitter account which reportedly belonged to Muthana

The United States Supreme Court rejected Muthana's appeal on Monday, not making any comments on why they declined it

The United States Supreme Court rejected Muthana's appeal on Monday, not making any comments on why they declined it

Muthana surrendered to U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces as Islamic State fighters were losing the last of their self-declared caliphate in Iraq and Syria and going to refugee camps.

Since then Muthana has said that she has regretted her decision to join the group, when she left the US at 19-years-old and headed to Raqqa in Syria via Turkey, where she would first marry an Australian jihadist and then a Tunisian man. 

Both died fighting for ISIS, and she secretly married a Syrian, The Guardian reveals.

During her time as a jihadi bride in ISIS's then-capital Raqqa in Syria, Muthana would use social media as a tactic to spread hatred against non-Muslims and call for terror attacks in the US.

In a 2015 tweet, she celebrated the burning of her U.S. passport online and made posts with statements like 'Spill all (the Americans') blood.'   

'Go on drive-bys and spill all of their blood, or rent a big truck and drive all over them. Veterans, Patriot, Memorial etc Day parades..go on drive by's + spill all of their blood or rent a big truck n drive all over them. Kill them.'

However, the young mother-of-one now wants to return to her country of birth with her child, Adam, who muis the son of Muthana's second husband.

Muthana is pictured with her son, Adam, who is believed to be around two-years-old, in an undated picture

Muthana is pictured with her son, Adam, who is believed to be around two-years-old, in an undated picture

In a picture from 2019, Muthana holds her 18-month-old son Adam in-front of one of the administration buildings of the al-Hawl IDP camp where ISIS suspected families, who fled heavy fighting in the city of Baghuz are kept

In a picture from 2019, Muthana holds her 18-month-old son Adam in-front of one of the administration buildings of the al-Hawl IDP camp where ISIS suspected families, who fled heavy fighting in the city of Baghuz are kept

Muthana was born to Yemeni diplomats in New Jersey in 1994 and grew up in her family's home in Hoover, Alabama (pictured), until 2014 when she left for Syria, after being radicalized online

Muthana was born to Yemeni diplomats in New Jersey in 1994 and grew up in her family's home in Hoover, Alabama (pictured), until 2014 when she left for Syria, after being radicalized online

For now, she is believed to be in the tent-city that is al-Hol - also known as al-Hawl - a refugee camp in northern Syria some 200 miles away from ISIS's 'last front' near the village of Baghouz by the Iraqi border. 

Speaking to The Guardian in 2019, the ex-jihadi claims she 'deeply regrets' leaving the US, and that she believed she was doing what was right according to Islam.

'I thought I was doing things correctly for the sake of God,' adding that she now believes she 'misunderstood' her faith.

'I was really young and ignorant and I was 19 when I decided to leave.'

At the time when she left, her family pleaded with her to come home and in an interview with BuzzFeed, her father said she had been 'brainwashed'. 

The 24-year-old former University of Alabama student says she is worried about her son's future, and begged the US and her family for forgiveness at the time.

'I believe that America gives second chances. I want to return and I'll never come back to the Middle East. America can take my passport and I wouldn't mind.'

The decision to revoke her passport was made under former President Barack Obama. The case gained widespread attention as former President Donald Trump tweeted about it, saying he had directed the secretary of state not to allow her back into the country.

Like Muthana, Shemima Begum, 22, is pleading with UK authorities to let her return to her home country as she fears for her son's future, but was denied

Like Muthana, Shemima Begum, 22, is pleading with UK authorities to let her return to her home country as she fears for her son's future, but was denied

Another western ISIS bride living in the camp is 19-year-old Shamima Begum, who was just 15 when she and two classmates Kadiza Sultana and Amira Abase travelled from London's Bethnal Green to Syria in February 2015.

Begum, like Muthana, is pleading with authorities to be allowed to return to her home country as she fears for the future of her son. However, like the US, the UK has denied her entry and stripped her from her citizenship in 2019.

Begum was born in the UK, but government ministers there decreed that she was also eligible for Bangladeshi citizenship, and revoked her British passport on that basis. 

Shamima Begum: The UK's most notorious teenage ISIS bride

Hoda Muthana's plea to the Supreme Court mirrors the experience of British ISIS bride Shamima Begun, who fled to join the so-called Caliphate in 2015, when she was just 15 years-old. 

In 2019, she was discovered in a Syrian refugee camp, and appealed to the public for forgiveness, while even offering to help the government fight terrorism if she is allowed to return home.

But the British-born extremist's pleas fell on deaf ears, with the UK government stripping Begum of her citizenship. Ministers said that because she also qualified for Bangladeshi citizenship through her parents, canceling her British passport did not render her stateless. 

Begum, along with two of her school friends, Kadiza Sultana and Amira Abase, boarded a flight from London's Gatwick Airport to Turkey seven years ago — where they then traveled to the Syrian border. Less than two weeks after arriving in the country, Begum married a man who was later convicted of terrorism offenses.

Sultana and Abase both died in allied bombing raids.  

In her latest interview, Begum asked the public to forgive her decision, saying that when she left British soil to join the Islamic State, she believed she was 'doing the right thing as a Muslim.'

Speaking from a detention camp in Syria, she said she did not realize that the group was a 'death cult,' and that it had never been her intention to hurt anyone.

In 2019, Begum, who was born in Britain, was stripped of her citizenship by the government — sparking global debate over whether countries should take back foreign fighters who many argue pose a significant risk to national security.

 'I tell you from the bottom of my heart that I regret every, every decision I've made since I stepped into Syria, and I will live with it for the rest of my life,' she said, adding that she would rather be killed than rejoin the terrorist group.

In a 2019 interview with Sky News, she had said she had no regrets about joining the extremist organization.  

Begum maintained on Wednesday that she did not carry out any crimes and that her decision was poorly judged because of her age at the time. She argued that if the authorities truly believed she was guilty, she should be allowed to return to Britain to face trial.

The schoolgirl fled London in February 2015 as a 15-year-old, travelling to Syria with two friends, Amira Abase and Kadiza Sultana, to become a jihadi bride
She has claimed for several years that she no longer supports ISIS and wants to return to the UK

The schoolgirl fled London in February 2015 as a 15-year-old, travelling to Syria with two friends, Amira Abase and Kadiza Sultana, to become a jihadi bride - but now claims she no longer supports ISIS and wants to return to the UK

She went on to say that she believed she could help Britain fight terrorism if allowed to return.

'I want to help,' she said. 'You clearly don't know what you're doing.'  

In the years since she left London, Begum has often shown little remorse for her actions — once saying that there was 'fair justification' for the Manchester Arena suicide bombing, in response to coalition airstrikes that killed Syrians.

The 2017 attack, which was carried out at an Ariana Grande concert in England, killed 22 people and injured over 116 — many of whom were young women.  

Sajid Javid, who was Britain's home secretary at the time Begum's citizenship was revoked, said Wednesday that the government stood by its decision and that the safety of citizens remained its priority, the BBC reported.

Under British law, the home secretary can revoke citizenship if it is 'conducive to the public good' and if it does not make a person stateless. The government has argued that Begum is eligible for Bangladeshi citizenship.

However, while Begum has Bangladeshi roots, the Bangladeshi Foreign Ministry said in a 2019 statement that she was not a Bangladeshi citizen and had never visited the country.

'There is no question of her being allowed to enter into Bangladesh,' the statement said.

Since moving to Syria, Begum has given birth to three children — all of whom have died in childhood.      

Wednesday, 12 January 2022

China builds artificial moon

 

China builds artificial moon

The national research facility simulates the low-gravity environment on the Moon
China builds artificial moon

China has built an artificial moon on Earth that simulates low-gravity conditions – the first of its kind. The facility is expected to play a key role in China’s future lunar missions.

Speaking on Tuesday, scientist Li Ruilin, from the China University of Mining and Technology, said that the artificial moon project in eastern city of Xuzhou is expected to be officially launched in the coming months. 

Li described the program as “first of its kind in the world” and said it takes lunar simulation to a completely new level, as it can make gravity “disappear” and can “last as long as you want.”

The facility is made up of a vacuum chamber which houses a mini “moon” measuring 60cm (about two feet) in diameter. The moon-like landscape is made up of rocks and dust that are as light as those found on our Moon.

The landscape is supported by a magnetic field, like the Moon – where gravity is approximately one-sixth as strong as the gravity on Earth. Where the field is strong enough, certain light objects, such as a frog or chestnut, can levitate.

Li said the project is likely to play an important role in preparing for Chinese lunar operations, allowing scientists to test equipment and even prevent miscalculations that could prove costly on the Moon itself. 

“Some experiments such as an impact test need just a few seconds [in the simulator],” said Li, adding that “others such as creep testing can take several days.”

The scientist noted that it could also be used to test whether 3D printing works on the Moon or whether lunar settlements would be able to survive.

“Some experiments conducted in the simulated environment can also give us some important clues, such as where to look for water trapped under the surface,” he said.

Li said that a number of technical innovations were needed to make the facility, noting that the magnetic forces needed to create the atmosphere are so strong that they can tear apart components like superconducting wires and render many metallic components useless.

He added that the facility, which was inspired by Andre Geim’s experiments to levitate a frog with a magnet, would be open to researchers from around the world.

https://www.rt.com/news/545796-china-builds-artificial-moon/

Escape from Egypt🐪🗻 moment on the Coconut Whisperer: Killer Zionist dolphins? Hamas claims they exist

 

Killer Zionist dolphins? Hamas claims they exist


Hamas claimed that its naval commandos were attacked by a dolphin operative of the Israeli forces, equipped with specialized combat gear.


Tuesday, 11 January 2022

Law allowing non-citizens to vote in US challenged in court

 

Law allowing non-citizens to vote in US challenged in court

Republicans will attempt to block the implementation of a controversial New York bill
Law allowing non-citizens to vote in US challenged in court

A law that will allow nearly 1 million non-citizen permanent residents of New York City to vote in city elections has been challenged by the state’s Republican Party, who are suing to declare the statute unconstitutional.

New York Republican Chairman Nick Langworthy and Staten Island Borough President Vito Fossella led the group of Republican city lawmakers seeking to block the new law enfranchising non-citizen New Yorkers who have lived in the city for over 30 days and have green cards or certain types of visas. They filed the lawsuit in state court on Staten Island on Monday, aiming to block the implementation of the law, which they insist is unconstitutional. 

The law is clear and the ethics are even clearer: We shouldn’t be allowing citizens of other nations to vote in our elections, full stop,” Langworthy said, promising to “use every legal tool in our arsenal to block this unconstitutional and un-American law.” He accused incoming Mayor Eric Adams of “kowtowing to the radical City Council” by advancing their “ultimate goal of eradicating all the lines between citizens and non-citizens.”

Fossella also denounced the measure, claiming it “cheapens what it means to be a citizen and is an insult to every immigrant who has followed the law, taken citizenship classes, and swore an oath to our nation.” Several naturalized citizen immigrant New Yorkers are participating in the lawsuit, including City Councilwoman Inna Vernikov.

Over 800,000 non-citizen permanent residents will be permitted to vote in city elections under the controversial new law that Adams allowed to pass earlier this month. The new mayor stood aside to let the measure become law after the City Council approved it, opening the door to voting for ‘Dreamers’ and permanent residents with green cards and certain types of visas. However, the law does not allow voting for these groups in federal or state elections.

In addition to a permanent injunction blocking the law’s implementation, the suit seeks to have it declared unconstitutional and in violation of New York state law.

https://www.rt.com/news/545717-nyc-republicans-block-noncitizens-vote/

Airports company says feet on counter 'not condoned'

 

Namibia: Airports company says feet on counter 'not condoned'

by Shante Mahalie


The Namibia Airports Company (NAC) says it is looking into the behaviour of an employee who was photographed sitting with her bare feet resting on an airport check-in counter.

The NAC employee was photographed with her feet on a counter in the presence of travellers at Hosea Kutako International Airport.

NAC spokesperson Dan Kamati told The Namibian on Monday that the NAC's management is looking into the matter for the necessary action to be taken.

"We do not condone such behaviour,” said Kamati, adding that the company is committed to efficient and friendly customer service ethics.

https://www.namibian.com.na/108915/read/Airports-company-says-feet-on-counter-not-condoned

Biden Administration Provides Still More Money to UNRWA

 

Biden Administration Provides Still More Money to UNRWA

Putting “Palestinian refugees” above all other refugees in the world.

  

Hundreds of millions of refugees who have been created by the wars, conflicts, natural disasters, droughts, and famines since the Second World War must share a single U.N. Agency, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, to look after their wellbeing. But there is one U.N. organization, the UN Relief and Works Agency, or UNRWA, that is devoted exclusively to the care and feeding of one hugely privileged group of refugees, those known as “Palestinian refugees.” Having their very own agency is not the only distinction that puts “Palestinian refugees” above all other refugees in the world. Uniquely, “Palestinian refugees” include all the descendants – children, grandchildren, and so on without end – of the original refugees; no other refugees in the world are allowed to pass on their refugee status as an inheritable trait.

The Taylor Force Act is an Act of the U.S. Congress to stop American economic aid to the Palestinian Authority (PA) until the PA ceases paying stipends through the Palestinian Authority Martyr’s Fund to individuals who commit acts of terrorism and to the families of deceased terrorists. This system of stipends to imprisoned terrorists and to the families of terrorists who were killed while carrying out their attacks is known, pejoratively and correctly, as the “Pay-For-Slay” program. The Act was signed into law by U.S. President Donald Trump on March 23, 2018. Several cuts were made to the aid given to the PA, with the last one made on August 24, 2018, ending all direct American aid to the PA.

Also in August 2018, the United States ended all aid to UNRWA, cutting off $300 million. That ending of aid to UNRWA was made for two reasons. First, it was a way to express American outrage with the UNRWA’s use of schoolbooks that remain full of antisemitic passages, despite repeated promises by UNRWA that it would be revising, or replacing, those texts. It has yet to do so. Second, the Trump Administration was expressing its frustration with the unique treatment of “Palestinian refugee” status as inheritable, which has meant that the UNRWA rolls constantly expand. In ending its aid, the Trump administration was putting pressure on UNRWA to halt this inexorable increase in the number of “Palestinian refugees.”

Now, in January, the Biden Administration has just announced a payment of $99 million to UNRWA. This is in addition to the $318 million previously given to UNRWA in the 2021 fiscal year. More than $400 million has thus been provided by Washington to UNRWA, even though the antisemitic texts used in its schools remain unchanged. It has also renewed hundreds of millions of dollars in aid to the Palestinian Authority, even though the Pay-For-Slay program remains in force – and Mahmoud Abbas insists he will give his “last penny” to keep that program running no matter what the Americans think. The Bidenites have tried to claim that this renewed financial assistance to the PA does not violate Taylor Force because it is “humanitarian.” But this is absurd; there was no exception made in the Taylor Force Act for “humanitarian” aid. Besides, money is fungible. If you give the PA $300 million in “humanitarian aid,” that will simply free up other sums It possesses to spend on such things as anti-Israel propaganda and, especially, on the Pay-For-Slay program that rewards past, and incentivizes future, acts of terrorism.

Since the Bidenites are shameless in their violating both the letter and the spirit of the Taylor Force Act, it will be up to the Republicans in Congress, possibly with a few decent Democratic defectors, to raise holy hell about the American aid currently being given to the PA. They can take turns reading aloud, again and again – emulating Jimmy Stewart in Mr. Smith Goes To Washington — the Taylor Force Act in both Houses of Congress and ask, in mock astonishment and genuine dismay, why the Biden administration is so determined to lavish largesse on the Palestinians, and so indifferent to enforcing Taylor Force, which was passed overwhelmingly by the people’s representatives. The Republicans should seek to pass an amended version of the Taylor Force Act that explicitly says there will be no exceptions made for any kind of aid, including “that which some have called “humanitarian,” as long as the Pay-For-Slay program remains.

But there is still more that Congress can do, which is to make the Taylor Force Act applicable not just to aid to the PA, but also to aid to UNRWA. Both kinds of aid, after all, have the same intended beneficiaries: Palestinians, and “Palestinian refugees.” It makes sense to pressure UNRWA by denying it support, which will understandably prompt the Agency to put its own pressure on the PA to finally put an end to the “Pay-For-Slay” program. And that result, devoutly to be wished, should chasten the o’erweening Bidenites, who thought they could simply ignore the Taylor Force Act but, in so doing, caused an infuriated Congress, as Biden and Blinken used to say about the Iran deal, to “lengthen and strengthen” it.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2022/01/biden-administration-provides-still-more-money-hugh-fitzgerald/